stem. Declaring it invalid isn't going to actually help anything.
Perry
--
A bug I reported has been in limbo for 5 months.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144089
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
esponded to. If further questions had been
asked they would have been responded to as well.
The problem is that the bug report was left to rot, not that the bug
was not fixed.
Perry
--
A bug I reported has been in limbo for 5 months.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144089
You received this bug noti
ed so things don't die without anyone
knowing whether they're important or not.
(The particular responsible party appears to have left many hundreds
of bug reports in this state, which appears to be unusual. A proper
tracking system would have escalated that at some point.)
--
Perry
Jukka Laurila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gutsy has the same problem and the temporary workaround "rmmod ehci_ucd"
> works there as well.
Wouldn't it be nice if we didn't have to use a workaround.
Perry
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launc
/etc/init.d/ssh restart || exit $?
fi
;;
esac
--
This really will take no time. Please fix it -- it will make the world
a better place and close an open bug.
Perry
--
sshd not reco
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
If you have a laptop that roams, you want your ntp daemon to restart
when you change networks so that your time remains synchronized. This
would normally be done by scripts in /etc/network/if-up.d/
/etc/network/if-up.d/ntp and /etc/network/ntp-server
n't
> entirely trivial and I wanted to think about it a bit.
Well, the code to do what you want is above.
See also bug #120199 if you fix the above one.
Feel free to bother me if you need any more shell magic like the stuff
above written.
Perry
--
sshd not reconfigured by /etc/netwo
Will do right now.
> * cat /proc/version_signature > version.log
> * dmesg > dmesg.log
> * sudo lspci -vvnn > lspci-vvnn.log
Perry
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
** Attachment added: "version.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098056/version.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098087/dmesg.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13098098/lspci-vvnn.log
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
By the way, things have improved slightly. With the absolutely latest
Hardy kernel, boot still hangs for quite a while before succeeding and
sound is still dead, but the ethernet now comes up. The wireless is
still dead, though.
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.
Public bug reported:
I upgraded a T40 to Hardy. The machine goes quite nuts with a 2.6.24
kernel -- booting the old 2.6.22 kernel works more or less fine.
Symptoms include a long hang during hardware probes and failure to
properly initialize a bunch of the hardware thereafter.
** Affects: linux (
the broken kernel when I run said commands.)
Perry
--
T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209342
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
** Summary changed:
- T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
+ IBM T40 breaks under Hardy with 2.6.24 kernel
** Description changed:
- I upgraded a T40 to Hardy. The machine goes quite nuts with a 2.6.24
- kernel -- booting the old 2.6.22 kernel works more or less fine.
- Symptoms include a l
I note that the bug report is still listed as "incomplete" although it
has been some days since I posted the requested information. The clock
is also ticking on auto-deleting the bug report. Is there something else
I need to add before the report will be considered complete? I'd hate to
have report
(I also think an ntp
client should be configured in Ubuntu by default, as is done in
Windows and OS X, but that's another story.)
Perry
--
default ntp.conf should use pool.ntp.org servers
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104525
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Does it really take three months to decide if a bug that prevents users
from touching any USB high speed peripheral is important or not?
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the
Public bug reported:
This article:
http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9016598&source=rss_topic122
claims that a remotely exploitable buffer overflow has been found in the
MadWiFi Atheros driver. Given that a large fraction of laptops running
Ubuntu
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> See http://www.ubuntu.com/usn/usn-404-1
If this is the same issue, then this was a false alarm. (I'm surprised
this is hitting the press three months later, but it is my fault for
not double checking.)
Perry
--
remotely exploitable
Daniel T Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Is the machine running the latest BIOS?
Yes, and more to the point, I'm pretty sure the problem wasn't there
in Edgy.
--
Sound problems on hibernate, IBM T41
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/98605
You received this bug notification because you are a m
The machine is indeed running the latest BIOS.
The BIOS should not, of course, be an issue since in recovering from
hibernate ALL hardware needs to have its state restored by the OS itself
-- I don't even think any AML code is involved. The ACPI S4 support
doesn't have anything to do with restorin
Here is my guess (purely a guess) on where to look for the problem.
Clearly a hook is being called on return from S3 and on return from S4
to fix the state of the audio device. On return from S3 (suspend) the
hook does the right thing. On return from S4 (hibernate) the hook is not
doing the right t
Oh, and there is one other possibility here. On resume from S4, the BIOS
has done an initial fixup of all the hardware after which the OS gets
handed control and then had to restore all state. On resume from S3, all
hardware was powered off (except for RAM) and the OS has a "blank slate"
from which
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ntp
A global cluster of ntp servers now exists as a way of allowing vendors
to supply default ntp servers in their ntp configurations -- see
http://www.pool.ntp.org/ for details on the project.
As a result of this, vendor supplied ntp.conf files, like th
Public bug reported:
Running on Feisty, my IBM T41 laptop makes no sounds after it has re-
awakened following a hibernate. Suspending the machine and resuming it
brings back the sounds. This has to be something low level in the driver
as all the infrastructure above seems to think it is playing au
Public bug reported:
Under Feisty, plugging in a USB high speed flash device (or just about
anything else that uses USB high speed) results in the following
messages showing up in the log (and a failure to connect the device):
Mar 29 09:28:43 hackworth kernel: [156070.92] usb 4-4: new high sp
As requested:
$ uname -a
Linux hackworth 2.6.20-13-generic #2 SMP Sun Mar 25 00:21:25 UTC 2007 i686
GNU/Linux
Attached please find dmesg and lspci output.
** Attachment added: "dmesg log"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7051896/dmesg.log
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://launchpad.
lspci output is attached.
** Attachment added: "lspci output"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7051912/lspci-vvnn.log
--
USB problems on IBM T41 laptop
https://launchpad.net/bugs/98608
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bu
The claim that the output is needed for support is specious. The
messages in question are not very important. However, the messages
filling the log *is* a very serious issue.
The entire method that NetworkManager is using to execute
wpa_supplicant, to whit, hard coding options in an array in an ob
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openssh-server
If you have a device that roams a lot (like a laptop), you want daemons
like sshd to be tweaked/restarted by scripts in /etc/network so that
they re-open the socket they listen on when the network address changes.
(Yes, some of us really do
I have similar issues with double separators, icons overlapping, and
sections white out. I'll attach screen shots of other examples when they
happen again
** Attachment added: "Bits of the panel whited out"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47687280/panel.png
--
[Lucid] Panel applets have problem
At this point I'm unsubscribing from the bug report. I no longer know,
or care, if the problem is still extant. Maybe it is and maybe it isn't,
but after a couple of years of the bug living in limbo I've ceased to
care, and I'm no longer running an Ubuntu laptop.
--
ntp daemon not reconfigured by
One would imagine that this bug could have been fixed any time in the
last couple of years. It would require editing a couple of files on the
part of one of the maintainers. Is there a good reason this has not been
completed?
--
ipmi modules need to manually inserted and device created
https://b
I've unsubscribed from the bug report. It could have been fixed in a few
minutes one way or another at any time over the last few years but no
one did, which is a sad commentary on the management of the project.
Anyway, after years of this bug report remaining in limbo I've ceased to
care what happ
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
This is the first time it has happen, but happened a second time when I
tried to run it again.
Ubuntu 9.10
ubuntuone-client:
Installed: 1.0.2-0ubuntu2
Candidate: 1.0.2-0ubuntu2
Version table:
*** 1.0.2-0ubuntu2 0
500 http:
** Attachment added: ".home.elmer..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36369260/.home.elmer..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log.txt
** Attachment added:
".home.elmer..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.exceptions.log.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/3636
rna writes:
> This is a bug of chipset.
No it isn't. Other operating systems don't have the problem.
Perry
--
ehci_hcd module causes I/O errors in USB 2.0 devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/88746
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
rna writes:
> Perry E. Metzger wrote on 2009-09-14:
>> No it isn't. Other operating systems don't have the problem.
>
> Chip has bug, but the workaround there, the patch said.
Whether other OSes have workarounds or whether the bug is purely in the
software, the effe
Dave Walker writes:
> Can this bug be reproduced on Lucid?
I'm not running Lucid yet. However, you can check if the defect is there
just by reading a couple of files, you don't need to ask anyone to
reproduce it.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 395565 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395565
I would LOVE to see a fix for this imminently - I have tried upgrading
to Ubuntu 9.10 and am now getting the exact same output from those
commands(no really, EXACT)...what is weird is that my card was working
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Fix Committed => New
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial)
Assignee: (unassigned) => shane cody perry (theinsanelunatic5934)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
** Changed in: base-files (Ubuntu Xenial)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1836236
Title:
9.4ubuntu4.9: Broken package because of missing "#"
its own this would happen.
And it isn't a "hack", this is exactly what ifup/down scripts are for.
Perry
--
Perry E. Metzgerpe...@piermont.com
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
On Mon, 20 Mar 2017 13:18:54 - Martin Pitt
wrote:
> Perry, I just revisited this:
That bug report was a decade ago.
So far as I know, this is still an issue for your users, because sshd
does not, on its own, change its network address when one changes
networks. I would not remove t
Uninstalled the Python3 package, then ran 'sudo service apport start
force_start=1' Restarted Ubuntu Software Store and re-installed Python3
package. No error message was displayed, and Python3 opened normally.
Regards, C.Perry arcturus...@gmail.com
--
You received this bug notification because
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 09:57:26 - Colin Watson
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 05:14:07PM -0000, Perry E. Metzger wrote:
> > And it isn't a "hack", this is exactly what ifup/down scripts are
> > for.
>
> They're useful for giving sysadmins the flexi
The workaround hasn't worked for me. When I run the kill command i get
this result:
kill: usage: kill [-s sigspec | -n signum | -sigspec] pid | jobspec ...
or kill -l [sigspec]
I tried to find the pid using ps -aef and dont see anything like
/usr/lib/unity-lens-applications
--
You received this
So, now that this broken librcc0 package has made it in to the release
version, and a solution has been found and verified, is there a reason
that the package maintainer can't just put the Debian binary in place of
the Ubuntu one? I don't mean to sound snarky, I'm not too familiar with
the Ubuntu p
Ah, I see.
Well, building librcc0 from ubuntu source doesn't seem to do the job, I
get the same segmentation fault on startup. Hopefully I was doing the
correct thing (per random internet instructions):
apt-get build-dep librcc0
apt-get source librcc0
cd librcc0-0.2.9/
dpkg-buildpackage -us -uc -
To Michael B
How did you get fglrx? i tried installing it through synaptic but it
isn't working
--
[ATI Graphics][Lucid] laptop runs hot, shorter battery life, fan always on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563156
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
I tried that, it says "No proprietary drivers are in use on this
system." I'm not sure what to do, but my computer overheated yesterday
and now i need the motherboard replaced so i would like to figure this
out.
--
[ATI Graphics][Lucid] laptop runs hot, shorter battery life, fan always on
https:/
sorry, I just realized it might be useful to include that the card is
ATI mobility radeon x300
--
[ATI Graphics][Lucid] laptop runs hot, shorter battery life, fan always on
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/563156
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I'm trying that but the hardware drivers method isn't working, it isn't finding
any proprietary drivers. the ubuntu x team ppa is also not working, it give
this result:
ch...@chris-laptop:~$ sudo add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-x-swat/x-updates
Executing: gpg --ignore-time-conflict --no-options --n
i'm confused. how do i get the fix package fglrx-installer?
--
Can't install fglrx-kernel-source, conflict with fglrx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545992
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Public bug reported:
lsb_release -rd
No LSB modules are available.
Description:Ubuntu 24.04 LTS
Release:24.04
fresh install of ubuntu server 24.04
with latest samba
when you put default acl (setfacl -dm g:toto:rwx Info) this is not
implemanted when you create a new directory and not
** Package changed: ubuntu => acl (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067389
Title:
default acl doesn't work
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
** Changed in: subiquity (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2082851
Title:
cloud-init validation fails on ubuntu-desktop with ModuleN
Same issue here, HP EliteBook 8440p, SSD disk.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779827
Title:
failure to boot with inux-image-4.15.0-24-generic
To manage notifications about this bug
Me either. The booting to prior kernel does not fix the issue. Glad to
help test but need some instructions. Only have non-bootable system at
this point.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Agreed, I see the same thing. Glad 0-23 boots, but 0-24 still hangs at
the Ubuntu logo, five white dots, not animated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779827
Title:
failure to boot w
Interesting thing happening... I tried booting 0-23 success, then did
shutdown -r now, and tried booting 0-24, as noted above just hangs.
Briefly hit power button tried to boot 0-23 again and now it doesn't
boot...
Tried turning off power and then booting 0-23, still hangs, got "Started
GNOME dis
Happy confirmed as well! sudo apt install haveged fixes the issue.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1779827
Title:
failure to boot with linux-image-4.15.0-24-generic
To manage notific
Hi Dave, I'm using the new kernel (4.13.0-39-generic) and I still get
the error (though my laptop did start up once without the error).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764087
Title:
W
** Changed in: xorg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764087
Title:
Wrongly boots into low graphics mode
To manage notifications about this bug
This sounds like the error that I'm getting. I did a system update on
19th April. Ubuntu 16.04. Lenovo T61. Is display info (see below)
relevant to the bug?
As a workaround the following command makes the wifi work:
sudo service network-manager restart
*-display:0
descripti
This might be the same bug as #1764087
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764445
Title:
the system is running in low-graphics mode
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
This might be the same bug as #1764445
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1764087
Title:
Wrongly boots into low graphics mode
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.l
Hi Dan, as regards editing the wiki, please see the "Contributing"
section on this page:
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/WikiGuide
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753915
Title:
Out
901 - 970 of 970 matches
Mail list logo
