[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-15 Thread Jerone Young
Here is a log for an initial startup. Looks like most of the time is spent powering up: Apr 15 14:12:50 laptop NetworkManager: (ttyACM0): powering up... Apr 15 14:13:24 laptop NetworkManager: (wlan0): supplicant connection state: completed -> associat Notice takes 34 seconds to power up.

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-15 Thread Jerone Young
Here is a log with a manual disconnect, then I reconnect. This is very fast to connect. ** Attachment added: "daemon.log" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25506907/daemon.log -- Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty https://bugs.laun

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-15 Thread Jerone Young
Actually nix that statement I made on the first post. I realized that that the power the next entry was for the wifi card. Apr 15 14:12:50 laptop NetworkManager: (ttyACM0): powering up... Apr 15 14:13:41 laptop NetworkManager: Associated with network: +COPS: 0,0,"AT&T",0 ... actually 51 se

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-15 Thread Jerone Young
Actually nix that statement I made on the first post. I realized that that the power the next entry was for the wifi card. Apr 15 14:12:50 laptop NetworkManager: (ttyACM0): powering up... Apr 15 14:13:41 laptop NetworkManager: Associated with network: +COPS: 0,0,"AT&T",0 ... actually 59 se

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-15 Thread Jerone Young
So it looks like the missing piece was in the kernel. This card has to allocate all it's memory via AGP. The intrepid kernel was missing AGP support: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=apw/ubuntu-jaunty.git;a=commit;h=4e8b6e25943a22036a6b704ebef634c7dec4c10e @jacyfan Ensure that you are usin

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-15 Thread Jerone Young
Well on the Lenovo x301 I have the f3507g is completely powered down till the initial bring up. Which is the long one. After that the device stays up and on the connecing a second time it works really quick. I think it would be the same on a reboot, as the card doesn't power down (you can tell by t

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-16 Thread Jerone Young
David Chen verified that the experiment did work! 1) So we now need to build an official Intrepid kernel with this patch: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=apw/ubuntu-jaunty.git;a=commit;h=4e8b6e25943a22036a6b704ebef634c7dec4c10e 2)Build an offical Intrepid xserver-xorg-intel driver with patch http:

[Bug 195608] Re: [Feature Request] enhance recipe format to allow specifying an existing partition

2009-04-16 Thread Jerone Young
Dell no longer has a use for this request with their current recovery solution. ** Changed in: dell Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: partman-auto (Ubuntu Hardy) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- [Feature Request] enhance recipe format to allow specifying an existing part

[Bug 120286] Re: [Feature Request] Allow Boot Modifications with Driver Updates

2009-04-16 Thread Jerone Young
No longer a valid use case for Dell at this point. ** Changed in: dell Status: Triaged => Invalid -- [Feature Request] Allow Boot Modifications with Driver Updates https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/120286 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-17 Thread Jerone Young
@lisaYue I must have copied the wrong link. I meant to post that patch link. Please try the kernel that David Chen posted. -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-17 Thread Jerone Young
@lisaYue I must have copied the wrong link. I meant to post that patch link. -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-17 Thread Jerone Young
Also wanted to note that the kernel linked by David Chen is in the proposed repository. -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-03 Thread Jerone Young
Which Intel graphics card is on this board? Can you post the output of "sudo lspci -vnn" ? -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-03 Thread Jerone Young
@Jason I read the logs. The reason you are seeing this is that the machine is using the "Vesa" video driver and not the intel video driver. The revision of the intel chip may not be in the database of supported intel chips in 8.10. Could you try out a Jaunty Live CD and see if you get the

[Bug 337236] Re: [Welch's]-Ubuntu8.10:Fn+F8 has no function in Ubuntu.

2009-04-06 Thread Jerone Young
Welch sends an acpi event. We handled in acpi-support package. ** Changed in: hotkey-setup (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- [Welch's]-Ubuntu8.10:Fn+F8 has no function in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/337236 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-06 Thread Jerone Young
@Jason This looks lot be a newer version of the Intel 4500 chip. The chip id may not be in the driver. Could you try out the Jaunty live CD .. you don't need to install it , you can see if comes up with the proper resolution in the Live Session. If that works it better helps narro

[Bug 287893] Re: Ericsson F3507g WWAN Card doesn't work with NetworkManager

2009-04-06 Thread Jerone Young
F3507g is support is now completely broken in Network Manger in Jaunty, as of April 5th. It no longer is listed in Network Manger. Last week it was listed but it would not activate the card. It was working through out Jaunty Alpha (just listing 4 instances), now lists no instances. This card is o

[Bug 287893] Re: Ericsson F3507g WWAN Card doesn't work with NetworkManager

2009-04-06 Thread Jerone Young
Just did a update and now it magically is working. So I must have been in between updates in Jaunty. @Robbie You your going to want to try the lastest updates as of 8pm CST. Something fixed the problem though I'm not sure what. -- Ericsson F3507g WWAN Card doesn't work with NetworkManager

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-10 Thread Jerone Young
Could you try adding the following to your /etc/X11/xorg.conf: Section "Device" Driver "intel" Option "DRI" "false" Option "Tiling" "false" EndSection Could you attach the logs. Also if this does not work. Can you first update your system with the latest kernel and all

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-10 Thread Jerone Young
@Jason If you are at a prompt. You can still update. To bring up networking (hooked up via ethernet): sudo ifconfig eth0 up sudo dhclient Then to update: sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get upgrade

[Bug 224229] Re: Quite hard to change screen resolution back to normal when resolution is set very low

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
I'm looking at behavior and it does not appear that Mike's patch is being applied in gnome-control-center - 1:2.26.0-0ubuntu2. I see it in the queue for the package. But the applet is not changed in anyway for smaller resolutions and still has the same issue. The applet still eat 571 vertical pixel

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
@Jason That means the intel driver failed to load and it then fell back to safe graphics mode. I'll see what more I can look into. It appears backporting support for the G41 is a lot more involved then expected. Will get back to you shortly. -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable

[Bug 360321] Re: [Regression] nm-applet extremely sluggish when reporting AP status in Jaunty

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "NM_network_status_Jaunty_not_smooth.ogv" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25307422/NM_network_status_Jaunty_not_smooth.ogv -- [Regression] nm-applet extremely sluggish when reporting AP status in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360321 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 360321] [NEW] [Regression] nm-applet extremely sluggish when reporting AP status in Jaunty

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
Public bug reported: nm-applet is extremely sluggish and not as responsive in Jaunty as it is in Intrepid. To show this I created videos on my Lenovo Thinkpad T61 with a 2ghz dual core Core 2 dou & Intel wireless 4965. I notice this on any machine running Jaunty though. ** Affects: network-manag

[Bug 360321] Re: [Regression] nm-applet extremely sluggish when reporting AP status in Jaunty

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "NM_network_status_intrepid_smooth.ogv" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25307457/NM_network_status_intrepid_smooth.ogv -- [Regression] nm-applet extremely sluggish when reporting AP status in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360321 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 336055] Re: Wifi driver fixes for age scan

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
@Tim When do you plan to put this fix into the so it tested out with our kernel? @Steve While yours does kick off a rescan the card still tries to connect to the old AP. I notice this in dmesg: [4253.476743] wlan0: direct probe to AP 00:21:55:b1:d9:01 try 1 [ 4253.676061] wlan0: direct

[Bug 356517] Re: NetworkManager does not detect eth0 on armel

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
When using 2.6.26 kernel provided by Freescale, NM detects the network device just fine. While they do compile the network driver into the kernel. Maybe that info can help some. -- NetworkManager does not detect eth0 on armel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356517 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 334964] Re: nm is not able to use Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
Thishas been resolved in jaunty. It does take up to 3 times trying to connect at times though. But it does work. ** Changed in: network-manager (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- nm is not able to use Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/334964 You receive

[Bug 360343] [NEW] Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: network-manager Network manager is not giving Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband Minicard Network Adapter enough time to fully initialize and make a connection to the 3G network. It looks to take about a minute for the card to completely initilized and then

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "Trying to connect 3G.ogv" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25327359/Trying%20to%20connect%203G.ogv -- Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360343 You received this bug notificatio

[Bug 360346] [NEW] [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: openoffice.org OpenOffice Wizards are not working even though package openoffice.org-java-common is installed. These are File->Wizards. I'm using openoffice version 1:3.0.1-9ubuntu2. ** Affects: openoffice.org (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Bug 360346] Re: [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "openoffice_wizards_no_work.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25327740/openoffice_wizards_no_work.png -- [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360346 You received this bu

[Bug 360346] Re: [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "openoffice_wizards_no_work2.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25327755/openoffice_wizards_no_work2.png ** Tags added: jaunty -- [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/36

[Bug 360346] Re: [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed

2009-04-12 Thread Jerone Young
I failed to mention that I am running all the latest update as of April 13 and I'm running on AMD64. -- [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360346 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
@jacyfan Hmm. According the the log it failed due to an error in the xorg.conf file. (==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/xorg.conf" Parse error on line 25 of section Device in file /etc/X11/xorg.conf This section must have an Identifier line. (EE) Problem parsing the config file I left ou

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
Ok I verified. It was because I left out the "Identifier" line in the stanza. Please try out the stanza in the post above and let me know what happens. -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You received this bug no

[Bug 360346] Re: [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 360120 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360120 That is odd. I have 2 seperate Jaunty installs that the wizards do not work. Let me try a fresh install on one today and see what happens. -- [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even wi

[Bug 356517] Re: NetworkManager does not detect eth0 on armel

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
Checked into this a little more. Guys from Freescale tried it out with our latest build. It's broken for that case now too. It seems that what I said is no longer true with the newest builds. It was this way till around early March with the monolithic Freescale kernel. Now this is nolonger the cas

[Bug 360346] Re: [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 360120 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360120 @Chris Looks like that is the case. after installing openjdk-6-jre things work. -- [Regression] Wizards not working in open office in Jaunty even with openoffice.org-java-common installed https://bugs

[Bug 356517] Re: NetworkManager does not detect eth0 on armel

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
** Also affects: oem-priority Importance: Undecided Status: New -- NetworkManager does not detect eth0 on armel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/356517 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list

[Bug 328167] Re: [arm] gnome-keyring-daemon eating 100% CPU at login in Jaunty

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
Verified fixed. ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => Fix Released -- [arm] gnome-keyring-daemon eating 100% CPU at login in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/328167 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- u

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
** Changed in: oem-priority Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: oem-priority Assignee: (unassigned) => Jerone Young (jerone) -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You received th

[Bug 358831] Re: [ARM] Pulse Audio eating up to much CPU

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
Freescale engineer is reporting pulse audio consumes 30%-40% CPU during video playback with latest build as of april 12 09. They have now removed pulse audio using aptitude, and are no longer using it. -- [ARM] Pulse Audio eating up to much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358831 You receive

[Bug 224229] Re: Quite hard to change screen resolution back to normal when resolution is set very low

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
Verified fix in now in 9.04 and applet works for 1024x576 displays. ** Changed in: oem-priority Status: New => Fix Released -- Quite hard to change screen resolution back to normal when resolution is set very low https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224229 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 358831] Re: [ARM] Pulse Audio eating up to much CPU

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
For ARM the reason this is important is that Pulse Audio eating significant CPU means less battery life for ARM based devices. So we need to minimize the CPU utilization of Pulse Audio on ARM. -- [ARM] Pulse Audio eating up to much CPU https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/358831 You received this bug

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
It looks like there is one more patch that needs to be added: http://cgit.freedesktop.org/xorg/driver/xf86-video- intel/commit/?id=4dd00681dd0f9fce8dfd4592b46418edbbd2eeb4 -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
Actually nevermind that patch was already in the source. @jacy fan @Jason Lee Please try the new xorg.conf entry that I have above. -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You received this bug notification beca

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-13 Thread Jerone Young
@jacyfan It looks like this is going to get way more involved. The driver can't seem to allocate video memory. (EE) GARTInit: Unable to open /dev/agpgart (No such file or directory) (WW) intel(0): /dev/agpgart is either not available, or no memory is available for allocation. Using pre-al

[Bug 338598] Re: [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution.

2009-04-14 Thread Jerone Young
@Jason That is the same error as in jacyfan log. But thanks for verifying. -- [West Lake] Ubuntu 8.10: System unable to detect optimized graphic resolution. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/338598 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-14 Thread Jerone Young
@Alex Yes. The device is not on initally. But on power up it takes about ... what I guess 30-40 seconds (need to measure this better) for the device itself to power up (about 7 seconds) and then connect to the Wireless network. But if I connected once, then disconnect. The device remains

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-14 Thread Jerone Young
@Alex Yes. The device is not on initally. But on power up it takes about ... what I guess 30-40 seconds (need to measure this better) for the device itself to power up (about 7 seconds) and then connect to the Wireless network. But if I connected once, then disconnect. The device remains

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-14 Thread Jerone Young
I've attached a log. I am connected to wifi access point "AustinJava". It took 3 tries this time to connect to the AT&T network. ** Attachment added: "Fresh startup trying to connect to AT&T network" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/25458172/nm.log.txt -- Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson

[Bug 360343] Re: Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty

2009-04-14 Thread Jerone Young
Actually the post above never actually gets a full connection. Looks like it's not getting a gateway. I'll try again later. -- Network Manager not giving 3G Ericsson F3507g Mobile Broadband enough time to initialize in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360343 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 224229] Re: Quite hard to change screen resolution back to normal when resolution is set very low

2009-03-30 Thread Jerone Young
With compiz on in Jaunty. Users can no longer use ALT+Left Mouse click to drag the "Display Prefrences" to see the rest of the applet that is cut off. Now it is impossible for users to actually use the app without cutting off compiz. Compiz is on by default. -- Quite hard to change screen resolut

[Bug 224229] Re: Quite hard to change screen resolution back to normal when resolution is set very low

2009-03-30 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "Display Prefences with 1024x576 screen" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24553512/1024_576_display_prefrences.png -- Quite hard to change screen resolution back to normal when resolution is set very low https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/224229 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 336055] Re: Wifi driver fixes for age scan

2009-03-30 Thread Jerone Young
Running kernel 2.6.28-11-generic with the iwlwifi driver with a 5350 card. This problem still exists now, from a fresh beta install with updates as of March 31. Network manager still tries to connect to a ghost network (that I last was connected to before suspending). ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu

[Bug 396716] Re: [ARM] default user audio goes to /dev/null

2009-07-07 Thread Jerone Young
** Summary changed: - default user audio goes to /dev/null + [ARM] default user audio goes to /dev/null -- [ARM] default user audio goes to /dev/null https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396716 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 397499] [NEW] Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release

2009-07-09 Thread Jerone Young
Private bug reported: The Soltech TA12 netbook does not send a release key when pressing volume up, volume down, or mute. This causes Ubuntu to see the key constantly being pressed. Zareason (www.zareason.com) is evaluating to this product to ship with Ubuntu 9.04. A patch attached was written f

[Bug 397499] Re: Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release

2009-07-09 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "Patch to fix issue with Jaunty 2.6.28 kernel" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28851684/soltech_hot_keyboard_fix_2_6_28_jaunty.diff -- Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397499 You received this bug notific

[Bug 397499] Re: Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release

2009-07-09 Thread Jerone Young
Attached is the DMI decode info, to add more info to understand the patch. ** Attachment added: "DMI decode info for the Soltech TA12" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28851707/dmidecode.txt ** Summary changed: - Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release + Soltech TA12 netbook

[Bug 397499] Re: Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release in Jaunty

2009-07-09 Thread Jerone Young
** Description changed: The Soltech TA12 netbook does not send a release key when pressing volume up, volume down, or mute. This causes Ubuntu to see the key constantly being pressed. - Zareason (www.zareason.com) is evaluating to this product to ship with - Ubuntu 9.04. + Zareason (www.z

[Bug 397499] Re: Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release in Jaunty

2009-07-09 Thread Jerone Young
** Visibility changed to: Public -- Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397499 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@list

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-09 Thread Jerone Young
This problem can be seen on any machine actually. I was seeing it earlier. The key is to NOT run "lsusb". This kicks off a fresh scan of the USB bus and then it's seen. So to reproduce: 1) Connect USB hub to usb port 2) Connect any device to it .. in this case try a USB stick .. though it's for

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-09 Thread Jerone Young
Narrowing the fix down. This problem does not appear on upstream kernels 2.24.4 and up. Have to try lower point releases. But I was able to get a binary for 2.24.4 & up here: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/~kernel-ppa/mainline/ Now to try lower 2.24 point releases. -- Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-09 Thread Jerone Young
Trying upstream 2.24.0 , 2.24.1, & 2.24.2 with the server kernel config all work without issue. I also tried 2.6.25 before and that worked without issue also. So their appears to be a patch in our kernel that has caused a regression. -- Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do no

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-09 Thread Jerone Young
This is a regression in the hardy server kernel starting with version 2.6.24-21.42 in the Ubuntu archive. Here are results of me trying various kernels from the archive: kernel Result - 2.6.24-16.30 works! 2.6.24-20.38 works! 2.6.24-21.42 Broken! 2.6.24-21.4

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-09 Thread Jerone Young
This patch is potentially what is causing the issue: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu-hardy.git;a=commit;h=6ca9208c22280928597bcc738bf4248de0ab359d -- Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406419

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-09 Thread Jerone Young
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu) -- Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-10 Thread Jerone Young
Trying the patch above with vanilla 2.6.24.0 source you see the problem. The 2.6.24 source worked fine without this patch (see past comments). So the patch pointed above is the source of the problem here. -- Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-11 Thread Jerone Young
Confirmed that the patch pointed to by Stuart does fix the issue. -- Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/406419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribe

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-03 Thread Jerone Young
I was able to reproduce this issue on my laptop. Very easy to reproduce. 1) Take a USB port 2) Connect USB hub to it 3) Try any USB device connected to the USB hub and notice that it never see it seen by the kernel. So this isn't a machine specific issue. It's a problem for any USB hub. Though

[Bug 406419] Re: Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device

2009-08-03 Thread Jerone Young
So looks like my findings where actually wrong. I just needed to wait a few seconds. Once I did things worked fine. Will have to try it on the actual Dell machine the problem is being reported on. -- Ubuntu 8.04.3 amd64 on Dell PE R610 : Front USB ports do not detect newly inserted USB device ht

[Bug 401537] [NEW] [Karmic] Create symlink /etc/event.d to point to /etc/init to remove confusion and keep documenation out on the net valid

2009-07-19 Thread Jerone Young
Public bug reported: In 9.10 init configurations for upstart have been moved to /etc/init , where as all other versions of Ubuntu before now have them in /etc/event.d. So to ensure that all documentation out their still remain accurate for 9.10, as well as application that may put configurations f

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-19 Thread Jerone Young
Well in a since it is hung. This is what I've found. *)Turning off Xorg and just using the console. Using pm-suspend on wake up it still hangs. When it wakes you can see the console, though you can't actually put input into it. I figure it's most likely what was in the framebuffer last. Funny e

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-19 Thread Jerone Young
So things appear to work now using 2.6.31-3-generic with using the internal hard disk. I was using a USB drive for root. It still fails with the USB drive, but works fine with the internal disk being used. The odd part of this is when I try other machines that use KMS with the USB drive, they have

[Bug 399369] Re: Usplash not displaying progress indicator on Dell Mini 10v using KMS & 1024x576 screen

2009-07-20 Thread Jerone Young
Here is an example video. You normally see the little indicator in the red bar, even with other systems using kernel mode settings: http://www.youtube.com/user/jerone222#play/all/uploads-all/0/jaG0JsNuiN8 -- Usplash not displaying progress indicator on Dell Mini 10v using KMS & 1024x576 screen

[Bug 385658] Re: Karmic doesn't boot up on Studio XPS 1340 with Nvidia Hybrid graphics

2009-07-20 Thread Jerone Young
** Summary changed: - karmic alpha2 candidate doesn't boot up on Studio XPS 1340 + Karmic doesn't boot up on Studio XPS 1340 with Nvidia Hybrid graphics -- Karmic doesn't boot up on Studio XPS 1340 with Nvidia Hybrid graphics https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/385658 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 395515] Re: trackpad jumpy on Dell mini 10v

2009-07-20 Thread Jerone Young
This issue is being discussed upstream: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21614 ** Package changed: ubuntu => xorg (Ubuntu) ** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #21614 https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=21614 -- trackpad jumpy on Dell mini 10v https://bugs.launch

[Bug 395515] Re: trackpad jumpy on Dell mini 10v

2009-07-20 Thread Jerone Young
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 365943 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/365943 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 365943 Mouse cursor jumps when two fingers are used -- trackpad jumpy on Dell mini 10v https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395515 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 322909] Re: future gnome-volume-control has many use case regressions with move to Pulse Audio

2009-07-20 Thread Jerone Young
This has returned in 9.10 alpha builds. Yet none of the issue have been addressed. ** Also affects: oem-priority Importance: Undecided Status: New -- future gnome-volume-control has many use case regressions with move to Pulse Audio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322909 You received

[Bug 322909] Re: future gnome-volume-control has many use case regressions with move to Pulse Audio

2009-07-21 Thread Jerone Young
@Sebastien Since this decision has been made, how does the ubuntu team plan to deal with all the regressions caused by this decision? -- future gnome-volume-control has many use case regressions with move to Pulse Audio https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/322909 You received this bug notificat

[Bug 402733] Re: 9.04 Jaunty Junk characters in oem-config

2009-07-21 Thread Jerone Young
** Also affects: oem-priority Importance: Undecided Status: New -- 9.04 Jaunty Junk characters in oem-config https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/402733 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ub

[Bug 397499] Re: Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release in Jaunty

2009-07-14 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "This is a version of the patch for 2.6.31 karmic kernel & upstream" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29001595/soltech_ta12_volume_key_fix_2_6_31.diff -- Soltech TA12 netbook volume hotkeys not sending key release in Jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397499 You receiv

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GM unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-14 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "lscpi output of the Dell Mini 10v" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29013440/lspci ** Summary changed: - Intel 945GM unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled + Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled ** Description changed: - The De

[Bug 399362] [NEW] Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-14 Thread Jerone Young
Public bug reported: The Dell Mini 10v comes with a 945GME intel graphics card. In 9.10 beta using 2.6.30 with KMS (kernel mode settings) enabled the machine is not able wake from suspend. Checking the intel-next tree (things going into upstream) as of July 13. I am able to wake and see a mouse c

[Bug 399369] [NEW] Usplash not displaying progress indicator on Dell Mini 10v using KMS & 1024x576 screen

2009-07-14 Thread Jerone Young
Public bug reported: The issue is when the Dell Mini 10v with 1024x576 screen, boots up in karmic (as of July 14 09) the usplash boot screen comes up but does not show the little indicator peg moving horizontally under Ubuntu logo. Just a red bar. I'm not sure though if it's 1) upslash not workin

[Bug 399369] Re: Usplash not displaying progress indicator on Dell Mini 10v using KMS & 1024x576 screen

2009-07-14 Thread Jerone Young
** Package changed: ubuntu => linux (Ubuntu) ** Also affects: usplash (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Usplash not displaying progress indicator on Dell Mini 10v using KMS & 1024x576 screen https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399369 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-15 Thread Jerone Young
So tried out both kernels. Looks like they both are on par with each other. Though the problem still exists. No real good info from the logs though, I need to get a usb serial connector and see if I can get anything through that. I'll attach what I got from the machine after rebooting it. @Jesse

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-15 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "Dmesg output of mini 10 after supsend hang" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29074658/dmesg -- Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bug

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-15 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "Xorg.0.log.old log after suspend hang" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29074669/Xorg.0.log.old -- Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399362 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-15 Thread Jerone Young
@Jesse I renamed the vbetool to ensure it's not run and still see the same issue. Doesn't appear anything is running vbetool after replacing to see if anything is calling it. That patch was actually in the intel-next kernel I tried out. So no effect on this problem. -- Intel 945GME unable

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-16 Thread Jerone Young
Created a video so you guys can see the problem in action: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUKsGsv8gnMhttp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CUKsGsv8gnM -- Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399362 You received this bug notification because

[Bug 399362] Re: Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled

2009-07-16 Thread Jerone Young
Actually that was a bad link. Here is the correct link for the video: http://www.youtube.com/jerone222#play/all/uploads-all/0/CUKsGsv8gnM -- Intel 945GME unable to wake properly from suspend with KMS enabled https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/399362 You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 404185] Re: dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot gets ejected from the USB bus on nautilus 'eject'

2009-08-18 Thread Jerone Young
The device is a Realtek Mass Storage Device and it is connected via USB. I've posted more extensive lsusb info on it. ** Attachment added: "Realtek Storage Device lsusb info" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30493521/lsusb_info.txt -- dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot gets ejected from the USB bus on

[Bug 404185] Re: dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot gets ejected from the USB bus on nautilus 'eject'

2009-08-18 Thread Jerone Young
Another observation is if I use the "eject" command on the comand line the Realtek device does get ejected from the USB bus. Only when you eject from nautilus does it do it. -- dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot gets ejected from the USB bus on nautilus 'eject' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404185 You

[Bug 404185] Re: dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot gets ejected from the USB bus on nautilus 'eject'

2009-08-18 Thread Jerone Young
This definitely seems to only be happing with Nautilus & gvfs. I believe this patch is the culprit if it made it in : http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~david/gvfs/commit/?h=gdu-volume- monitor&id=303cfd43578f0a4198c063f1a5fbcd16fec2b0bf When using other programs such as Palimpsest (it's the new disk

[Bug 404185] Re: dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot gets ejected from the USB bus on nautilus 'eject'

2009-08-18 Thread Jerone Young
So reverting the patch pointed to above does resolve the issue. This patch needs better logic added to it. I assume this problem will also effect other Dell & other vendor machines with SD card readers. ** Also affects: gvfs (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: gv

[Bug 404185] Re: dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot gets ejected from the USB bus on nautilus 'eject'

2009-08-18 Thread Jerone Young
I'm posting a tarball with compiled packages with the reverted patch. This will allow for quick testing for folks. ** Attachment added: "gvfs-package-with-reverted-patch-fix-issue.tar.bz2" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30496581/gvfs-package-with-reverted-patch-fix-issue.tar.bz2 -- dell mini

[Bug 404185] Re: dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot gets ejected from the USB bus on nautilus 'eject'

2009-08-18 Thread Jerone Young
To add another thing. With the reverted patch the card reader will be removed from the usb bus on eject. But once you remove the SD card and place it back in it shows back up and works as it should. I believe this is the same behavior it does with Ubuntu 9.04 also. -- dell mini 10v SD/SDHC slot

[Bug 416099] Re: In prefrences has button "Setup_new device" .. "_" should not be their or should be under "n" in new

2009-08-19 Thread Jerone Young
** Attachment added: "Screenshot-Bluetooth Preferences.png" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30527669/Screenshot-Bluetooth%20Preferences.png -- In prefrences has button "Setup_new device" .. "_" should not be their or should be under "n" in new https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/416099 You receive

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >