Dustin,
it's still not fixed. Guests not using virtio have flaky network
connection. I need them to work, so I converted them to use virtio. Now
they work, for me, but the problem is not fixed, merely worked around.
--
kvm guests not using virtio for networking lose network connectivity
https://
** Changed in: system-cleaner (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Duplicate shortcut keys for Cleanup and Close
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/311557
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
** Changed in: system-cleaner (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Better description(s) needed for cleanup actions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300354
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Yes, Debian forbids the changelog from being a symlink, while Ubuntu
doesn't. I removed the "invalid" status because of this. (What's the
point of asking a question and immediately marking the bug as invalid,
before anyone has had a chance to answer?)
** Changed in: lintian (Ubuntu)
Status:
Oh, my error: I misread, you did indeed use incomplete. My apologies.
To expand on my answer: it is not clearly documented in Debian, but
lintian is correct in that symlinking the changelog file to another
package is treated as a bug in Debian: a changelog is a required part of
each package, and s
I concur with Michael that it looks like a hardware problem: either a
temporary problem with the CD, or possibly with the hard disk. I
disagree with Michael that it makes sense to copy files to the hard disk
first: that slows down the upgrade, and introduces problems related to
available disk space
Scott, sorry to see you've had to reopen this twice already. Let me
surprise you by not closing it. :)
It strikes me that this bug should be easy to reproduce, if one has a
system one is willing to risk: start the dist-upgrade, then turn off the
computer in the middle of it. Anyone willing to do t
This would actually make a fine computer-janitor plugin, now that
update-manager uses them. It's too late for jaunty, but we can put in
early in the karmic cycle, if Michael finds that acceptable.
--
run apt-get autoclean after upgrade
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/109765
You received this bug
I note that one of the lines in /proc/mounts has 7 fields instead of 6:
//winserv/CD\040Masters /mnt/shares/cd_masters cifs
rw,mand,nosuid,nodev,noexec,unc=\\winserv\CD
Masters,username=dtjl,domain=,rsize=16384,wsize=57344 0 0
The problem here is that the options field embeds a space
("unc=\\wins
** Summary changed:
- ValueError: too many values to unpack (DistUpgradeControler.py stack trace)
+ /proc/mounts has lines with embedded spaces, update-manager doesn't
understand them
--
/proc/mounts has lines with embedded spaces, update-manager doesn't understand
them
https://bugs.launchpad.
The current update-manager code has this in file
DistUpgrade/DistUpgradeCache.py, method checkFreeSpace. It now ignores
any /proc/mounts lines it can't parse (that do not have exactly six
space-delimited fields).
--
/proc/mounts has lines with embedded spaces, update-manager doesn't understand
t
I've verified that /etc/mtab correctly encodes a mount option that
contains spaces, but it seems that /proc/mounts does not. /proc/mounts
does encode a mount point or device with spaces so it would seem logical
the same encoding could be used for mount options.
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
This bug happened in the edgy-feisty timeframe, but no-one else seems to
have had it. I'm told the Qt frontend to update-manager was a bit flaky
then, so it was probably a bug that has since been fixed. I would like
to mark this as "probably fixed by now", but Launchpad only supported
"invalid".
e
enzito75,
hi, you reported a bug about upgrading Ubuntu in 2007. Have you still
had the problem? The log files you reported don't seem to have been
useful in tracking down the problem, and no-one else seems to have the
same problem. It was also a long time ago, for Ubuntu development.
Because of
This bug does not contain enough useful information to debug it. It has
also been almost two years since it was reported, and no-one else seems
to have had the problem. Thus, I suspect it was either a temporary
problem, or it has since been fixed in some way. I therefore close the
bug. Unfortunatel
/dev/loop\040nolla /home/liw/update-manager/foo\040bar iso9660
rw,loop=/dev/loop\040nolla 0 0
That's how the line looks in mtab. Unfortunately, I couldn't figure out
a way to get the option into /proc/mounts myself.
--
/proc/mounts has lines with embedded spaces, update-manager doesn't understan
I used a virtual machine to test this.
The machine initially had a current intrepid on it. I started the
upgrade to jaunty (update-manager -d), and killed the virtual machine
while it was installing packages. After rebooting the VM and logging in,
the update-notifier informed me the system was bro
This bug hasn't had any discussion in about 16 months, and there's been
a couple more Ubuntu releases since. Do the problems still occur?
--
Prerequisites download fails if gpg authentication fails on over-aggressive
caches
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/144920
You received this bug notificatio
It looks to me, from a quick analysis of the log files, that this was a
temporary problem with some packages in the beta version of gutsy. The
bug has no duplicates, and there doesn't seem to be other similar bugs
open. Thus, I suspect it was fixed since.
--
upgrade from feisty to gutsy beta erro
Since Michael Vogt agreed on IRC with my analysis, I'll close the bug.
Because the only relevant bug state Launchpad allows is "invalid",
that's what I'm going to use, even though the bug certainly was valid
when it was reported.
TimArbuckle, if you disagree with my analysis, please re-open the bu
Since Michael Vogt (update-manager maintainer) agreed on IRC with my
analysis, I'll mark the bug as fixed. TimArbuckle, if you disagree,
please change the state, or ask me, and I'll gladly do it for you.
** Changed in: update-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
upgrade f
What do you mean by the upstream link?
If you mean the Homepage: header in debian/control, I'll add one after I
have a homepage for the program. The current Launchpad page will change
soon anyway.
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
add upstream link
ht
The judgement of computers cannot ever be fully relied on...
I'm not sure which wording would be better. I would like it if people
who don't know what they do would not accidentally remove packages by
mistake, and thus I chose a fairly severe wording.
I'll be happy to reconsider the wording for k
Huygens, as far as I know and can see from the code, computer-janitor
does remove only the packages it shows. Could you send the
/var/log/dpkg.log file from your computer, and attach it to this bug?
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Computer Janitor wip
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
Please, use X-Ubuntu-Gettext-Domain=computerjanitor in
computer-janitor-gtk.desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/352770
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subs
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => In Progress
--
Computer Janitor wiped out most of my packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/345939
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
My best guess as to the reason for this bug is that the kernel
identifies some disks as "SEMB devices", whatever those are. See
drivers/ata/libata-core.c, function ata_dev_classify (line 1082 in
2.6.27):
if ((tf->lbam == 0x3c) && (tf->lbah == 0xc3)) {
printk(KERN_INFO "ata:
I realize that printing out those values wasn't altogether useful, now
that I look at the actual test code.
--
kernel does not recognize Western Digital Caviar SE WD3200AAJS 320GB 7200 RPM
SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive (2nd generation)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257790
You received this bug notif
Suggestion from IRC was to add "iommu=soft" to kernel command line.
This resulted in grub or the kernel booting right back to BIOS again. No
kernel messages were visible.
Same thing happens with ata_ignore_hpa=0.
(It's a normal 3.5 inch disk, not a laptop one, in case the hpa thing
refers to the
I made kernel modification that forces it to treat these "SEMB" devices
the same as ATAPI ones. Now my hard disk works: it shows up as a device,
and I can create and use filesystems on it.
if ((tf->lbam == 0x3c) && (tf->lbah == 0xc3)) {
#if 0
printk(KERN_INFO "ata: SEMB dev
I tested with ATA_DEV_ATA and the disk works with that, too.
--
kernel does not recognize Western Digital Caviar SE WD3200AAJS 320GB 7200 RPM
SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard Drive (2nd generation)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257790
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: computer-janitor
I would like to upload a new version of computer-janitor. This version
includes some string changes:
* Some files were missing from po/POTFILES.in, and not scanned for
strings. This adds some strings to the po files, but does not affect
Links to messages to -doc and -translators:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-doc/2009-April/012587.html
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-translators/2009-April/002288.html
--
Request for freeze exception for computer-janitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354529
You received thi
been updated with the description. (Closes: LP: #349653)
+ + * plugins/unsupported_plugin.py: Don't mark as cruft stuff that has
+ +installed reverse dependencies. (Closes: LP: #345939)
+ + * data/computer-janitor.desktop.in: Use the right translation
+ +domain. (Closes: LP: #352770)
A suspended computer doesn't use all that much power, even if uses some.
If I know I'm going to get power within a reasonably short time, there
is no point in forcing me to go through a very slow hibernation+resume
(up to several minutes, with a high probability of failure) when a
suspend (fairly f
The code in sysklogd, file ksym.c, seems to be looking for a symbol
Version_[0-9]+ in all System.map-$version files it knows. However, the
Ubuntu map files don't seem to include that symbol.
--
sysklogd cannot find map file
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/277924
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: metacity
I have focus mode in metacity set to strict. In intrepid, this meant
that new windows that popped up immediately would get focus, but if I
was doing something else they would not. A typical scenario is with the
browser: I might click on a link in
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25015078/Dependencies.txt
--
metacity new window has/hasn't focus usually wrong
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357688
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
My laptop has a 10.6 inch screen (1280*768). At home, I have a 22 inch
external screen (1680*1050) attached to it. gnome-display-properties
does not let me set things up so that the screens are mirrored, and the
resolution is set to t
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25015322/Dependencies.txt
--
gnome-display-properties doesn't let me use external monitor's full resolution
in mirror mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357694
You received this bug notification because you are a member
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 337241 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337241
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 337241
I do not want to remove '/'
--
computer-janitor actions are unclear
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355543
You received this bug notification because
I'm using the stock GTK+ list widget for this, and the default way in
which it works is that you have to select the actual tickbox once and
then moving up and down with arrow keys and ticking/unticking with space
works. I thought update-manager did the same thing, but now I see that
it's doing some
computer-janitor reports the error message it gets from dpkg, and it
handles and reports explicitly locking, too. (I just verified that.)
Sometimes package installs or (especially) removals fail silently, but
temporarily, because of maintainer scripts, and I suspect this was one
of those cases. I
Mirroring means, or used to mean and should mean, that the two screens
show the same thing. Before, the laptop screen would show only as much
as would fit into the top left corner of the full resolution. This is
good for me because when I unplug the external monitor, the screen has
useful stuff on
Public bug reported:
I have two identical monitors attached to my desktop machine. There does
not seem to be a way for me to tell GNOME that I want the panels on the
right monitor and not the left one. Sometimes it puts them on one,
sometimes on the other.
I tried to fix this by swapping the moni
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
Computer Janitor complains that package dash is missing
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/341002
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gscan2pdf
I have an HP Laserjet 3052 printer/scanner/fax. When scanning with
gscan2pdf on jaunty, using default settings, the image is distorted.
With the scanadf frontend (see Edit/Preferences) it works. scanadf works
on this printer even when not using
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25200683/Dependencies.txt
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: "Page scanned with scanimage.pl frontend"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25202187/scanimage.pl.pdf
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you
** Attachment added: "Same page scanned with scanadf frontend"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25202362/scanadf.pdf
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are
Both the above pages were scanned of the same page, with a huge hand-
written A on it. The scan quality is not great, but the shape of the
distorted page should be visible anyway.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Ricardo,
how did you get "update-manager" there? The source says
"computerjanitor".
** Summary changed:
- Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated (patch supplied)
+ Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're
The reason the translations are not used is because the GTK UI is
failing to call gettext in one place.
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
Ah, now I see: the file you patched belongs to update-manager-core. The
proper translation domain for that file is indeed update-manager, not
computerjanitor.
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
You received this bug notification be
Specifically, the problem is as follows:
* Part of the computer-janitor code is in the update-manager source
package. This is necessary so that u-m can use c-j plugins. This code
uses the "update-manager" translation domain.
* The rest of the computer-janitor code is in the computer-janitor
packa
Oh, and additionally some of the plugins in computer-janitor are using
the wrong gettext instance. I'll fix that as well.
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 361312 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361312
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 361312
Some strings shows untranslated, albeit they're translated
--
Mess
I have still not been able to reproduce this, even on real hardware. I
suspect it is computer-janitor-gtk doing something bad when starting up
that interferes with the interaction with the window manager, which
prevents the window manager from realizing that the window is already
up. I have no idea
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Released
--
Request for freeze exception for computer-janitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/354529
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
Missing files from POTFILES.in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351595
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
u
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
some english phrases aren't right I think
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342907
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
rumandfruit, does it still occur to you? If it does, could you attach
the output of the commands "dpkg --status dash" and "apt-cache policy
dash"?
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Incomplete
--
Computer Janitor complains that package dash is missing
https://bugs.lau
** Attachment added: "Full diff of all changes in new version"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25498439/diff.txt
--
Freeze exception for computer-janitor 1.12.1-0ubuntu3
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/361792
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
putting back the whole
description string again. (Closes: LP: #361312, #358354)
-- Lars Wirzenius Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:22:01 +0300
** Affects: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Freeze exception for computer-janitor 1.12.1-0ubuntu3
https
** Attachment added: "xrandr --query output"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25501169/xrandr.log
--
gnome-display-properties doesn't let me use external monitor's full resolution
in mirror mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357694
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
The above gnome-settings-daemon log is probably useless. I can't switch
modes (resolutions?) using fn-f7: this is a desktop machine, so no fn
key.
--
gnome-display-properties doesn't let me use external monitor's full resolution
in mirror mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357694
You received
** Attachment added: "(silly) gnome-settings-daemon log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25501201/gsd.log
--
gnome-display-properties doesn't let me use external monitor's full resolution
in mirror mode
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/357694
You received this bug notification because you are a
There is no libc6-v9v package (on amd64, in jaunty, as of today).
--
gcc-4.3 ftbfs if libc6-v9v is installed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/301356
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@
I'm now running jaunty. I haven't had a repeat of the bug since a while
now, even with flash installed. It used to happen every day, sometimes
many times a day. I suspect the bug has been fixed, unless whatever
triggered it no longer happens in my feeds. I'll let it be for a while,
but if no-body r
I can now reproduce it as well, using today's version of the live cd
(amd64). I have no idea what causes this, yet, and it's not important
enough to fix for jaunty, but I'll look into this for karmic.
--
computer-janitor opens two tasks when starting
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350286
You rec
I'll do the following:
* start gscan2pdf
* choose frontend
* scan the same piece of paper (at 75 dpi)
* save scan as ppm
* gzip ppm
* attach scan to this bug report
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You
** Attachment added: "scanadf"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25532987/scanadf-75.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
** Attachment added: "scanadf.pl"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25533006/scanadf-pl-75.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
** Attachment added: "scanimage"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25533021/scanimage-75.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
** Attachment added: "scanimage.pl"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25533027/scanimage-pl-75.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub
Summary of results:
- scanadf and scanimage frontends work OK
- scanadf.pl and scanimage.pl frontends don't work
I don't know if this is specific to the model of the scanner.
In case it matters: the scanner is not physically attached to the
computer, but to another computer, running Debian lenny
Works fine with scanadf and scanimage on the command line.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
The scanimage.pl and scanadf.pl commands also result in good scans from
the command line on the jaunty computer with scanner attached directly
to it.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this b
Also works fine with scanadf and scanimage on the command line when
scanner is attached directly to machine running jaunty.
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug notification because yo
On closer look, no they don't. scanadf.pl produces a slightly distorted
image from the command line when scanner is attached directly. Also over
the net.
Summary of results:
Works: scanner is attached to either machine, accessed locally or over
the net, using scanadf or scanimage.
Doesn't work:
** Description changed:
cvs checkout returns within the same second that the Entries files contain,
this
leads to missed commits, when scripts are performing operations on fast
machines.
+
+ ** See below for a test case. (Bug triagers especially: run the test
+ before changing status. This
The patch in the upstream bug
(http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11579) fixes my problem. In
order for me to use my disks, I'll need an installer that includes this
fix, though.
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #11579
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11579
--
ke
The images I've uploaded were scanned with gscan2pdf, which I've
configured to run unpaper. If I scan things from the command line,
there's still distortion, so unpaper is not relevant.
scanadf doesn't give me a setting for bit depth. It gives me --mode,
with options color, gray, and lineart. No d
** Attachment added: "scanadf.pl scan, grayscale, from command line"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25613620/scanadf-pl-jaunty-net-gray.pnm.lzma
--
gscan2pdf distorts image with scanimage.pl frontend, but works with scanadf
frontend
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358970
You received this bug
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25613299/Dependencies.txt
--
gnome-terminal opens tabs with wrong working directory when using man
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362880
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
Ubuntu version: up-to-date jaunty.
When I open a new tab in gnome-terminal (using shift-control-t), it
attempts to open the new tab int he same working directory as the old
one. If I am reading a manpage, the new tab opens up in /usr/share
scanadf.pl with lineart still distorts. A top-left partial scan (lineart
or color) doesn't distort, but since the distortion happens in bands,
that's not really conclusive. Since using scanadf works for me, I'm not
really motivated doing a few more dozen scans and inspecting them for
distortion, so
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: debian-installer
I tried to make a custom jaunty alternate ISO today, following
instructions at https://help.ubuntu.com/community/InstallCDCustomization
. The ISO I made works, except that it fails to get networking up
automatically. Colin Watson, a debia
Thank you for your bug report. Unfortunately, the word "Word" does not
carry enough detail for us to figure out what the problem is. The Ubuntu
Code of Conduct prevents us from treating Microsoft Word as a bug, out
of consideration for our esteemed competitors in Redmond. Thus, I am
marking this bu
carpediemtf,
at least the problem I am seeing is not related to Parted Magic
(whatever that is): my disks are brand new and completely empty. It is
also not related to all WD disks, some of my WD disks do work.
--
kernel does not recognize Western Digital Caviar SE WD3200AAJS 320GB 7200 RPM
SAT
When update-manager checks for updates, it downloads lists of packages
and stores them for the package manager to use. If it did not do this,
there would be no persistent memory of what happened during the check.
That would be bad, because the lists can be large, and it takes a while
to download th
phenest, yes, the white list needs to be automated. This requires
changes to dpkg, which did not happen during jaunty, unfortunately.
Computer-janitor can't automate it, also unfortunately.
--
System cleaner removes explicitly installed third-party packages
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/285746
I seem to have the same problem, with a WD Caviar SE WD2500AAJS drive.
The gutsy kernel works (for the disk), everything from hardy to jaunty
beta does not.
What can I do to help get this fixed?
--
kernel does not recognize Western Digital Caviar SE WD3200AAJS 320GB 7200 RPM
SATA 3.0Gb/s Hard D
phenest, the "residual config" was planned for jaunty, but didn't make
it, so it'll happen for karmic instead. It is a good idea, although not
entirely risk-less.
CJ already separates between 'local or obsolete' and 'autoremovable'.
Jan, changing gdebi to whitelist packages would be a nice first
Computer Janitor does not deal with only packages. It also deal with
configuration tweaks. A the moment there's not a whole lot of other
stuff than packages, but there will be more. Thus, I am afraid I'm going
to decline this.
--
Rename Computer Janitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350956
You
Marking as invalid, because that's the best option Launchpad gives me.
"Declined" would be better.
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Rename Computer Janitor
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/350956
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Hm, right. The way CJ is set up in Launchpad is messy, for various
historical reasons and my personal failures. I'll see this get fixed.
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
** Changed in: computer-janitor (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
Adi, thanks for the patch. Unfortunately, the "computerjanitor" domain
is wrong, and "computerjanitorapp" is right.
I already verified this (when I marked it confirmed), but now I can't
reproduce it again. One way or another, I'll get this fixed today. Sorry
for the delay.
--
[I18N] Wrong transl
Things seem a bit more complicated than I thought. computer-janitor code
is divided into two source trees: one part is in the update-manager tree
(so that u-m can use c-j plugins), and the other is in the computer-
janitor tree. When I set this up, I divided things so that the u-m part
used "comput
301 - 400 of 775 matches
Mail list logo
