Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
In the printeradmin.desktop file (
/usr/lib/openoffice/share/xdg/printeradmin.desktop) the Exec line is calling a
non-existent executable: ooffice-printeradmin .
The correct executable is /usr/lib/openoffice/program/spadmin .
ProblemType
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36232573/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36232574/XsessionErrors.txt
--
ooffice-printeradmin is missing / wrong Exec entry in
/usr/lib/openoffice/share/xdg/print
Public bug reported:
I tried upgrading my ec2 instance from 14.04 using sudo do-release-
upgrade
I get this error
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: initscripts 2.88dsf-59.3ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-158.208-generic 3.13.11-ckt39
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-158-ge
Thanks. it worked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792752
Title:
do-release-upgrade failed on ec2
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
Thanks. It worked.
On Sun, 16 Sep 2018 at 23:31, Steve Langasek
wrote:
> The error in your log shows:
>
> insserv: warning: script 'S99startEverything' missing LSB tags and
> overrides
> insserv: warning: script 'startEverything.sh' missing LSB tags and
> overrides
> [...]
> insserv: There is a
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
Affected version: 0.8.5-1 (and 0.8.6-1 installed directly from
http://mechtilde.de/Loook/ )
I expect to have a working program.
Instead the following error message is shown:
Bad package! No loook-0.8.4.mo file found!
After clicking on OK, the program is c
** Description changed:
Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS
- Affected version: 0.8.5-1 (and 0.8.6-1 installed directly from
http://mechtilde.de/Loook/ )
+ Affected version: 0.8.5-1 (and also 0.8.6-1 installed directly from
http://mechtilde.de/Loook/ )
I expect to have a working program.
Instead the
Hi, here is the output of the requested commands:
ls -l /usr/share/locale/*/LC_MESSAGES/loook*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2016 Apr 22 2018
/usr/share/locale/cs/LC_MESSAGES/loook-0.8.6.mo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2190 Apr 22 2018
/usr/share/locale/de/LC_MESSAGES/loook-0.8.6.mo
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root
Public bug reported:
I'm using Ubuntu 16.04.4 LTS with
http://ppa.launchpad.net/libreoffice/libreoffice-5-4/ubuntu and the
latest version of LibreOffice 5.4.5-0ubuntu0.16.04.1~lo1 .
Since the latest update, LibreOffice can't open documents from a sshfs share
anymore. It starts to load and then e
Public bug reported:
I updated LibreOffice from 6.0.7 to 6.4.2.2 via
ppa:libreoffice/libreoffice-6-4. Now I get an error when trying to open
a form in a HSQLDB 2.3.2 split database: “Error in script file line: 1
Unexpected token UNIQUE, requires COLLATION in statement [SET DATABASE
UNIQUE]“
When
Public bug reported:
A PDF I got referenced the not embedded font TimesNewRomanPSMT. Document viewer
evince by fontconfig used DejaVu Sans to display it.
But „TimesNewRomanPSMT“ is the postscriptname of Times New Roman, so it looks
like fontconfig is not looking for the postscript names.
** Aff
Public bug reported:
Sometimes a PDF generated by LibreOffice is not printed correctly with lpr but
is printed correctly with evince.
For an example see attached PDF: Using lpr only the first line is printed,
nothing more.
I'm using Ubuntu 16.04.2 LTS with cups-filters 1.8.3-2ubuntu3.1 . The
pr
I read https://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-processing.php ,
specially https://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-processing.php#input
and https://www.imagemagick.org/script/command-line-processing.php#output .
There is no difference mentioned between
STDIN & STDOUT and using f
Public bug reported:
When postfix sends a bounce message (often through MAILER-
dae...@example.org) the bounce message does not have the In-Reply-To
and/or the References header referencing the message which failed to
send.
This is very annoying to users who use an email view where emails are
gro
Public bug reported:
"aplay -Dplughw:0,0 -fcd sound.wav" works fine
kes@vesta:~$ aplay -l
List of PLAYBACK Hardware Devices
card 0: PCH [HDA Intel PCH], device 0: ALC1150 Analog [ALC1150 Analog]
Subdevices: 1/1
Subdevice #0: subdevice #0
<...other cards which do appear in the System
Public bug reported:
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.4 LTS
Release:14.04
Version: 8:6.7.7.10-6ubuntu3.1
I tried to convert a multipage postscript file generated by LibreOffice
writer to JPG and then to PDF using following command line:
convert -density 150 /tmp/file.ps jpg:- | convert - pd
Public bug reported:
I'm using Ubuntu 14.04.3 LTS and the ppa:libreoffice/libreoffice-5-0 ,
libreoffice 1:5.0.3~rc2-0ubuntu1~trusty2 is installed.
When I do
sudo apt-get update
I get the following errors:
W: Failed to fetch
https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/libreoffice-5-0/dists/trust
Public bug reported:
There is a typo in the following quote in fortune-de
„Alle Verallgemeinerungen sind gefährlich. Auch diese!
Frauen inspirieren uns zu großen Dingen - und hinden uns dann, sie
auszuführen.
-- Alexandre Dumas d.J.“
The correct spelling is „hindern“ instead of „h
Public bug reported:
It seems ripperX has a problem with the character encoding of the data
received via freedb.org: I inserted this CD
http://www.freedb.org/freedb/folk/ac078d0d . The title of track #3 is
shown as "Jepobaoan, jepobaoan. Polska" but right would be "Jepobåoan,
jepobåoan. Polska" a
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1021142
Title:
Problems with character encoding with data from cddb
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+sou
This bug is still present in Ubuntu 10.11!
Ian's fix in comment #5 fixed it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/281471
Title:
Unable to use 'locate' to locate files mlocate.db permission
Thanks for your help, you was right!
Indeed I had a script in my personal bin folder named loook with the old
version 0.8.4.
So it's not a bug - please close this bug.
** Changed in: loook (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Public bug reported:
I just installed ubuntu 23.10 on my thinkpad L13. It works fine on my
laptop monitor. But when I connect an HDMI cable to my other monitor,
then the screen flickers on the laptop and nothing shows on the other
monitor
I know it can't be the problem with the other monitor as I
I just removed the oibaf packages with
sudo add-apt-repository ppa:oibaf/graphics-drivers -r
I also tried
sudo ppa-purge ppa:oibaf/graphics-drivers
but it said no such drivers existed
I rebooted but I'm getting the same flickering problem
My only option now is to reinstall the OS?
--
You re
Public bug reported:
this is a continuation of the bug reported in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/2062504
I reinstalled ubuntu 23, and didn't install anything else. I'm still
having the flickering when connecting an HDMI to an external monitor.
please help
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease:
I had the same problem when using another HDMI cable
I couldn't change the external monitor to a lower resolution because it
kept flickering and going to the menu for the external monitor, it would
just reset and send me to the settings for the built-in monitor
I attached a video
** Attachment a
yes, its the laptop screen that flickers. It only flickers when I plug
in the HDMI cable. The external monitor shows nothing when I plug in the
HDMI cable
I attached the file
** Attachment added: "journal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/2062950/+attachment/5769809/+f
I don't know if I have the fix for bug 2034664
I can't delete that monitors.xml since it doesn't exist in my computer
in that directory
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062950
Title:
If I choose Xorg then I still get that bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062950
Title:
RE: Flickering problems on external monitor with HDMI after installing
Ubuntu 23.10
To mana
I tried and that the issue is still the same as before
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062950
Title:
RE: Flickering problems on external monitor with HDMI after installing
Ubuntu 23
Public bug reported:
I use Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS and following version of nautilus-dropbox:
2019.02.14-1ubuntu1
Problem: The dropbox syncing daemon keeps downloading the same upgrade
over and over again: In this case dropbox-upgrade-144.4.4491.tar.gz.
There are already several copies in folder
$HOME
any updates on this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062950
Title:
RE: Flickering problems on external monitor with HDMI after installing
Ubuntu 23.10
To manage notifications about
do you have any updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062950
Title:
RE: Flickering problems on external monitor with HDMI after installing
Ubuntu 23.10
To manage notifications ab
is there an older version of ubuntu I can use that won't have this
flickering problem?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062950
Title:
RE: Flickering problems on external monitor with H
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: emacs-snapshot
This is a new install of 10.04 with almost nothing (extra) on it. I
first tried to install the emacs23 but it locked the machine up and
required a power cycle to reboot it. I then tried removing it - which
was difficult, as every time I tou
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49511483/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49511484/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "Df.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49511485/Df.txt
** Attachment added:
On 08/14/2015 01:46 PM, teo1978 wrote:
>> Are you aware that each comment triggers THOUSAND of emails to other
> users?
>
> Are you aware that you can unsubscribe if you want to?
>
>
I unsubscribed from this bug report days ago and it's still sending me
your silly tirades.
Would you please STFU?
re signed in to launchpad.
>
> HTH
>
> R.
>
> On 15/08/15 02:33, J K Cunningham wrote:
>> On 08/14/2015 01:46 PM, teo1978 wrote:
>>>> Are you aware that each comment triggers THOUSAND of emails to other
>>> users?
>>>
>>> Are you aware th
Public bug reported:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 14.04.1 LTS
Release:14.04
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: nvidia-331-updates-uvm 331.113-0ubuntu0.0.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-44.73-generic 3.13.11-ckt12
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-44-generic x86_
Link at bottom of email.
On 01/22/2015 02:37 AM, SillasOS wrote:
> How to unsubscribe ? I have not subscribe to this email list ? It was a
> system report that do it. I dont want to receive lots of bug email
> reports every day. How can I stop this ?
>
--
You received this bug notification becau
'... .tmp_nv.o': No such file"
>
> Thank you !!
> Am 22.01.2015 um 17:18 schrieb J K Cunningham:
>> Link at bottom of email.
>>
>> On 01/22/2015 02:37 AM, SillasOS wrote:
>>> How to unsubscribe ? I have not subscribe to this email list ? It was
>>
Maverick 10.10 fresh install. Same bug. I've had it before and previous
fix doesn't work this time.
--
audiophile 24/96 not working after 10.10 install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/631234
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
I'm having the same problem in 10.10 on an AMD-64 system. texlive is
broken. I tried uninstalling every package it complained about started
from scratch several times. It appears you cannot have texlive-base
texlive-latex-base and tex-common coexisting which makes it a pretty
limited tex system. If
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: spider
This bug might be due to a name conflict with the ace-of-penguins
package. After noticing the error report icon and reading it, I tried to
manually install spider and saw this error message:
Unpacking spider (from .../spider_1.2-5_amd64.deb) ...
d
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717097
Title:
package spider (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to
overwrite '/usr/games/spider', which is also in package ace-of-
p
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: texlive-base
Yesterday morning I had a working LaTeX system on my 10.10 64-bit
desktop. I do updates about every week, so nothing was very old. I
attempted to install latex-cjk-korean and it failed, producing something
like:
dpkg: error processing tex-co
** Attachment added: "apt-get-texlive-latex-recommended.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/717112/+attachment/1843274/+files/apt-get-texlive-latex-recommended.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
I forgot to add the file fmtutil.ho7M82G6. Here it is.
** Attachment added: "fmtutil.ho7M82G6"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/texlive-base/+bug/717112/+attachment/1843276/+files/fmtutil.ho7M82G6
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Interesting. I had installed libz.so.1.2.5 from sources to satisfy the
needs of another project. So I removed it and reinstalled the default
zlib so it now has libz.so.1.2.3.4 like the header. I removed everything
texlive-xxx and tex-common and started over from scratch. This time a
ran into a new
Sorry, I dropped a digit in the cut/paste. That was bug #354073. The
former would have been stale, indeed.
Jeff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/35407
Title:
This package is missing its
Thanks. But I assure you I haven't done anything knowingly with
MinionPro. There isn't any such package in the Ubuntu repositories, and
I haven't attempted to install anything like it. With the exception of
the later version of zlib - which I removed - this is pretty much a
vanilla 10.10 installati
Well now, that was a most excellent observation. I grepped "MinionPro"
in /etc/texmf/updmap.d/ and turned up a reference to it in 10local.cfg.
It was the only entry, in fact. I commented it out and was successfully
able to install texlive-latex-base. That was exactly it. Now I'm
wondering how it go
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: tex-common
I was installing texlive-full and ended up with this error.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: tex-common 2.08
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.35-24.42-generic 2.6.35.8
Uname: Linux 2.6.35-24-generic x86_64
NonfreeKerne
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712159
Title:
package tex-common 2.08 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess
installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1
--
ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: spider
No additional info I can give you - I was using aptitude to install a
whole series of educational games and noticed the crash report at some
point.
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 10.10
Package: spider (not installed)
ProcVersionSignatu
** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658372/+attachment/1684692/+files/AptOrdering.txt
** Attachment added: "Df.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/658372/+attachment/1684693/+files/Df.txt
** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
56 matches
Mail list logo
