[Bug 494476] Re: Samba blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2009-12-11 Thread Okkulter
hi there, here are two new tasks blocking for more than 120 seconds. but this time the task "kjournald2" followed dy "rsync" are affected. this happens when i tried to copy from one ext4 volume to an other with rsync. So its not samba - specific as i assumed at first let me say it seems to be a

[Bug 494476] Re: "Smb", "kjournald2" and "rsync" blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2009-12-11 Thread Okkulter
** Summary changed: - Samba blocked for more than 120 seconds. + "Smb","kjournald2" and "rsync" blocked for more than 120 seconds. ** Summary changed: - "Smb","kjournald2" and "rsync" blocked for more than 120 seconds. + "Smbd","kjournald2" and "rsync" blocked for more than 120 seconds.

[Bug 494476] [NEW] Samba blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2009-12-09 Thread Okkulter
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gnome-utils hi there, here are some additional information omn this bug: during the creation of an .bin file (with imgburn) via my MS Windows Vista client the application reaches a timeout with lossing the connection to the samba server for a while. the

[Bug 494476] Re: Samba blocked for more than 120 seconds.

2009-12-09 Thread Okkulter
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36621625/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcMaps.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36621626/ProcMaps.txt ** Attachment added: "ProcStatus.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36621628/ProcStatus.txt -- Samba

[Bug 494476] Re: "Smbd", "kjournald2" and "rsync" blocked for more than 120 seconds while using ext4.

2010-04-09 Thread Okkulter
hi there, As a result of this error (behavior?) i switched back from ext4 to ext3 on my 14 TB softraid volume and no more blocking messages. ==> error with ext4 - definitly greetings to all who waits for a correction I still will have a look on this thx -- "Smbd","kjournald2" and "rsync" b

AW: [Bug 666197] Re: Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drivesfound connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter

2010-12-02 Thread Okkulter
rom Ubuntu 10.04 to Ubuntu 10.10, with Linux 2.6.35-23-generic (64Bit) still shows the bug. Is the testing of the upstream kernel still needed or interesting? In this I'm a newbi. Greetings Okkulter -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: boun...@canonical.com [mailto:boun...@canonical.com]

AW: [Bug 666197] Re: Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drivesfound connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter

2010-12-02 Thread Okkulter
Hi Jeremy, I just tried the upstream kernel "v2.6.36-maverick" (was very simple to manage). After restarting this result: It works - the drives are working well. I think i have to wait, 'til this kernel version will be a part of the Ubuntu online distribution update. Gre

[Bug 666197] Re: Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drives found connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter

2010-11-25 Thread Okkulter
does anybody care about this bug? -- Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drives found connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 666197] Re: Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drives found connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter

2010-11-08 Thread Okkulter
the Ubuntu 10.10 i386 life CD also did not start with connected drives to the controller syslog repeats Nov 8 16:52:19 ubuntu kernel: [ 305.725169] ata11.00: qc timeout (cmd 0xec) Nov 8 16:52:19 ubuntu kernel: [ 305.725175] ata11.00: failed to IDENTIFY (I/O error, err_mask=0x4) Nov 8 16:5

[Bug 666197] Re: Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drives found connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter

2010-11-03 Thread Okkulter
(64Bit) works fine. So, what ist the reason? Bad driver configuration in the underlaying kernel? Thanx for helping and greetings Okkulter -- Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drives found connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666197 You

[Bug 666197] [NEW] Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drives found connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter

2010-10-25 Thread Okkulter
] ata4.04: hard resetting link Oct 19 15:13:11 ubuntu kernel: [ 1971.310564] ata4.05: hard resetting link ...so what about the support of this controller in the new Ubuntu (linux)? thx for a helping answer Greetings, okkulter add info: the drives connected via Sil 3132 - and Sil 3124 - controllers are

[Bug 666197] Re: Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drives found connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter

2010-10-27 Thread Okkulter
...lonesome waiter for an answer -- Ubuntu 10.10 - after upgrade from 10.04 - no drives found connected via Marvell 88SX7042 SATA-Host-Adapter https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/666197 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --