I have seen this bug recently, I believe on the Gutsy -> Hardy upgrade.
If ferevently expiring bugs like this as if they were support requests
is the policy, it's little wonder that this was one of the more minor
problems amongst many (that caused an unusable/unbootable machine for
the third succes
This bug still exists in Intrepid, keyboard preferences are set to
provide a different default than that used after login.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
Feisty Keyboard does not use correct default setting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96020
You received this bug
Obviously the proposed workaround of deleting one of the keyboard
layouts is not effective if one wants to use more than one keyboard
layout.
--
Feisty Keyboard does not use correct default setting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96020
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: network-manager
On Intrepid, networking is not re-enabled coming out of suspend using
this card. The network icon on the panel has a little exclamation mark.
Right-clicking and selecting Enable Networking reconnects without
problem. Here is the dmesg part
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-system-tools
When a user other than the current one is selected (but greyed out) in
users-admin, clicking unlock does not fully update the UI to reflect
that - for example - one can now click properties for that user. The
button remains greyed out.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: vuze
I guess long-time users of Azureus on Ubuntu are used to this by now.
Azureus was working normally before upgrading to Intrepid/Vuze. Now it
is broken in multiple ways. It has silently changed my port number from
49512 to 49151 which now appears to b
I would think that either adding a notification that the port has been
changed and possibly an explanation of the limit on the options page
would be a minimum requirement for making this kind of change.
Having completely removed GNU Java it seems to be working properly. It
seems GCJ is still not
** Summary changed:
- Boot splash screen always disapears at reiserfs check.
+ Boot splash screen always disappears at reiserfs check.
--
Boot splash screen always disappears at reiserfs check.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
I haven't got around to moving to Intrepid yet. I think this happened on
a Swiss rental DVD where the "first" language was German and the DVD
also had English (which was my language setting). My guess was that it
was simply selecting the first language. I will have to try renting
again after moving
Compiz does not seem to be respecting the initiate condition for
viewport switching with a touchpad. It it supposed to be button2
(middle?) by default. I don't know what this means for the touchpad, but
if I add the Control key modifier I still see the viewport switching
occurring without pressing
I'm pretty sure my system has PATA and SATA controllers integrated on
same chip but I don't use the SATA at all and still get this problem.
--
Grub installs to wrong drive's MBR in default install. No way to change in
standard installer.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/46520
You received this bu
Please see my comment
https://bugs.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mplayer/+bug/121476/comments/15
with attached diff.
--
Use Compiz' "video" plugin when available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121476
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
All I have done is move the patched xv video out driver plus David
Reveman's patch into a new compiz driver, so this explains the bulk of
the patch: just the existing xv code moved into a new file. I have only
read the discussion surrounding David's submissions (I think freedesktop
list) which seem
Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> the status is used to help developers to mark their priorities and
workload.
Launchpad provides functionality for users as well as developers.
Downplaying user feedback and frustrations causes antagonism towards
developers which I can only assume they don't want. Especia
Yes, happens every boot on Hardy. I have never seen a "clean" boot using
reiserfs.
--
Boot splash screen always disapears at reiserfs check.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32398
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-
The "new compiz" driver is mostly working excellently for me. However, I
have encountered one problem - sometimes I get nothing but a black
screen full screen (I always just quit and turn off desktop effects when
it happens so haven't tried windowed). Seems a bit random but nothing
crashes and mpla
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: update-manager
udev gives the message, but says to report against update-manager. I was
attempting to upgrade up-to-date dapper to hardy through ssh as
described here: http://ubuntu-tutorials.com/2008/04/03/dapper-to-hardy-
direct-server-upgrade-works/ (a
** Attachment added: "upgrade logs"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14559290/dist-upgrade.zip
--
update-manager fails - requires at least kernel version 2.6.17
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/231075
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I should add that I didn't have the dapper-proposed repository enabled.
Perhaps I would otherwise have a more up-to-date kernel installed? Seems
to me the upgrader should be intelligent enough to deal with this.
--
update-manager fails - requires at least kernel version 2.6.17
https://bugs.launch
I should add that I didn't have the dapper-proposed repository enabled.
Perhaps I would otherwise have a more up-to-date kernel installed? Seems
to me the upgrader should be intelligent enough to deal with this.
--
update-manager fails - requires at least kernel version 2.6.17
https://bugs.launch
richard, thanks for the quick response. I didn't see it before I started
playing myself. It was up-to-date dapper server upgrade to hardy as
described in the link. I started playing around with sudo aptitude dist-
upgrade/remove and eventually managed to get everything installed (and
not broken). I
In case you are not aware, I should add that choosing an Azureus port in
the now-forbidden range is common practice to help dodge ISP
banning/throttling P2P traffic.
--
azureus/vuze totally broken after interpid upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/293491
You received this bug notification bec
Did anyone else have any success with this? Any interest whatsoever?
--
sometimes doesn't detect main title
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/145801
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
I patch /usr/lib/firefox-addons/searchplugins/google.xml but it has to
be re-done after every upgrade. I think this should be the default
distributed version, and that another param could be added using "lr"
for language - I haven't tested if there is a {moz:lang} or similar.
** Attachment added
I still have this issue on up-to-date 8.10. Here are the logs attached
earlier. Not sure what I'm supposed to get from dbus-monitor whilst
suspending - I see the following, but nothing extra when I do a suspend:
s...@teresa-laptop:~$ dbus-monitor --session
"type='signal',interface='org.freedeskto
other attachment
** Attachment added: "gpm.gconf.values.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/22197547/gpm.gconf.values.txt
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
fail to sleep when lid is closed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/37626
You received this bug n
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: azureus
The SafePeer plugin for azureus/vuze does not work properly by default
and does not notify the user. I think this should be considered a
serious bug because it's effectively a privacy issue. If you run the
azureus console mode using "azureus -u co
This bug or similar is reported multiple times upstream:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=458602
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426426
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=439737
It seems like everyone wants to disclaim responsibility for this: Ubuntu
passes to M
I created this patch to attempt autodetection of the main title based on
maximum title length. I haven't actually got a DVD with me at the
moment, so have been unable to test it. But it compiles cleanly and
looks right ;) Can someone review/test please? I should be able to test
tonight or over the
I had changed the wrong variable for the default title number and was
reading teh VTS files too often. This updated patch has the loops
reorganised to only open the VTS files once - although it still has to
skip over titles that are not within that VTS rather than knowing
straight away where to sta
I can confirm that the previous patch works correctly as compiled on the
latest Hardy package of mplayer (1.0rc2-0ubuntu13). I have also tested
it on a "normal" DVD where the first track is in fact the correct one
(i.e. mplayer works without the patch) and there is no regression.
--
sometimes doe
I hadn't had any problems with tracker until this afternoon (running up-
to-date Hardy). Suddenly my hard disc was thrashing and everything was
unresponsive - eventually everything returned to normal after an OOM. I
have attached the end of dmesg. Willing to provide further help if
necessary but it
I have modified David's patch to make a new compiz vo driver and have
built a working mplayer package using it - is there any use in
continuing this bug or is upstream completely opposed or something?
--
Use Compiz' "video" plugin when available
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121476
You received
This bug just started for me on DVDs that were working yesterday - dmesg
also has a whole load of I/O errors in addition to the ifo_read.c
messages. mplayer also hangs/fails.
--
Totem cannot play DVD
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/206916
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
Using the most up-to-date Hardy and EnvyNG to get Catalyst 8.6 still
produces buggy video playback for me. Looking at what David wrote in the
mailing list, I'm not sure that this is necessarily meant to be faster
than Xv: he refers to resource usage, not speed. Here is my adapted
patch to put this
kzez, that's all good, but isn't the point that this should be working
automatically? Locales work in dapper, you expect them to work in
upgrade, and then also in edgy (as per Martin's comment).
--
Upgrading from dapper to edgy causes locales to stop working during installation
https://bugs.launc
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mplayer
mplayer appears to select the default audio language from somewhere
other than the language setting. I have my language set to English (UK)
and time zone to Zurich: mplayer starts playing DVDs in German. However,
changing time zone to Paris doesn'
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mplayer
mplayer man page suggests dvdnav support in several places (command line
syntax, key bindings, -mouse-movements description), but it does not
appear to be compiled in (updated Feisty). It should either be compiled
in if the quality of support is s
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: mplayer
there are some DVDs for which mplayer(-nogui) does not seem to reliably
detect the main title when simply using "mplayer dvd://" - other players
seem to manage this. one is forced to manually search through (mplayer
dvd://1, mplayer dvd://2 etc.).
marked as new, assigned to nobody. same old story. i hate writing on
bugs just to complain but this is scandalous and i hope comments will at
least make someone listen/ask for more information. i am yet to
experience the joy of this bug on hardy, as i tried to use the upgrader.
my machine is now un
I think it would help if people posted the hotspot crash reports (and
descriptions, Shane) not just the output. Perhaps this should be made
clear in all Ubuntu bug reporting guides? It would be great if this
could be an automatic warning for people trying to report against Java-
based packages.
(a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 57875 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57875
I have been absent from this for a while, and in no way helpful in
producing the fix, but I must say that I don't think these bugs should
all be marked dups. They are different bugs, and should stay as such. My
We'll see what he says, but I think it's worth arguing the case. Whilst
I appreciate the effort you're putting in here, I remember there were
two really common bugs and possibly one or two less common ones that
were already marked as duplicates where appropriate - and I think it
should stay that wa
I don't often whine about bug status and progress, but I have to say
that I find it unbelievable that this is still marked unconfirmed
(albeit High) and does not seem to ever see any progress. I made a
similar comment on bug 45989 several months ago, and it is still marked
unconfirmed and lacking i
** Summary changed:
- Azureus crashs after start
+ Azureus crashes after start
--
Azureus crashes after start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109850
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
Have since confirmed this bug on another machine. Unfortunately I am
unable to remember the details and exact configuration but the installer
required manual intervention to get grub installed properly, and then
boot configuration editing to boot successfully. Windows partition
doesn't boot at all.
Lutz and Marcos: would be helpful to know which version you are using
(of Java/of Azureus) and see the crash log specified in the report you
got. Lutz, also which version are you using from the website - the same
one or the latest?
--
Azureus crashes after start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10
Yes, I think the VNC issues may just complicate matters.
At this point it sounds like it is still unconfirmed what precise combination
causes this problem.
Options:
Compiler - people have said that upstream works, but as far as I can tell
no-one has tried a matching version (i.e. 2.5.0.0 upstre
Are we sure that those gutsy crashes are the same bug? They don't look
like the same crash report and neither screenshot shows the splash stuch
at "loading images" as described here or in the duplicates. Perhaps a
separate bug should be filed for this gutsy problem.
Also, is the patch simply disab
Mike, please clarify - outside the scope how? Why is it marked as a bug
in VNC on Feisty?
--
Azureus crashes just after startup (attempt to show sliding notification window)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68020
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Perhaps I wasn't clear enough in my comment above then. I am
specifically agreeing with you that VNC is not relevant here, hence my
query as to why the package is listed as vnc4. I am also agreeing that
we should focus on one bug, and have made effort here and elsewhere to
make sure duplicates are
Thanks, that makes more sense. We still should confirm it's fixed - I
forgot to check again last night. As far as I can tell, these are the
most clear datapoints:
iKs says
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/azureus/+bug/68020/comments/6)
that it's not fixed (without the repackaging update,
Furion, more information would be required to be able to help identify
the problem, but it doesn't look the same as this bug. Have you looked
at other startup bugs? You need to tell us:
What you were doing at the time of the crash
What you expected to happen/what went wrong
Java version (type "jav
I had not taken into account that dates, quite right. I had also missed
Nelson's first comment. Could you clarify: are Feisty pre-release issues
automatically Edgy issues or are you saying Java 5 isn't in Feisty? I
was sure I saw it on the list somewhere, nearly installed by accident.
My concern a
I thought I was going insane until I tried this again last night. I also
confirm that Java 6 and Feisty's azureus 2.5.0.0 repack1 definitely is
still broken, with the same
"resizeBounds/forceResize/gtk_widget_size_allocate" dump as before.
Sending SIGSEGV to a running Azureus can put it in a state
I find it likely that this bug is a duplicate of bug 68020 or one of the
other Azureus startup bugs. Without a full Hotspot crash report it is
hard to tell. A lot of those bugs are worked around by using upstream's
jar file - this is not a fix in Ubuntu as it is not clear whether other
users would
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 57875 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57875
Adding that I also know this is not really the place, but that there are
simpler ways out of this mess: it's pretty obvious to me that changing
bug names to be more specific would be an excellent starting point.
Further to my comments in bug 74799, these bugs are not dups of each
other. All the other dups appear correct except for bug 83780, which,
like bug 74799, is a dup of bug 68020. Can you confirm that your friend
in fact has this second problem?
--
Azureus does not start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68020 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68020
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 57875
Azureus does not start
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 68020
Azureus 2.5.0.0 crashes
--
Azureus doesn't start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68020 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68020
My understanding is that your patch fixes the problem described in bug
57875, but your stack trace matches bug 68020. I will go ahead and
correct the descriptions/duplicates to clarify the separate bugs, but
cou
Does it get stuck/crash on the splash screen at startup, or continue as
normal? See bug 57875
--
Azureus 2.5: Three (unhandled?) exceptions on startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68106
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68020 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68020
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 95183
azureus crashed after opening : HotSpot Virtual Machine unexpected error
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 68020
Azureus 2.5.0.0 crashes
--
** Summary changed:
- Azureus does not start
+ Azureus hangs or crashes showing splash screen at start
--
Azureus hangs or crashes showing splash screen at start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/57875
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug con
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68020 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68020
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 95183
azureus crashed after opening : HotSpot Virtual Machine unexpected error
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 68020
Azureus 2.5.0.0 crashes
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68020 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68020
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 68020
Azureus 2.5.0.0 crashes
--
azureus crashed after opening : HotSpot Virtual Machine unexpected error
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/95183
You received th
** Summary changed:
- Azureus 2.5.0.0 crashes
+ Azureus crashes just after startup (attempt to show sliding notification
window)
--
Azureus crashes just after startup (attempt to show sliding notification window)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/68020
You received this bug notification because y
People reporting this problem as fixed running e.g. Azureus2.5.0.4.jar,
would it be right to assume that this file is downloaded from a separate
source (Azureus home page/self-compiled) and then copied over the
existing one etc.? I read a report (can't find the bug now) that it
suggested compilati
this bug has been both confirmed and fixed, why is it still unconfirmed?
--
gnome-terminal mouse performance slow on feisty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/78343
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
Also, this bug looks like it might be related to a plugin rather than
main Azureus. Lutz, what plugins have you installed for Azureus?
--
Azureus crashs after start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109850
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug
Chris, it seems like you are experiencing bug 68020, which at the moment
looks unrelated to this one.
--
Azureus crashs after start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109850
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
Indeed, getting Azureus from SourceForge often seems to resolve
problems.
However, there is also confusion amongst different bugs, which I have
being trying to clean up. "It doesn't start" is not particularly helpful
and confuses separate causes. It is unclear whether the SourceForge
version works
Daniel, Ulf's proposed fix was in fact for bug 57875, this one looks
completely different from the stack traces. However, they are only debug
messages, so may not be causing the crash. Then it sounds more like bug
68020. If the original poster could attach the hotspot log (specified in
crash as hs_
BUGabundo, I'm not sure what you are saying - I didn't ask you to do
anything. The log I requested from Ernst should still be available to
him and besides there is little point in reporting bugs without the
willingness to provide sufficient information. I am simply trying to
distinguish between dif
It could be related to this report - my understanding is that UPnP is
not very well specified/compatible and the Azureus wiki mentions that it
should be disabled if Azureus keeps crashing or if your ISP disconnects
every 24h or so. If it's causes you problems then you can disable it in
Tools->Optio
James, could you possibly try with 2.5.0.0 but from the site rather than
repositories. I'm sure that someone said that this version worked too,
it would be good to clarify that it's getting it from the site, rather
than the new version as such that solves the problem. (or not).
--
Azureus crashes
I've not looked at the source at all, but could it possibly be looking
at the command line and splitting on "." to find the (class) path to
some resource for the informational messages?
--
Azureus 2.5.0.0 crashes
https://launchpad.net/bugs/68020
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
I should add that my earlier comment was wrong to advise running under
GCJ as a workaround - this will indeed fix the problem with crashing on
startup when there is an informational message to be displayed (without
having to delete the logs), but as some people are reporting Azureus
then crashes ra
it might just be general slowness that i haven't noticed before - i've
seen that it doesn't happen as badly with smaller terminal windows, and
is particularly acute with a maximised window. i still feel that it
really should be faster though.
--
gnome-terminal mouse performance slow on feisty
htt
Colin, what do you mean by "[grub-installer] is an installer component"?
Does this mean that bug 45989 and bug 46520 are also filed against the
wrong package?
--
Not equivalent to root(hd), setup(hd)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/29329
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
I will soon have the opportunity to confirm this bug using 6.10 on a
different machine.
If it is still an issue, I find it incredulous that such bugs are still
being marked as only medium severity. This bugs leaves an unbootable
machine - not just the new install but whatever was on the other disk
There is something odd going on here, possibly two separate bugs. I was
going to confirm that it is not so much the log files as the
informational box about them that is causing the crash (as per Michael
Plump's comment
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/azureus/+bug/68020/comments/3).
Using
If this bug is not a duplicate of bug 71220 then it is almost certainly
a duplicate of bug 68020. I think these informational dialogs have been
an issue for a while - they never used to go away, and I seem to recall
the workaround then being to load the about box.
--
azureus crashes on startup
ht
After further investigation it seems that the contents of the
.azureus/logs/save directory are what is used to determine whether it
shut down properly. There is some kind of timestamp/unique id in the
filenames, and it looks at the one for the previous launch when it
starts. This is why removing th
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: azureus
Starting Azureus from the command line with a relative path to a torrent
(or using "~/") doesn't work under either Sun JVM or GCJ. When the save
dialog comes up in Azureus, there is another in front giving the path
you provided and the message "no
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
I'm pretty sure that this started with Feisty, but only went through
Edgy to upgrade, so it could have been there. gnome-terminal mouse
select for copying text is now very slow - it takes about a second (or
more) to highlight the text when
gnome-terminal is 2.16.1-0ubuntu1, this is feisty updated as of about
Friday. The mouse is a PS/2 Logitech MouseMan+. uname -a gives "Linux
wildthing 2.6.20-3-386 #2 Tue Dec 26 06:50:47 UTC 2006 i686 GNU/Linux"
--
gnome-terminal mouse performance slow on feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/78343
-
Haven't turned anything special on myself, and just used apt to upgrade
from Edgy. Also not seeing anything fancy: it's an old computer that
wouldn't cope with it, but this didn't used to happen.
--
gnome-terminal mouse performance slow on feisty
https://launchpad.net/bugs/78343
--
ubuntu-bugs
As I said, this looks like a duplicate of bug 68020. Please see my
comments there. Most of the errors you see on Azureus startup seem
pretty harmless to me (they are annoying though).
--
azureus crashes on startup
https://launchpad.net/bugs/78167
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
It may be something different, but it looks very similar to me. The
crash report looks like the same cause. Are you not still using Sun
Java? If so, try switching to GCJ as I described and seeing if the
informational window comes up. If it does, a successful shutdown of
Azureus should allow it to w
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68020 ***
I remember there might be other issues with Azureus 2.5 and Sun Java
1.5, so it may be best to stick with GCJ for a while until these are
cleared up.
I started looking into it but haven't done anything for a while. It
seems to me that it's the display/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 68020 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 68020
Azureus 2.5.0.0 crashes
--
Azureus crashes with SIGSEGV
https://launchpad.net/bugs/71220
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubunt
Not really understanding why this is incomplete/undecided. With search
integrated in the browser, it should really respect the user
locale/language setting.
--
can't switch to local google search
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255043
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
I mean incomplete/INVALID.
--
can't switch to local google search
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255043
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
As I said, this bug existed in Interpid too, which has not reached EOL.
Haven't tested it recently or on more recent releases though.
--
Feisty Keyboard does not use correct default setting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96020
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
It seems to me quite clear that waking up on keyboard/mouse is pretty
standard behaviour. More generally, options for power management are
very limited (I've often gone to the power options and thought... "wow,
that's it? can't fix it here then"). So on the policy issue I'm
suggesting wake on kb/mo
I can't remember the context from 6 years ago. I believe there was
nothing unsupported about it; trying to build a package for a non-host
architecture. debhelper not actually building all when told to made this
harder, and especially harder to automate.
--
You received this bug notification becau
This happens on mkv files as well for me.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1182205
Title:
totem freezes after changing/disabling subtitle on mp4 files.
To manage notifications about th
Public bug reported:
Prior to 16.10, I always disabled module-suspend-on-idle in
/etc/pulse/default.pa. With it enabled (the default), I often lose the
beginning of audio being played because of the time it or my receiver
takes to start up. I also sometimes gets cracks/pops.
Commenting out the li
apport information
** Attachment added: "PulseList.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637862/+attachment/4769869/+files/PulseList.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637862
Titl
apport information
** Attachment added: "JournalErrors.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1637862/+attachment/4769867/+files/JournalErrors.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/16378
1 - 100 of 220 matches
Mail list logo
