Hi!
I have uploaded a new revision to Debian, so you can sync from it now
:-)
Best regards,
Nelson
--
pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250835
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
debian/patches/use-only-one-the.patch isn't necessary for version
6.4.3.2.dfsg1-1
The parallel building is broken on the buildds (but it works on my
machine). I need to investigate (see http://bugs.debian.org/496212).
About syncing it, probably you will have the same "problem" as us on Debian.
S
hardy and intrepid both have the same version of ImageMagick (so probably you
will see the same problem if you update your system).
Even using version 6.4.5.4 (Debian experimental) it seems that the problem is
still there. I will take a better look at it (and forward upstream, if
necessary).
**
*** This bug is a security vulnerability ***
Public security bug reported:
Binary package hint: optipng
Hi!
I have upload a new version of optipng to Debian unstable, fixing a security
vulnerability (Secunia Advisory SA32651).
Changes from 0.6.1-2 (jaunty) are small (see
http://lists.debian.o
** Attachment added: "Patch for CVE-2008-1096"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19939414/CVE-2008-1096.patch
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-1096
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
CVE-2008-1096
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/302102
You received this bug
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-5101
--
Sync optipng from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2008-5101
--
OptiPNG 0.6.2 (previous versions vulnerable to vulnerable to array-overflow
attacks)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296798
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 366961 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366961
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 366961
odt2txt starts automaticly, using 23% cpu doing nothing, after closing files
--
Tracker and odt2txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370756
You receive
On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 5:32 PM, Chris Cheney wrote:
> This is probably related to tracker indexing all of your files.
Then reassign it to tracker, please.
--
odt2txt starts automaticly, using 23% cpu doing nothing, after closing files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366961
You received this bug
Hi!
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 3:21 PM, hillwanderer
wrote:
> When I try running the identify command on DNG files, I get messages
> about PPM16 being deprecated. It looks as if the version of ImageMagick
> that is included is not compatible with the version of UFRaw and so is
> sending it an incorre
There is a workaround and upstream won't fix this:
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=12355&sid=54308c34dfbb41b6ec97646d91bb788c&p=40757#p40757
--
imagemagick: information disclosure from exif thumbnails
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/13516
You received this bug noti
Can I take a look at the .psd that made it crash, please? (as if I am
not wrong, it's calling "convert file.psd xmp:-"
--
Miro crashed in beta of Ubuntu 8.04.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/189588
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 11:48 AM, eniel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Unpacking libmagick10 (from
> .../libmagick10_7%3a6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1_i386.deb) ...
>dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
>dpkg: error processing
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libmagick10_7%3a6.3.7
Actually not a bug.
** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
imagemagick convert -composite option not working
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/221857
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
Duplicated of
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/graphicsmagick/+bug/246489;
already fixed.
** Changed in: graphicsmagick (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: imagemagick => graphicsmagick
Status: New => Fix Released
--
Installation erros while trying to install support packages for rmagick
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #455801
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455801
** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455801
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
ImageMagick conversion problem (GIF89a->
php-imagick needs to be rebuilt, not a problem with imagemagick.
** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #459874
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=459874
** Also affects: php-imagick (Debian) via
http://bugs.de
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #473529
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473529
** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=473529
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
identify reports every single EXIF tag a
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #491860
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491860
** Also affects: pngnq (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491860
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
https:/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 227631 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227631
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 227631
identify reports every single EXIF tag as empty
--
Imagemagick: identify -format "%[EXIF:string]" yields nothing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25079
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 250835 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250835
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 250835
pngnq crashed with SIGSEGV in strlen()
--
Segfault when running 'pngnq -V'
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250927
You received this bug notification b
Hi!
On 7/22/08, Cesare Tirabassi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for reporting this, since the fix is quite trivial I'd suggest we
> wait until this is fixed by debian and sync. If this will not be done
> before freeze we will make it as an ubuntu specific change.
I will be able to upload a f
Fixed upstream: http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-
server/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=12036
--
imagemagick display show wrong dimensions for JPEGs in visual image directories.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/43323
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a d
What is the version of ImageMagick that you are using, please? (you can
use "dpkg -l imagemagick")
--
mogrify says "No decode delegate for this image format"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268096
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Indeed ImageMagick depends on X stuff (you can see
http://bugs.debian.org/470671 and also our TODO list at
http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/pkg-gmagick/branches/experimental/debian/TODO?op=file&rev=0&sc=0).
It somebody wants to help us in getting a new ImageMagick without X
dependencies, we can be rea
Hi!
The fixed version (with parallel building) is available on Debian experimental.
About the fix for bug #178575, I will take a look at it (but I can't promise
that it will be fast)
You can search for this fix using
http://trac.imagemagick.org/browser/ImageMagick; I know that it has been
fixed
Hi!
On Fri, Aug 8, 2008 at 3:35 PM, Adam Williamson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No modern, F/OSS encoder that I've found seems to be able to understand
> .par files. They all expect you to just feed them a series of images
> direct on the command line, which is a completely different system. So
>
It's not a problem with apt-get nor with aptitude.
We have fixed this bug on Debian with graphicsmagick version 1.1.11-2:
* debian/control: ImageMagick's -dev packages have stopped providing
virtual, unversioned aliases, recently. Add explicit Conflicts and
Replaces on the versioned p
I have already forwarded a patch fixing all the duplicated words that I have
found.
See:
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=11764&sid=f83fd4d2ed8cf34c856007535cf944c3
It's already fixed upstream (and on Debian experimental).
--
Grammatical error in Keyboard Message
Hi!
Is it possible to you also send me the file that triggers this
problem, please? (north_berwick_colin_murray.jpg)
You can send me privately if you prefer.
Thank you!
Best regards,
Nelson
--
mogrify says "No decode delegate for this image format"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/268096
You re
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-0749
--
OptiPNG 0.6.2 (previous versions vulnerable to array-overflow attacks)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/296798
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
-
** CVE added: http://www.cve.mitre.org/cgi-
bin/cvename.cgi?name=2009-0749
--
Sync optipng from Debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297440
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:25 AM, moma wrote:
> The current ImageMagick version in Jauntu is 6.4.5. It is BUGGY and
> HOPLESSLY old.
Even the latest version is buggy. That is why upstream keeps releasing
new versions.
> Ubuntu users have hard time when participating on the ImageMagick forums
> be
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 5:38 AM, Giovanni Condello wrote:
> Imagemagick 6.5.0 should packaged in Jaunty, since our version is 80+ patches
> old. One bug, for instance, is this:
> http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1105865
> (error while rotating a simple .gif)
Yes, we all know.
Somebody al
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 348862 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/348862
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 348862
Ubuntu 9.04: Expecting an important patch for ImageMagick.
--
[needs packaging] Imagemagick 6.5.0
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350154
You received
Confirmed and forwarded to
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=13441
Thanks!
** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Convert goes into infinite malloc loop while converting buggy djvu files
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351743
You rec
The user is trying to install ImageMagick by hand (and not using the
distro package).
** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
** bug changed to question:
https://answers.edge.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/imagemagick/+question/43857
--
ImageMagick-6.4.3 installation
Almost sure that this is a problem in Tracker.
--
Tracker and odt2txt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/370756
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.c
We fixed this bug on Debian with pngcrush 1.6.4-2.
Nelson
--
pngcrush not compiled with itxt or text support
https://launchpad.net/bugs/32234
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #455801
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455801
** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=455801
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
identify command requires mpeg2decode
ht
Reassigning to sim
** Changed in: sim (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: sim4 => sim
--
sim on kde4 not show icons
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224998
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
Hi!
Are you sure that it was working with version 6.2.4.5?
I have tested it here and it outputs the same message, even with Debian's
6.4.0.9
I couldn't find something similar at http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/compose/
(using convert input1 -composite input2 -composite outpt)
Using
convert im
Hi!
On Fri, Apr 25, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Yuzem <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have tested it here and it outputs the same message, even with Debian's
> > 6.4.0.9
> > I couldn't find something similar at
> > http://www.imagemagick.org/Usage/compose/ (using convert input1 -composite
> > input2 -co
I can confirm this on Debian, with libgtk2.0-0 from experimental
(version 2.11.6, while with version 2.10.13 it builds without any
problem).
Will it helps if I upload a new revision to Debian and then you sync it
to Ubuntu?
--
[FTBFS] gdpc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136973
You received this
I am working on it
** Changed in: gdpc (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nelson A. de Oliveira
Status: New => In Progress
--
[FTBFS] gdpc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136973
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug conta
Hi!
I have uploaded a new revision to Debian.
In about 3 to 4 hours it should be available on Debian mirrors (and then it can
be synced to Ubuntu).
Best regards,
Nelson
** Changed in: gdpc (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
[FTBFS] gdpc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136
Hi!
Actually imagemagick isn't available on unstable. We have uploaded to
experimental :-)
--
Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110178
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact
Because there is a soname bump, and we need to ask and coordinate about
this transition with the Debian release team.
--
Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110178
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
OK
Uploaded to unstable:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/imagemagick/news/20080213T030203Z.html
A rebuild of the packages showed that two will fail to build with the new
version of imagemagick: dx and vips.
--
Please sync imagemagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 from debian unstable
https://bugs.launchpad
This bug has been fixed on ImageMagick 7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-1 on Debian
(7:6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1 on Ubuntu).
** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
composite doesn't
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/30292
You received this bug notification because you are a me
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #470671
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470671
** Also affects: imagemagick (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=470671
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
imagemagick depends on x stuff
https://b
Argh... sorry for the click on this button :-/
It doesn't affect OpenOffice.
Sorry
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #409225
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409225
** Also affects: python-central (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=409225
I
Take a look at http://bugs.debian.org/465526 to see why we have disabled
HDRI support in ImageMagick.
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #465526
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=465526
--
Missing --enable-hdri
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573715
You received this bug no
Not a problem in imagemagick.
But try to remove
/var/cache/apt/archives/libmagick10_7%3a6.3.7.9.dfsg1-2ubuntu1.1_i386.deb (it's
inoffensive to remove the file), "apt-get update" (or "aptitude update", or use
Synaptic, etc) and do your upgrade process again.
--
Broken libmagick Package in Updat
Since the SVG coder is on libmagickcore3-extra, do you really need to
keep diverging the package from our (Debian) version and not build-
depending on librsvg?
--
Merge imagemagick 7:6.6.0.4-2 (main) from Debian testing (main)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/408119
You received this bug notificat
On my Debian unstable system, odt2txt properly works with the attached
file.
With pt_BR.UTF-8, de_DE and de_DE.UTF-8 I can see "Voß" without any problems
(running both "odt2txt odt2txt_bugreport_example.ods" and "odt2txt --raw
odt2txt_bugreport_example.ods").
With LC_ALL=C I see "Voss" instead "
What is the output of "mogrify -version", please?
--
mogrify -flatten mentioned in manpage but not recognised
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430634
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
Maxime Doyen, will we be able to schedule a payment for split transactions?
Example: I buy something with my credit card and it will be paid (split) for
the next 10 months.
For the next 10 months then we will have a total payment with this 1/10 of the
bought thing already included on it.
Will we
Actually not.
It only means that it was compiled with NDEBUG defined.
** Changed in: pngquant (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306426
Title:
png
Or NDEBUG isn't defined :-)
fprintf(fd, "pngquant, %s, by Greg Roelofs, Kornel Lesinski.\n"
#ifndef NDEBUG
" DEBUG (slow) version.\n"
#endif
But anyway, it's only a message.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Right, the asserts :-)
Good catch.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1306426
Title:
pngquant is distributed in "SLOW (debug) version"
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
It was fixed in Debian unstable. Thanks for spotting this, uqbar.
** Also affects: pngquant (Debian)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: pngquant (Debian)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #645277
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645277
** Also affects: sqsh (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=645277
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #635075
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635075
** Also affects: zoneminder (Debian) via
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=635075
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification becaus
Actually it doesn't fail to build, but gives only a warning at the end:
=
Function `gdk_gc_new' implicitly converted to pointer at drawatoms.c:63
Our automated build log filter detected the problem(s) above that will
likely cause your package to segfault on architectures where the size of
a
Hi!
Note that there is no "imagemagick" command.
The binaries available from the imagemagick package are:
/usr/bin/import
/usr/bin/conjure
/usr/bin/compare
/usr/bin/convert
/usr/bin/mogrify
/usr/bin/composite
/usr/bin/display
/usr/bin/stream
/usr/bin/identify
/usr/bin/animate
/usr/bin/montage
Tr
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Scott Ritchie wrote:
> In terms of file size, gnome-exe-thumbnailer is about 150k, imagemagick is
> 100k, and icoutils is 200k, for a combined CD impact of just under half a
> megabyte.
Note that imagemagick also depends on libmagickwand3 (compressed
package siz
** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
** Changed in: imagemagick (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Missing --enable-hdri
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573715
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
68 matches
Mail list logo
