[Bug 1927219] Re: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version

2021-05-31 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927219 Title: context deadline exceeded: unknown in containerd with latest runc version To manage notifications about this bug go

[Bug 1927208] Re: nfs-ganesha doesn't include built shared object files to enable storing configuration in RADOS

2021-05-05 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927208 Title: nfs-ganesha doesn't include built shared object files to enable storing configuration in RADOS To manage notificati

[Bug 1927207] Re: NFS Ganesha is built without RADOS support

2021-05-05 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1927207 Title: NFS Ganesha is built without RADOS support To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/u

[Bug 1834213] Re: After kernel upgrade, nf_conntrack_ipv4 module unloaded, no IP traffic to instances

2019-08-23 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1834213 Title: After kernel upgrade, nf_conntrack_ipv4 module unloaded, no IP traffic to instances To manage notifications about t

[Bug 1834213] Re: After kernel upgrade, nf_conntrack_ipv4 module unloaded, no IP traffic to instances

2019-08-23 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
Spent some time debugging this and I found some interesting bits. I was able to reproduce this by deploying a xenial-queens environment with VXLAN and the OVS firewall. Investigating this, here is what I found: 1) This module is first loaded on the compute nodes when libvirt-bin is installed. This

[Bug 1834213] Re: After kernel upgrade, nf_conntrack_ipv4 module unloaded, no IP traffic to instances

2019-08-26 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
Just tested on devstack deployed on Xenial. The module gets loaded at some point during neutron configuration on the deployment script. It seems like a neutron bug to me. It relies on conntrack for the firewall to work, but never actually loads the module. In most cases something else will end up

[Bug 1834213] Re: After kernel upgrade, nf_conntrack_ipv4 module unloaded, no IP traffic to instances

2019-08-27 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
Fix up for review: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/678956/ ** Changed in: charm-neutron-openvswitch Assignee: (unassigned) => Tiago Pasqualini da Silva (tiago.pasqualini) ** Changed in: charm-neutron-openvswitch Status: Confirmed => In Progress -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 1821767] Re: Cinder ISCSI drivers require /sbin/iscsiadm permissions in apparmor

2019-05-15 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
Fix: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/655803/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1821767 Title: Cinder ISCSI drivers require /sbin/iscsiadm permissions in apparmor To manage notification

[Bug 1867386] Re: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections

2020-06-03 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
Hello all, Just tested eoan-proposed. Will now start testing train and stein. Thanks ** Tags removed: verification-needed-eoan ** Tags added: verification-done-eoan -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Bug 1867386] Re: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections

2020-06-04 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
Tested stein and train, all good. Thanks ** Tags removed: verification-stein-needed verification-train-needed ** Tags added: verification-stein-done verification-train-done -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs

[Bug 1867386] Re: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections

2020-03-17 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Also affects: cloud-archive Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867386 Title: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pen

[Bug 1867386] Re: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections

2020-03-17 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Description changed: + [Impact] + Currently, RGW has no option to configure the maximum size for the queue of connections waiting to be accepted when using the Beast frontend. Instead, it uses the value from boost::asio::socket_base::max_connections. + [Test Case] + + Add the 'max_

[Bug 1867386] Re: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections

2020-03-17 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Patch added: "eoan.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/+bug/1867386/+attachment/5338155/+files/eoan.debdiff ** Tags added: sts -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/

[Bug 1867386] Re: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections

2020-03-18 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Tags added: sts-sru-needed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1867386 Title: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections To manage notifications a

[Bug 1867386] [NEW] Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections

2020-03-13 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
Public bug reported: Currently, RGW has no option to configure the maximum size for the queue of connections waiting to be accepted when using the Beast frontend. Instead, it uses the value from boost::asio::socket_base::max_connections. This bug is similar to 1838109, which reports the same issu

[Bug 1867386] Re: Beast frontend does not allow tuning of maximum backlog of pending connections

2020-03-13 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
This is already fixed upstream: https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/33053 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/33340 https://github.com/ceph/ceph/pull/33341 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18

[Bug 1900851] Re: [SRU] Cannot Create Port with Fixed IP Address

2021-10-14 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
Hi Mateusz and JP, This has been fixed and released through another bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/cloud-archive/+bug/1941048 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1900851 Title: [SRU] Can

[Bug 2076943] Re: Incorrect GPG signature file during autoinstall when using custom GPG key

2024-10-03 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~tiago.pasqualini/curtin/+git/curtin/+merge/474394 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076943 Title: Incorrect GPG signature file d

[Bug 2076943] Re: Incorrect GPG signature file during autoinstall when using custom GPG key

2024-09-18 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
It is currently possible to achieve this by using templates, which is supported by curtin. This is currently not documented anywhere besides one of the examples: https://github.com/canonical/curtin/blob/master/examples/apt- source.yaml#L109 I have proposed a PR that adds documentation for this in

[Bug 2076943] Re: Incorrect GPG signature file during autoinstall when using custom GPG key

2024-09-23 Thread Tiago Pasqualini da Silva
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~tiago.pasqualini/curtin/+git/curtin/+merge/473681 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076943 Title: Incorrect GPG signature file d