Only because the majority who say no has already expressed their view
and is tired of being ignored.
On Sat, 24 Apr 2010 18:45 +, "scholli" wrote:
> I say "yes"... and I see that always more and more peoples are agreed
> with left.
>
> --
> [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/al
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:51 +, "Steven" wrote:
> Why not just choose one of the following two solutions:
Because it has been stated that ubuntu is trying to be *less*
configurable (Linus might have been right all along)
And because, honestly, I think the move to patch button order support
into
I think Mark first rationale for the change was actually right and
overriding. He needs to clear the right corner to put something there
and he needs to do it 6 months in advance.
I can already sort of guess what it will be. Forget Esfera, it will be
some sort of live facebook chat/twitter feed/lo
No one is arguing it isn't easy to change.
The point is that this will only make things harder for new users
(mainly from windows but also mac).
The point is also that this makes no one happy (or about %5 of users
IIRC the poll has disappeared or become hard to find)
All the arguments in favor ar
On Sat, 20 Mar 2010 00:55 +, "j_baer" wrote:
> My belief is this decision was not made by the flip of a coin, the toss
> of a dart, or the personal preference of any single individual. I
> believe the concept was discussed, debated, and evaluated as to adding
> value to Ubuntu as it exists to
Just forget it. Ubuntu Design want it this way so it's the greatest
thing ever. Maybe they'll change their minds later and return it to the
right, THEN that would be it's the greatest thing ever.
--
http://www.fastmail.fm - Send your email first class
--
You received this bug notification becau
