[Bug 534832] Re: dh_dkms silently exits at the first non-dkms package

Fixed in dkms 2.1.1.2-2fakesync1. ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released -- dh_dkms silently exits at the first non-dkms package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534832 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubun

[Bug 535535] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.57 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: failed to exec /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms: Exec format error

Can install the debsums package and run ‘debsums -as dkms’, to check whether any of the files in the dkms package have been modified? You may also want to check all your packages for modifications, with ‘debsums -as’. ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- package linu

[Bug 541702] Re: package linux-headers-2.6.32- 16-generic 2.6.32-16.25 failed to install/upgrade: Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab d en Fehlerwert 2 zurück

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480055 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480055 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 541701 package linux-image-2.6.32-16-preempt 2.6.32-16.25 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 126 ** This

[Bug 541701] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-16-preempt 2.6.32-16.25 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 126

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480055 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480055 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 480055 run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 1 [ due to removed package with lingering files in /etc ] -- package linux-image-2.6.3

[Bug 535535] Re: package linux-image-2.6.31-20-generic 2.6.31-20.57 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: failed to exec /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms: Exec format error

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480055 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480055 Never mind, I bet this is just bug 480055 in disguise. ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 480055 run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 1 [ due to removed package with

[Bug 528852] Re: package linux-image-2.6.32-14-generic 2.6.32-14.20 failed to install/upgrade: run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 126

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 480055 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/480055 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 480055 run-parts: /etc/kernel/postinst.d/dkms exited with return code 1 [ due to removed package with lingering files in /etc ] -- package linux-image-2.6.3

[Bug 532737] Re: package dkms 2.1.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package dkms is already installed and configured

I don’t understand the problem. There are no errors about dkms in your attachments, nor indeed any errors at all (or anything about dkms). Can you say exactly what the problem is (e.g. a copy of the error message you got)? ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- packag

[Bug 391035] Re: aptitude stops displaying downloads

This patch is wrong. This needs to be ScreenWidth + 1, not ScreenWidth: + BlankLine = new char[ScreenWidth]; because otherwise acqprogress.cc:273 overflows the buffer: BlankLine[ScreenWidth] = 0; ** Changed in: aptitude (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress -- aptitude s

[Bug 391035] Re: aptitude stops displaying downloads

In addition, the patch has a more subtle problem. ScreenWidth is an int _reference_, that points to unsigned int screen_width in cmdline_progress.cc, which can be updated at any time from the SIGWINCH signal handler. This would lead to a buffer overflow if the window size is increased. -- aptit

[Bug 550905] Re: dkms does not run when upgrade downloads new kernel version

Yes, that would happen if you installed the particular header package (linux-headers-2.6.32-19-generic) before installing dkms or nvidia- current. Because linux-headers is a virtual package provided by linux- headers-2.6.32-19-generic, the dependency is considered satisfied and you will not automa

[Bug 555334] Re: Add linux-tools metapackage

This really is about linux-meta. ** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => linux-meta (Ubuntu) ** Tags added: kj-linux-meta -- Add linux-tools metapackage https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/555334 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu

[Bug 497149] Re: Packages using DKMS should make use of /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst

openafs in Debian is using dh_dkms now, so this will be fixed in the next sync. ** Changed in: openafs (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- Packages using DKMS should make use of /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/497149 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 550905] Re: dkms does not run when upgrade downloads new kernel version

Fair enough. If you can figure out how to reproduce the problem step- by-step, starting from the default installation (say a Lucid live CD), that would let us determine which package to assign the bug to. It would be enough to figure out how you got linux- headers-2.6.32-19-generic installed with

[Bug 554295] Re: Sync git-core 1:1.7.0.3-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

git-core 1:1.7.0.4-1 is out and has these Debian changes over 1:1.7.0.3-1, including a fix for bug 255578: git-core (1:1.7.0.4-1) unstable; urgency=low * debian/git-daemon-run.postrm: purge: don't warn if the git-daemon service is already removed; use -f option to userdel, on fast-purge

[Bug 556694] Re: package git-daemon-run 1:1.6.3.3-2 failed to install/upgrade: il sottoprocesso vecchio script di post-removal ha restituito lo stato di errore 1

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 255578 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255578 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 255578 package git-daemon-run 1:1.5.4.3-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 1 -- package git-

[Bug 550905] Re: dkms does not run when upgrade downloads new kernel version

Thanks. I’m assigning this to the jockey package. ** Package changed: ubuntu => jockey (Ubuntu) ** Changed in: jockey (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- dkms does not run when upgrade downloads new kernel version https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/550905 You received this bug notificati

[Bug 248355] Re: Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics

The bug task is labelled poppler (Ubuntu), not poppler (Ubuntu Lucid). Since the fix is planned to be uploaded for Lucid+1, this marking is correct. It would be massively irresponsible to upload a development version of poppler (0.13.x) to Lucid so late in the LTS release cycle. If you want this

[Bug 248355] Re: Evince doesn't anti-alias graphics

Josh: Your patch modifies Makefile.am without updating Makefile.in or causing the packaging to run automake. So it fails to build the new object and dies with a linker error. After fixing that, it seems to work for me on the examples from this bug, such as ubuntu-manual-draft.pdf. I would sugges

[Bug 569212] Re: zephyr-clients manpages have incorrect paths

** Also affects: zephyr-clients via https://zephyr.1ts.org/ticket/64 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- zephyr-clients manpages have incorrect paths https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569212 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 445773] Re: git-core FTBFS: test failures [ia64]

I’m going to assume this was fixed in Ubuntu since maverick’s eglibc is descended from the Debian version with the fix (2.10.2-6). ** Changed in: eglibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Released ** Changed in: git-core (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid -- git-core FTBFS: test failu

[Bug 588033] [NEW] oprofile needs rebuilding against binutils 2.20.51.20100527

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: oprofile Currently oprofile and its rdeps (llvm-dev) are not installable in maverick, because oprofile depends binutils (>= 2.20.51.20100518), binutils (< 2.20.51.20100519), but binutils is version 2.20.51.20100527-1ubuntu1. oprofile needs to be rebuilt

[Bug 587910] Re: [maverick] Syntax error in bash-completion.d/apt prints ugly messages at every login

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 546794 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546794 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 546794 [revert, causes errors] Smarter lib* aware autocompletion? -- [maverick] Syntax error in bash-completion.d/apt prints ugly messages at every login ht

[Bug 546794] Re: [revert, causes errors] Smarter lib* aware autocompletion?

** Description changed: - This patch has lead to serious errors (comments #6, #7) and has clearly - never been tested. It should be reverted (debdiff in comment #8). + This patch has lead to serious errors (comments #6, #7) and has clearly never been tested. It should be reverted (debdiff in co

[Bug 588237] Re: Sync git 1:1.7.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) [replaces git-core]

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 586509 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586509 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 586509 Sync git 1:1.7.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) -- Sync git 1:1.7.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) [replaces git-core] https://bugs.launch

[Bug 546794] Re: Smarter lib* aware autocompletion?

Josh Brown: The behavior of this patch (even with the syntax errors fixed) is not desired. That is why it was reverted. See comments #7 and #10. ** Changed in: bash-completion (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- Smarter lib* aware autocompletion? https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546794 Yo

[Bug 588928] Re: Circumvention of sudo's secure path option

** Changed in: sudo (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Circumvention of sudo's secure path option https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/588928 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@li

[Bug 585196] Re: emacs fails to start: X protocol error

This problem is still present with gtk+2.0 2.21.1-1ubuntu1 (as was probably expected). -- emacs fails to start: X protocol error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs maili

[Bug 588808] Re: Rogue root 'emacs23' process

Do you have the auctex package installed? You are probably just seeing /etc/cron.weekly/auctex (which runs every week in the background as root). ** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid ** Converted to question: https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/emacs23/+quest

[Bug 587424] Re: libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)

You didn’t look at my debdiff, did you? libavfilter-extra-1 0.6~svn20100505-1ubuntu4 is still empty. You need to rename debian /libavfilter-extra-0.install to debian/libavfilter-extra-1.install. ** Changed in: ffmpeg-extra (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => New -- libavfilter-extra-1 is e

[Bug 587424] Re: libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)

** Patch added: "ffmpeg-extra_0.6~svn20100505-1ubuntu4_lp587424.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49621922/ffmpeg-extra_0.6%7Esvn20100505-1ubuntu4_lp587424.debdiff ** Summary changed: - libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc) + libavfilter-extra-1 is empty (except /usr/share

[Bug 48153] Re: bcm43xx wireless interface needs “pre-up ifconfig eth1 up”

This was with the free bcm43xx driver, not the proprietary bcmwl driver. I don’t know if b43/b43legacy still have this problem. It was on someone else’s laptop, so I can’t test anymore. Scott, you marked this as confirmed a long time ago; can you still reproduce the bug? If not, I suggest we clo

[Bug 587424] Re: libavfilter-extra-1 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)

BUGabundo, that sounds like a different bug. libavutil50 is from the ffmpeg source package, not the ffmpeg-extra source package (perhaps you meant to install libavutil-extra-50?). Anyway, if you can’t get it to work, file another bug report. -- libavfilter-extra-1 is empty (except /usr/share/do

[Bug 553745] Re: plymouthd crashed with SIGSEGV in ply_event_loop_process_pending_events()

The plymouth patches should still be applied (hopefully upstream); they’re all good changes. Whether they should be applied as a Lucid SRU is up to the SRU team. It’s possible that the reduction in events from mountall has made this bug unlikely enough that an SRU is no longer as critical; I’m no

[Bug 566956] Re: package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.12+dfsg-3 failed to install/upgrade: openafs kernel module failed to build

I sent a patch for the 1.4.x branch upstream: http://gerrit.openafs.org/1988 -- package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.12+dfsg-3 failed to install/upgrade: openafs kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566956 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 223170] Re: Trackpad scrolling is jerky and difficult to be precise with

I know this isn’t an Ubuntu bug and has been Won’t Fix for some time, but for anyone else looking for the current status of the upstream work, it seems to be stalled: http://hortont.com/blog/posts/2008/12/18/071607.html -- Trackpad scrolling is jerky and difficult to be precise with https://bug

[Bug 582645] Re: Linker was not configured to use sysroots

I think gcc-4.4 needs to update its versioned dependency on binutils (>= 2.20.51.20100407-0ubuntu1). binutils (2.20.51.20100407-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * Configure native build --with-sysroot=/. Closes: #556126. -- Matthias Klose Thu, 08 Apr 2010 01:31:49 +0200 -- Linker was not conf

[Bug 580594] Re: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory)

Please do not use Launchpad bugs as a support forum. This bug tracker is for development work. If you have future questions, take them to https://answers.launchpad.net/ubuntu or http://ubuntuforums.org/ . As you can see from comment #4, 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu4 was uploaded to Maverick, not Luc

[Bug 285241] Re: aptitude SIGABRT on attempting to play minesweeper

David: You’re misreading the changelog. aptitude 0.5.1-1 was in experimental a year and a half ago. The current version is 0.6.1.5-3 in testing and 0.6.2.1-2 in unstable. The 0.6.x series has been in unstable for seven months and testing for two. We don’t need to wait for anything; someone just

[Bug 577136] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

nezgul: Please don’t post comments on unrelated bugs. Open a new bug report instead. Your particular bug has already been reported (bug 584180). -- package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 589035] Re: emacsclient plays games with the mouse

** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- emacsclient plays games with the mouse https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/589035 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lis

[Bug 592794] [NEW] Rebuild against new Xorg abi

Public bug reported: nvidia-current Provides xserver-xorg-video-6, but maverick’s xserver- xorg Depends xserver-xorg-video-7, and xserver-xorg-core Breaks xserver- xorg-video-6. nvidia-graphics-drivers needs to be rebuilt to pick up the ABI number change. No source modifications are necessary, s

[Bug 592857] [NEW] maverick’s apt is old er than lucid’s

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: apt maverick has apt 0.7.25.3ubuntu8, but lucid-updates has apt 0.7.25.3ubuntu9 (which appears to have been an SRU even though it isn’t numbered like one). ** Affects: apt (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- maverick’s apt is ol

[Bug 580594] Re: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- bcmwl kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580594 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub

[Bug 577136] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

Do you have the kernel headers for your kernel (linux- headers-2.6.34-999-generic) installed? ** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete -- package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launc

[Bug 542234] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 580594 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580594 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 580594 bcmwl kernel module failed to build -- package bcmwl-kernel-source (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build htt

[Bug 542200] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 580594 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580594 ** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 542234 package bcmwl-kernel-source (not installed) failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug

[Bug 500036] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.10.91.9+bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 580594 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580594 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 580594 bcmwl kernel module failed to build -- package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.10.91.9+bdcom-0ubuntu5 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to

[Bug 580594] Re: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory)

** Summary changed: - bcmwl kernel module failed to build + bcmwl kernel module failed to build (error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory) -- bcmwl kernel module failed to build (error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580594 You received t

[Bug 580594] Re: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory)

This patch fixes building on kernel ≥ 2.6.33. I’ve uploaded the patched package to my PPA <https://launchpad.net/~anders-kaseorg/+archive/ppa>. ** Patch added: "bcmwl_5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3_lp580594.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48473836/bcmwl_5.60.48.36%2Bbdcom-0

[Bug 577136] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu3 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

Okay, not a bug with bcmwl, then. You just need to download linux-headers-2.6.34-999 and linux- headers-2.6.34-999-generic from the same place you got linux- image-2.6.34-999-generic. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KernelTeam/MainlineBuilds . The headers won’t be in apt because the image wasn’t in

[Bug 580594] Re: bcmwl kernel module failed to build (error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory)

Thanks. I forwarded the patch to linux-wlan-client-support- l...@broadcom.com. -- bcmwl kernel module failed to build (error: linux/autoconf.h: No such file or directory) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/580594 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 574719] Re: scan-build broken

** Changed in: clang (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- scan-build broken https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/574719 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://l

[Bug 410407] Re: Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION]

Joe: No, this is not fixed in 1.3.0. The reason that it works in Fedora is that they enabled the GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS workaround in Fedora release nspluginwrapper-1.3.0-10.fc12. -- Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION] https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/410407 You received

[Bug 590219] [NEW] Remove libavutil-extra-49 from maverick (multiverse)

Public bug reported: Due to an incorrect merge (bug 587424), libavutil-extra-49 in maverick is an empty package. The fixed version also had its soname bumped, so libavutil-extra-50 is fine, but there are still 61 binary packages from 50 source packages that depend on libavutil49 | libavutil-extra

[Bug 590197] Re: git interactive rebase fails with "shift: 1: can't shift that many"

Can you check whether that’s fixed by this patch (from http://bugs.debian.org/583974 )? http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.bugs.general/712342/focus=148057 ** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #583974 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583974 -- git interactive

[Bug 382048] Re: Backport subversion 1.6.5dfsg-1ubuntu1

Valentin: See the debdiffs I already posted in comment #17. ** Changed in: hardy-backports Status: Incomplete => New -- Backport subversion 1.6.5dfsg-1ubuntu1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/382048 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscr

[Bug 410407] Re: Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION]

I’m guessing that what would help upstream most is a reliable, deterministic, verified recipe for reproducing the problem starting from a controlled known environment, such as a specific version of the Ubuntu live CD -- Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION] https://bug

[Bug 590732] Re: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build

** Changed in: bcmwl (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Summary changed: - package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.60.48.36+bdcom-0ubuntu4 failed to install/upgrade: bcmwl kernel module failed to build + bcmwl kernel module fails to build on kernel 2.6.35 -- bcmwl kernel module fails to build o

[Bug 586509] [NEW] Sync git 1:1.7.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main)

Public bug reported: Please sync git 1:1.7.1-1 (main) from Debian unstable (main) The git-core source package was renamed to git. Changelog entries since git-core 1:1.7.0.4-1: git (1:1.7.1-1) unstable; urgency=low * debian/diff/0003-t-t7400-submodule-basic.sh-debug-output-...diff: remove

[Bug 546794] Re: Smarter lib* aware autocompletion?

Ahem. Did anybody test this patch before uploading it? It’s not even valid syntax. bash: /etc/bash_completion.d/apt: line 32: syntax error near unexpected token `;' bash: /etc/bash_completion.d/apt: line 32: `2> /dev/null ); $( apt-cache --no-generate pkgnames "lib$cur" \'

[Bug 546794] Re: Smarter lib* aware autocompletion?

Also, I disagree with the premise of the patch. It is wrong for apt-get install clutt to complete itself to apt-get install libclutter such that I can’t undo the change by hitting backspace. If you are looking for libraries, I don’t think typing three characters “lib” is too much to ask. Ple

[Bug 546794] Re: Smarter lib* aware autocompletion?

Please apply this debdiff to revert the previous patch. Thanks. ** Patch added: "bash-completion_1.1-3ubuntu3_revert.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49227213/bash-completion_1.1-3ubuntu3_revert.debdiff ** Summary changed: - Smarter lib* aware autocompletion? + [revert, causes errors]

[Bug 586688] [NEW] llvm-dev should no longer depend on oprofile

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: llvm In llvm 2.7~svn20100409-0ubuntu1, a dependency on oprofile was added to llvm-dev (bug 557033). But then in llvm 2.7~svn20100418-0ubuntu2, llvm is no longer configured --with-oprofile. So the oprofile dependency should now be dropped. ** Affects: l

[Bug 586711] Re: [Maverick] Errors whenever opening a terminal

Here is the patch I posted in bug #546794. ** Patch added: "bash-completion_1.1-3ubuntu3_revert.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49278096/bash-completion_1.1-3ubuntu3_revert.debdiff -- [Maverick] Errors whenever opening a terminal https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/586711 You received thi

[Bug 546794] Re: [revert, causes errors] Smarter lib* aware autocompletion?

** Description changed: + This patch has lead to serious errors (comments #6, #7) and has clearly + never been tested. It should be reverted (debdiff in comment #8). + + [ORIGINAL DESCRIPTION:] Binary package hint: apt Wouldn't it be nice if when typing apt-get install clu [press tab

[Bug 587424] [NEW] libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)

Public bug reported: $ dpkg-query -W libavutil-extra-49 libavutil-extra-49 4:0.6~svn20100505-1ubuntu3 $ dpkg -L libavutil-extra-49 /. /usr /usr/share /usr/share/doc /usr/share/doc/libavutil-extra-49 /usr/share/doc/libavutil-extra-49/README.Debian.gz /usr/share/doc/libavutil-extra-49/MAINTAINE

[Bug 587424] Re: libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)

Upon further inspection, all of the other binary packages from ffmpeg- extra are empty, too. This is … what you might have expected to happen when you delete the dh_install line from debian/rules. -- libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587424 You r

[Bug 587424] Re: libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)

** Patch added: "ffmpeg-extra_0.6~svn20100505-1ubuntu3_lp587424.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49345959/ffmpeg-extra_0.6%7Esvn20100505-1ubuntu3_lp587424.debdiff -- libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587424 You received this bug notific

[Bug 587424] Re: libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)

Here’s a better debdiff that corrects some additional mistakes in the 0.6 merge (rename libavutil-extra-49 to libavutil-extra-50, and rename debian/libavfilter-extra-0.install to debian/libavfilter- extra-1.install). ** Patch added: "ffmpeg-extra_0.6~svn20100505-1ubuntu3_lp587424.debdiff" htt

[Bug 587379] Re: ffmpeg-extra shared library packages in Maverick contain no shared object files

*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 587424 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587424 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 587424 libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc) -- ffmpeg-extra shared library packages in Maverick contain no shared object files https://bugs.la

[Bug 587431] [NEW] libavfilter-dev depends on libavfilter-extra-0 instead of libavfilter-extra-1

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ffmpeg This is a clear typo in ffmpeg/debian/control: the libavfilter-extra-0 should be libavfilter-extra-1. Package: libavfilter-dev Section: libdevel Architecture: any Depends: libavfilter1 (>= ${binary:Version}) | libavfilter-extra-0 (>= ${source

[Bug 587431] Re: libavfilter-dev depends on libavfilter-extra-0 instead of libavfilter-extra-1

** Patch added: "ffmpeg_0.6~svn20100505-1ubuntu1_lp587431.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49346893/ffmpeg_0.6%7Esvn20100505-1ubuntu1_lp587431.debdiff -- libavfilter-dev depends on libavfilter-extra-0 instead of libavfilter-extra-1 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587431 You received th

[Bug 587424] Re: libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc)

** Changed in: ffmpeg-extra (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- libavutil-extra-49 is empty (except /usr/share/doc) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/587424 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 587431] Re: libavfilter-dev depends on libavfilter-extra-0 instead of libavfilter-extra-1

** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #583728 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583728 ** Also affects: ffmpeg (Debian) via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=583728 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- libavfilter-dev depends on libavfilter-extra-

[Bug 411740] Re: REVIEW/SPONSOR: Please review and sponsor nspluginwrapper 1.3.0-0ubuntu2

> I didn't prepare a merge, since we're way over Debian import freeze. Debian import freeze doesn’t stop you from manually syncing or merging new versions from Debian, it only stops the automatic syncs. (See .) Anyway, we’re in a new development cycle.

[Bug 578074] [NEW] Clicking on nm-applet locks the entire desktop during wireless association

Public bug reported: NetworkManager takes (eerily close to) 30 seconds to connect to a wireless network: 15 seconds with “one green light” and 15 seconds with “two green lights”. If I click on the applet during the second half of this operation, the animation stops and the *entire desktop freezes

[Bug 578074] Re: Clicking on nm-applet locks the entire desktop during wireless association

Here’s a backtrace from nm-applet while it’s hanging with the keyboard and mouse grabbed. (This was gathered by running gdb nm-applet inside screen and reattaching from the text console—one side-effect of this bug is that grabbing a backtrace using normal means would be impossible.) ** Attachmen

[Bug 578074] Re: Clicking on nm-applet locks the entire desktop during wireless association

And here’s a backtrace from the NetworkManager daemon while nm-applet is stuck waiting for it. (Though I think it is unacceptable for nm-applet to hang the entire desktop regardless of what it’s waiting for the daemon to do.) ** Attachment added: "backtrace from NetworkManager daemon" http://

[Bug 398300] Re: The new gdm doesn't give an option to run /etc/X11/Xsession

Works for me with gdm 2.30.2-0ubuntu1 on Maverick. -- The new gdm doesn't give an option to run /etc/X11/Xsession https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/398300 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 578074] Re: Clicking on nm-applet locks the entire desktop during wireless association

By the way, although the daemon backtrace mentions resolvconf, the problem does not go away with resolvconf uninstalled (the pause is just somewhat shorter). -- Clicking on nm-applet locks the entire desktop during wireless association https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/578074 You received this bug

[Bug 578408] [NEW] package haskell-mode 2.7.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: haskell-mode It seems haskell-mode doesn’t work with xemacs21. While compiling toplevel forms in file /usr/share/xemacs21/site-lisp/haskell-mode/haskell-c.el: !! Invalid read syntax (("#")) >>Error occurred processing haskell-c.el: Invalid read s

[Bug 578408] Re: package haskell-mode 2.7.0-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48227653/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "Df.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48227654/Df.txt ** Attachment added: "Dmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48227655/Dmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminal

[Bug 532737] Re: package dkms 2.1.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package dkms is already installed and configured

Thanks; I’m closing this report. If you find any other bugs, don’t hesitate to report them. ** Changed in: dkms (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Invalid -- package dkms 2.1.0.1-0ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: package dkms is already installed and configured https://bugs.launchpad.net/

[Bug 569823] Re: libavformat SEGV playing certain mp4 files

** Changed in: ffmpeg (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- libavformat SEGV playing certain mp4 files https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569823 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@

[Bug 573381] Re: Git-Gui fails when cloning a repository

** Changed in: git-core (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Git-Gui fails when cloning a repository https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/573381 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@l

[Bug 410407] Re: Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION]

** Bug watch added: Red Hat Bugzilla #542424 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542424 ** Also affects: nspluginwrapper (Fedora) via https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=542424 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [

[Bug 410407] Re: Clicking on items in Flash player does nothing [READ DESCRIPTION]

Yixing Jia closed the upstream Adobe bug with the following comment: “Please update to the latest Flash player build” Since this issue is not fixed in either the latest stable version or the latest release candidate, I reopened the upstream bug as

[Bug 585196] Re: emacs fails to start: X protocol error

** Changed in: emacs23 (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- emacs fails to start: X protocol error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lis

[Bug 585196] Re: emacs fails to start: X protocol error

The problem starts happening with the following upgrade (and goes away with the corresponding downgrade): [UPGRADE] gtk2-engines-pixbuf 2.20.0-0ubuntu4 -> 2.21.0-1ubuntu2 [UPGRADE] libgail-common 2.20.0-0ubuntu4 -> 2.21.0-1ubuntu2 [UPGRADE] libgail18 2.20.0-0ubuntu4 -> 2.21.0-1ubuntu2 [UPGRADE] li

[Bug 585196] Re: emacs fails to start: X protocol error

Another workaround is ‘export XLIB_SKIP_ARGB_VISUALS=1’. -- emacs fails to start: X protocol error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585196 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubun

[Bug 585196] Re: emacs fails to start: X protocol error

Also, emacs23-lucid is unaffected (note: that’s the Lucid user interface frontend, not the Ubuntu release codename), so this problem is specific to the GTK+ frontend. -- emacs fails to start: X protocol error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/585196 You received this bug notification because you ar

[Bug 585196] Re: emacs fails to start: X protocol error

It also works with libgtk2.0-0 2.21.0-1ubuntu1, which you can get from https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+2.0/2.21.0-1ubuntu1 . So the client-side decoration patch in 2.21.0-1ubuntu2 is what broke this. (Apparently Emacs isn’t the only application that broke: bug 491521, bug 584228.) -- e

[Bug 566956] Re: package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.12+dfsg-3 failed to install/upgrade: openafs kernel module failed to build

OpenAFS 1.4.12.1 was just released, including this fix. We’ll probably have Debian/Ubuntu packages soon. -- package openafs-modules-dkms 1.4.12+dfsg-3 failed to install/upgrade: openafs kernel module failed to build https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/566956 You received this bug notification becau

[Bug 585603] Re: graphical nonresponsivness while "gitk" on linux kernel source

The linux-2.6 repository is huge, so using gitk on it does unfortunately require a lot of memory (ideally 2 GiB or more). You can make things a little bit better by unchecking Edit → Preferences → Display nearby tags, and also by only using gitk on specific ranges of the history or specific subtre

[Bug 534832] [NEW] dh_dkms silently exits at the first non-dkms package

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dkms In dkms 2.1.1.2-0ubuntu1, dh_dkms has an ‘exit;’ that should have been a ‘next;’. This causes it to silently exit after seeing the first non- dkms package, and fail to generate maintainer scripts for later dkms packages. As a result, openafs 1.4.12

[Bug 534833] [NEW] dh_dkms postinst snippet always fails

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: dkms In dkms 2.1.1.2-0ubuntu1, the postinst snippet generated by dh_dkms always falls through to an ‘exit 1’ after calling /usr/lib/dkms/common.postinst , even if it succeeded. This was fixed in Debian’s dkms 2.1.1.2-1 by http://git.debian.org/?p=collab-

[Bug 534843] [NEW] Sync dkms 2.1.1.2-2 (main) from Debian testing (main)

Public bug reported: Please sync dkms 2.1.1.2-2 (main) from Debian testing (main) Explanation of the Ubuntu delta and why it can be dropped: Debian has been updating their dkms package so that it can be synced into Ubuntu. The current Debian package is identical to the Ubuntu package plus the f

[Bug 534843] Re: Sync dkms 2.1.1.2-2 (main) from Debian testing (main)

I guess this probably needs a fakesync because Debian repacked the .orig.tar.gz (its contents are the same). -- Sync dkms 2.1.1.2-2 (main) from Debian testing (main) https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/534843 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscri

[Bug 533090] [NEW] package qemu-kvm 0.12.3-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

Public bug reported: Binary package hint: qemu-kvm Setting up qemu-kvm (0.12.3-0ubuntu6) ... rmdir: failed to remove `/etc/kvm/utils': No such file or directory rmdir: failed to remove `/etc/kvm': No such file or directory dpkg: error processing qemu-kvm (--configure): subprocess installed post-

[Bug 533090] Re: package qemu-kvm 0.12.3-0ubuntu6 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

** Attachment added: "AptOrdering.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40308526/AptOrdering.txt ** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40308527/BootDmesg.txt ** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40308528/CurrentDmesg.txt ** Att

<    4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   >