[Bug 363750]

On 25 May 2012 19:52, dinexi <363...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: >      Remove the following packages: > 1)      libapache2-mod-wsgi > 2)      libasound2:i386 > 3)      libasound2-plugins:i386 > 4)      libasyncns0:i386 [… unrelated foreign-arch packages …] This specific case is related to multi-a

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

** Description changed: TEST CASE: 1. Enable multiarch (should be automatic on new oneiric systems) 2. Install an i386 package on amd64 (like flashplugin-installer:i386) 3. Mark something with a lot of dependencies for installation 4. On the confirmation screen, try to remove on of the d

[Bug 995396] Re: aptitude tries to remove 90 installed packages, because one pacakge doesn't fitt

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 831768 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 831768 aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

Re: [Bug 1002654] [NEW] cant update 12.10 software

status invalid On 22 May 2012 13:34, mas adib zahiruddin <1002...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > W: Failed to fetch > http://ppa.launchpad.net/artfwo/ppa/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/source/Sources   > 404  Not Found > > W: Failed to fetch > http://ppa.launchpad.net/artfwo/ppa/ubuntu/dists/precise/mai

Re: [Bug 998972] Re: Ubuntu Update Manager Hash Sum mismatch (ru.archive.ubuntu.com)

On 21 May 2012 16:20, Oleg wrote: > and again fixed > These are transient errors. No need to keep reporting on the working/not working status. Discussion to resolve this is happening, see here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972077 status invalid ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status:

[Bug 987161] Re: aptitude search reports outdated dependency

This is by design. To match only the dependencies of the installed package use the ?narrow term, such as: $ aptitude search '?narrow(~i, ~Dlinux-image-2.6.32-40-generic)' See the section Sections and Versions in the user manual for info. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => I

[Bug 362443] Re: changelogs are often not available with updates

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #357542 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357542 ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=357542 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because

[Bug 381507] Re: Install / Remove Packages should ignore display limits

** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/381507 Title: Install / Remove Packages should ignore display limits To mana

[Bug 441059] Re: incorrect problem resolution

> speaking in more general terms, aptitude generally fails to accept "keep > everything as it is" when there are currently no unresolved conflicts but > updates introduce irreconcilable conflicts. Aptitude will not present "hold > all packages" as a solution. You may find adding this to /etc/apt/a

[Bug 441059] Re: incorrect problem resolution

Please state what action you are trying to perform. Instructing aptitude to perform a dist-upgrade is different to safe-upgrade, and different again to directly asking for a new version of "package A". ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug n

[Bug 642840] Re: aptitude help text is UFT8 but shown as ASCII

** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/642840 Title: aptitude help text is UFT8 but shown as ASCII To manage notification

[Bug 570554] Re: aptitude does not connect to internet but pkcon does

See #432631, I believe the issue with apt and proxy settings has been resolved, as best as it will. Please confirm whether you still have the problem. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 1002981] Re: Software Center won't install or remove any package

On 31 May 2012 02:28, modulewth <1002...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > OK, I just could make things work better reinstalling python-pkg-resources. > Now it doesn't throw me any error messages anymore. Have you tried also reinstalling software centre, aptdaemon, and all of their dependencies? -- Y

[Bug 16953] Re: Aptitude: should accept both "Si" and "Sí" (when asking for confirmation)

Removing accents from strings before or while comparing them There is libunac [1] which provides a function to remove accents from a string. There is an algorithm discussed here [2] which could be implemented with libunistring: Now, the best algorithm is hinted at the approved answer: Use NK

[Bug 16953] Re: Aptitude: should accept both "Si" and "Sí" (when asking for confirmation)

... or see apt-get's "YnPrompt" for an alternate (and very succinct) solution using nl_langinfo(YESEXPR) FYI the english version of this looks is "^[yY]", so matching any string beginning with 'y'. This is probably the preferred way to go since it would match apt-gets behaviour. -- You received

[Bug 823953] Re: aptitude ignores preferences files in /etc/apt/preferences.d/

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #557580 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557580 ** Also affects: aptitude via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=557580 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 16953] Re: Aptitude: should accept both "Si" and "Sí" (when asking for confirmation)

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #475802 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475802 ** Also affects: aptitude via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=475802 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 188008] Re: aptitude shows "1 packages upgraded

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #457946 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457946 ** Also affects: aptitude via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457946 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 890510] Re: aptitude search tells lies

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 884945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884945 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 885114 Aptitude fails to report correct package status on search ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 884945 aptitude show wrong package state -- Y

[Bug 885114] Re: Aptitude fails to report correct package status on search

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 884945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884945 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 884945 aptitude show wrong package state -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

[Bug 378545] Re: package install error - subprocess post-removal script returned error exit status 2

Bug in the ooolatex post/prerm script, can not find such a package in ubuntu. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/378545 Title

[Bug 919216] Re: aptitude returns 0 exit status code even if the requested action is not successful

The inclusion of "-y": > sudo /usr/bin/aptitude -y install hadoop-0.20 means that in the event of problems you are instructing aptitude to proceed with it's first suggestion: Keep the following packages at their current version: hadoop-0.20 [Not Installed] hadoop-0.20-native [Not

[Bug 16953] Re: Bug#475802: aptitude: i18n usability deficiency in Yes/No translation

tags 475802 + patch thanks [CC to some people that commented on these bug reports related to input translation on prompts.] On 14 January 2012 22:24, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > Anyway, there are not many places where the prompt is invoked so I > will get a patch together next time I am

[Bug 920903] Re: Aptitude does not show reliably if a package is installed

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 884945 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884945 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 884945 aptitude show wrong package state -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:

Re: [Bug 1156929] [NEW] triggers called multiple times in one upgrade

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396381 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396381 On 19 March 2013 08:28, Seth Arnold <1156...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > When I upgraded from 12.10 to Raring, I found multiple instances of > running kernel triggers. It seemed inefficient to me to see the g

[Bug 1156929] Re: triggers called multiple times in one upgrade

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 396381 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396381 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #481542 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=481542 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 396381 Update-grub should probably be set up to be a

[Bug 1168780] Re: "apt" package

This is not a forum for general support. What you describe is not a bug in the software. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+question/226636 -- You received th

Re: [Bug 1168801] [NEW] Broken dependency, unable to update or install packages

On 14 April 2013 13:25, Luther <1168...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > When using apt-get install: What is the complete command line issued? > > You might want to run 'apt-get -f install' to correct these: > The following packages have unmet dependencies: > python3 : Depen

Re: [Bug 1168801] [NEW] Broken dependency, unable to update or install packages

On 15 April 2013 00:41, Luther <1168...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > My current problem seems > to be fixed, but I don't know the bug that caused it. status invalid ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 1168847] Re: should store files in XDG-recommended directories

On 15 April 2013 01:19, Ads2 <1168...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > I agree that that probably should be fixed but it doesn't damage the > program. The recommendation is a recommendation not a requirement so it > can't be a bug surely? That is what the wishlist severity is for. status new *

Re: [Bug 1168847] Re: should store files in XDG-recommended directories

On 15 April 2013 03:26, Adam Dingle wrote: > There's been a broad push in the GNOME world for all > applications to use XDG directories, and I think Synaptic should be no > exception. Note that synaptic is not a part of the GNOME project. It does make sense to apply the basedir spec. to synaptic

[Bug 1168847] Re: should store files in XDG-recommended directories

** Description changed: Synaptic currently stores various files in ~/.synaptic. Instead it should use the directories recommended by the XDG specification: - https://live.gnome.org/GnomeGoals/XDGConfigFolders + http://standards.freedesktop.org/basedir-spec/ -- You received this bug notif

[Bug 413453] Re: synaptic asks to just "Download package files only" when not installing/updating

As discussed here this “bug” will not be fixed, as there is no simple way for the program and user to agree when to discard this option and when to keep it. Either it is remember for _any_ action (current behavi

Re: [Bug 1169002] [NEW] synaptic Quick Filter does not find words in title

On 15 April 2013 09:54, Susan Cragin wrote: > Public bug reported: > > I want to find RedNotebook, so I enter the word "notebook" in the Quick > Filter. > There are many entries, but no RedNotebook and nothing with Notebook in the > title. > Quick filter uses xapian, which by default only match

[Bug 8952] Re: There should be a section "Office" in the archive (was: Openoffice should be in section "Word processing", not "Editors".)

> This is not a synaptic issue, as synaptic only shows the Debian-accepted > sections listed. The placement of libreoffice-writer in Editors is fine. The only thing to be done here is: > "Word processing" in synaptic is probably misleading. "Text processing" is a > better term I think, which re

Re: [Bug 1174509] Re: Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is

On 1 May 2013 00:47, Adam Niedling <1174...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Exactly the same thing is happening with gcalctool. Apt-cache policy is > saying that it's installed, but when I try to start it Ubuntu is saying > that it's not installed. > Again, the program has been renamed. The old name

[Bug 1174509] Re: Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is

** Changed in: software-center (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1174509 Title: Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is To

Re: [Bug 1175637] [NEW] Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed

On 2 May 2013 22:57, Steve J. <1175...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Updates to the linux-image-* packages in Precise are being marked as > "manually" installed, regardless of the auto/manual flag on the existing > kernel packages. This happens when updating packages with ap

[Bug 1175895] Re: do-release-upgrade fails: TypeError: decode() argument 1 must be string, not None

** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1175895 Title: do-release-upgrade fails: TypeError: decode() argument 1 must be s

Re: [Bug 1175637] [NEW] Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed

On 3 May 2013 20:24, Steve J. <1175...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > On Fri, May 03, 2013 at 01:09:09AM -0000, Daniel Hartwig wrote: >> > This is a problem, because it renders the fix in this bug, >> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/923876 (Limit and

Re: [Bug 1175637] [NEW] Kernel updates are being marked as manually installed

On 3 May 2013 22:11, Steve J. <1175...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Unattended-upgrades does perform > kernel updates, so it's likely installing/dist-upgrade-ing kernel upgrades as > new > packages (which must be why I'm seeing them as being marked 'manual'). > Looks like an issue with unattended

Re: [Bug 1174671] [NEW] Syntax error /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/01autoremove-kernels

On 30 April 2013 17:12, Bertie Davel <1174...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Did a normal update of Ubuntu 12.04 via Software Updater. Restart > requested. After restart Software Updater does not want to run/open and > red "error/stop" icon is displayed in the top right too

[Bug 975665] Re: distcc pump mode does not handle -I/usr/include/foo correctly

** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Hartwig (wigs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Bug 482571] Re: package distcc 3.1-2 fails to purge if distccd is running

** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => In Progress ** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Daniel Hartwig (wigs) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

Re: [Bug 1097532] Re: synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields: "Lastest Version" and "Descripti

On 6 May 2013 06:54, Jane Atkinson <1097...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > This problem, or something very similar, is still happening in 13.10 > with synaptic v. 0.80~exp2 > Or something very similar? Is it a crash under the same conditions, at the same point or not? Use apport to report a new bu

[Bug 1176700] Re: synaptic crashes when removing residual config or obsolete package

** Description changed: This is happening on saucy testing installs, both with openbox and unity. Both are built up from minimal installs using --no-install- recommends to keep the system lightweight. When I go to remove a residual config or an obsolete package, synaptic locks up. It'

Re: [Bug 1069019] Re: [software-properties-gtk] can not delete, enable or modify any software source with non-ASCII characters in the comment

On 7 May 2013 06:11, Fernando Conesa <1069...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > The solution of Jorge worked for me without problem. > The change in the message won't affect forthcoming updates right? > I mean, for the 13.10, the message will be changed again? > You can always use a text editor to rem

Re: [Bug 1165014] [NEW] libsdl1.2-dev:i386 cannot be installed on 64-bit systems

On 05/04/2013 10:30 PM, "Colsta" <1165...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Behaviour: > When I try to bring in libsdl1.2-dev:i386, apt wants to uninstall half my system! > > Expectation: > I would expect the library to be installed seamlessly along with the other i386 libraries I had already obtained.

Re: [Bug 1165014] Re: libsdl1.2-dev:i386 cannot be installed on 64-bit systems

On 6 April 2013 21:32, Colsta <1165...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > OK - I wasn't aware the package status was arch:all My mistake, it is not. In any case, apt is not at fault here as the dependency chain of this package is not fully converted to multi-arch. That process will be completed in tim

Re: [Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

On 17 April 2013 17:25, Tim wrote: > Laney, pretty sure it was already fixed in Q,via upstream. Confirm this, with upstream hat on. The fix appears from version 0.6.8.1. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

[Bug 1169365] Re: synaptic crashes when removing residual configs

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532 synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields: "

[Bug 1168848] Re: crashes while trying to mark old configuration files

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 1168648 Synaptic crashes when selecting one or several files when using the filter "not installed (residual configuration)". ** This bug has been marked a dupl

[Bug 1168648] Re: Synaptic crashes when selecting one or several files when using the filter "not installed (residual configuration)".

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532 synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields: "

[Bug 1161324] Re: segfault error 4 in libapt-pkg.so.4.12.0[7ff0c0c97000+11c000]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532 synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields: "

[Bug 1167845] Re: synaptic crashes when clicking on package names, that have remaining config (status: rc), but doesn't exist in the repositories anymore

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532 synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields: "

[Bug 1154379] Re: (synaptic:1231): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkNotebook 0x??????? is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x????? is not mapped

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1171379] Re: (synaptic:2603): Gtk-WARNING **: GtkNotebook 0x1a4c410 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1a63010 is not mapped

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1140857] Re: Synaptic crash " GtkNotebook 0x13f24a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x15f1620 is not mapped"

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1097532 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1097532 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1097532 synaptic crashed with SIGSEGV in File() (or in pkgRecords::Lookup()) when trying to remove residual config files for packages without the fields: "

Re: [Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

On 22 April 2013 18:38, Stephan Springer wrote: > I checked by trying to install wine. The dependency resolution only > grumbles about one “recommends” which can't be resolved, which is > probably okay. gettext? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 1171117] Re: Alias emacs to emacs24 during install

** Project changed: emacs => emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171117 Title: Alias emacs to emacs24 during install To manage notifications about this bug go to:

[Bug 954029] Re: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are not required/useful at all

Scott, any chance of an SRU? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/954029 Title: gettext fails to install; package relationships should be with "gettext:any", "gettext-base:any", or are no

[Bug 1171252] Re: A program is still running dialog doesnt work instinctively

(guessing this is shell related) ** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) => unity (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1171252 Title: A program is still running dialog doesnt

[Bug 1078116] Re: Traditional emacs color configuration no longer works since 12.04

** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) => emacs23 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1078116 Title: Traditional emacs color configuration no longer works since 12.04 To man

[Bug 1077639] Re: Text repaint problems in Emacs

** Package changed: emacs-defaults (Ubuntu) => emacs24 (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1077639 Title: Text repaint problems in Emacs To manage notifications about this bug go

Re: [Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

On 22 April 2013 20:30, Stephan Springer wrote: > Yes: See bug #954029. Trivial fix, could be SRU. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768 Title: aptitude cannot handle conflicts wit

[Bug 1171475] Re: Synaptic spams console with a gtk warning (GtkNotebook 0x13f24a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x15f1620 is not mapped)

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

Re: [Bug 1171657] [NEW] Error message at the end of package upgrade in aptitude

On 23 April 2013 07:47, Thomas wrote: > Public bug reported: > > After applying changes aptitude returns an error : What changes? Attach the _relevant_ part of /var/log/aptitude and /var/log/apt/history.log. > ldconfig deferred processing now taking place > Error org.freedesktop.DBus.Error.Spaw

Re: [Bug 1153703] [NEW] apt should ignore commas to facilitate copy and paste of package lists from apt-cache

On 12 March 2013 02:14, Matt Fischer <1153...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Apt doesn't understand commas, for example: > > mfisch@caprica:~$ sudo apt-get install gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad, > gstreamer1.0-plugins-ugly > ... > E: Unable to locate package gstreamer1.0-plugins-

Re: [Bug 1154491] [NEW] Please remove guile-1.6 from the archive

On 13 March 2013 17:07, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Obsoleted by guile-1.8 and 2.0. > Only two leaf rdeps remaining, which do not seem to have any upstream any > more / not ported to newer guile. Why not make this request in Debian? > ** Affects: guile-pg (Ubuntu) >

Re: [Bug 1172138] [NEW] add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa

On 24 April 2013 14:25, Ravuri suresh wrote: > Public bug reported: > > Installed ubuntu 12.0.4.1 by ISO image. > when i try to add PPa:ubuntu-wine/PPa to repository to congiure outlook > getting below message: > That does not appear to be an error. What is your point? Is the repository not

[Bug 1172138] Re: add-apt-repository ppa:ubuntu-wine/ppa

Restoring previous status, whose info was not delivered to me. ** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1172138 T

Re: [Bug 1087543] Re: apt-get does not properly reuse connections with https

On 26 April 2013 08:05, Brian Murray wrote: > This fix doesn't seem to have made it into raring. Where did you apply > it? > apt (0.9.7.8~exp1) experimental; urgency=low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.l

Re: [Bug 1168847] Re: should store files in XDG-recommended directories

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 882825 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/882825 duplicate 882825 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 882825 Does not save the configuration file under ~/.config/ ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 882825 Does not save the co

Re: [Bug 929597] Re: [regression] in Status mode, new packages are not listed as "new into archives"

On 26 April 2013 21:19, dino99 <929...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Changed in: synaptic (Ubuntu) >Status: Confirmed => Fix Released > When marking bugs as fix released, please indicate the version and if possible quote the changelog entry. -- You received this bug notification becaus

Re: [Bug 1173176] [NEW] Synaptic doesn't retain window size from previous invocation

On 26 April 2013 21:21, Adam Dingle wrote: > Public bug reported: > > To see the problem: > > 1. Start Synaptic. > 2. Resize the window to be larger than the default size. > 3. Close Synaptic and run it again. > > The window will briefly flash into view at the size which you set in > step 2, then

[Bug 882825] Re: Does not save the configuration file under ~/.config/

** Changed in: adobe-flashplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: dbus (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: gegl (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => New ** Changed in: gnome-games (Ubuntu)

[Bug 442928] Re: package libcwidget3 0.5.12-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:

dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe) dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libcwidget3_0.5.12-4ubuntu3_amd64.deb (--unpack): short read in buffer_copy (backend dpkg-deb during `./usr/lib/libcwidget.so.3.0.0') Looks like a transient error. Anyone seeing this in rec

[Bug 1173746] Re: synaptic GTK warning

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped -- You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 1174509] Re: Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is

> krychek@ultraviolence:~$ gnibbles > The program 'gnibbles' is currently not installed. You can install it by > typing: > sudo apt-get install gnibbles The database that provides this information is outdated on your system. There is no package in raring that provides a ‘gnibbles’ binary, the nam

Re: [Bug 1174509] [NEW] Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is

On 30 April 2013 09:49, Daniel Hartwig wrote: > On 30 April 2013 03:56, Adam Niedling <1174...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: >> krychek@ultraviolence:~$ gnibbles >> The program 'gnibbles' is currently not installed. You can install it by >> typing: >>

Re: [Bug 1174509] [NEW] Ubuntu 13.04 is saying that gnibbles is not installed but it is

On 30 April 2013 03:56, Adam Niedling <1174...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > I do have gnibbles installed, I can even start it with the Launcher and > with the gnome-nibbles command in the terminal, but issuing "gnibbles" > says it's not installed even thou apt-cache policy

[Bug 1137946] Re: ChangeLog Stops full update on 12:10 Ubuntu

** Also affects: apt-listchanges (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1137946 Title: ChangeLog Stops full update on 12:10 Ubuntu To man

[Bug 283033] Re: apt-listchanges doesn't ask for confirmation

> cat /etc/apt/listchanges.conf > [apt] > frontend=xterm-pager > email_address=root > confirm=1 > save_seen=/var/lib/apt/listchanges.db > which=news headers That is not a valid value for "which". In any case, it appears that with the versions in this upgrade there is no new NEWS so there is noth

Re: [Bug 1178828] Re: libgtk2.0-dev and libgtk-3-dev do not exist in repo

> ** Package changed: uget (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) No, I do not think so. affects ubuntu/apt status invalid > Bug description: > I'm trying to install a package that provides which > > "http://packages.ubuntu.com/search?searchon=contents&keywords=gtk%2Fgtk.h&mode=exactfilename&suite=rar

Re: [Bug 1178710] [NEW] Gtk-WARNING

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1135687 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1135687 duplicate 1135687 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1135687 GtkNotebook 0x114d4a0 is mapped but visible child GtkLabel 0x1450610 is not mapped ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of

Re: [Bug 777879] Re: removing ntpdate removes ubuntu-minimal

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 61619 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/61619 duplicate 61619 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 61619 ntpdate in -minimal should have an alternative ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 61619 ntpdate in -minimal should have

Re: [Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS

On 11 May 2013 10:58, Steve Langasek wrote: >> On Quantal, this does not appear to solve the problem described in bug > #1131512. > > If you use update-manager to install updates, there is a remaining issue > with aptdaemon causing all updates to be marked as manually installed, > preventing apt's

Re: [Bug 1178943] [NEW] /etc/cron.daily/apt is holding memory while "sleep"

On 11 May 2013 17:18, Jérôme <1178...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Public bug reported: > > The "random_sleep" function is calling "sleep". Thus the memory used by > anacron, the /etc/cron.daily/apt script is frozen for minutes when the > "random_sleep" blocks until the "sleep" program completes.

Re: [Bug 1178943] Re: /etc/cron.daily/apt is holding memory while "sleep"

On 12 May 2013 02:37, Jérôme <1178...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Below is the output of ps : > --- > j@lt:~$ ps axlf > F UID PID PPID PRI NIVSZ RSS WCHAN STAT TTYTIME COMMAND > (...) > 1 0 812 1 20 0 2392 840 rt_sig Ss ? 0:00 anacron > -s > 0

Re: [Bug 1123710] Re: wine1.4:i386 not installable on raring amd64

On 14 May 2013 16:12, Daniel <1123...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Attachment added: "As of 2013-05-14, this is what I still get when trying > to install wine with current package database (apt-get update)" > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/winetricks/+bug/1123710/+attachment/36

[Bug 999810] Re: apt-get fails to simulate a upgrade, when running as non-root user, fix available in debian package

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 975793 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975793 On 16 May 2012 13:25, Allo wrote: > Okay ... the mail cron-apt mails after trying to upgrade: > > CRON-APT RUN [/etc/cron-apt/config]: Wed May 16 04:00:01 CEST 2012 > CRON-APT SLEEP: 44, Wed May 16 04:00:45 C

Re: [Bug 975793] Re: 'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop

On 16 May 2012 15:38, Alexander Schier wrote: > in which version was the patch applied? > >From the associated Debian report[1]: > Fixed in version aptitude/0.6.7-1 [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=629266 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

Re: [Bug 192023] Re: distccmon not displaying threads because DISTCC_DIR is not defined

Works on my machine without setting DISTCC_DIR and compiling as the same user that runs distccmon. Anything particular about your situation? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/192023 Title

[Bug 144008] Re: should use a shared key to protect against unauthorized access

One year after this bug is filed, upstream documents using SSH connection sharing in the FAQ [1]. This looks like the most sensible way to gain access control without large overhead. [1] http://distcc.googlecode.com/svn/trunk/doc/web/faq.html ** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu) Status: Confir

[Bug 192023] Re: distccmon not displaying threads because DISTCC_DIR is not defined

Actually I am not sure this was ever broken, the original report looks more like a misunderstanding. By design, you can not monitor jobs issued by another user unless you share DISTCC_DIR with that user. This will only monitor jobs issued from the local machine, it does not monitor the total load

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

** Description changed: [Impact] * Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch packages. The packages are removed alwa

[Bug 357001] Re: distcc prevents mounting due to wrong home directory

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 459998 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459998 It is not incorrect for distccd to have a home of "/". Affected users should upgrade to davfs2 (≥ 1.4.7-1) or use the option ignore_home, as documented in davfs2.conf(5). ** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu)

[Bug 592933] Re: distcc doesn't report enough information via avahi

I suggest that any non-trivial setup or large network use DMUCS [1] in addition to distcc. This is a system that provides network-wide load balancing and central monitoring. [1] http://dmucs.sourceforge.net/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 592933] Re: distcc doesn't report enough information via avahi

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #491175 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491175 ** Also affects: distcc (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=491175 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because yo

[Bug 592933] Re: distcc doesn't report enough information via avahi

** Changed in: distcc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/592933 Title: distcc doesn't report enough information via avahi To manage notifications

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >