This report was already getting too big for Launchpad to handle quickly,
and is all marked fixed. In these cases I'm usually advised to leave
the closed report as it is, and handle the new occurrence with the new
bug. You can certainly put a link to this bug, there, for informational
purposes. M
I'm getting these crashes with the current Kubuntu 13.10 packages (no
relevant PPAs on this machine).
Qt 4.8.4+dfsg-0ubuntu18.1
KDE 4.11.3-0ubuntu0.1
As best as I can tell, this bug looks unfixed in Kubuntu, but marked
Fixed.
On my upstream report, I was advised:
"Please update to un
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1200523
Title:
Some of the kubuntu patches break plasma
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/kdebase-worksp
Sindhu, without any comment given -- why was this marked as fixed?
I don't know for sure what the status of the bug should be, but I think
that's a spurious 'Fix Released'. Unfortunately, LP doesn't let me undo
that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
This is happening on a machine I just upgraded to 16.10. AFAICT, from
looking back at the logs, it only started happening, regularly, after
this upgrade. :)
Only comes about every three hours here. Just wanted to confirm it
seems to exist in the latest release. Thanks.
--
You received this
** Bug watch added: Linux Kernel Bug Tracker #65201
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65201
** Also affects: linux via
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65201
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
Thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/934445
Title:
hits g_assert (device->priv->styli) when my Wacom Bamboo 2FG 4x5 is
plugged in
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
h
The bug is still just as described above, as of Precise Beta 2.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/662386
Title:
package netdiag (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: trying to
ove
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975202 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975202
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975202
package ubuntu-wallpapers-karmic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/backgrounds/Bay.jpg », qui appart
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975202 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975202
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 975027
package ubuntu-wallpapers-karmic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
trying to overwrite '/usr/share/backgrounds/Bay.jpg', which is also in package
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975202 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975202
Duping this to Bug 975202, just 'cause a little more progress has been
made there.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975202
package ubuntu-wallpapers-karmic (not installed) failed to install/
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975202 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975202
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975202
package ubuntu-wallpapers-karmic (not installed) failed to install/upgrade:
tentative de remplacement de « /usr/share/backgrounds/Bay.jpg », qui appart
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975374 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975374
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975375
package libtelepathy-farstream2 0.4.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
--
You received th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975378 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975378
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975378
package rhythmbox-plugin-zeitgeist 2.96-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
--
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975374 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975374
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 975375
package libtelepathy-farstream2 0.4.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
** This bug has been ma
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975366 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975366
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975366
package rhythmbox-plugins 2.96-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
--
You received this bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975365 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975365
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975365
package banshee 2.4.0-1ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: ErrorMessage:
dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
--
You received this bug notificat
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975374 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975374
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975374
package libtelepathy-farstream2 0.4.0-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade:
ErrorMessage: dependency problems - leaving unconfigured
--
You received th
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 971120
package flashplugin-installer 11.1.102.63ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-dow
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
There are many dupes of bug 870643, where flashplugin-installer fails
because it was unable to get the file it needs, over the internet.
This one may be different, because the DpkgTerminalLog.txt says:
Setting up flashplugin-installer (11.2.202.228ubuntu2) ...
update-alternatives: error: no alter
Martin, while looking through recent Ubuntu bugs, I saw how many dupes
there are of this, basically generated by network failures of one kind
or another. So far, I've seen piles and piles of unconfirmed reports,
with one user listed affected. They really look like they need duping.
I don't know a
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975367 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975367
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975367
package flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.228ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
I don't know just why things went wrong here, but let me highlight the
important part of DpkgTerminalLog.txt, below. There are many, many bug
reports where the download of the flash plugin failed. This is not one
of them. There's a problem with /etc/alternatives. Alternatives
problems also appe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
Oops, Martin's not subscribed here. Someone else may certainly know,
but I'll try to mail him.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
Title:
package flashplugin-downloader failed to i
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
In this bug report, flashplugin-installer completed its download, but
then the file checksum did not match. I'm going to categorize that as
still a network problem, and dupe this to bug 870643. If anyone dec
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
The DpkgTerminalLog.txt file does not have any messages relating to
flashplugin-installer. I'm going to make an educated guess that there
was a download failure, from some network problem, like many very
simi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
Many people have similar reports, which I'm duping to bug 870643. That
seems to make it a pretty good chance that the problem was on the other
end, as you say. Thanks.
** This bug has been marked a duplica
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
This download of the flash plugin completed, but the file checksum
failed. Hopefully a retry has worked, or will work for you.
I'm categorizing that with other network failures, and duping it with
bug 870643
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 870643 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/870643
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 870643
package flashplugin-downloader failed to install/upgrade: wget: unable to
resolve host address `archive.canonical.com'
--
You received this bug notif
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975426 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975426
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 975367
package flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.228ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
**
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975426 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975426
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 975367
package flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.228ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
**
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975426 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975426
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 975367
package flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.228ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
**
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975426 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975426
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 975367
package flashplugin-installer 11.2.202.228ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 2
**
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975426 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975426
Oh, now I see that this has been addressed in bug 975426. It's fixed,
and I'm duping to that. thanks.
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 975426
flashplugin-installer failed to install during
I think there's a pretty good chance that this alternatives problem is
fixed in bug 975426, but I can't test it myself.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/970073
Title:
package flashplugi
I just found out that with today's upgrades, bug 876298 is fixed. As
Martin said, this bug is a duplicate of that, but is not marked so, for
technical limits, or whatever we shall call them.
So I'm marking this bug 'Fix Released'.
** Changed in: flashplugin-nonfree (Ubuntu)
Status: Confi
I downgraded to the last package of the 290 nvidia driver,
290.10-0ubuntu2, and this bug still occurred. I can't downgrade further
as easily; the X ABI changed, and I'd have to downgrade a lot more
packages. It's more than I can bite off right now; maybe later. But
apparently this is not an just
Well, I edited the title, to show that it's general, however you restore
the window. Hope you don't mind, Shayne.
** Summary changed:
- [nvidia] Clicking minimized applications from launcher presents blank window
+ [nvidia] Restoring minimized applications presents blank window
--
You receive
In addition! I didn't emphasize this: Nobody who fixed 938658 commented
on this page, or maybe even read it. That's one of the big reasons your
shortest route to help is likely through a different bug report. You
won't be missing anything here, just me writing a lot! :)
--
You received this b
Hi gentlemen -
I still do not grok bug patterns enough; excuse me. For me and other
recent reporters, it's the traceback which matches bug 628104, and is
automatically duped to it. The client-side duping catches it; if you
manually upload the crash, the server-side retracing catches it.
You can
I can now reproduce this, and might rewrite the description, and even
reopen the status. But I will wait a while to hear back in my last
comment, before trying that.
In brief, to reproduce it, quit update-manager from the Launcher
quicklist, during a running upgrade. It may not happen 100% of
at
I have read up a little on bug patterns. Since apport and LP will match
on tracebacks, and did so, here, that still seems significant, though
there is no pattern written. (As I understand it.) No?
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Thank you, Steve, that helps quite a bit.
The 'client-side duping' I'm talking about is, I guess, a fairly recent
arrival?
http://www.piware.de/2011/11/apport-1-90-client-side-duplicate-
checking/
"So with the just released Apport 1.90 we introduce client-side
duplicate checking. So from now,
So, does anyone here have privileges to change the status fields?
Unity is Fix Released. That suggest Ayatana-design must be the same.
Unity 2D might go from Won't Fix to Confirmed, then.
I'd do this, if I could. Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Cripes!
I am getting blank windows on restore, again.
* It doesn't happen every time, now.
* It's only windows that were maximized, then minimized. So not exactly
the same as Fuzzy or Scott report. Which is frustrating! :)
* It has only happened when switching back to minimized windows with t
Scott, thank you -- boy, that is the smarter thinking I was wishing for.
I had just come back, to note that my attempts to get a well-focused bug
definition were falling apart. I actually tried to search for similar-
but-open bugs, just now, but Launchpad was timing out on searches. I
don't know
Thanks, FuzzyQ, and you're welcome, and, hey -- if we're a little off-
topic, I started it. :)
I want to note that, currently, the windows never show blank in the
spread view. Which I think they were, in my earlier round of symptoms,
and there were bug reports related to that, too.
So at the mom
Thanks for testing again, Shayne. I think it's pretty common to re-open
bugs when necessary, and since you're seeing it too, I would definitely
change it. (Probably to 'Triaged'.)
I would change it myself, if Launchpad would let me. As the original
reporter, I think you can, and I think that's
I wish I knew the release process better. I'd kind of like to know
whether we should work with great urgency, to try to make Precise, or
whether it's really too late for that, and any fix would go out in an
update, and we can be a bit calmer.
I have to step away again, but I just saw Scott's new
To be more explicit, I think the recent reports like mine, against
628104, *are* the new duplicates -- their equivalents, since the system
intercepts them. (It's been my plan to mail Martin, to ask about this
sort of thing, after release happens.)
Since we can't open the bug we're sent to, bug 9
There's now discussion going on, again, in bug 982767.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628104
Title:
update-manager crashes: AptDaemonError: org.debian.apt: Could not
cancel transact
On an unrelated report (bug 982767), I had the chance to ask release
expert Steve Langasek about current bugs and Thursday's release. He
said:
"Any fixes in this area will not make it for 12.04.0. They will be
considered for inclusion in 12.04.1."
That was a different piece if software, but I'll
This could be a candidate for a "Known Issues" list, for 12.04.0. I'll
try to learn how that happens. Of course if we can't even get the bug
opened again right now, maybe that's wishful thinking. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Daniel Hartwig
<831...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Also, this report does not need more comments about:
Sorry, Daniel. Overexcited about aptitude. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
Apport just sent me here, from an apparent crash, although the update-
manager window is still present and functional, after the apport window
came up.
I can only offer pretty minor details.
The upgrade was just a day's worth of updates in Precise. It included a
new kernel, with update-manager i
More minor points -
The upgrade that was happening seemed to complete fine. No packages
were in a half-installed or unconfigured state, and every available
update was completed. (And as I said, the update-manager UI didn't go
away.)
It looks like gnome-settings daemon was missing, possibly cras
Well, I haven't been able to reproduce the crash at all. Including
manually killing g-s-d while update-manager was running (although it
just restarted itself, so that wasn't quite what I was going for.) I
don't know if g-s-d's absence was a cause, at all, or another symptom of
something wrong in
Apport did not save the crash report from my system, seeing the bug as a
dupe. But since the original report is older, and information was asked
for, here is the crash report from my system.
** Attachment added: "_usr_bin_update-manager.1000.crash"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/u
I see that in duplicate bug 915413, apt-daemon crashed just before
update-manager. There's no evidence of that in the one time this
happened to me. For whatever that's worth...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
I should add that I didn't start an upgrade, then cancel it, like the
original bug reporter. I ran update-manager, and it was working away
when apport came up. These recent reports might be a lot of reasons
it's not the same bug, but this is where apport wanted to put it; same
errors and stack tr
It's not clear that this should be the same bug, but as long as new bugs
are getting duped to this one, I guess I'll have treat it that way. I
changed the title just to "apport crashes", from the original "Doing and
update and canceling it".
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: update
Oh, and I moved the original title into the description.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/628104
Title:
Apport crashes
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launch
Oops! I retitled this bug a little while ago, and I totally messed up.
Apport had crashed on me, and I evidently got confused. I titled this
bug 'Apport crashes'. It's not, it's *update-manager* crashing. Fixed
that now, quite sorry.
To summarize, while I'm here, it looks like occasional updat
1 - 100 of 1472 matches
Mail list logo
