Same as bug 1019806 fuse 2.9.0 is buggy, this is not an ntfs-3g bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041944
Title:
ntfs-3g crashed with SIGABRT in get_node()
To manage notifications
The patch to fuse for this bug is in
http://fuse.git.sourceforge.net/git/gitweb.cgi?p=fuse/fuse;a=commit;h=1061a0a2d90148bd2e7f32e1e694399db2dbe087
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1041944
In the above situation (full shutdown, with hibernation configured, but not
enabled), what are the outputs of :
ls -l /windows/hiberfil.sys
head -c 8 /windows/hiberfil.sys | od -t x1
(/windows to be replaced by the mount point of the Windows8 system partition)
This obviously requires mounting in r
This looks like a problem in fuse, not in ntfs-3g. The fuse library is
getting a request from the fuse kernel module, and this is a request for
forgetting an inode with invalid parameters. The fuse library which is
being used is not the one bundled with ntfs-3g.
--
You received this bug notificat
> the mountall attempts to call fsck.ntfs misses it (because it's
> called ntfsck) and stops the boot process with something like
> "severe error checking disk - go manual"
See https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/896944
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
> Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
Is this device mountable on Windows ?
If not, apply ntfsfix from the latest ntfs-3g release (ntfs-
3g_ntfsprogs-2011.10.9-RC, or ntfs-3g_ntfsprogs-2011.10.9AR.1) and post
the output. See
http://tuxera.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=27721&sid=c548d5
> After the grsync operation my ntfs partition had the following
> permission settings: owner "root" with permissions to "access files"
> only. Group and Others had no permissions at all.
This is what you are supposed to get if you did not mount with option
"permissions" or define the user mapping
> How is a normal user supposed to know that we have to use a
> special mount command in that case? If the mount has been
> inconsistent with rsync operation I expect a warning and not
> this type of own, unexpected default action of the system.
Your device was probably mounted automatically by ud
> Your Ubuntu boss wants...
I was just trying to help, unpaid.
> In Windows as administrator in the security tab of the
> folder/partition, you can change the owner and set the
> permissions as you prefer without worrying about masks
> and mount commands and that is how it should be.
> Sorry :)
> After the grsync operation my ntfs partition had the
> following permission settings: owner "root" with
> permissions to "access files" only. Group and Others
> had no permissions at all.
This is the new fashion. In your syslog, you may find something like :
Cmdline options:
rw,nosuid,nodev,uhe
This stopped happening to me some time ago, I can't tell when. It's all
good FYI.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009879
Title:
NetworkManager high CPU usage while nm-applet and Trans
> * The ntfs-3g crashes regularly, making it unable to access the drive.
And ntfs-3g cannot do anything about it, as it is caused by a bug in
fuse.
> * Only reboot helps
> * What can I do to get it more stable?
> * Seems to be a problem of 12.10!!
> * How can I repair it without reboot?
Upgrade
> In properties of that non-working symlink, nautilus shows as target path:
> "../..\my_NTFS_target"
> So the 2nd back-slash is the problem
Can you please post the output (on Ubuntu) of :
getfattr -h -e hex -n system.ntfs_reparse_data bad-symlink
With "bad-symlink" to be replaced by the name o
Ok I got it. There is indeed a bug in the slash reversing procedure.
Can you please test the attached patch ?
** Patch added: "Fix reverse slashes in Windows-type relative symlinks"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntfs-3g/+bug/1172261/+attachment/3652380/+files/bad-reparse-slash.pat
> Can you give me please advice, how to apply the patch?
If you do not know how to apply the patch, you have to wait for a fixed
release. Until then you can either :
- use a hard link instead (works the same way on Linux and Windows, but has a
different semantics from a symlink, which might not
This issue is still present, as it should :
[root@dimension ntfslowprof]# ntfs-3g -o uid=0,gid=500 ../images/cf32M-9.clone
disk
[root@dimension ntfslowprof]# exit
exit
[linux@dimension ntfslowprof]$ cd disk/linux
[linux@dimension linux]$ bunzip2 linemode.try.bz2
bunzip2: I/O or other error, bail
I have a computer with an nVidia video card, using proprietary drivers.
I experience this issue.
I have to add that after a suspend/resume cycle my videos playback
slowly if they are enlarged, but normally when there's a 1:1 relation
between display pixels and video pixels, meaning that hardware
a
"At the moment, it seems that mount.ntfs-3g disables -o permissions if -o
uid=UUU and/or uid=GGG are also specified."
Yes, that should be expected. You cannot both define the owner of a file both
as the current user and a forced user. See
http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-advanced/ownershi
This is a bug in fuse 2.9.0. Please upgrade.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1094187
Title:
ntfs-3g keeps crashing with SIGABRT in raise()
To manage notifications about this bug go to
Public bug reported:
When connecting to a wireless network that has been configured to
automaticall connect to a VPN in Ubuntu 13.04, I get this error in
syslog:
Jul 2 20:05:14 zenbook nm-openvpn[15982]: write UDPv4 []: Network is
unreachable (code=101)
This message repeats a few times, and the
1) Please post the formatting parameters of sda2 and sda6 :
sudo ntfsinfo -fm /dev/sda2
sudo ntfsinfo -fm /dev/sda6
2) Are the files created on Win7 shown by Linux ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
Do you use some special hardware (such as a cache on SSD) ?
To discriminate "Linux does not write the data" from "Windows does not get the
data", please try the following (on sda6, to avoid putting Windows at risk) :
1) Boot on Linux and create some file.
2) Reboot on Linux (without starting Wind
"Yes, I use a SSD cache memory"
Windows and Linux do not use compatible cacheing. On a dual-boot computer, you
have to disable the cacheing altogether. See for instance
http://useranswer.com/answer/dual-boot-installation-of-ubuntu-12-04-lts-on-hp-ultrabook-envy-4-1002tx/
However this is a risky
Ultradefrag has been ported to ntfs-3g two years ago. It is marked for
testing and will remain so until a few users test it. See http://jp-
andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/advanced-ntfs-3g.html#ultradefrag
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscrib
On this issue, see
http://tuxera.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=30157&sid=3cbd3aa600181004df63ad98506701ef
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/324166
Title:
ntfsresize doesn't back up the b
> If fsck can't do ntfs, don't try it, don't throw an error about it and don't
> halt boot!
> Surely something can be done about this?
Well, just do NOT request a check at boot time, by NOT setting the last
field in the /etc/fstab line relative to your partition to 2.
>From "man fstab" : "If th
> Can ntfs-3g provide an implementation of fsck.ntfs
> that avoids this error message (and would it be wise)?
Of course it can. If you just want to avoid the error, just put a dummy
shell script into /sbin/fsck.ntfs.
Now, developping a true fsck.ntfs is just a matter of free manpower, and
if you
> But what should I do when I start my Oneiric and it bothers me with
> fsck.ntfs for my two windows partitions?
As there is no possible check, you should not request a check. Checks at
boot time are determined by the last field in /etc/fstab. : If the sixth field is not present or zero, a value
> Creating a symlink from ntfsfix to /sbin/fsck.ntfs make things working
again.
Yes, but ntfsfix is not a file system checker, it fixes common errors
preventing the partition from mounting and triggers chkdsk next time the
partition will be used on Windows.
It is a bad idea to give users the impr
The ntfsprogs package has been taken over by ntfs-3g, and the "extended
record need" has been implemented in ntfs-3g advanced versions. See
http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-advanced/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Does this happen on a specific file, or a specific target directory ?
Does the copy eventually go through after unusual duration time ?
Please do a chkdsk /f on a Windows box (much recommended if you have
shutdown your computer without unmounting), and post again if this does
not fix the problem.
This could be a hardware issue. It could be useful you do a chkdsk
again, saving the error messages to a file ("chkdsk /f X: > chkdsk.log")
and post them. To identify possible bad sectors, do a "chkdsk /r".
How full is your partition ?
--
All may system stop working when i use an usb storage med
Hi Dmitry,
Can you post the result of the command (type in a terminal window)
getfattr -e hex -n system.ntfs_attrib
Obviously replace "" by the name of an NTFS file
you had difficulties writing.
--
Huge CPU usage by mount.ntfs process
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/392204
You received this bu
So check the conditions listed on
http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-faq/#highcpu
If the issue mainly appears on big files or fragmented partitions, upgrading to
an advanced version from http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-advanced/ may
be useful.
--
Huge CPU usage by mount.ntfs proce
Hi Huygens
> My scenario was: from NTFS to ext4, moving 2.1 GB of data (Java workspace).
Most likely your NTFS partition is corrupt. Please do a "chkdsk /f" on Windows.
If that does not fix the issue, please report again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Hi Dmitry,
> I got this bug again while watching video from ntfs partition
The attrib indicates a sparse file, which is unrealistic for a video file, it
is most likely corrupt. You should upgrade to a newer version of ntfs-3g and
recreate the file.
--
You received this bug notification because
The ntfs-3g manual explains how to make chmod store the requested
permissions on ntfs, it also explains how to get an error when
permissions are not configured.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Phillip, in post # 23 you say "1) ntfs-3g canonicalizes the name so that
if you mount with /dev/mapper/foo, the device name listed in mtab is
/dev/dm-n, so you can not umount /dev/mapper/foo"
A similar remark has just been posted to the ntfs-3g forum
http://tuxera.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=273
xrwxrwx 2 linux root 180 Nov 8 2008 /vista/Users/Jean-Pierre_2/Application
Data -> /vista/Users/Jean-Pierre_2/AppData/Roaming
The Vista symbolic links are supported by ntfs-3g since ntfs-
3g-2009.11.14
PS The links you reference are related to problems which have been fixed
long ago
Hi,
I cannot provide precise help unless I know the exact version of ntfs-3g
you use (type "ntfs-3g --help" obviously on Linux).
What you say about "Application Data" seems to indicate that this is not
a directory on Windows 7. If you are using an old version of ntfs-3g,
you have to put your file
Hi Mikko,
You did not indicate which ntfs-3g version you are using.
Anyway the performance indeed depends on the file size, and on the
fragmentation of the partition. You should try the improvement for big
and fragmented files in ntfs-3g-2010.8.8AR.5 See
http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-ad
Can anybody try the latest advanced ntfs-3g version with improvements when
appending data to big or fragmented files or on a close to full disk ?
See http://www.tuxera.com/community/ntfs-3g-advanced/ (currently
ntfs-3g-2010.8.8AB.1 a beta test version).
--
Huge CPU usage by mount.ntfs process
h
Please remove default_permissions from your mount command. Better still,
apply what is described in the user mapping section of the ntfs-3g
manual.
--
unable to set executable bit on ntfs partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/598023
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Please note that on Linux, only the owner of a file and root are allowed to set
the timestamps of a file to a value different from the current time. So there
are three options :
1) disabling permissions checks (no uid, gid, dmask, fmask and umask options)
2) make the user appear as the owner (uid
You can use the option hide_hid_files with a recent ntfs-3g version.
--
Ubuntu should not always show NTFS system and hidden files and directories
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/179907
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
When setting partial ownership/permission parameters (such as forcing a gid
without defining a uid), you are bound to have problems because the rights
cannot be evaluated properly.
Do not forget that even on ntfs (unless you use an old ntfs-3g version), you
can use normal Linux permissions. Th
First of all, please show you are using ntfs-3g. In your syslog, you
should have something like :
Cmdline options: rw,permissions,umask=0022
Mount options: allow_other,default_permissions,subtype=ntfs-3g,rw,fsname= [...]
Are these followed by other errors ?
Then, problems have been r
See the conclusion on
https://github.com/tuxera/ntfs-3g/issues/108
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062972
Title:
ntfs partition does not mount
To manage notifications about this bug
1) what are the ntfsresize options ?
2) what are the file system metadata (given by "ntfsinfo -fm device-path"
before resizing)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1945011
Title:
kernel B
Please report what is hinting at ntfsresize and in what conditions it is
started (such as the file system state) ?
Also please start ntfsresize from command line.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
When started with option -i, ntfsresize only evaluates the minimal size
needed for the stored data. There may be a subsequent ntfsresize to
actually do some resizing, which might not be run when you kill the
parent process.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
I see nothing wrong in these file systems. Only the first one has only
0.16% space left (which is 1.6GB), and probably not shrunkable. As you
were able to extract the metadata, all the file systems are proven to be
at least mountable read-only.
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Nothing to be worried about, this is not a bug and the message is just a
technical warning. The chkdsk conclusion is "Windows has scanned the
file system and found no problems."
Since about 2016, Windows allocates space by chunks of multiple
clusters, but it still correctly processes files allocat
> Same problème with 22.04 Beta Jammy
Which one ?
Your attachment is missing.
Please post the output of the commands described at the bottom of
https://github.com/tuxera/ntfs-3g/wiki/Junctions-Points,-Symbolic-Links-and-Reparse-Points#other-types-of-reparse-points
--
You received this bug not
@geole (post #82)
The file shown is "system compressed", which is the case for most
Windows 10 system files. You need the "system-compressed" plugin to read
it with ntfs-3g, and unfortunately Ubuntu has not packaged it yet.
You can get the source from :
https://github.com/ebiggers/ntfs-3g-system-
@suntao : Did you try the OneDrive plugin from https://jp-
andre.pagesperso-orange.fr/junctions.html#other ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1728354
Title:
ntfs: unsupported reparse po
fsck.ntfs is missing because nobody has ever developed an open source
ntfs fixer.
There is an ntfsfix which only fixes a few important parameters, so you
may have to use chkdsk on Windows.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
> So i had some bug report, that on some crash of computer and reboot,
> my external drive isnt opening.
Which ntfs driver are you using ? This forum is only about ntfs-3g.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
This bug has its source in a manual modification of the Latex updmap.cfg
file, through the manual installation of a new set of fonts (e.g. :
cbgreek). During the upgrade of texlive-latex-base (and associate
files), the mktexlsr program does not find the modification, which is in
the /home tree. Try
After a quick look, there are still several issues with the 9.04beta - I didn't
especially checked the kernel, but the USB and network don't work.
However I don't use this (old and noisy) PC any more; I've a newer one, with an
Hardy Heron running nicely. So if nobody else is concerned by this bug
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.0
Ubuntu 8.10
Firefox 3.0
Gnome
On the right side of Firefox window, under Gnome "clearlook", "minimize",
"maximize" and "close" icons don't appear. There was not such event in Ubuntu
Hardy Heron.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
DistroRel
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19377696/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19377697/ExtensionSummary.txt
** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/19377698/profiles
Alexander Sack a écrit :
> do you have desktop effects enabled in Preferences -> Appearence ?
>
> Please try to disable that.
>
> ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
>
OK ! It works :-)
The "preferences" menu was on "usual" ("normal" in French). Curiously,
t
Alexander Sack a écrit :
> do you have desktop effects enabled in Preferences -> Appearence ?
>
> Please try to disable that.
>
> ** Changed in: firefox-3.0 (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
>
Oups ! My French had a bug ! "Normal" (French) means "regular"
(English), instead of "usua
** Summary changed:
- Serch bar,and adress bar doesn't work : Assertion failed
+ Search bar,and adress bar doesn't work : Assertion failed
--
Search bar,and adress bar doesn't work : Assertion failed
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/251891
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
Impossible d'arriver à configurer ma carte wifi athéros avec jaunty
help me please§
--
dépendances rompues et irréparables pous le noyau
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/299062
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bu
** Changed in: gnome-power-manager (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
gnome-power-manager crashed with SIGSEGV in start_thread()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/360278
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-
I'm using an ndiswrapper driver and I'm having this problem, I can't
connect to unencrypted networks with network-manager-gnome.
The spinner goes on indefinitely.
I currently don't have an open network right here, but if you need the
logs I can open my network and get the logs for you. I'll also
I have the BCM4318 chipset as it comes on the Compaq Presario V2000
laptop. I'm using ndiswrapper version 1.8, I will upgrade in a few
minutes to see how it goes. I attach my output. I'm able to connect to
any kind of encrypted network (WAP2/WAP/WEP) but not to unencrypted
networks.
--
Cannot ass
I upgraded ndiswrapper from the Ubuntu Dapper version (it says 1.8, but
I don't think that is correct) to the stable version from ndiswrapper
website (1.23, released 2006-08-10). Still no luck with unencrypted
networks.
--
Cannot associate with unencrypted networks using bcm43xx chipset (ndiswrap
This is the output of NetworkManager --no-daemon with wpasupplicant
compiled from sources brought from edgy, version is 0.5.4-5. Still no
connection to unencrypted networks.
--
Cannot associate with unencrypted networks using bcm43xx chipset (ndiswrapper
driver)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/42504
After I upgraded to ndiswrapper 1.23 I couldn't connect to WPA encrypted
or unencrypted networks anymore using network-manager. I downgraded to
the ndiswrapper included on linux-image package and it's working fine
again for WPA.
--
Cannot associate with unencrypted networks using bcm43xx chipset
Public bug reported:
I have my IDE hard drive already set up for linux, with a swap
partition, two /boot partition (one for fedora, one which was intented
for ubuntu) and one for LVM, which has /home, two / and one /tmp. All
partitions are primary partition.
As I was trying to install ubuntu, I c
I have saved /var/log/installer/syslog , /var/log/syslog
and /var/log/partman in case it would serve.
(it seems I could not join them with the bug report)
--
crash while unable to setup partition for installation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52368
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun
** Attachment added: "archive of the 3 log files for my bug"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/3309742/crashubuntu.tar.bz2
--
crash while unable to setup partition for installation
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52368
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/
This bug is upstream bug #334212 (Gnome, not Debian). I'll attach a
patch. By the way, it's not my patch, but an adaptation of upstream
patch id=63596 from Paul Betts. By the way, my patch doesn't update any
changelogs. Please refer to upstream patch.
The problem is due to HAL reporting that the b
Public bug reported:
Nautilus version: 2.14.3-0ubuntu1
To reproduce the behaviour:
1. Right click a file on nautilus
2. Click on Permissions tab
3. Read the numeric view
** Affects: nautilus (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
Incorrect octal permissions on file
I attach the screenshot.
--
Incorrect octal permissions on file properties
https://launchpad.net/bugs/58764
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Hello Ubuntu team,
I managed to compare the output of NetworkManager on Fedora, where it
works properly, and I found that the problem was related to a wrong
wpa_supplicant driver selection made by Ubuntu's NetworkManager.
I downloaded the latest NetworkManger Ubuntu sources (network-
manager_0.6.
I posted fixed packages on my website. I'm no Ubuntu maintainer and the
fixes are quite ugly, but things are currently working and you can get
NetworkManager to play nicely with ndiswrapper. If you have trouble
getting it to work, just grab the latest ndiswrapper from
http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge
If you still get problems when using my packages, just try to upgrade
ndiswrapper to the latest version which can be downloaded from
http://ndiswrapper.sourceforge.net/ , you'll have to manually compile
and install it.
--
Cannot associate with unencrypted networks using bcm43xx chipset (ndiswrapp
On a previous comment [https://launchpad.net/distros/ubuntu/+source
/network-manager/+bug/42504/comments/49] I made packages available to
the Ubuntu community without the bug for Ubuntu Dapper.
I recently upgraded to Ubuntu Edgy and I'm very glad to announce that it
works with the Edgy packages, I
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-control-center
Whenever I launch the gnome-about-me app, it hangs. It shows a gray
window with white rectangles where the text boxes should be.
I don't have the debugging version, but I launched the app with gdb and
this are the last two lines, and
By the way, I'm on Ubuntu 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon Release Candidate
--
gnome-about-me hangs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152932
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
Hello Sabastien,
Thanks for your information.
After I downloaded the latest updates as of today, the problem got
fixed. This bug can be considered to be closed and fixed.
--
gnome-about-me hangs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/152932
You received this bug notification because you are a member o
Public bug reported:
USB peripherals are not recognized by Ubuntu 7.10RC desktop i386 on a Soltek
QBIC EQ3401 barebone. There are a lot of messages like "device not accepting
address 2, error -110" in log files.
USB works well on a Mandriva 2007 hard disk.
** Affects: ubuntu
Importance: Un
** Attachment added: "dmesg"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10045756/dmesg
--
usb not working on a QBIC EQ3401 (P4 / i865)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
** Attachment added: "Output of "lspci -vvnn""
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10045780/lspci-vvnn.txt
--
usb not working on a QBIC EQ3401 (P4 / i865)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for
** Attachment added: "kern.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10045759/kern.log
--
usb not working on a QBIC EQ3401 (P4 / i865)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-b
** Attachment added: "Attached /var/log/messages"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10045773/messages
--
usb not working on a QBIC EQ3401 (P4 / i865)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubu
** Attachment added: "Ouptput of "lsusb -v""
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10045783/lsusb-v.txt
--
usb not working on a QBIC EQ3401 (P4 / i865)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubunt
** Attachment added: "Output of lsmod"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10045789/lsmod.txt
--
usb not working on a QBIC EQ3401 (P4 / i865)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
The network (probably DHCP) is not correctly configured by Ubuntu 7.10RC
desktop i386 on a Soltek QBIC EQ3401 barebone. ifconfig shows interfaces but
with wrong IPs (169.254.x.x, my network is in 192.168). dhclient doesn't find
any configuration.
The driver (from lsmod) is
** Attachment added: "Output of 'ifconfig'"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10050853/ifconfig.txt
--
network not configured by DHCP on Soltek QBIC EQ3401
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153420
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact f
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: linux-source-2.6.22
An hard disk connected to the SATA port is not seen (Ubuntu 7.10RC desktop
i386), although it is found by the BIOS.
It is neither found when I try to install the system on it, nor with a system
installed on another IDE drive - /etc/
g (Ubuntu)
>Status: New => Incomplete
>
>
--
Jean-Pierre Houix
Environmental Consultant for Russia, CIS and the Baltic States
Home Phone / Fax: +372 662 45 31
Mobile (Estonia): +372 5 344 05 10
Mobile (France): +33 6 28 84 79 67 (leave a message)
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox
http://forums.france3.fr/forum1.php?config=france3.inc&cat=prive&page=1&subcat=&sondage=0&owntopic=0&trash=0&trash_post=0&moderation=0&new=0&nojs=0&subcatgroup=0
Windows are enlarged or the contrary
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Wed
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/8566542/Dependencies.txt
--
Dimensions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/128281
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnucash
If I use Compiz, Beryl or Compiz Fusion, with XGL and an AMD ATI card,
it doesn't render the account tabs properly, it does render the reports
correctly.
It's a pain to add information to the accounts or to scroll them.
I have Ubuntu 7.04, the A
I'm under AMD ATI 8.39.4 drivers and still doesn't work properly.
--
Incorrect rendering of account tabs under XGL and Compiz
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129867
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs ma
101 - 200 of 442 matches
Mail list logo
