Pedro Villavicencio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> This does not appear to be a bug report and we are closing it.
It would be neat if you guys could spend as much time paying attention
to complaints as you did to stifling them. The complaint, I will note,
was not about the bug itself.
> We apprec
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you think getting more bugmail is going to encourage developers to fix
> more stuff, I think you are seriously mistaken.
Not to *fix*. To *categorize*. I'm not demanding a fix. I'm demanding
that the process be followed so things don't die without
Nope. I didn't look at the bug. Kernel bugs aren't my thing.
My point was rather more subtle. By asking on IRC you show an interest in
helping and draw a developers attention to it. Both of which increase your
odds of getting it fixed.
If you think getting more bugmail is going to encourage
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Unless you have a Canonical support contract, the fact that a bug isn't
> fixed as quickly as you would like isn't a bug.
I didn't ask that it be *fixed*. It could be a legitimately hard
problem that might take years to fix, or it might be that I'm o
Unless you have a Canonical support contract, the fact that a bug isn't
fixed as quickly as you would like isn't a bug.
What I would suggest is ask what can be done to improve the clarity or
completeness of the bug on #ubuntu-kernel during their normal workday.
--
A bug I reported has been in
Scott Kitterman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Filing another bug isn't going to help.
>
> ** Changed in: ubuntu
>Status: New => Invalid
And what will help? Shutting up and ignoring things perpetually?
This is a valid bug. It is a bug in the bug management
system. Declaring it invalid isn
