> Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2025 at 4:52 PM
> From: "Ranjan Maitra via users"
> To: "Community support for Fedora users"
> Cc: "Ranjan Maitra"
> Subject: Re: Dell Latitude 7420's camera not working on new F42 install
>
> On Tue Jul15&#
ommunity support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Dell Latitude 7420's camera not working on new F42 install
>
> On Tue Jul15'25 08:38:45AM, Ben Matteson wrote:
> > From: Ben Matteson
> > Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:38:45 -0500
> > To: Community support for Fedor
On Tue Jul15'25 08:38:45AM, Ben Matteson wrote:
> From: Ben Matteson
> Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2025 08:38:45 -0500
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: Dell Latitude 7420's camera not working on new F42 instal
On Mon, 2025-07-14 at 16:47 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
>
> As an update, rebooting and waiting for the system to come up, that
> webpage above does say "Success" but the camera window is black.
>
> Best wishes,
> Ranjan
BTW, Dell started including the mipi camera in models in 2022. (I
Ben Matteson wrote:
> You can see if the camera on this particular Dell works by installing
> the akmod-intel-ipu6 driver from rpmfusion-nonfree. I believe it
> requires Secure Boot to be disabled (it builds an unsigned kernel
> module).
FWIW, the akmods utility gained the ability to sign modules
Latitude 7420's camera not working on new F42 install
>
> Thanks for this!
>
> On Mon Jul14'25 03:53:35PM, Ben Matteson wrote:
> > From: Ben Matteson
> > Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 15:53:35 -0500
> > To: Community support for Fedora users
> > CC: Ranjan
#x27;s camera not working on new F42 install
>
> On Mon, 2025-07-14 at 13:27 -0500, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I installed F42 from scratch on a Dell Latitude 7420 about a month
> > ago, and only now have I noticed that the in-built camera do
I do have a similar problem with my laptop
MSI GE62 6QD MS-16J5
The camera is not detected
no /dev/video
In the past it has been working !
===
Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdu...@gmx.com
=
rivers are already in the kernel, but there are some
sensors included in newer Dells that aren't supported yet.
You can see if the camera on this particular Dell works by installing
the akmod-intel-ipu6 driver from rpmfusion-nonfree. I believe it
requires Secure Boot to be disabled (it build
> On 14 Jul 2025, at 19:27, Ranjan Maitra via users
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I installed F42 from scratch on a Dell Latitude 7420 about a month ago, and
> only now have I noticed that the in-built camera does not appear to be
> working. I just get a black screen.
>
> Perhaps it is missing a d
On 7/14/25 11:27 AM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
I installed F42 from scratch on a Dell Latitude 7420 about a month ago, and
only now have I noticed that the in-built camera does not appear to be working.
I just get a black screen.
Perhaps it is missing a driver or something else. I am stil
Hi,
I installed F42 from scratch on a Dell Latitude 7420 about a month ago, and
only now have I noticed that the in-built camera does not appear to be working.
I just get a black screen.
Perhaps it is missing a driver or something else. I am still runnning
6.15.4-200 kernel, though the system
a USB stick.
I've forgotten what it actually said by now, but plugging it in then
trying to double click on the drive icon in the file browser popped up
a window with a message of complaint.
> Why were you trying to mount it instead of using it to install?
Just as a simple test to see what
Tim:
> And it can't be mounted.
Were you trying to mount /dev/sdb, or /dev/sdb1 and then /dev/sdb2?
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to users-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
h
Is it no-longer possible to use dd to write an install ISO to a
flashdrive, or is there something wrong with the ISO (which passes the
checksum tests)?
If I do this command:
[root@rocky fedora42]# dd if=Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-42-1.1.iso of=/dev/sdb
status=progress
2923241984 bytes (2.9 GB
;s just
an mental exercise to figure out why it didn't want to work.
Why were you trying to mount it instead of using it to install?
I did leave it for ages to finish, it should have had plenty of time.
It was done.
--
___
users mailin
x27;ve done similar in the past (adding a sync), just to be sure. Though
I did leave this at it for a very long time. I'll give it another go
later tonight, see if it behaves any differently.
Considering the low usage of the flash drive, I'd be annoyed if it
failed. It's only been
Tim:
>> And it can't be mounted.
Samuel Sieb:
> How are you trying to mount it?
Plugging it in and trying to mount it like any other USB stick.
I ended up burning a DVD and installing from that. So, now, it's just
an mental exercise to figure out why it didn't want to work.
I did leave it for
On 6/23/25 12:01 AM, Barry wrote:
On 23 Jun 2025, at 03:13, Tim via users wrote:
Marvel at the blistering write speed!!
The speed is because the dd copied the data into kernel buffers and does not
wait for those buffers to flush to the USB stick.
Seems like people didn't actually look a
> On 23 Jun 2025, at 03:13, Tim via users wrote:
>
> Marvel at the blistering write speed!!
The speed is because the dd copied the data into kernel buffers and does not
wait for those buffers to flush to the USB stick.
If you do not wait for the buffets to flished to the stick then the file
On 6/22/25 7:00 PM, Tim via users wrote:
Is it no-longer possible to use dd to write an install ISO to a
flashdrive, or is there something wrong with the ISO (which passes the
checksum tests)?
If I do this command:
[root@rocky fedora42]# dd if=Fedora-Server-dvd-x86_64-42-1.1.iso of=/dev/sdb
One should ALWAYS do a sync after a dd. I learned this the hard way...
On 6/22/25 10:34 PM, Jeffrey Walton wrote:
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 10:01 PM Tim via users
wrote:
Is it no-longer possible to use dd to write an install ISO to a
flashdrive, or is there something wrong with the ISO (which
On Sun, Jun 22, 2025 at 10:01 PM Tim via users
wrote:
>
> Is it no-longer possible to use dd to write an install ISO to a
> flashdrive, or is there something wrong with the ISO (which passes the
> checksum tests)?
>
>
> If I do this command:
>
> [root@rocky fedora4
On 23 Jun 2025 at 11:30, Tim via users wrote:
Subject:creating install media for Fedora server (42)
To: Tim via users
Date sent: Mon, 23 Jun 2025 11:30:32 +0930
Send reply to: Community support for Fedora users
From
alBox)
Using the XFCE Live Fedora 42 .iso image.
Used EFI and "Secure Boot".
Basic EFI install on dual raid1. Just need /boot/efi and /
Could add /home, /data, etc if wanted. This is a GPT format, so it is not
limited to 4 physical partitions.
Use Blivet/Advanced partition thing.
1 Raid
Le 2025-05-26 13:27, Peter Boy Uni a écrit :
Am 26.05.2025 um 14:51 schrieb François Patte :
Bonjour,
I try to make a new install of f42.
I want to install it on 2 drives using RAID1, say /dev/sda and
/dev/sdb
I define partitions /boot/efi, /, swap, /var
When definning these partitions, I can
Le 2025-05-27 12:21, François Patte a écrit :
Le 2025-05-26 13:27, Peter Boy Uni a écrit :
Am 26.05.2025 um 14:51 schrieb François Patte
:
Bonjour,
I try to make a new install of f42.
I want to install it on 2 drives using RAID1, say /dev/sda and
/dev/sdb
I define partitions /boot/efi
On 5/26/25 12:28 PM, Peter Boy Uni wrote:
On a UEFI boot system you need a dedicated EFI partition with a EFI file system
(it has a dedicated partition id) because the system firmware looks for that id
and the specific file system.
even if there was enough space.
Fedora currently needs grub2 to
> Am 26.05.2025 um 19:24 schrieb François Patte :
>
> Le 26/05/2025 à 19:22, Barry a écrit :
>>
>>
>>> On 26 May 2025, at 18:15, François Patte wrote:
>>>
>>> Why 2 boot partitions?
On a UEFI boot system you need a dedicated EFI partition with a EFI file system
(it has a dedicated partitio
Le 26/05/2025 à 15:27, Peter Boy Uni a écrit :
Am 26.05.2025 um 14:51 schrieb François Patte:
Bonjour,
I try to make a new install of f42.
I want to install it on 2 drives using RAID1, say /dev/sda and /dev/sdb
I define partitions /boot/efi, /, swap, /var
When definning these partitions, I
Le 26/05/2025 à 19:22, Barry a écrit :
On 26 May 2025, at 18:15, François Patte wrote:
Why 2 boot partitions?
One for the UEFI bios to read files from.
One for grub to read files from.
But why my f40 install has only one /boot/efi partition?
F.P
> On 26 May 2025, at 18:15, François Patte wrote:
>
> Why 2 boot partitions?
One for the UEFI bios to read files from.
One for grub to read files from.
Barry
--
___
users mailing list -- users@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email
Marco Moock writes:
Am 26.05.2025 um 11:28:10 Uhr schrieb Sam Varshavchik:
> The trick is to create a version 1.0 RAID volume, where the RAID
> superblock is at the end of the raw partition, and RAID-unaware bits
> just see an ordinary partition, instead of the default version 1.1
> RAID where
Marco Moock writes:
Am 26.05.2025 um 14:51:23 Uhr schrieb François Patte:
> At the end, I get this message: device RAID cannot be boot/efi,
> device RAID cannot be swap, device RAID cannot be ext4...
The EFI system partition must not be on LVM or mdadm RAID. The UEFI
needs to be able to read i
Am 26.05.2025 um 11:28:10 Uhr schrieb Sam Varshavchik:
> The trick is to create a version 1.0 RAID volume, where the RAID
> superblock is at the end of the raw partition, and RAID-unaware bits
> just see an ordinary partition, instead of the default version 1.1
> RAID where the RAID stuff is at th
Am 26.05.2025 um 14:51:23 Uhr schrieb François Patte:
> At the end, I get this message: device RAID cannot be boot/efi,
> device RAID cannot be swap, device RAID cannot be ext4...
The EFI system partition must not be on LVM or mdadm RAID. The UEFI
needs to be able to read it. That means it needs
> Am 26.05.2025 um 14:51 schrieb François Patte :
>
> Bonjour,
> I try to make a new install of f42.
> I want to install it on 2 drives using RAID1, say /dev/sda and /dev/sdb
> I define partitions /boot/efi, /, swap, /var
> When definning these partitions, I can choose
Bonjour,
I try to make a new install of f42.
I want to install it on 2 drives using RAID1, say /dev/sda and /dev/sdb
I define partitions /boot/efi, /, swap, /var
When definning these partitions, I can choose the type (RAID1), the
format (boot/efi, swap, ext4) all seem ok
BUT
At the end, I
Le 30/04/2025 à 13:49, Barry a écrit :
On 30 Apr 2025, at 09:03, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I have a f40 install on one disk (say /dev/sdc) and I want to install F42 on
/dev/sda.
I suppose that after the installation grub will propose to start f42 from the
new disk, how can I add to
> On 30 Apr 2025, at 09:03, François Patte wrote:
>
> Bonjour,
>
> I have a f40 install on one disk (say /dev/sdc) and I want to install F42 on
> /dev/sda.
>
> I suppose that after the installation grub will propose to start f42 from the
> new disk, how can I
Bonjour,
I have a f40 install on one disk (say /dev/sdc) and I want to install
F42 on /dev/sda.
I suppose that after the installation grub will propose to start f42
from the new disk, how can I add to grub the now old f40? Is there a
step during the install process of f42 to say that I want
On 13/3/25 18:16, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 3/12/25 2:20 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
In /etc/default/grub is the following line, that line causes grub to
boot off, I think, the first entry in the grub menus and to not show
the menus at all. If you change the entry to "false" instead of
"true" and ru
On 13/3/25 19:11, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
On 13 Mar 2025 at 0:17, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:17:44 -0700
Subject:Re: Fresh install Fedora 41. Bootloader Problem.
Camina Shell/Barry
Scott/Samual Sieb/Jeffrey Walton/Tim. On
> On 13 Mar 2025, at 07:18, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> Even if you get it to show on the menu, recent versions of windows will not
> successfully boot from grub.
True if you have bitlocker enabled in windows.
But if you are not using bitlocker then grub can boot windows.
I do this with my dual bo
On 13 Mar 2025 at 0:17, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Date sent: Thu, 13 Mar 2025 00:17:44 -0700
Subject:Re: Fresh install Fedora 41. Bootloader Problem.
Camina Shell/Barry
Scott/Samual Sieb/Jeffrey Walton/Tim. On Dell
Inspiron 3721
To: users
On 3/12/25 2:11 PM, Michael D. Setzer II via users wrote:
Second, the latest released grub2 has an issue with windows ntfs
regular partitions, and doesn't create grub menu entries. Works
with UEFI windows thou.
There is an updated version of grub2 in updates-testing repo, and
atleast on my two n
On 3/12/25 2:20 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
In /etc/default/grub is the following line, that line causes grub to
boot off, I think, the first entry in the grub menus and to not show the
menus at all. If you change the entry to "false" instead of "true" and
run grub2-mkconfig to get it to take eff
On 13/3/25 06:01, Ger van Dijck wrote:
Hay all of You,
Thanks for help and answering. The problem is simple . The fresh
install of Fedora 41 no problem. The menu of the booatloader is the
problem and I do understand this is kwown. (See mail Camina Shell)
After the succesfull fresh
On 12 Mar 2025 at 20:01, Ger van Dijck wrote:
Date sent: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 20:01:47 +0100
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
From: Ger van Dijck
Subject:Fresh install Fedora 41. Bootloader Problem.
Camina Shell/Barry
Scott
> On 12 Mar 2025, at 19:02, Ger van Dijck wrote:
>
> So the final question is : Where is GRUB ?
By default I believe grub menu is hidden.
You can edit grub env config to always show the menu.
If hold down SHIFT key while booting the grub menu should appear.
Barry
--
_
Hay all of You,
Thanks for help and answering. The problem is simple . The fresh install
of Fedora 41 no problem. The menu of the booatloader is the problem and
I do understand this is kwown. (See mail Camina Shell)
After the succesfull fresh install I get the bootmenu : First Kernel
Ger van Dijck wrote:
> > When I try to install with the Mediawriter the proces is aborted , when
> > doing with the Netinstall .ISO on DVD Fedora 41 can be installed but
> > there is no bootloader , but in the BIOS there are two bootfiles.
> >
> > So I can go in
On 3/5/25 6:16 AM, Ger van Dijck wrote:
When I try to install with the Mediawriter the proces is aborted , when
doing with the Netinstall .ISO on DVD Fedora 41 can be installed but
there is no bootloader , but in the BIOS there are two bootfiles.
So I can go in the BIOS and change the
On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 9:17 AM Ger van Dijck wrote:
>
>
> On my Dell Inspiron 3721 I had a crash : HD drive defect. So i
> installed a SSD drive (1TB) and decided to convert from MBR to GPT.
>
> I did a fresh install of Windows 10 Professionel : No problem ; Runs fine.
>
&g
> On 5 Mar 2025, at 14:16, Ger van Dijck wrote:
>
> Hay All,
>
>
> On my Dell Inspiron 3721 I had a crash : HD drive defect. So i installed a
> SSD drive (1TB) and decided to convert from MBR to GPT.
>
>
> I did a fresh install of Windows 10 Professione
Hay All,
On my Dell Inspiron 3721 I had a crash : HD drive defect. So i
installed a SSD drive (1TB) and decided to convert from MBR to GPT.
I did a fresh install of Windows 10 Professionel : No problem ; Runs fine.
Then I did an attempt to a fresh install of Fedora 41 by a netinstall
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, Michael Hennebry wrote:
DeVeDe produces a good .iso file and then offers to burn it with brasero.
Brasero will burn it, but the result is "incompatible" with my DVD player,
Trying to burn it directly with brasero produces "unknown disc image type".
Burning it with wodim did
On 12/19/24 2:07 PM, Stephen Morris wrote:
Does --allowerasing only remove the offending package or does it also
remove everything that has a dependency on that package as well? I've
had similar sorts of conflicts with "freeworld" packages, so I've
manually removed the freeworld package first,
On Fri, 2024-12-20 at 09:07 +1100, Stephen Morris wrote:
> Does --allowerasing only remove the offending package or does it also
> remove everything that has a dependency on that package as well? I've
> had similar sorts of conflicts with "freeworld" packages, so I've
> manually removed the freewor
call some of
them were essential for what you're trying to do, and often only
available from an external repo (which may not exist any more). You
may need to install more than just the ones you already have.
growisofs and wodim were other tools I remember using in the past. You
mention wodim
On 19/12/24 19:20, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/19/24 12:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 23:46:31 -0600 (CST), Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to
On Thu, 19 Dec 2024, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it seems to have done the
On 12/19/24 12:09 AM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 23:46:31 -0600 (CST), Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it s
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024 23:46:31 -0600 (CST), Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>
> > On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
>
> > Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
>
> I have now and it seems to have done the job.
> I
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Michael Hennebry wrote:
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it seems to have done the job.
I hadn't before because it seemed like a
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Did you try what it suggests? Add "--allowerasing" to the dnf command.
I have now and it seems to have done the job.
I hadn't before because it seemed like a generic suggestion,
like turn it off and on or
On 12/17/24 8:15 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg,
even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg .
When I try to install ffmpeg,
dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free:
rror:
Problem: problem with installed package
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 9:15 PM Michael Hennebry
wrote:
> When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg,
> even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg .
> When I try to install ffmpeg,
> dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free:
> rror:
>
On Tue, Dec 17, 2024 at 11:15 PM Michael Hennebry
wrote:
>
> When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg,
> even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg .
> When I try to install ffmpeg,
> dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free:
> rror:
&g
When I try to install DeVeDE, dnf complains about a lack of ffmepg,
even though I have /usr/bin/ffmpeg .
When I try to install ffmpeg,
dnf complains about conflicts between @System and rpmfusion-free:
rror:
Problem: problem with installed package ffmpeg-free-6.1.2-1.fc40.x86_64
- package
On 12/12/24 7:53 AM, François Patte wrote:
I have several disks on my computer and run f40 on one disk.
Is it possible to install fedora on a free disk from my installed fedora
(ie. without booting from an usb stick).
You can install "anaconda-gui". I think that gives you the
François Patte composed on 2024-12-12 16:53 (UTC+0100):
> I have several disks on my computer and run f40 on one disk.
> Is it possible to install fedora on a free disk from my installed fedora
> (ie. without booting from an usb stick).
Partitions and disks can be _cloned_. I do it of
On 13/12/24 02:53, François Patte wrote:
Bonjour,
I have several disks on my computer and run f40 on one disk.
Is it possible to install fedora on a free disk from my installed
fedora (ie. without booting from an usb stick).
Thank you.
Theoretically yes. If you have an ISO of the Fedora
Bonjour,
I have several disks on my computer and run f40 on one disk.
Is it possible to install fedora on a free disk from my installed fedora
(ie. without booting from an usb stick).
Thank you.
--
François Patte
UFR de mathématiques et informatique
Laboratoire CNRS MAP5, UMR 8145
On Dec 9, 2024, at 06:07, Ranjan Maitra via users
wrote:
> # # for efi-based systems: #
>
> sudo bash -x grub2-mkconfig -o /boot/efi/EFI/fedora/grub.cfg
Ack! Burn these instructions from your memory, this is the wrong path and can
leave your system unable to update kernels!
On any supported
EFI partition).
Sorry I am not very clear on this. Any suggestions on how to do this?
I just tested F40 in a VM. If you configure a swap partition at install
time, anaconda will set the resume parameter automatically. However, I
still had to add the "resume" module to dracut to ma
On Tue, 2024-12-10 at 09:25 +, Barry wrote:
> > [...]
> >
> > If you don't have any concerns about the physical security of your computer
> > and you're only running Fedora, then very little.
>
> However if a bad actor gets your laptop they may well be able to get your
> credentials out of
On 12/10/24 1:25 AM, Barry wrote:
On 10 Dec 2024, at 04:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Got it, but what are the risks that I run by disabling it?
<#>
On 12/9/24 7:20 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Mon Dec09'24 06:56:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wro
On 10 Dec 2024, at 04:32, Samuel Sieb wrote:Got it, but what are the risks that I run by disabling it?On 12/9/24 7:20 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:On Mon Dec09'24 06:56:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:If s
On 12/9/24 7:20 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Mon Dec09'24 06:56:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
If secure boot is enabled, you need to encrypt the swap partition, but I
haven't had a chance to t
On Mon Dec09'24 06:56:08PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 18:56:08 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
On 12/9/24 6:01 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
From: Samuel Sieb
Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:22:12 -0800
To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no l
On Mon Dec09'24 05:22:12PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> From: Samuel Sieb
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 17:22:12 -0800
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
on this. Any suggestions on how to do this?
I just tested F40 in a VM. If you configure a swap partition at install
time, anaconda will set the resume parameter automatically. However, I
still had to add the "resume" module to dracut to make it work.
If secure boot is enabled, y
On 12/9/24 3:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/9/24 3:05 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 15:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after
it becomes stable, my plan is to
Ranjan Maitra:
> > Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after
> > it becomes stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
Joe Zeff:
> You might want to think that over because all it takes is one typo and
> you'll probably lose your train of thought before it comes back f
On Mon Dec09'24 03:45:25PM, Joe Zeff wrote:
> From: Joe Zeff
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 15:45:25 -0700
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> hibernate?
>
On 12/9/24 3:21 PM, Samuel Sieb wrote:
On 12/9/24 3:05 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 15:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after
it becomes stable, my plan is to
On 12/9/24 3:05 PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 15:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after it becomes
stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
You might want
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 15:45 -0700, Joe Zeff wrote:
> On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
>
> > Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after it
> > becomes stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
>
> You might want to think that over because all it t
On 12/09/2024 03:33 PM, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
Thanks! I use systemctl hibernate from the commandline though after it becomes
stable, my plan is to bind a key doing this.
You might want to think that over because all it takes is one typo and
you'll probably lose your train of thought
On Mon Dec09'24 10:02:06PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 22:02:06 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 11:10 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> I do not have anything other than Fedora installed. It seems to me to be
> strange that it reliably comes back the first time, but not in future times.
> Something is being triggered from the second time on. It could have been H/
On Mon Dec09'24 04:32:00PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 16:32:00 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no
nity support for Fedora users
> > Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no longer needed for
> > hibernate?
> >
> > On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 06:31 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> > > I don't understand what this could be, and wonder what the i
On Sun, 2024-12-08 at 19:57 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have not installed Fedora on a laptop for a while, and I am pretty confused
> with how to partition the disk: I do custom partition because I want a very
> big /home, and a reasonable /
>
> In the old past, several it
On Mon Dec09'24 12:38:54PM, Patrick O'Callaghan wrote:
> From: Patrick O'Callaghan
> Date: Mon, 09 Dec 2024 12:38:54 +
> To: users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: new F41 install: is swap partition no
On Mon, 2024-12-09 at 06:31 -0600, Ranjan Maitra via users wrote:
> I don't understand what this could be, and wonder what the issue could be?
Check the journal, e.g. 'journalctl -g hibernate'. Maybe also:
$ systemctl list-units --failed
followed by:
$ systemctl status for any failed units.
p
On Mon Dec09'24 05:07:31AM, Community Support for Fedora Users wrote:
> From: Ranjan Maitra via users
> Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2024 05:07:31 -0600
> To: Community support for Fedora users
> Cc: Ranjan Maitra
> Reply-To: Community support for Fedora users
> Subject: Re: n
ifier=%N
User=root
Type=oneshot
ExecStart=/bin/bash -c ' \
if ! swapon --show=NAME --noheadings | grep -q /dev/zram0; then \
swapon /dev/zram0; \
fi; \
exit 0; \
'
[Install]
WantedBy=hibernate.target
You put those in the appropriate places a
1 - 100 of 2898 matches
Mail list logo
