If the file system is active (a process if running from the directory,
or you have a window opened in the directory), then the partition cannot
be unmounted.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
This looks like a duplicate of the following problem:
gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/617885
This problem is resolved in the upstream GParted 0.7.0 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
This might be related to the following bug report:
gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/617885
Or possibly to the following upstream bug report:
Bug 629592 - Unable to find Mount Point if it contains a Space Character
https://bugzilla.gno
This looks like a duplicate of the following bug report:
gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/617885
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
What is the output from the following command (run as root):
dmraid -sa -c
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/669737
Title:
gparted does not show nvraid partitions
--
ubuntu-bugs maili
This looks like a duplicate of the following bug report:
gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/617885
This problem was fixed in the upstream release of GParted 0.7.0.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
That looks normal.
Would you be able to try the most recent version of GParted?
Today GParted 0.7.1 was released, but will probably not be available in a live
image for a day or so.
GParted Live 0.7.0 is available though for testing:
http://gparted.org/livecd.php
--
You received this bug notif
The log in comment #12 indicates libparted is being used. The libparted
library is part of the parted project.
Perhaps you installed a version of fdisk that uses libparted (e.g., gnu-
fdisk)?
If so you might wish to run the version from utils-linux-ng (now utils-
linux) instead.
--
You receive
Thank you for reporting this problem.
The visual display of the disk seems to consistently disappear when
enough operations have been added to the queue so that a scrollbar is
required (about 4 operations).
I have been able to prevent this from happening if I comment out the
following lines in HB
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 545911 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545911
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 545911
Cannot use gparted
* You can subscribe to bug 545911 by following this link:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/545911/+subscribe
It would appear that something went wrong in the resizing process. If
you happened to save the gparted_details.htm log file then we might
glean a clue as to what happened.
The images you attached indicate that the file system is FAT32, so I am
not surprised that the e2label command failed. e2lab
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 545911 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545911
Both the Ubuntu installer and GParted use the libparted library from the
parted project. Hence each program that uses this library will also
fail in a similar manner.
--
You received this bug notification b
My testing results of Phillip's patch can be found in the parted-devel mailing
list:
[parted-devel] > 63 heads. Why does this keep coming up?
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/parted-devel/2011-February/003806.html
Derek,
As you point out in comment #23, a work-around to this problem is t
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 545911 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545911
Marcos, can you try the latest version of GParted (currently 0.7.1) to
see if the problem still occurs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Brian, I think that this report contains two different bug reports.
FIRST BUG REPORT - GParted Crash
Two bugs that would crash GParted were fixed in GParted 0.7.0.
Ekron, would you be able to retest with the latest version of GParted?
SECOND BUG REPORT - Visual Disk Display Disappears
The file
This behaviour is as designed.
BACKGROUND INFORMATION
One challenge with dmraid is that it is inconsistent in naming partition
devices. Earlier versions never append a 'p' followed by the partition number.
Later versions by default always append a 'p' followed by the partition number
for part
GParted 0.8.0 was released on Feb 15, 2011.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583746
Title:
Partition graph disappears after a swap partition has been deleted
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing li
GParted uses the blkid command to read volume labels, and if no label is
found then it will try mlabel to read the label for FAT16 or FAT32 file
systems.
Would you be able to provide the output from the following command?
sudo blkid -c /dev/null /dev/sdb1
--
You received this bug notificatio
There are many things to consider before trying to change the behaviour
of gparted.
The current solution maintains compatibility with all versions of dmraid
and parted version 1.7.1 and higher.
Only newer versions of (lib)parted appear to use the dmraid library to
handle naming. Previous version
Unfortunately this is not surprising news. See the last few comments in
the following bug report
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=576616
There appears to be inconsistency in the way that various tools handle
FAT16 and FAT32 file system labels.
** Bug watch added: GNOME Bug Tracker #5
Unfortunately since dmraid offers _at least_ two different ways of
creating partition names, there is never a guarantee that the dmraid
default will match the device names chosen for use.
For example:
A) Persons wanting the default behaviour might use:
sudo dmraid -ay -v
to create partit
I am open to considering a patch that performs as you mentioned, and
also maintains compatibility will all versions of dmraid, and also
(lib)parted versions 1.7.1 and higher.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
> Why does it try to call kpartx when dmraid has already created
> the devices?
If I recall correctly, kpartx did not create the device entries if
dmraid had not been used to activate the device.
> For that matter, why does it need to run dmraid at all?
> Libparted already takes care of creating
> If dmraid does not add the 'p' and kpartx does, then kpartx ends up
> creating duplicate devices for the partitions with the 'p', so you
> have one with, and one without.
In my testing I recall some GNU/Linux distributions as having both
/dev/mapper and /dev/dm-# entries for the same dmraid devi
ure.in#n43
If you can help reduce this duplication of code then I would be very
appreciative.
As I stated above, I know exactly where to place the #ifdef
HAVE_LIBPARTED_2_3_0_PLUS conditionals to accomplish the above goals.
Hopefully that helps to address questions raised, and outline a path
forwa
You might try changing the label from Windows. If it is DOCS now, try
making it DOCS1 and then checking if all the necessary locations get
updated.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695283
Based on comment #17, I think we are on same page. :-)
Attached is an initial patch to use native libparted /dev/mapper
dmraid support. This patch was generated using:
$ git diff > enable-libparted-dmraid.patch
During the development process I discovered that an automatic
configure option t
Updated patch attached. Generated with the command:
$ git diff > enable-libparted-dmraid-2.patch
The difference between this and the prior patch is that no changes
should be needed to src/DMRaid.cc.
** Patch added: "Enable native libparted dmraid support patch 2 - lightly
tested"
https
As you discovered, the patch was not made against the Natty code, but
against the head of the master branch in the upstream git repository. I
apologize for this misunderstanding.
Attached is another patch that includes an update to the
src/Dialog_Progress.cc file. This change includes the " --en
My testing using GParted compiled from the master branch of the latest
upstream git repository worked very well with the new --enable-
libparted-dmraid configure option.
The relevant upstream commit can be viewed at the following link:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gparted/commit/?id=2f99511228c01e3
My testing was performed using the live image of natty-desktop-i386.iso
from today (Feb 22, 2011).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/719129
Title:
[Natty] Gparted duplicates dmraid parti
There is no automated unit testing for gparted (at least that I am aware
of). My testing included creating, deleting, moving, and resizing of
primary and logical partitions.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
I too am experiencing High Definition video tearing with my Intel
sandybridge CPU/GPU processors. Most of the time the tearing occurs on
the upper third of the screen.
This problem occurs on both an Intel i7-2600K and on an Intel i5-2500K.
Both of these chips feature Intel High Definition Graphic
Thank Envel for reporting you findings and the link to the other bug
report.
While researching this problem I came across the following Intel Linux Graphics
documentation:
http://intellinuxgraphics.org/documentation.html
My thoughts are that this problem must be solvable, or else why would
Intel
Have you looked at the GParted FAQ to learn what you can do to improve your
success with resizing NTFS file systems?
http://gparted.org/faq.php#faq-17
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789
Envel, if you need help with testing or something else just let me know.
I do have a background in C and am the maintainer of the GParted
application.
I have two systems for testing:
- ASUS P8M61-M motherboard and an Intel i5-2500k CPU
- ASUS P8M67-M Pro/CSM motherboard and an Intel i7-2600k CPU
Thanks for reporting back with how you were able to resolve the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/789977
Title:
Failed to reduce size of NTFS partition
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
The problem arises using the ntfsresize command from the ntfsprogs
package. Unfortunately the ntfsprogs package does not appear to be
actively maintained so I do not have much hope that a fix will be
forthcoming for this problem anytime soon.
Fortunately there are ways to work around this problem
Support for sector sizes greater than 512 bytes was added to Parted in
version 2.0.
Support for sector sizes greater than 512 bytes was added to GParted in
version 0.6.0, and requires Parted version 2.0 or higher.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
GParted 0.8.1 has been released upstream. It includes a new configure
option --enable-libparted-dmraid that permits this same functionality.
Thanks again go to Phillip Susi for help with this idea.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
This enhancement has been included in the upstream GParted 0.8.1
released on May 23, 2011.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/696937
Title:
running gparted as non-root user displays no gr
This enhancement has been included in the upstream GParted 0.8.1
released on May 23, 2011.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/151796
Title:
0.2.5 can't unmount partition with apostraphe i
madbiologist, yes I can confirm that this fixed the problem for me.
Recently I tried kubuntu-11.04-beta2-desktop-amd64.iso and can confirm
that the problem appears to be fixed in this new beta2 release.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subsc
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 663839 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663839
If this is indeed a duplicate of bug #663839, then how does one view
this previous bug report?
I tried following the link, but receive an "Error: Page not found" as
the title of the web page.
--
You receive
>From reading the following bug report, it sounds like the dosfslabel
command might set the partition (volume) label in both locations (since
version 3.0.7).
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=506786
Would you be able to try setting the label using a version of dosfstools
>= 3.0.7?
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 663839 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/663839
Thank you Jan for the clarification. That explanation makes sense.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Thank you Stjepan for initially reporting this problem, and for
responding with how you were able to work around this problem. Your
work around could prove helpful to others.
Confirmation of whether the newer version of dosfslabel resolves this
label problem will wait until someone has time and r
I am experiencing the same problem.
I am running Kubuntu 11.04 Beta1 on an Asus P8H67-M PRO/CSM motherboard
with a Sandy Bridge Intel i7-2600K CPU using the on CPU Intel HD
Graphics.
Also of note is that menus in non-KDE applications do display correctly
(e.g., Firefox, Open Office, etc.)
--
Y
I am experiencing the same problem.
I am running Kubuntu 11.04 Beta1 amd_64 on an Asus P8H67-M PRO/CSM
motherboard with a Sandy Bridge Intel i7-2600K CPU using the on CPU
Intel HD Graphics.
Of particular note is that menus in non-KDE applications do display
correctly (e.g., Firefox, Open Office,
Scott, would you be able to describe in detail how to work around this
problem by creating the xorg.conf file?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750964
Title:
Screen corruption in menus
Thank you for the work around Scott.
It does appears to address the incorrectly displayed kde menus. :-)
A side effect I have noticed is that typing appears to be slower to
respond. For instance while typing this message in Firefox, I can see
some temporary artifacts around each letter when I t
Of note regarding the work around is that the temporary artifacting
problem (when typing quickly) appears to be more pronounced in GNU
Emacs.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/750964
Title
Great work Robert!!!
I added the PPA and performed a "sudo apt-get upgrade", and then
rebooted. After booting up natty, the problem with screen corruption in
menus and title bars was gone! For my testing, the DebugFlushBatches
workaround was not in place.
Also of note is the missing "slow typin
A fix to prevent the visual disk display area from disappearing has been
committed in the upstream GParted project.
The relevant git commit can be viewed at the following link:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gparted/commit/?id=ec876448b4539a1e25272fe3f9ebb44552d3df53
This enhancement is planned for
Phillip, would it be possible to update the title of this bug to
something link "GParted crashes with Assertion (head_size <= 63)"?
If so, that might help others with filing bug reports in the proper
area.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
Thank you Eliah for bringing this bug to our attention.
A patch has been committed in the upstream git repository and will be
included in the next upstream release of GParted (0.9.0).
The relevant git commit can be viewed at the following link:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gparted/commit/?id=caa76
Thanks for the tip Phillip. I have added your suggestion to my todo
list to learn more about the bugsquad team. :-)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/545911
Title:
GParted crashes with
Following are some relevant mailing list posts regarding this problem
including the one by T Kortehisto:
Verbatim USB drive crashes libparted
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2011-02/msg0.html
Re: Bug report
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-parted/2011-02/msg2.html
[part
T Kortehisto,
I am curious. If you plug in this drive with it's default formatting,
are you able to read and write to the drive using GNU/Linux? Windows?
Other operating systems?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https
One more request. Would you be able to provide a copy of the Master
Boot Record which is contained in the first sector of the device?
You can capture the Master Boot Record in a file with the following
command:
NOTE: Be extra careful to type this command in properly, otherwise loss
of data coul
Thank you Tom for confirming that the problem is now resolved.
--
Gparted does not list dmraid devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Thank you Luca and Seth for clarifying the problem for me.
If I understand this correctly, one of the best ways to avoid this
problem is to not use Glib::ustring when reading data directly from the
disk.
Luca,
I will investigate removing the Glib::ustring stuff from the
GParted_Core::get_filesy
Wow, that was fast! Thank you Seth.
I will look into applying these patches to master. I appreciate you
supplying the git commands for your git repo too. Though I use git
frequently I am by no means an expert with git.
--
gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs
Thanks again for the patch Seth. My preliminary testing went well so I
have committed the patch to the Gnome git repository for GParted for
inclusion in the next release of GParted (0.7.0).
For those curious, the plans for GParted 0.7.0 can be viewed at the following
link:
http://gparted-forum.s
I believe that this problem has been worked and solved in a different
bug report.
See Ubuntu launchpad bug #617885
Bug #617885 - gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/617885
--
gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_
No worries Phillip. :-)
GParted 0.6.3 removes the requirement for kpartx to support dmraid
devices. GParted 0.6.4 removes a regression that I introduced in 0.6.3.
Hopefully Debian and Ubuntu pick up the latest version soon.
--
Gparted does not list dmraid devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
Thanks go to Seth for providing a patch to resolve this problem.
The enhancements to address this bug report have been included upstream in
GParted 0.7.0
which was released on October 29, 2010.
--
gparted crash at start: glibmm-ERROR **
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/617885
You received this b
Thanks go to Seth for providing a patch to resolve this problem.
The enhancements to address this bug report have been included upstream in
GParted 0.7.0
which was released on October 29, 2010.
--
gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
The enhancements to address this bug report have been included in upstream
GParted 0.7.0
which was released on October 29, 2010.
--
no need to copy data when moving swap partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401228
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
In follow up to comment #32, the patch by Seth will be included in the
upstream release of GParted 0.7.0 on October 29, 2010.
For anyone interested in testing GParted 0.7.0-beta1 prior to the release date,
this version is currently available on the beta version of the System Rescue CD:
http://www
My recommendation would be to use GParted 0.6.2. This is because
GParted 0.6.0 contains two serious bugs that have been fixed in version
0.6.2.
The bugs present in GParted 0.6.0 are as follows:
Bug 623630 - Move logical partition to right yields invalid partition table on
/dev/sda -- wrong sign
Good news! I believe that I have solved this problem, and I would like
some help with testing.
Is anyone able to compile and test GParted source code from the GNOME
git repository?
Instructions on how to compile GParted from the git source code repository can
be found at the following link:
Good news! I believe that I have solved this problem by removing the
dependency on kpartx and ensuring that the partition names are
compatible with the dmraid command. I would like some help with testing
to determine if the problem is indeed resolved.
Is anyone able to compile and test GParted s
Thank you Peter for confirming that current git version of GParted does
correctly list your firmware RAID array.
When GParted is started, it invokes the command "dmraid -ay -v" to
ensure that the /dev/mapper device entries are created.
If you have found a problem in the boot log, then you might w
Thank you for the clarification Brian.
Would you be able to try using the gparted-0.6.2 source code directly from the
GParted web site?
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gparted/files/gparted/
The reason I ask is that in comment #12 and comment #13 joopbraak
mentioned that compiling from source or
Excellent work Brian! Now we know the problem originates with the
02-btrfs.patch.
--
gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/609447
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
I believe that the btrfs patch originated with the following bug report:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=571170
Luca Bruno did more work on the patch and committed his changes to the gnome
git repository for gparted in a separate branch (lucab/btrfs):
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gparte
For background information, the patch included in comment #21 does not
fix this problem. The single line change of code has been included in
the GParted git repository for the GParted 0.6.3 release planned for
tomorrow.
Git commit link:
Use direct assignment for string in class initialization
htt
This bug sounds very similar to and is perhaps a duplicate of bug
#609477.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/609447
--
Gparted crashing on start
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/645521
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
This bug sounds very similar to and is perhaps a duplicate of bug
609477.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gparted/+bug/609447
--
gpartedbin crashed with signal 5 in Glib::exception_handlers_invoke()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/635743
You received this bug notification because you a
The enhancements to address this bug report have been included in
GParted 0.6.3 which was released on September 23, 2010.
--
gparted allows user to overwrite active mounted partition
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/503125
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
The enhancements to address this bug report have been included in
GParted 0.6.3 which was released upstream on September 23, 2010.
--
Gparted not usable on fakeraid arrays
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/600729
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
The enhancements to address this bug report have been included in
GParted 0.6.3 which was released upstream on September 23, 2010.
--
Gparted does not list dmraid devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
GParted 0.6.0 has just been released upstream. This new version
includes support for devices with sector sizes greater than 512 bytes.
For more details refer to the following link:
http://gparted.sourceforge.net/news.php
--
gparted doesn't support sector sizes > 512
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
Diego, are you able to create new partitions with the FAT32 file system,
and then resize these new partitions?
This answer would help to diagnose if the problem occurs for all FAT32
file systems on your disk device, or one specific file system.
As a side note, GParted uses the libparted library t
I believe that it is the Ubuntu Live CD that enables the swap on bootup.
This is not the same as partitions that are automatically mounted when
introduced to the system, such as plugging in a USB flash drive.
>From GParted you can select the swap partition and then use the
"Partition --> Swapoff"
Thank you Julien for confirming that the changes included in the git
repository do resolve the problem.
As mentioned earlier, an upstream release of GParted 0.6.3 is planned
for later this month.
--
raid not detected (sb750) on ubuntu 9.10 and 10.04.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615753
You r
Thank you Tom for continuing to offer to help with resolution of this
problem.
Recently another user confirmed that the enhancements in the upstream
git repository do indeed resolve this problem. The relevant bug report
can be found at the following link:
Bug #615753 - raid not detected (sb
The following patch will use both udisks and hal-lock to prevent auto-mounting
if both binaries exist and both daemons are running:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gparted/commit/?id=f242ccba462ae12bc7fd82a0ae774e60bf12e008
I also re-worded the comment after committing if you want this portion of the
GParted requires both dmraid and kpartx to properly function with
FAKERAID. The Ubuntu 10.04 Live CD did not ship with kpartx and this is
why GParted will not automatically detect FAKERAID setups.
The kpartx application is required to create the proper device names
when the dmraid command does no
>From the log file I translated the following message from Spanish:
No se puede detectar el sistema de ficheros.
to English:
Can not detect file system.
Based on this message it would appear that the libparted library is
unable to detect the FAT32 file system. This is not surprising
Samir, the disadvantage to removing the dosfstools package is that
operations on FAT16/32 file systems will no longer be supported.
--
Gparted scan for device infinitely because of filesystem check (dosfsck)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121943
You received this bug notification because you are
Based on comment #7, are you saying that you need something like the
following if both udisks and hal-lock are present together?
E.g.:
udisks --inhibit -- \
hal-lock --interface org.freedesktop.Hal.Device.Storage
--exclusive \
--run "/path-to-gpart
Would you be able to provide the output from the following two commands?
fdisk -l -u
where one of the options is a lower case "L" and not the number one.
parted /path-to-your-device unit s print
where /path-to-your-device is something like /dev/sda.
--
Gparted failed to grow fat32 f
Based on the description of the problem, I do not think this problem is
with GParted or QTParted.
Would you be able to provide a picture or screen shot of the problem?
This might help to get the problem routed to the proper team.
--
List of possible filesystems duplicates itself during partition
>From the text file in comment #2, it appears that the device has 2048
byte sectors. GParted versions 0.5.2 and earlier do not support sector
sizes other than 512 bytes.
Support for sector sizes > 512 bytes will be included in the upcoming
GParted 0.6.0 version planned for release on June 18, 201
Hi Tom,
GParted Live 0.6.3-3 is now available if you would like to test out the
new GParted 0.6.3 using a Live CD image.
Regards,
Curtis
--
Gparted does not list dmraid devices
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Thank you for testing these other versions of GParted. The fixes in
GParted to get it to work with Ubuntu will be in an upcoming GParted
0.6.3 release planned upstream for later this month.
--
raid not detected (sb750) on ubuntu 9.10 and 10.04.1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/615753
You receive
If you are up to compiling the GParted source code, you could download
the git version and test it to confirm that it resolves the problem for
you.
A link to instructions on how to do this are included in comment #2.
--
raid not detected (sb750) on ubuntu 9.10 and 10.04.1
https://bugs.launchpad.
I believe that this problem is solved in the upstream git repository.
Would you be able to compile and test GParted source code from the GNOME
git repository?
Instructions on how to compile GParted from the git source code repository can
be found at the following link:
How to Build GParted
301 - 400 of 412 matches
Mail list logo
