Hi larytet
As Benjamin wrote, we cannot support eclipse downloaded directly from
eclipse.org.
Furthermore, eclipse has extracted shared libraries into your home
folder (~/.eclipse), which means the crash will persist even after you
install eclipse from Ubuntu (from 9.10 or 10.04, older Ubuntu ver
Seth Hikari wrote:
> I have attached picture below. Excuse my laziness.
>=20
> ** Attachment added: "Versions JRE JDK"
>http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45243086/Screenshot-5.png
>=20
Hi
Do you have icedtea6-plugin installed? I cannot see it on that list.
~Niels
--
pingtest.net packet loss te
an/rules change to move the
> original eclipse binary. Is that incomplete, or is there some nonobvious
> magic?
>
> ** Also affects: eclipse (Ubuntu Karmic)
>Importance: Undecided
>Status: New
>
> ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu Karmic)
>
Hi
Can you reproduce this with 3.5.2-2ubuntu4?
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Plugin load is not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/568566
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Hi
Can this be reproduced with eclipse 3.5.2-2ubuntu4 with eclipse-pde
installed?
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Plugin installation - keystore issue, reports: "This trust engine is read only."
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569224
You received thi
Frank Groeneveld wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: eclipse
>
> It seems wrong to me that I can run:
> apt-get install eclipse
> And I will end up with a "broken" Eclipse, namely one that can't compile
> anything, because only a JRE was installed, not JDK (so javac is missing
Farly FD wrote:
> same error here. Eclipse-pde already installed, but it doesn't fix the bug...
> I'm trying to install PDT...
>
> here's the output:
>
> An error occurred while collecting items to be installed
> session context was:(profile=PlatformProfile,
> phase=org.eclipse.equinox.intern
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
Eclipse not depending on a jdk
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576952
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
Help cannot be loaded: Error 500 Unable to compile class for JSP
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/549904
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
Hi
I can confirm the issue. The groovy feature depends on the plugin
org.eclipse.jdt.core version "3.5.2.20100319-1100-e35-RELEASE", which
looks like a home made version (but it could also be an official "post
release" update). Perhaps upstream could be convinced to build against
"3.5.2.v_981_R35x
Andrew Eisenberg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The problem here is likely in the way that the Ubuntu Eclipse package is
> created. Groovy-Eclipse uses a feature patch for jdt.core, which means
> that we need to overwrite the original org.eclipse.jdt.core bundle with
> our version. Now, in most distros of Ecl
Hi
This bug has been fixed on our VCS - with the next upload, our eclipse-
wrapper will inject the galileo update site if (and only if) ~/.eclipse
does not exist. Old users will have to add it manually via the eclipse
update menu (or remove their ~/.eclipse/ before starting eclipse).
Thank you fo
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Niels Thykier (niels-thykier)
--
eclipse source package provides libswt* binary packages that would conflict
with swt-gtk
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Hi
I agree with you that eclipse ought to have "per-user" configurations
and even if eclipse does not support it out of the box, it can be done
with just (shell) scripting[1]. Nevertheless, we recently received a
similar question on the Debian-java list [2], where a maintainer wanted
to add an arg
scription.
* Added missing ${misc:Depends}.
* Set source "1.3" for the java-doc generation to deal javadoc errors.
* Added myself to uploaders.
* Converted to 3.0 (quilt) source.
* Updated the build to recognize "test-all" as a test rather than a
build target.
-- N
Hi
According to your bug report, eclipse was terminated by signal 5; which
I believe translates to "SIGTRAP". To the best of my knowledge, this
signal is only used for debugging purposes. Can you reproduce this crash
reliably? Also are there any logs from eclipse (e.g.
$WORKSPACE/.metadata/.log) ?
** Changed in: eclipse-cdt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Niels Thykier (niels-thykier)
--
Upgrade eclipse-cdt to 6.0.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/163739
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
Hi Ash
Yes, this bug is still in 3.5.1+repack~1-0ubuntu3, since we did not fix
it until 3.5.1+repack~3-0ubuntu2. If you can reproduce this in
3.5.1+repack~3-0ubuntu2 (after having removed/renamed your ~/.eclipse)
then please reopen it.
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confi
Closing the debian side as well (had been closed for a while)
~Niels
** Changed in: jetty (Debian)
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: jetty (Debian)
Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #452586 => None
** Changed in: jetty (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
JSP pages
Hi
This bug seems to have been fixed in an NMU upload of javatar on the
16th of June 2008[1], which was included in intrepid.
~Niels
[1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/javatar/news/20080616T181706Z.html
** Changed in: javatar (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
jar contains no cla
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 123064 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 123064
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
--
Old version of eclipse in repository
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/186634
You received this bug notification because you
Hi
Based on the latest posts in this report I have closed this bug as
invalid in eclipse (and notified upstream eclipse that we are closing
this bug).
I used invalid as status because the bug appeared to have been in New
Wave and no changes were done in eclipse to fix this (at least not in
any Ub
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
Upgrade to Eclipse 3.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/123064
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu
java-gcj-compat is to the best of my knowledge deprecated in favor of
default-jre which eclipse 3.4.1-1 depends and therefore I consider this
bug as fixed.
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Eclipse should require java-gcj-compat
https://bugs.la
We will try to get this fixed in eclipse 3.5.0-1
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Niels Thykier (niels-thykier)
--
"eclipse" package needed for /usr/bin/eclipse, lo
Firefox is not a dependency of eclipse 3.4.1-1 and thus this bug should
be fixed.
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
eclipse-platform unnecessarily requires firefox
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191586
You received this bug notification because
We will try to fix this in eclipse 3.5.0-1
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: MOTU Java Growers (motujava) => Niels Thykier (niels-thykier)
--
[Reopened] [Dapper] Eclipse startup script should r
ng 36534 turns out to give more problems, we will implement this one
instead.
~Niels
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eclipse/+bug/36534
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Niel
We will get this into 3.5.0-1.
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Niels Thykier (niels-thykier)
--
eclipse-package misses org.eclipse.jdt.apt.core
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Hi
The jar file attached by nh2 only works for x86 machines - amd64 needs a
different one. Nevertheless, we will look into backporting the patch for
this problem from eclipse 3.6 - I hope (but cannot promise) that we can
get it backported to Karmic (or into proposed-updates)
~Niels
--
Eclipse S
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 471859 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471859
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 471859
installs broken symlinks
--
Eclipse entry in taskbar shows no icon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493920
You received this bug notification because y
Hi
Thank you for your bug report and for helping making eclipse in Ubuntu
better. The short story is "only -vm is supposed to work" and the
manpage is out of date.
The use of JAVA_HOME and .eclipse/eclipserc were Debian/Ubuntu
workarounds since /usr/bin/java (at that time usually gcj) tended to
g
Hi
I think this is a duplicate LP #471859.
~Niels
--
Eclipse entry in taskbar shows no icon
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/493920
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.co
Hi seasoned_geek
First of all; thank you for reporting this bug and your following effort
on tracing down the problem. I do appreciate that; most of our users
would have stopped at the first problem without as much as even
considering to report it. So truly thank you for that.
I have not actually
I believe that this bug has also been filed against Debian as 551091 [1]
~Niels
[1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551091
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #551091
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551091
--
Eclipse can't find catalina.policy and boots
d in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Niels Thykier (niels-thykier)
--
installs broken symlinks
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/471859
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
We have committed a fix for this problem in our repository[1] - this
will be fixed with next upload to Ubuntu.
~Niels
[1]
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse.git;a=commit;h=972c2d6e36ec277036833c83e1d6d415712b49a9
-- and --
http://git.debian.org/?p=pkg-java/eclipse.git;a=commit;h=d63c27df
Anton Danilchenko:
Try installing eclipse-pde as well - it is required for most plug-in
installations.
~Niels
--
Unable to Install any plugins - 3.5.1+repack~1-0ubuntu1 on Karmic
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477944
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Adrian Wilkins wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: eclipse
>
> Updated to eclipse-3.5.2-2ubuntu2 today.
>
> Running Lucid x86_64
>
> The first symptom I noted was that any content assist popups would crash
> the IDE. The IDE turns grey. It isn't consuming CPU time.
>
> Sinc
Adrian Wilkins wrote:
> If given a fresh workspace, it crashes before anything is written to
> this file.
>=20
Okay - different approach. Try starting eclipse with
-debug -consoleLog
Hopefully that will give some output.
~Niels
--
Eclipse broken by latest update
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Dylan Taylor wrote:
> Still an issue in Lucid x86_64... :(
>
Hi
This was fixed in eclipse (3.5.1+repack~3-0ubuntu2) - the update sites
will be injected if (and only if) ~/.eclipse does *not* exist when you
start eclipse. This is usually only the case if you never used eclipse
before on the machi
Gabe Gorelick wrote:
> Are you using the version of eclipse from the Ubuntu repository? If so,
> do you still encounter this error on Karmic or Lucid beta?
>
> ** Package changed: ubuntu => eclipse (Ubuntu)
>
> ** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
Hi
It appears
Hi
We have a committed a change set to our repository to fix this. You can
read the new descriptions here[1]; please let us know if you feel they
are inadequate.
NB: This change is currently expected to go into the release after
Lucid; we may decide to back-port it into Lucid itself.
~Niels
[1]
Scott Grant wrote:
> ** Attachment added: "hs_err_pid15711.log"
>http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44389299/hs_err_pid15711.log
>
Hi
Your log shows that swt libraries has been extracted to your
~/.eclipse[1], which is likely to cause crashes (e.g.) when we update
eclipse to a new upstream versio
Célio Cidral Junior wrote:
> I'm experiencing this problem too in a fresh install of Lucid beta2 with
> all updates done until now. Even disabling A.T. and setting
> GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1 don't fix the problem. Eclipse freezes soon at the
> splash screen when it's showing the message "Loading work
Célio Cidral Junior wrote:
> ** Attachment added: "hs_err_pid2685.log"
>http://launchpadlibrarian.net/44631974/hs_err_pid2685.log
>
Thanks,
Looking at the log, I can see that you are using a local eclipse and not
the one from Ubuntu. We cannot support versions of eclipse that we have
not upl
Victor Costan wrote:
> @madmed, @joshcody: I'm actually using the Aptana stuff for my work, so
> uninstalling isn't a solution. If I have to choose between Lucid and the
> RadRails plugins, I'll drop Lucid.
>
Could you try to add
-Dswt.library.path=/usr/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/
Victor Costan wrote:
> For the sake of completeness, here is the output of the find command:
> /usr/lib/eclipse/configuration/org.eclipse.osgi/bundles/144/1/.cp/libswt-xulrunner-gtk-3557.so
>
Just to be certain (because I failed to specify it), the
-Dswt.library.path should be added after a line
nanouck wrote:
> Hello Tiago,
>
> i've got the same issue with osgi, i've got the following traces
>
> !ENTRY org.eclipse.osgi 2 0 2010-04-22 12:29:34.096
> !MESSAGE One or more bundles are not resolved because the following root
> constraints are not resolved:
> !SUBENTRY 1 org.eclipse.osgi 2 0
peterkirn wrote:
> Yes. I believe eclipse-pde is installed automatically with eclipse-jdt.
> Note, as well, that after removing the Ubuntu package, the package from
> eclipse.org works perfectly. These issues appear to be introduced by the
> Ubuntu package. (In fact, why shouldn't the Ubuntu packag
Hi
Most JVMs (including Oracle/Sun's java and openjdk-6) have more than one
variant. For instance openjdk-6 ships a server variant (see man java or java
-help), which makes the JVM assume that will be run for "long periods of time".
It also has a client variant that attempts to reduce start-up
Hi
I am closing this bug as invalid, since it has expired. Also should this
particular problem reappear, please report to the particular JVM
(probably one providing /usr/bin/java via alternatives) and not java-
common.
~Niels
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Inva
Hi
I am closing this as invalid[1]. In general, programs should work
without requiring a particular environment variable is set. Secondly it
is impossible for update-java-alternatives to update the variable of any
running terminal or X11 session. Also, as I recall, messing with
/etc/environment is
Hi
First of, the policy Matthias Klose refers to is the Debian Policy[1]
(see paragraph 9.9).
Boris Devouge wrote:
> But this is Java ... not really directly relating to debian packages
> policies, no?
> Majority of java apps (read enterprise software) require it to be set, and it
> will be nic
Hi
I am reclosing this as invalid; it was reopened without a comment 1 and
a half year ago and there has been no updates since. If this can be
reproduced in the current version of java-common, please reopen it.
~Niels
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
**
Hi
This is not limited to java-common but a lot of other packages - perhaps
your mirror has corrupted packages? Do you still have this issue?
~Niels
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
package java-common (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: cannot ac
Hi
The problem is/was that another package failed to upgrade:
dpkg: error processing ca-certificates-java (--configure):
subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1
I do not know if it is still present, but I am reassigning it to the
correct package.
~Niels
** Package ch
Hi
I think this belongs to openjdk-6 or perhaps netbeans.
~Niels
** Package changed: java-common (Ubuntu) => openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
--
fatal error detected by java runtime environment on svn activity in netbeans
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557686
You received this bug notification because you
Hi
I cannot reproduce this problem with my Firefox. Mind you, I use Debian,
so it might be a fix that has not reached Ubuntu. Which java provides
your java plugin?
~Niels
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
pingtest.net packet loss test fails
https://bugs.l
Vadim Dmitriev wrote:
> Fixed in latest eclipse 3.6 RC2: https://bugs.eclipse.org/309907
>
Hi
I have tried to backport this to the eclipse in Ubuntu and have uploaded
modified versions of eclipse to the team PPA[1].
If you decide to test if this patch work, please remember to test with a
"clean
Michele Costantino Soccio wrote:
> Tried the 3.6RC2 of Eclipse and the problem is _not_ fixed.
>
Hi
If you downloaded that 3.6RC2 from eclipse.org, then please report your
result directly to the upstream bug so they are aware of it and can
revise their solution. There is a link to it in this rep
Felix Yan wrote:
> apport information
>
> ** Tags added: apport-collected
>
> ** Description changed:
>
> After a latest upgrade, when I started eclipse, the splash window
> appeared and then, when the progress bar showed, the background of the
> splash window went black, and after loading
deader69 wrote:
> Niels,
>
> Any workaround? Can I install an older version of ibm.icu?
> If so, how?
>
Hi again
You *may* be able to install an older version by downloading it from [1]
and putting it in /usr/lib/eclipse/plugins/ - (close eclipse before
doing this).
> Seems like I can install
Will wrote:
> I see this also in 10.04, In fact eclipse is pretty un-useable with an
> apparently random crash every other minute. Doesn't seem to matter if I
> use sun-java or openjdk its just really unstable. Attached openjdk error
>
> ** Attachment added: "hs_err_pid18828.log"
>http://launc
Launchpad Bug Tracker wrote:
> You have been subscribed to a public bug:
>
> $ cat /etc/lsb-release
> DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
> DISTRIB_RELEASE=10.04
> DISTRIB_CODENAME=lucid
> DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 10.04 LTS"
>
> Eclipse
>
> a) SpringSource Tool Suite
> Version: 2.3.0.RELEASE
> Build
Hi,
The missing default software site was fixed in 3.5.2-1 which is already
in Lucid and Maverick (see below). It has also been backported to
Karmic. I believe it was in fact fixed before in Ubuntu, since Ubuntu
saw some pre-releases of the Debian eclipse package.
The reason why you do not have t
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click on t
We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need
to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments.
Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't
hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report
you can click on t
@Alexey Kotlyarov
Hi
We recently uploaded a new package to the PPA with another patch; does
that fix the Ruby/DLTK issue? If not then we need to forward this issue
upstream.
~Niels
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Incomplete
--
eclipse: tooltips unreadable
https://bu
Hi
Looking at
eclipse/plugins/org.eclipse.team.cvs.core/src/org/eclipse/team/internal/ccvs/core/client/Command.java
(in the source package) heavily suggests that it indeed uses the
command-line CVS. Particularly have a look at the method:
private String constructCommandInvocationString(IPath comm
Hi
This was fixed in java-common 0.36, which is available in Maverick.
Older versions (Lucid and Karmic) are still affected.
~Niels
** Changed in: java-common (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
incorrect path to jinfo file when doing "update-java-alternatives -list"
https://
Hi
default-jre-headless provides a default-java symlink in /usr/lib/jvm
which is the "default java" for Debian and Ubuntu systems. Alternatively
you can probably use a mix of readlink -f + dirname to find the
JAVA_HOME for the current system (assuming there is no other java in
path).
There has al
Hi again and sorry for the late reply,
That is an interesting experiment. :)
Getting java installed by default is not likely to happen. Java runtimes are
not exactly "cheap" space-wise and a lot of setups do not need it. Technically
it is possible to rename the packages themselves, but it is no
On 2010-06-06 10:05, Victor Costan wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: eclipse
>
> The easiest way to reproduce: create a new Java project, then create a
> new class with the "public static void main" option checked off. After
> the file opens, move the cursor to the line with
Jarkko Lietolahti wrote:
> This same issue seems to bother all SWT based applications (like
> Azureus/Vuze). But running Vuze you get a little bit more verbose 1)
> error message which actually helped me to find a temporary solution.
>
> For me the solution which makes Eclipse work again (until th
deader69 wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: eclipse
>
> Trying to install Android plugins, but cannot satisfy it's package
> requirements.
>
> Seems the android plugin requires wst, which requires jem, which
> requires com.ibm.icu.
>
> Not sure what packages I need from what
** Summary changed:
- Make installing software easier
+ Make installing software easier (karmic)
--
Make installing software easier (karmic)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/533448
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 460944 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460944
Hi
We have fixed this for eclipse Lucid; I cannot remember if it was done
in time for the Karmic upload or not. If this has already made into
Karmic; this bug will be closed when I have digged out the changel
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 460944 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/460944
What the h*** am I talking about, you are on a lucid system and your
particular version is fixed.
Please see #460944, which I am making this a duplicate of.
~Niels
** Summary changed:
- Make installing so
Hi
Upstream has declared that this is "expected behavior" and have no
intention of changing this (see [1]). I am closing this report on the
Ubuntu side as we do not have interest in differing from upstream with
this (using as invalid, as it was the most appropriate I could find).
If you still wa
Hi
I have not heard anything on this since my request 2009-10-12; I have
not experienced this issue myself and as of such I will close this bug
as invalid (considering it expired). If anyone can still reproduce this
particular issue in the latest version of eclipse, please post so (or
open a new b
Hi
I have not heard anything on this for nearly two months, Sampi, have you
had a chance to test if eclipse is still affected by this?
If I have not heard from anyone able to reproduce this issue soon (14
days give or take), I will close this bug as invalid/expired.
~Niels
--
SCIM disturbs key
Hi
This bug has been fixed in Lucid (the coming release of Ubuntu), however
Karmic (9.0) has been frozen for quite a while, so I am not certain I
can do much about it in Karmic; I will have ask my co-maintainer the
possibility of back-porting eclipse 3.5.2 to karmic.
~Niels
** Tags added: karmi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 528324 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528324
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 528324
eclipse crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
--
Eclipse crashes intermittently when interacting with the UI
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531315
You r
Hi
Based on the information provided it looks like you are using eclipse
3.2.2, which is badly outdated. I recommend upgrading to eclipse 3.5.1
(which will require that you upgrade your system to Ubuntu Karmic/9.10).
If you upgrade, you may have to remove or rename your ~/.eclipse, as
older versio
As I forgot to mention the logs; for starters check
$workspace/.metadata/.log (where $workspace is your eclipse workspace)
and also look for files named "hs_err_pid.log" (where is a
number) in your home folder - they may not be there (they usually only
appear if the JVM crashes).
Hopefull
** Summary changed:
- eclipse looses focus when tool tip windows disappear
+ eclipse (w. SCIM) looses focus when tool tip windows disappear
** Tags added: scim
--
eclipse (w. SCIM) looses focus when tool tip windows disappear
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378228
You received this bug notifica
Hi
I believe that Tristan Tarrant is right and this is caused by a broken
xulrunner - see #531719 [ 1] for more information (and a ppa with a
possibly functional version of xulrunner).
~Niels
[1]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xulrunner-1.9.1/+bug/531719
** Summary changed:
- eclip
sten wrote:
> Public bug reported:
>
> Binary package hint: eclipse
>
> 1) Ubuntu 9.10
> 2) I suspect eclipse-3.5.1+repack~1-0ubuntu3 ; although I'm not sure.
> * osgi.framework.version=3.5.1.R35x_v20090827, is the version used by the
> application that exposes this bug
>
> First, a link to th
Luke Maurer wrote:
> This also breaks Eclipse *as packaged by Ubuntu*, since the profiling
> tools require a native binary that gets linked against libstdc++5.
>
> So it's not even sufficient to avoid non-Ubuntu applications to be safe
> from the repercussions of this decision. Moreover, I suspect
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 528324 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528324
duplicate 528324
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 528324
eclipse crashes due to xulrunner
--
eclipse crashes when using code completion.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545608
You receiv
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 528324 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528324
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 528324
eclipse crashes due to xulrunner
--
eclipse crashed with signal 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/541502
You received this bug notification because yo
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 528324 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528324
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 528324
eclipse crashes due to xulrunner
--
java crashed with signal 5
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539718
You received this bug notification because you a
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Committed
--
Eclipse is closed together with Help
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529658
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
Hi
Yes, Karmic is known to be broken (see LP: #531376); however eclipse in
Lucid (3.5.2-2) should be fixed
~Niels
--
SIGSEGV error in OpenJDK
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/477615
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
Hi
According to the log, eclipse has loaded two different versions of
xulrunner libraries.
/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.2/libxpcom.so
/usr/lib/xulrunner-1.9.1.8/libxpcom.so
Please try with only one xulrunner installed (or try something like
eclipse -vmargs
-Dorg.eclipse.swt.browser.XULRunnerPath=/usr/
Right, I will cherry pick it then. I am reopening this and using it as a
tracker for the progress.
~Niels
status inprogress
assignee niels-thykier
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => In Progress
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigne
Hi
This bug has been fixed in eclipse 3.5.2 (Lucid, expected 10.04).
~Niels
status fixreleased
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Eclipse is closed together with Help
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/529658
You received this bug notification becau
Ah, had not seen this was open for Karmic as well. Reclosing for Lucid.
~Niels
status fixreleased
assignee none
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
** Changed in: eclipse (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Niels Thykier (niels-thykier) => none (none)
*
Hi
@Rich: Your problem is that older versions of eclipse has extracted
shared libraries into your ~/.eclipse. This means eclipse will try to
use SWT from eclipse 3.4.1 or older which does not work with the current
xulrunner. Renaming or removing your ~/.eclipse should fix it, though we
also had ot
1 - 100 of 367 matches
Mail list logo
