Moreover, using Eclipse 3.2.2 on Hardy (Build id: M20070212-1330 (Ubuntu
version: 3.2.2-5ubuntu2)), Eclipse use by default the GCJ JVM and
doesn't ask for workspace whatever the value of
SHOW_WORKSPACE_SELECTION_DIALOG in
~/.eclipse/org.eclipse.platform_3.2.0/configuration/.settings/org.eclipse.ui.
Could confirm the importance of such a dialog. Get a FAT32 external
media corrupted (accidentally unplugged while writing) and search for a
while what was the reason for the mount read only behavior. dmesg was
helpfull but it's not a acceptable solution for the common user.
I use Ubuntu Hardy. Str
Same problem but a startup.
Can confirm almost the same problem on a Dell Inspiron 1520 (iwl3945).
Have to wait from 30s to 3min before connection is done. Happen on my
WPA encrypted network with only this laptop. Non problem with others and
apparently no problem with this laptop on another WPA ne
@ktulu77 : From where di you get this 'Open with' dialog with two tabs
'Installed applications' and 'Available applications'? Is it in the
Karmik alpha? I personaly doesn't have such a dialog.
I'm new on this bug, but wondering technically what prevent an extension
from replacing the 'Open with' d
Have found this thread on MarkMail speaking of the exactly same problem
with another point of view (extracting the 'Open with' dialog from the
libnautilus to be usable elsewhere).
--
[MASTER] "Open With" dialog not user-friendly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/18995
You received this bug notifica
@ktulu77 :
I have forgotten the MarkMail URL in my previous post:
http://markmail.org/message/mcarb3i4gg5hcvm3#query:+page:1+mid:qxaeqv22o3pkzgvx+state:results.
On Nautilus 2.26.2, on Jaunty, I don't have the two tabs. Strange.
You will not be happy, because you're right. First, the freedesktop
@Coren: Thanks Coren, it makes things clearer. Your patch is then needed
(solving a first problem, without solving the 'Open with' one, but it's
better than nothing).
@ktulu77: In the Gmome mailing list (MarkMail) I referenced, there are two
points of view :
- extraction from Nautilus and integra
This subject has, of course, already been talked on FreeDesktop. No
exactly from this point of view, but for setting up a consensus on the
best way to conceive the MIME database. It seems that Gnome and KDE have
both common and specific ways of handling that. I will not enter in the
details because
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: diff-ext
Overview:
When you just installed diff-ext and try to compare two (or three) files from
the context menu Compare entry in Nautilus, you get no result.
Steps to reproduce:
– Fresh install ofdiff-ext,
– Select two (or three) files in Nautilus,
–
A small patch correcting the problem. Just a modification of the gconf
diff-ext schema default values.
** Summary changed:
- meld (or other) must be use instead of kdiff3 by default in Jaunty
+ meld (or other) must be used instead of kdiff3 by default in Jaunty
** Attachment added: "use-of-meld-
Get a Dell Latitude D530 with an Intel Corporation PRO/Wireless 3945ABG
[Golan].
Can confirm this. I have fought 1 entire day with this problem trying
also solution on Ubuntu forums and launchpad bugs to not having to boot
to Windows. I finally boot to Windows, activate the bluetooth and it
works
I can confirm that installing and setting up properly gnome-user-share
make the deal. I have a Nokia 6630 and I can send files from it to my
laptop now.
There's the problem of the notification of gnome-user-share that stays
here after the transfer and which is completely useless because you
cannot
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 321098 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/321098
I comment here because I experience the same problem at startup. From 0s
to 1min to connect on my two Dell laptops. Annoying, because I also
experienced some connection failures with my ISP and I'm always aski
The problem cannot be reduced to a wide system setting. Here we talk of
removable media, it meens you take it and plug it wherever you want on
multiple PCs. If you don't want a .Trash on your usb stick, you don't
want it whatever the Ubuntu where you plug it. It means that what is
needed here is a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 190263 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190263
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 190263
Wrong character encoding in text input
--
Flash Player with Strange Characters
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247894
You received this bug notificati
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #532666
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532666
** Also affects: flashplugin-nonfree (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=532666
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Wrong character encoding in text
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/jaunty-updates/flashplugin-nonfree
** Branch linked: lp:debian/squeeze/flashplugin-nonfree
** Branch linked: lp:debian/sid/flashplugin-nonfree
--
Wrong character encoding in text input
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190263
You received this bug notification because
This bug is also reported twice on the JIRA bugtracker of Adobe :
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-133
http://bugs.adobe.com/jira/browse/FP-40 (opened 04/09/08)
--
Wrong character encoding in text input
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190263
You received this bug notification because you are
** Summary changed:
- nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper
+ nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one
--
Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/494400
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Summary changed:
- nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one
+ opening folder as root with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root
** Summary changed:
- opening folder as root with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root
+ opening folder as root with nautilus-gksu chang
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #560180
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560180
** Also affects: gksu (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560180
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change deskto
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gksu
In Nautilus, when you open a folder as admin through the nautilus-gksu
script, it changes the background of the desktop to the root one.
I suspect the nautilus-gksu script doesn't invoke the nautilus command
with the --no-desktop option.
Additionna
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #604153
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604153
** Also affects: gksu via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604153
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
What do you think of an ‘Unlock button’ like the one of the time-admin
app ?
The user open the permissions dialog. There is already a message “You
are not the owner, so you cannot change these permissions.”. An ‘Unlock’
button give him the ability to bypass its user privileges to perform
permissio
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66015 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66015
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 157921
language-support-en pollutes Firefox's spell-check languages list
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 66015
Duplicate spell checking dictionari
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 66015 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66015
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 66015
Duplicate spell checking dictionaries for every entry
--
language-support-en pollutes Firefox's spell-check languages list
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
A advice to everybody: the installation of Dictionary Switcher add-on
(https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/3414) doesn't solve the
problem but leverage it a lot. It automatically detects your typing
language and select the right dictionary. No more need to change it in
the context menu
I don't think this bug is only a Firefox one. I'm French and often use
English on the web. Thus, I need both language-support-en and language-
support-fr. But, those meta-packages install a lot of dictionaries that
I don't care because I live in France, not in Belgium, not in Canada, so
fr-CA, fr-B
When using the PPA, I now get this new error : "GLib-WARNING **:
g_set_prgname() called multiple times". Anybody else with the same
problem ?
--
gvim complains about "gtk_form_set_static_gravity: assertion
`static_gravity_supported' failed" in the shell it's started from
https://bugs.launchpad.n
** Description changed:
--
Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic proxy settings
(gnome-network-preferences) for authenticated proxies
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300271
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #605357
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605357
** Also affects: gnome-control-center via
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=605357
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #562399
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562399
** Also affects: debian via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=562399
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
Setting the network proxy doesn't change the synaptic
I cannot reproduce the bug in Lucid. I haven't migrated to Maverick yet,
but this bug does no more affect me.
@jay armstrong
Try $gksu 'nautilus --no-desktop' with single quotes instead of $gksu nautilus
--no-desktop to prevent the unrecognized option message.
--
Opening folder with nautilus-gk
@hedgehog#29
Brillant simple patch! Works like a charm now.
--
ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523484
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
There's less interest on depending on a repository if update can not be
done. And as said before, it becomes difficult to use the old version as
incompatibilities arrise.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.lau
It seems now that Ubuntu provides a mirror list through
http://mirrors.ubuntu.com/mirrors.txt. Is it enough to push back apt-spy
in repository (with some modifications to retrieve the list of mirrors
from this URL)? The only problem seems to be that mirros.ubuntu.com is
regularly down.
It seems th
As the other user concerned by this bud, can I do the apport-collect so
that it is reopened and investigated?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298552
Title:
bluetooth enabled after res
Is there any importance if I do the new report when the bug is present
or not (when bluetooth is enabled after suspend or at any time)?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1298552
Title:
b
Thanks a lot for having take time to look at this.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361550
Title:
Help button does nothing
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
I can confirm this problem is gone for me in Precise Pangolin.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/264333
Title:
remote printer : freeze when not available
To manage notifications about t
As you can see here (http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=560180#10), nautilus-gksu is discontinued : a good
way to fix a bug concerning a feature is to remove the feature.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
What people seems to not understand it's that it's counter-intuitive to
pretend that a user must be aware of the destination of it's removed
files and moreover that it doesn't free its key space as expected.
When you delete files, there are two reasons: the file is useless + you
don't have enough
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 663610
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: el subproceso script
post-installation instalado devolvió el código de salida de error 1
* You can sub
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 663356
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: underproces installed
post-installation script returnerede afslutningsstatus 1
* You can subscribe to
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 663009
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can subscribe to bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 662122
package udev 151-12.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script
post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1
* You ca
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 660765
package udev 151-12.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can subscribe to bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 642998
package udev 162-1 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can subsc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 641902 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/641902
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 641902
package udev 151-12.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script
post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 1 (live usb
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 681579 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/681579
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subs
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
* You can subscribe to bug 681579 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ude
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** This bug has be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** This bug has be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** This bug has be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** This bug has be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** This bug has be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** This bug has be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** This bug has be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 665892
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can subscribe to bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 665892
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can subscribe to bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 681579
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio
script di post-installation ha restituito lo stato di errore 1
** This bug has be
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 665892 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/665892
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 665892
package udev 162-2.1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
post-installation script returned error exit status 1
* You can subscribe to bug
Any proof of a link with ureadahead? Would be interesting for others to
give some details on this (first, to know if we can make a migration
with /var on another part).
--
ureadahead requires /var on root filesystem
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/523484
You received this bug notification because
It's normal. When you launch Nautilus as root without the option --no-
desktop, this new nautilus instance begins to manage the desktop. You
just have to launch gksudo nautilus --no-desktop.
--
Opening folder with nautilus-gksu change desktop wallpaper to root one
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
71 matches
Mail list logo
