mån 2010-04-19 klockan 15:40 + skrev Miro Hadzhiev (Хаджиев):
> > Right, a flash-64 package in the repos isn't going to hurt anyone.
> > No one is speaking about making it the default.
+1
--
Niklas Herder | her...@dsv.su.se | +46(0)8-161438
Department of Computer and Systems Sciences
Stockh
Alas, since I live outside the US, Hulu works perfectly well at
telling me that I can't watch it, so I couldn't confirm that. Maybe I
will in the future.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
On Sun, 18 Apr 2010, Simon Ruggier wrote:
> I think they should both be in there, so people can choose for
> themselves what sort of problems they want to experience. I've never
> seen any video websites that don't work with the 64-bit plugin, and no
> matter what package is in the repositories, y
I think they should both be in there, so people can choose for
themselves what sort of problems they want to experience. I've never
seen any video websites that don't work with the 64-bit plugin, and no
matter what package is in the repositories, you're not being forced to
run anything.
--
npview
sandy what are you goign to do on pages that do have flash?
On Tue, Mar 30, 2010 at 4:28 AM, Sandy Harris
wrote:
> Just updated Xubuntu 9.10 to 10.04 beta. Only things running are a few
> terminals, Pidgin & Firefox with many tabs. Plenty of RAM, 4 gigs. No
> flash on page I was browsing. This di
+3 for flash-64 in the repos.
2010/3/28 eagles051387 :
> +2 for flash-64 in the repos.
>
> On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, giorgio130 wrote:
>
>> +1 for the "flash-64" package in the repos.
>>
>> --
>> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
>> You received t
+2 for flash-64 in the repos.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 12:41 PM, giorgio130 wrote:
> +1 for the "flash-64" package in the repos.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bu
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:35 PM, gushi wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
>
>> The fix is to move directly to the 64 bit version, and stop worrying
>> about nspluginwrapper. How did a 32-bit stopgap become the only and
>> blessed solution?
>
> No official non-alpha-quality x64 b
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
> The fix is to move directly to the 64 bit version, and stop worrying
> about nspluginwrapper. How did a 32-bit stopgap become the only and
> blessed solution?
No official non-alpha-quality x64 bit version from the upstream vendor,
maybe? And yes, w
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 7:26 AM, perpetualrabbit
wrote:
> That's not a fix. That is called a workaround.
This is true, but it's a very acceptable workaround. If you have no
philosophical misgivings about running Adobe Flash, this really is the
way to do it on 64-bit systems.
--
npviewer.bin cra
That's not a fix. That is called a workaround.
The fact is, there are still multiple bug in this 32-in-64 wrapper
thing. Because of the severe problems people were having with this,
choking up their linux workstations, I banned it from the network
altogether. I needed it for acroreader and flash. T
thank you...works well, doesn't it?
--- On Fri, 2/19/10, iMac wrote:
From: iMac
Subject: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To: nussmaus...@yahoo.com
Date: Friday, February 19, 2010, 7:25 AM
This flash npviewer issue has been bugging me for ages (even moreso
since Karmic). It
hi mark,
i had the same prob with karmic-64biti re-installed with karmic 1-386, and,
voila!
flash works, no more blue-green movie playback, still a bit buggy (not sure
it's really utilizing all 4 of my processor cores)nvidia 173 seems to work
better with my 9500gt than nvidia 185 driverz
any fixez in sight?
--- On Sun, 11/1/09, matism wrote:
From: matism
Subject: Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
To: nussmaus...@yahoo.com
Date: Sunday, November 1, 2009, 12:37 PM
I clearly made a mistake in reporting this
problem and subscribing. How does one unsubscribe
I clearly made a mistake in reporting this
problem and subscribing. How does one unsubscribe?
--Mark Matis
At 08:25 PM 11/1/2009 +, Vortex wrote:
>This sounds like the error I got, except I just upgraded from Ubuntu
>AMD64 9.04 to 9.10. Sorry, I don't know where to find the log file for
>t
OK, I got it. I was just curious. Then that's probably something else. I
hope you can find what uses the npviewer and replace with the 64 bit version
of it if available.
Regards,
Kevin
2009/10/9 krutoileshii
> that's the message that gets reported. i don't use the 32 bit flash for
> sure. maybe
that's the message that gets reported. i don't use the 32 bit flash for
sure. maybe some other plugin that uses it
2009/10/8 Blade II
> Hello, krutoileshii
>
> I'm sorry but I don't get what you mean by the same problem. The 64 bit
> flash player does not use npviewer. How can you possibly have
Hello, krutoileshii
I'm sorry but I don't get what you mean by the same problem. The 64 bit
flash player does not use npviewer. How can you possibly have "npviewer.bin
crashed with SIGSEGV" problem with the 64 bit one?
Are you sure you removed the 32 bit flash player before installing the 64
bit o
Already have that. still the same problem
2009/10/5 Blade II
> Installing 64 bit flash and GPU acceleration.
>
> http://blog.lckymn.com/2009/06/07/installing-64bit-flash-player-in-ubuntu-linux/
>
> As far as I know, the alpha version of 64 bit flash has been available
> for almost one year (or l
On Tue, Sep 29, 2009 at 10:32 PM, vnieto wrote:
> The only way to sove it is install the native 64 bit flash
The cleanest way to do this is to use Debian's flashplugin-nonfree
package:
http://packages.debian.org/testing/flashplugin-nonfree
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.laun
I'm running on Jaunty-amd64, and nvidia-glx-180 works without problems. All
installed from the main repository, not a specific mirror like cl.ubuntu.com
.
On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Vadim Peretokin wrote:
> I'm pretty sure 180.44 got uploaded to jaunty already. Try refreshing the
> package
I'm pretty sure 180.44 got uploaded to jaunty already. Try refreshing the
package list in synaptic and see if it's available (if not, switch to the
main ubuntu mirror)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a
Hi, Blake,
on 64 bit Ubuntu I have ONLY 64 bit Flash Player. There are no any
directories or mounted drives, where 32 bit version could have been found.
So, the problem is still open.
Best regars,
Alexander
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Blake Munro
wrote:
> If you are running the Adobe Al
If you needed to move it to /root/.mozilla/plugins then you must be logging
into your system as root.
If you are any other user then you'd be using
/home/username/.mozilla/plugins for sure.
Not sure what is going on there but glad you got it working... I'm just a
little puzzled that you might be lo
If you are running the Adobe Alpha 64 bit Flash Player then make sure you
have removed the 32bit flashplugin-nonfree package and or disabled the
plugin in Firefox, so that only the native 64 bit version is allowed to run.
It's a temorary workaround.
Blake
2009/3/31 torro
> Hi,
>
> I have Flash-
Hi,
I have Flash-Plugin 10.0.22 from 24.02.09. The Problem is still there.
Ubuntu 8.10 x64, Intel.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Vadim Peretokin
wrote:
> Try downloading the latest one (they released it feb 24th, while yours is
> feb 3)
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://b
Try downloading the latest one (they released it feb 24th, while yours is
feb 3)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
The file needs to go in /home/username/.mozilla/plugins
Note that the "plugins" directory does not exist by default. You need to
create it first before moving the plugin there.
Same goes for the new Sun Java 64 bit plugin, you can copy a .so file into
that same plugin folder to get access to the
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I can confirm that running the native (alpha version) of the Adobe Flash
plugin on an amd64 system makes this error go away. So by removing the
flashplugin-nonfree package and installing the Adobe 64bit alpha version
(with Firefox) I am no longer receiving this error.
Cheers
Blake Munro
2009/3/27
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 22:50 +, Slug71 wrote:
> This crash is solved with the official 64bit Alpha of Adobe Flash.
How can this be fixed if Intrepid still uses the 32 bit wrapper
version?
Setting up nspluginwrapper (1.1.2-0ubuntu1) ...
Setting up flashplugin-nonfree (10.0.15.3ubuntu1~intrep
Just imagine how the anti-fanboys would go nuts though if Ubuntu shipped an
alpha of Flash - when they raised a hell of a storm after it shipped a beta
of Firefox ;)
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Depends on how does Adobe do with the 64bit player before it's not too late
to have it in 9.04. There are still bad bugs in it (like being unable to
display letter "a" and spaces). At least when I checked a month or so ago.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1416
On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 7:05 AM, Hew McLachlan wrote:
> flashplugin-nonfree 10.0.15.3ubuntu1 for Jaunty is now the 64-bit
> version, so there should be no need for third-party flash packages. Bug
> 310061 is the Intrepid backport request.
>
> Using the 64-bit plugin is not a fix for the nspluginwr
Thanks for the .deb for 8.10
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/m
It was changed by someone, whose identity is in the activity log.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Not me. What happened to set it as "Fix Committed"?
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
htt
It should be noted that, before you install the 64-bit alpha driver,
you should first completely remove the flashplugin-nonfree and
nspluginwrapper packages from your computer. There's an article which
describes the procedure here:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/How-to-Install-Adobe-Flash-Player-6
Weird, here is working fine even with that ppt2swf available thru Gmail.
2008/11/22 Manuel McLure <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I wish I could say that the new 64-bit Adobe flash plugin works for me,
> but it causes loading Gmail to crash my Firefox (why, I don't know,
> since as far as I know Gmail does
Just to let you all know, that very same plugin works flawlessly under
Opera 9.6x 64-bit browser as well.
The only thing what has to be done is linking statically to that
Adobe Flash plugin. For me with Kubuntu 8.10 it worked out in the
following manner:
cd /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins
ln -s /usr/lib
New alpha plugin seems to work like a charm on my Intrepid with Firefox
3.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 23:25, Philip_W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> @ Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu;
>If you are referring to the Adobe Flash 64bit, it is still only in alpha
> version.
>Only way to use it right now is to
It works great with FF 3.0.4, seems to be extremely stable and much father
along than an alpha release. I have been running in since yesterday and its
been much better than the regular version.
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Philip_W <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> @ Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu;
>I
@ Iulian-Nicu Șerbănoiu;
If you are referring to the Adobe Flash 64bit, it is still only in alpha
version.
Only way to use it right now is to unistall whatever Flash you have
installed now and put
the new 64bit Flash in your Firefox plug-ins. (from what I have read it
is not working fo
2008/11/20 Fidor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this
> bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit systems
>
> You can download it here:
> http://labs.adobe.com/downloads/flashplayer10.html
>
> Just put the libflashplayer.so into /usr/
Shouldn't be this included as a software update replacing the old
package in case of 64 bit systems?
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Fidor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> While this is not the solution ... it should lower Importance of this
> bug - Adobe has released flash for linux for 64bit syste
This deb do not contain ndiswrapper executable file. :(
2008/11/16 sketec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I was completely fed up with this issue as well, but I found out that
> nspluginwrapper is at a newer version 1.1.4 which I found here
>
> http://freshmeat.net/projects/nspluginwrapper/?branch_id=75051
Re email below. I am afraid I do not understand what this is about
John Temple
Quoting Harrison Conlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> To maintain a respectful atmosphere, please follow the code of conduct -
> http://www.ubuntu.com/community/conduct/ . Bug reports are handled by
> humans, the majority
@Eric:
Be respectful. (from conduct rules page)
The Ubuntu community and its members treat one another with respect.
Everyone can make a valuable contribution to Ubuntu. We may not always
agree, but disagreement is no excuse for poor behaviour and poor
manners. We might all experience some frustr
If you could, please cite what part of that code I violated by informing (I
hope) someone who has the power to unsubscribe me from this bug (which still
hasn't happened) that there was a problem unsubscribing, then updating the
relevant bug against launchpad on launchpad?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 4
UNSUBSCRIBE ME FROM THIS BUG. WHEN I CLICK UNSUBSCRIBE LOGGED IN AS THIS
ACCOUNT, IT TELLS ME I'M FORBIDDEN. I WANT TO TRACK THE BUGS THAT ACTUALLY
AFFECT ME AND THIS IS JUST SPAM AT THIS POINT.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Harrison Conlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> The mandriva report look
Could you send the webpage with the bug in mandriva, please?
On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 3:40 PM, Brad Johnson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> According to the bug status, this is fixed in Mandriva. Please evaluate
> if the same fix can be done in intrepid.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> ht
No problem. Thanks.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/li
Sorry is my signature
2008/10/17 Jose Luis Rodilla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Let me tell you that I think that your "big" sign and your blog
> self-promotion are over the top in this kind of bug-threads.
>
> Greetings
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
Let me tell you that I think that your "big" sign and your blog
self-promotion are over the top in this kind of bug-threads.
Greetings
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
The firefox crash when i use flashplayer-nonfree
2008/10/17 Michael Castielli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>
> It happens when starting Firefox or Prism
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notificat
You're right, I did that yesterday, and is working relatively well now, but
I got the crash reports sometimes, as you said... Thank you anyway.
Greetings, Felipe.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 11:48 PM, Walter_Wittel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> @Felipe De la Puente -- I also had only gray boxes and s
2008/9/23 Bremm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Does it work, for example, if the plugin crashes randomly loading
> videos from youtube or metacafe? Because I've noticed random crashes
> since last npviewer update.
I've got what happens when a flash turn gray with no warning.
*** NSPlugin Wrapper *** ERRO
Does it work, for example, if the plugin crashes randomly loading
videos from youtube or metacafe? Because I've noticed random crashes
since last npviewer update.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
At least, since a couple of days, The strange pop-up windows have
disappeared, Still without flash, but now surfing on the net is relatively
normal(regardless of the lack of flash animations).
Greetings, Felipe.
On Mon, Sep 8, 2008 at 11:07 AM, D. Grady <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'm on Intrep
Actually, hardy heron.
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Kraemer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Confirming on Intrepid alpha 4 amd64
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bu
Ludwig,
Can you reproduce the crash? Because I tried, I don't see anything happening
when visiting, moving-away-from and/or closing nytimes.com
On Sun, Apr 13, 2008 at 10:14 PM, Ludwig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> still crashing with hardy fully updated as of now, when leaving
> nytimes.com pa
PS:
By running "firefox -g 2>&1 | tee ~/Desktop/gdb-firefox.log" without having
installed firefox-dbg, I already get some output:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ firefox -g 2>&1 | tee ~/Desktop/gdb-firefox.log
** Message: GetValue variable 1 (1)
** Message: GetValue variable 2 (2)
** Message: GetValue vari
John,
As described on the page you gave, I tried to install firefox-dbg, but I got
an error (see below). Looking further, "firefox-2-dbg" does exist, but will
also install firefox-2, which I don't want. "firefox-3-dbg" does not exist.
Tips how to proceed?
Sander
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ sudo apt-g
Thanks
On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 5:45 AM, John Vivirito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Please read https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MozillaTeam/Bugs on what to do with
> crashes, but still only one crash per bug report, apport will than mark
> it as a duplicate if it sees one.
>
> --
> npviewer.bin crashed wi
I will go and check on my Hardy box and let you know. Thanks for the info
Jim
On Thu, Apr 10, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Jim Braux-Zin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> It seems fixed for me since the last bunch of upgrades on Hardy. I get
> no more crashes when I close a tab with flash content or when I go to
t; from gutsy to hardy.
>
> - Original Message
> From: joe williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:40:48 AM
> Subject: Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
>
> I am running Core 2 Duo as well :
>
>
My situation occurred with an AMD64 dual core when trying to upgrade
from gutsy to hardy.
- Original Message
From: joe williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:40:48 AM
Subject: Re: [Bug 141613] Re: npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
I am running Core 2 Duo as well :
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor: 0
vendor_id: GenuineIntel
cpu family: 6
model: 15
model name: Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU T7500 @ 2.20GHz
...
Eduard Grebe wrote:
> I keep getting this crash on Hardy amd64 on a Intel
Yeah, let me give you some details about my system upgrade
I have Xubuntu 7.10 Gutsy amd64 dualcore. I upgraded to all the stable Gutsy
updates. I upgraded Xfce to 4.4.2 via the Xubuntu Team PPA's. Then I decided
to help out the Phatch project, and Upgraded to Ubuntu (not Xubuntu) amd64
dualcore v
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 3:07 AM, Majord51 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Juksu wrote:
> > Unlike Tomas Fryda, I am still getting these crashes With Firefox-3.0b5
> >
> >
> I had stopped getting these crashes for a while, but they started up
> again today after updating.
Same here: the crashed have
Juksu wrote:
> Unlike Tomas Fryda, I am still getting these crashes With Firefox-3.0b5
>
>
I had stopped getting these crashes for a while, but they started up
again today after updating.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notific
Cyrus Jones wrote:
> Peppe P.: do you have an SMP system (multiprocessor,multicore,etc.)?
>
>
Yes, I have an AMD Turion 64 x2 in an HP laptop.
--
npviewer.bin crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/141613
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
I've just realized that I am using realtime kernel (uname -a: Linux
tomas-desktop 2.6.24-15-rt #1 SMP PREEMPT RT Fri Apr 4 04:31:40 UTC 2008
x86_64 GNU/Linux) since yesterday... And now I am running FF for more than 4
hours still no errors and I am viewing multiple pages with flash (
youtube.com, v
With the latest version of Firefox (3 beta 5) on Intel(R) EM64T (Core 2 Quad)
everything is all right. No further crashes related to Firefox or npviewer.
2008/4/6, McKinney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> still the same problem for me too. just visited a website with flash and
> it crashed twice without
it might be, several possible matches came up and i linked it to the one
that had an exact matching subject.
i'm not a programmer so i cant provide any more insight other than what the
crash reporter generated
On 4/5/08, Cyrus Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jim Braux-Zin: maybe your issue i
yes i am using hardy, and yes the version installed with synaptic is
2.7-9ubuntu2. I'm going to take a guess and say that a way you could install
it in gutsy is to either go compile from source or add "
http://mirror.anl.gov/pub/ubuntu/ hardy main" as a repository and just find
it from there ( thou
This may be a duplicate, however I am HH Alpha 5, latest updates when this
happened. Now on A6.
On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 4:45 AM, Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is this a duplicate of Bug #179882?
>
> It appears there is a potentially fix package for 8.04, but not for 7.10
> at the moment.
>
I dont use ubuntu anymore, sorry
btw, macromedia swf plugin just works fine with flash on 64bit systems.
2008/3/7, hlhcomms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> It coould be a duplicate... the screen turns grayscale while watching
> video content via Firefox, then returns to colour after avariable
> interlude
It coould be a duplicate... the screen turns grayscale while watching
video content via Firefox, then returns to colour after avariable
interlude. I can live with this problem for now, so I'll wait for 8.04.
Austin wrote:
> Is this a duplicate of Bug #179882?
>
> It appears there is a potentiall
Sorry that I can't help anymore, I think its been since a week after I
posted the bug that it disappeared off of my machine.
On Jan 25, 2008 12:18 PM, gururise <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've attached a screenshot of the npviewer.bin process windows hanging
> around on my desktop after a firefo
I haven't had a recurrence of this bug in months (since I originally posted
it, I think). I haven't seen something reliably crash the flashplayer. Sorry
guys :)
On Jan 13, 2008 2:41 PM, Austin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This one is hard to reproduce I find. Does anyone have a website which
> r
npviewer.bin related...
After updating to the adobe's non-free flash plugin... Several time I
had the following situation. I could not close a tab (it just freeze
my FF) until I kill the npviewer.bin process
It directly affects the productivity of ff!!! Negatively!
--
ASCII ribbon campaig
82 matches
Mail list logo
