On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 12:51 +0000, "Steven" <steve...@gmail.com> wrote: > Why not just choose one of the following two solutions: Because it has been stated that ubuntu is trying to be *less* configurable (Linus might have been right all along)
And because, honestly, I think the move to patch button order support into metacity was so technically unnecessary, that I'm guessing the move was not technical at all. I think it might be intended to move the responsibility to theme makers to pressure them to make their themes more fit for left alignment, or at least make them develop two versions of each theme, as it is kinda obvious that mere relocating of buttons breaks some theme designs. Or maybe the dev team reasoned that the set of users who want the buttons in the right overlaps significantly with the set of users who use themes other than the default. -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Accessible with your email software or over the web -- [Master] Window Control buttons: position/order/alignment https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532633 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
