Re: [Bug 1022102] Re: Can not update the system. Get an error "Unable to mark upgrades."

On 3 August 2012 17:07, Wesley Schwengle <1022...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #663134 >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663134 > > ** Also affects: aptitude (Debian) via >http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=663134 How is

[Bug 831768] [PATCH] aptitude: resolver always removes foreign-arch packages

Attached patch updates the problem resolver to better handle multi-arch situations so that it no longer gets stuck trying to remove all foreign-arch packages. Affected users and interested persons should perform testing and review on this. The changes are relatively small but there is room for re

[Bug 968412] Re: Internal error in the solver

A patch has been submitted against Bug #831768 which, in my testing, resolves this issue also. Please test that patch if you are affected by this bug and report whether or not it works. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

** Changed in: aptitude (Debian) Importance: Undecided => Unknown ** Changed in: aptitude (Debian) Status: New => Unknown ** Changed in: aptitude (Debian) Remote watch: None => Debian Bug tracker #672340 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

On 4 August 2012 17:12, Fyodor Kupchik <831...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > However, after update > and pressing CTRL+G I see that aptitude still unable to > understand that libqt4-gui both i386 and amd64 can coesist > like apt-get does. libqt4-gui is not multi-arch: same and apt-get does not supp

Re: [Bug 884026] Re: aptitude does not return to command-line prompt

On 31 August 2012 15:30, Paul Manners <884...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > If I do something like: > > aptitude -d install chromium-browser > > I find that aptitude sits waiting, never returning to the command line. That specific issue is bug #975793 and fixed in 0.6.7-1 (Quantal) and a proposed

[Bug 884026] Re: aptitude does not return to command-line prompt

> recently, aptitude will frequently not return to the command-line prompt. I > believe this is only after installing/updating packages. The program has to > be killed with ctrl+c. Rolf, does your original report refer to: - quitting from the interactive interface (i.e. debbugs #658271, which I p

Re: [Bug 884026] Re: aptitude does not return to command-line prompt

status confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/884026 Title: aptitude does not return to command-line prompt To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net

[Bug 1042412] Re: ubuntu softwaremanagement

> I use Terminal: apt-get install > Paket or Synaptic Package Manager Ok. I am marking this as invalid on aptitude; you could reassign this to apt, however they will likely suggest to use unmarkauto like I have. As per previous comments, it is not really feasible to do this general undo of packa

Re: [Bug 503765] Re: aptitude pkgstates gets corrupted

On 4 September 2012 00:51, Sergio Callegari wrote: > aptitude install > > on my current system, which is perfectly up to date according to apt- > get, synaptic, apper, muon, the ubuntu update manager, whatever, > provides the usual crazy output: Which release and what version of aptitude? -- Yo

Re: [Bug 503765] Re: aptitude pkgstates gets corrupted

On 4 September 2012 00:51, Sergio Callegari wrote: > aptitude install > The following NEW packages will be installed: > anthy-common byobu{b} cl-asdf common-lisp-controller{b} cpu-checker > docbook-xsl-doc-html fancontrol gcj-4.6-jre-lib hal-info icc-profiles-free > […] You are running just “

Re: [Bug 503765] Re: aptitude pkgstates gets corrupted

On 4 September 2012 17:41, Sergio Callegari wrote: > If I clean up the scheduled changes in aptitude, then I work for some > time (say 1 month) without using aptitude, but just apt-get, synaptic, > or apper and after 1 month I go back to saying 'sudo aptitude install', > then aptitude shows that

Re: [Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

On 6 August 2012 03:15, Edward Donovan wrote: > (I tried to build it against 0.6.8 from the debian source, but the gtest > stuff wouldn't build. I was compiling it with dpkg-buildpackage, and > couldn't find how to skip building those tests.) After review of the changes between .6 and .8, the pa

[Bug 1022102] Re: Can not update the system. Get an error "Unable to mark upgrades."

Lothar (lothar-tradescape) wrote on 2012-07-08: > Todays update fixed it :-) Thanks! The original issue appears to be packages unavailable in the archive. These are typically transient in nature and there is nothing that apt can do about them anyway. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Co

[Bug 1022102] Re: Can not update the system. Get an error "Unable to mark upgrades."

** Changed in: aptitude (Debian) Importance: Unknown => Undecided ** Changed in: aptitude (Debian) Status: Unknown => New ** Changed in: aptitude (Debian) Remote watch: Debian Bug tracker #663134 => None -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, w

[Bug 1022102] Re: Can not update the system. Get an error "Unable to mark upgrades."

Wesley, your issue is unrelated to the original reported here (though the symptoms are similar). It _may_ be a bug and so require it's own report. As your report contains details only of aptitude's behaviour, please note that safe-upgrade is not guaranteed to find any solution and it is *not* a b

[Bug 205915] Re: aptitude prints duplicate warnings, status messages for install actions

** Changed in: aptitude Importance: Unknown => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205915 Title: aptitude prints duplicate warnings, status messages for install actions To man

[Bug 73843] Re: strange arrow-key behavior after suspend/resume

** Changed in: aptitude Importance: Unknown => Low -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/73843 Title: strange arrow-key behavior after suspend/resume To manage notifications about this b

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

Fyodor, you reported “no improvement.” Are you able to provide an update given my previous response? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768 Title: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with

Re: [Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

On 7 August 2012 13:44, Fyodor Kupchik <831...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > After update went successfully I downloaded new skype package > from skype.com i386 version and installed it. Everything went OK! > > So here's is *definitely improvement* for me and disabling the > option in /etc/apt/apt.c

Re: [Bug 1033838] [NEW] both 00aptitude and 05aptitude in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d

On 7 August 2012 15:08, Shahar Or wrote: > dpkg -S 00aptitude suggests that no package contains 00aptitude. > dpkg -S 05aptitude suggests that aptitude contains 05aptitude. > > So... Perhaps this is a result of a left-over file from an aptitude > package upgrade? aptitude has only contained 05apt

Re: [Bug 1033838] Re: both 00aptitude and 05aptitude in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d

On 7 August 2012 16:07, Shahar Or wrote: > shahar@shahar-netbook:~$ (x=/etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00aptitude; ls -l $x; cat $x) > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 49 May 30 21:17 /etc/apt/apt.conf.d/00aptitude > Aptitude::Get-Root-Command "sudo:/usr/bin/sudo"; > > Perhaps I made this? I don't remember doing this a

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

** Tags added: patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768 Title: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.l

[Bug 933556] Re: aptitude is totally unusable due to rolling list of internal errors

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 968412 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/968412 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 968412 Internal error in the solver -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 968412] Re: Internal error in the solver (multi-arch: foreign packages not considered to solve other-arch dependencies)

** Summary changed: - Internal error in the solver + Internal error in the solver (multi-arch: foreign packages not considered to solve other-arch dependencies) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 1029898] Re: Unable to remove fglrx AMD driver properly using apt

>From : > I installed the latest drivers from the amd site, and wanted to revert to > the xorg drivers. I removed fglrx using apt rather then the uninstaller > provided with the drivers… User is using third party driver. > Uninstalling by apt sho

[Bug 1029898] Re: Unable to remove fglrx AMD driver properly using apt

On 30 July 2012 15:30, Christopher Forster <1029...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thanks for your response. If a user chooses to download a third party > driver: I see no reason why Ubuntu cannot restore back to the default > driver if possible, if he or she is uninstalling fglrx (third party > driv

[Bug 824708] Re: aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed."

** Summary changed: - aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." Please merge the fixed version, 0.6.8, from Debian. + aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." -- You received this bug no

[Bug 975793] Re: 'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop

The debdiff for precise SRU is attached to bug #824708. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/975793 Title: 'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop To manage notifications about

[Bug 324731] Re: aptitude display corruption in jaunty

> the bug occured in Jaunty, there was no update on it since 2009, Indeed. It could use some triage which for this issue I can not provide (I do not run a full Ubuntu desktop). Did you try to reproduce it with the mentioned locale and gnome- terminal? > so I > wanted to clean up and see if it's

[Bug 995445] Re: package gpsmanshp 1.2.1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

Apt can not do anything about this. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/995445 Title: package gpsmanshp 1.2.1-1 failed to i

[Bug 995445] Re: package gpsmanshp 1.2.1-1 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 127

Source: gpsmanshp Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 8.0.0 ), libshp-dev, tcl8.4, tcl8.4-dev * Debian Package: gpsmanshp Depends: tcllib, libc6 (>= 2.7-1), libshp1, tcl8.4 (>= 8.4.16) Ok, Build-Depends: tcl8.4/-dev results in Depends: tcl8.4. * Ubuntu Package: gpsmanshp Depends: tcllib, libc6 (>= 2.4)

[Bug 972858] Re: packages are listed twice in Conflicts/Breaks/Replaces without :arch qualifiers:

** Patch added: "0001-Hide-multi-arch-implicit-relations.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/972858/+attachment/3264760/+files/0001-Hide-multi-arch-implicit-relations.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 972858] Re: packages are listed twice in Conflicts/Breaks/Replaces without :arch qualifiers:

** Patch added: "0002-Remove-duplicate-entries-from-lists-of-package-relat.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/972858/+attachment/3264761/+files/0002-Remove-duplicate-entries-from-lists-of-package-relat.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 593047] Re: distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses [Please import 3.1-5 from Debian, no Ubuntu changes required]

3.1-5 includes the fixes for both patches in 3.1-4ubuntu2, so no Ubuntu changes are required on this version. ** Summary changed: - distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses + distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses [Please import 3.1-5 from Debian, no Ubuntu changes required] ** Tags a

[Bug 593047] Re: distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses [Please import 3.1-5 from Debian, no Ubuntu changes required]

** Patch added: "r650_ipv6-zeroconf.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distcc/+bug/593047/+attachment/3267447/+files/r650_ipv6-zeroconf.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 593047] Re: distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses [Please import 3.1-5 from Debian, no Ubuntu changes required]

** Patch added: "r673_zeroconf-nodups.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distcc/+bug/593047/+attachment/3267448/+files/r673_zeroconf-nodups.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 593047] Re: distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses [Please import 3.1-5 from Debian, no Ubuntu changes required]

** Patch added: "r678_distcc-v6-acl-2.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distcc/+bug/593047/+attachment/3267449/+files/r678_distcc-v6-acl-2.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 521165] Re: distccmon-gnome client list grows infinitely

** Patch added: "r732_distccmon-gnome-client-list.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/distcc/+bug/521165/+attachment/3267450/+files/r732_distccmon-gnome-client-list.patch -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 593047] Re: distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses [Please import 3.1-5 from Debian, no Ubuntu changes required]

These three patches are all the upstream changes to fix IPv6 issues: - r650 is small and required for ipv6+zeroconf to work correctly; - r673 is already included in 3.1-4ubuntu2 (oneiric and later); - r678 may be considered optional, nice to include for full ipv6 support. The regression potential

[Bug 593047] Re: distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses

** Summary changed: - distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses [Please import 3.1-5 from Debian, no Ubuntu changes required] + distcc fails to distribute to IPv6 addresses -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 824708] Re: aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." Please merge the fixed version, 0.6.8, from Debian.

The patch from upstream commit eb9f6c2. ** Patch added: "download-big-files.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/824708/+attachment/3269989/+files/download-big-files.patch ** Description changed: - After update of aptitude (0.6.4-1ubuntu2) and apt (0.8.16~exp5ubunt

[Bug 824708] Re: aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." Please merge the fixed version, 0.6.8, from Debian.

** Description changed: Aptitude (<< 0.6.8) can't download/view package changelogs with libapt-pkg (>= 0.8.16~exp3). This affects both the command line interface and the interactive (ncurses) interface. Viewing a packages changelog is a significant part of deciding which updates to a

[Bug 975793] Re: 'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop

** Description changed: - When executing thoses commands, aptitude loops infinitely : + [Impact] - aptitude clean && aptitude update && aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y + Users of aptitude can not download updates in advance with the + intention of installing them later. One common use case is usin

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

An update for Oneiric should also include the fixes for other serious multi-arch issues. At least Bug #845136 and Bug #904486. Without these multi-arch on that release is still effectively broken; IMO those bugs should be nominated also for Oneiric. The specific patches for those issues may be f

Re: [Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

Thanks everyone. I think we have enough user confirmations of the patch now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/831768 Title: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled To

Re: [Bug 1041363] [NEW] package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo' is different from the same file on the system

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 1039685 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039685 duplicate 1039685 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 1039685 package libapt-pkg4.12 0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.3 failed to install/upgrade: './usr/share/locale/sk/LC_MESSAGES/libapt-pkg4.12.mo'

Re: [Bug 824708] Re: aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." Please merge the fixed version, 0.6.8, from Debian.

On 27 August 2012 22:02, Marcin Juszkiewicz <824...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > Thanks to Daniel Hartwig I managed to build Precise package: > http://tygrysek.juszkiewicz.com.pl/~hrw/ubuntu/ Great. Please consider adding the patch for bug #975793 to this also. I was meaning to foll

[Bug 1042412] Re: ubuntu softwaremanagement

Which program are you having the issue with? It appears to be aptitude based on your description, but you do not specifically mention it. Please provide the output of a complete session demonstrating the problem. > This sucks, there is no way to reverse an installation. > > sudo apt-get --purge

[Bug 824708] Re: aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." Please merge the fixed version, 0.6.8, from Debian.

Updated copy of debdiff from Marcin's repository. ** Patch removed: "debdiff for precise SRU" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aptitude/+bug/824708/+attachment/3279057/+files/aptitude-precise.deb.diff ** Patch added: "debdiff for precise SRU" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so

[Bug 862776] Re: apt-get --install-suggests install is a NOOP

** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/862776 Title: apt-get --install-suggests install is a NOOP To manage notifications ab

[Bug 972858] Re: packages are listed twice in Conflicts/Breaks/Replaces without :arch qualifiers:

Updated patch to exclude more instances of the implicit relations (such as in reverse depends and version lists). At the moment this will not be included upstream as the implicit relations are important to show why a package may be broken, or select valid alternatives. A better solution is being

Re: [Bug 1042412] Re: ubuntu softwaremanagement

On 29 August 2012 04:33, Affenputtel wrote: > Thanks for your answer, but the problem is: > > I just want to be able undo the last installation or previous > installations in the exact same reverse way as is installed them. Sounds simple, but in practice it is not. Any particular session may inv

[Bug 1050240] [NEW] "aptitude install PATTERN" without ~r installs conflicting packages for all architectures

Public bug reported: Already reported in Debian; placing here as it impacts all Ubuntu releases which multi-arch support. [Impact] Running aptitude install (or remove, etc.) with pattern arguments selects all architectures and will typically result in conflicts. In contrast, apt-get only select

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

The details on the sponsorship overview are incorrect. This is currently only a request to get the fixed version (0.6.8.1) merged in Quantal. As per the previous comment, that release is only a bug fix. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu Precise) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- You rec

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

** Patch added: "debdiff for quantal" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+source/aptitude/+bug/831768/+attachment/3313663/+files/aptitude.ubuntu.deb.diff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

** Description changed: [Impact] + * Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which + results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes + the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch + packages. + + The packages are removed alwa

[Bug 831768] Re: aptitude cannot handle conflicts with multiarch enabled

** Description changed: [Impact] * Inability to use aptitude on multi-arch systems. Any action which results in a packaging conflict, or otherwise broken package, invokes the problem resolver which will proceed to remove *all* foreign-arch packages. The packages are removed alwa

[Bug 1051224] [NEW] aptitude: display, search by “Supported:” field

Public bug reported: Forwarded request from [1] as it is specifically of interest to Ubuntu users. I presume that support has been implemented in USC or whatever is package-manager-of-the-day; what about the rest of main? [1] http://bugs.debian.org/606546 [Original Description] Canonical place

Re: [Bug 923876] Re: FR: Limit and clean-up kernel images and headers automatically in LTS

APT has good reason to not autoremove kernels, why you want to break that? You want *some* process to reap old kernels, ok, but that does not mean that the core package manager should be that process. The selection of which kernels to clean up is domain-specific. Determine such a list external t

[Bug 1051690] Re: update manager will not start

Provide error message which prevents: $ sudo apt-get clean $ sudo apt-get update $ sudo apt-get install -f ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.lau

[Bug 1012478] Re: Changelogs not visible for recent updates

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 362443 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362443 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 362443 changelogs are often not available with updates -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 1012475] Re: Changelogs not visible for recent updates

Not related to the package itself. Please only report issues once, and that this issue has been reported long ago. ** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https:/

[Bug 1006189] Re: Changelogs not visible for recent updates

** Changed in: net-snmp (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1006189 Title: Changelogs not visible for recent updates To manage notifications a

[Bug 1009862] Re: Changelogs not visible for recent updates

** Changed in: openssl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1009862 Title: Changelogs not visible for recent updates To manage notifications about th

[Bug 362443] Re: changelogs are often not available with updates

Related: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/523714 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/362443 Title: changelogs are often not available with updates To manage

[Bug 1012100] Re: programs using libapt-pkg segfault at multiple locations within libapt-pkg

Please provide backtrace for the apt-get crash. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1012100 Title: programs using libapt-pkg segfault at multiple locations within libapt-pkg To manage n

[Bug 910935] Re: libapt-pkg segfault

Provide backtrace or apport crash diagnostics. ** Package changed: release-upgrader-apt (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bug

[Bug 1003633] Re: Escape plus character in apt HTTP requests to work around Amazon S3 bug

> Can't they just encode the plus character as a space in their S3 instances? That does seem preferable. Is there a package that is commonly used to maintain a mirror on S3 where this change can be made? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is sub

[Bug 511585] Re: Unable to start pump server because of python version mismatch

Only an issue with the packaged software. Installing from source is ok. ** Changed in: distcc Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/511585 Title: Unable to st

[Bug 972847] Re: “Provided by” line for virtual packages doesn't contain architecture information

** Also affects: aptitude Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972847 Title: “Provided by” line for virtual packages doesn't contain architecture

[Bug 975793] Re: 'aptitude safe-upgrade -d -y' enters infinite loop

> seems, this is still an issue with cron-apt: > $ apt-cache policy aptitude > aptitude: > Installed: 0.6.6-1ubuntu1 > Candidate: 0.6.6-1ubuntu1 Yes. The previous message indicating "Patch applied to: aptitude_0.6.6-1ubuntu1.debian" was not saying that the ubuntu package has been fixed, rathe

[Bug 972847] Re: “Provided by” line for virtual packages doesn't contain architecture information

0.6.7 ** Changed in: aptitude Status: New => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/972847 Title: “Provided by” line for virtual packages doesn't contain architecture i

[Bug 880277] Re: aptitude always wants to install libnspr4-0d which is neither required nor recommended by any installed package

Is issue resolved by installing, then removing the package in aptitude? [Actually installing the package, not just marking it for install.] Could be related to http://bugs.debian.org/648313 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #648313 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=648313

[Bug 892074] Re: aptitude show does not show other architecture packages

[master 8abd4ac] Improve multi-arch handling of package arguments 3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to U

[Bug 923525] Re: aptitude safe-upgrade attempts to install both "or" (|) dependencies

> It depends on the package apturl or the package apturl-kde. The package > apturl was already installed but the package apturl-kde was not. Aptitude > wanted to install the package apturl-kde and its dependants which numbered in > the seventies. Ok. Is there not some other package depending on a

[Bug 923525] Re: aptitude safe-upgrade attempts to install both "or" (|) dependencies

> I expect the safe resolver to be more conservative than the full resolver. Depends on how you evaluate conservativeness. It is more conservative in that it will not remove packages. There is no guarantee that any solution found by the safe resolver will be more compact than what the full resol

[Bug 857826] Re: aptitude (oneiric) does not install libsigc++-2.0-0c2a to provide /usr/lib/libsigc-2.0.so.0

Current dependencies in Oneiric are correct. Suspect this is due to misconfiguration of your system. Provide more information demonstrating packaging error or seek assistance in some other forum. ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- You received this bug notifi

[Bug 734737] Re: aptitude removes packages conflicting with requested package even if it was not downloaded

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #639789 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639789 ** Also affects: aptitude via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=639789 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 919216] Re: aptitude returns 0 exit status code even if the requested action is not successful

commit a88745bf22c3e83e5d78331a69f813e451c895a0 Author: Daniel Hartwig Date: Tue Jun 12 18:19:47 2012 +0800 ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 734737] Re: aptitude removes packages conflicting with requested package even if it was not downloaded

commit 2f544c3c351591f0f30e9f3bdf2cc905f54b906a Author: Daniel Hartwig Date: Wed Jun 20 17:22:11 2012 +0800 ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 585408] Re: aptitude returns 0(=OK) even if install fails

commit a88745bf22c3e83e5d78331a69f813e451c895a0 Author: Daniel Hartwig Date: Tue Jun 12 18:19:47 2012 +0800 ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 563155] Re: Add support for 3rd party repository changelogs

[master a7f3cf7] Guess changelog URI for third-party sites 5 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 53 deletions(-) ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 727716] Re: Aptitude does not support downloading source package

** Changed in: aptitude Importance: Unknown => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/727716 Title: Aptitude does not support downloading source package To manage notifications a

[Bug 647835] Re: Add option to wait for /var/lib/dpkg/lock to become free

** Changed in: aptitude Importance: Unknown => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/647835 Title: Add option to wait for /var/lib/dpkg/lock to become free To manage notificatio

[Bug 53270] Re: Pass more than one command to aptitude at once

** Changed in: aptitude Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53270 Title: Pass more than one command to aptitude at once To manage notifications about

[Bug 53270] Re: Pass more than one command to aptitude at once

** Changed in: aptitude Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/53270 Title: Pass more than one command to aptitude at once To manage notifications about this

Re: [Bug 1025184] [NEW] Trigger high-color-icon-theme takes minutes with every install

> Whenever "trigger high-color-icon-theme" is called while installing some > app with gui, this can take up to 6 minutes! You mean hicolor-icon-theme? Please paste the actual output from when the process hangs and also the output of: $ sudo grep hicolor-icon-theme /var/lib/dpkg/{info/*.triggers

[Bug 1016285] Re: E:Dynamic MMap ran out of room

> E:Dynamic MMap ran out of room. Please increase the size of > APT::Cache-Limit. Current value: 25165824. (man 5 apt.conf) The error message explains what the problem is and how you can fix it. See https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+question/10190 The value you set for APT::Cache

Re: [Bug 862776] Re: apt-get --install-suggests install is a NOOP

@TJ IIRC recommends (and suggests, with --install-suggests) are only considered when upgrading/reinstalling a package if they are new recommends which were not present with the previous version. This makes sense, if the user has previously requested a particular recommends to be ignored it should

Re: [Bug 824708] Re: aptitude can no longer show changelogs: "Changelog download failed: Download queue destroyed." Please merge the fixed version, 0.6.8, from Debian.

Priority: important -Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers -XSBC-Original-Maintainer: Aptitude Development Team +Maintainer: Aptitude Development Team Uploaders: Daniel Burrows , Daniel Hartwig DM-Upload-Allowed: yes - VCS: -XS-Debian-Vcs-Git: git://git.debian.org/git/aptitude/aptitude.git -XS-Debian-Vc

[Bug 38889] Re: Aptitude losing larger strings on output

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #445206 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445206 ** Also affects: aptitude via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=445206 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 1021080] Re: software index is broken

> Not all updates work & sudo apt-get install -f does not work then unable to > get executive lock Which program says it can not get the lock? > Some of the packages could not be retrieved from the > server(s). > W: Failed to fetch http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/pool/main/l/linux/linux- > ima

[Bug 860432] Re: tried to grab repository for wrong architecture

>From attached apt-wrap: > mkdir -p $DIR/var/cache/apt/archives/partial > cat >$DIR/etc/apt/apt.conf < APT::Architecture "$ARCH"; … You should also add this line: APT::Architectures { "$ARCH"; }; which will prevent apt getting this list from "dpkg --print-foreign- architectures". Alternativel

[Bug 980636] Re: install two arch for same lib

Screen shows libxi6 which is Multi-Arch: same; behaviour is expected provided you have installed i386 packages which would depend on it. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to

[Bug 992449] Re: Ubuntu 12.04 downloads i386 sources on amd64 system

Multi-arch is enabled by default on amd64 systems from 11.10 onwards. See this page for information on disabling: http://askubuntu.com/questions/66875/how-to-disable-multiarch-support and this page which notes why that might not be a good idea: https://help.ubuntu.com/community/MultiArch > E: D

Re: [Bug 1003633] [NEW] Escape plus character in apt HTTP requests to work around Amazon S3 bug

Also, this 2007 thread: [1] https://forums.aws.amazon.com/thread.jspa?threadID=16361 where AWS representatives expound on their "justification" some more. Instead of being well-behaved netizens, they just document their non-conformance – though there is no indication in these threads where such d

Re: [Bug 1003633] [NEW] Escape plus character in apt HTTP requests to work around Amazon S3 bug

Effectively S3 does not implement HTTP according to the spec. Rather than working around the behaviour of S3 mirrors in methods/http we could define methods/s3. S3 mirrors would then be properly identified as non-http in sources.list. This method could be a wrapper which invokes the http method

[Bug 1002981] Re: Software Center won't install or remove any package

Are there any aptdaemon log files in /var/log which may provide more details? ** Package changed: apt (Ubuntu) => aptdaemon (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: aptdaemon (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Incomplete -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is s

Re: [Bug 1002981] Re: Software Center won't install or remove any package

> I have history.log and term.log in /var/log/apt. No aptdaemon logs then? Perhaps run: sudo invoke-rc.d aptdaemon restart and check if the output is different. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   >