Me neither 🤣
> On 14. Jul 2020, at 19:00, jhasz <988...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
> I'm unsure as to why I am receiving this message - I am running 18.04 on
> all my platforms, so 14.04 would not apply to me.
>
> Thanks tho.
>
>
>> On 7/14/20 3:42 AM, Daniel Letzeisen wrote:
>> Ubuntu 14.
I'm unsure as to why I am receiving this message - I am running 18.04 on
all my platforms, so 14.04 would not apply to me.
Thanks tho.
On 7/14/20 3:42 AM, Daniel Letzeisen wrote:
> Ubuntu 14.04/Trusty has reached End of Life (EoL) for standard support
> and the samba4 package is not included in
Ubuntu 14.04/Trusty has reached End of Life (EoL) for standard support
and the samba4 package is not included in the Extended Security
Maintenance plan:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SecurityTeam/ESM/14.04#A14.04_Infrastructure_ESM_Packages
If this issue still exists in supported Ubuntu releases, please
Mario-
What you "must do":
1) Do NOT click on the link in Lehotzky László's post.
2) See if you can report Lehotzky László as a phisher, or a compromised account
3) Tell the admin at autul-amin.my that their website may be compromised
None of us fell for this trick, so we don't know that it is not
ato: ‎17/‎02/‎2014 11.51
A: "mariobosco2...@gmail.com"
Oggetto: Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
Can happen sometimes. :-)
Verzonden vanaf Samsung-tablet
Oorspronkelijk bericht
Van Grzegorz Widera
Datum: 2014-02-17 07:09 (GMT+01:00)
Aan gbw...@
Can happen sometimes. :-)
Verzonden vanaf Samsung-tablet
Oorspronkelijk bericht
Van Grzegorz Widera
Datum: 2014-02-17 07:09 (GMT+01:00)
Aan gbw...@gmail.com
Onderwerp Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
Hi, so sorry: (. Reported bug in Ubuntu, I
Hi, so sorry: (. Reported bug in Ubuntu, I thought it was the answer
from them. Unfortunately, it turned out that it was a virus, but rather
an attempt to extort passwords guessed it already gone part of the
message.'m So sorry.
Z poważaniem
Widera Grzegorz
GSM: +48 605 835 492
W dniu 15.02.2
Hi, so sorry: (. Reported bug in Ubuntu, I thought it was the answer
from them. Unfortunately, it turned out that it was a virus, but rather
an attempt to extort passwords guessed it already gone part of the
message.'m So sorry.
Z poważaniem
Widera Grzegorz
GSM: +48 605 835 492
W dniu 15.02.2
Just some Chinese guy trying to "make" money. These are the WRONG type of
people to try and rip off, people who have launchpad accounts are probably
quite a bit more intelligent than the average person. NICE TRY!!
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:00 AM, EvilSupahFly <988...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote:
>
What kind of fradulent fakery is this "Google Docs" business?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
setoption.pl is not executable
To manage notifications about this bug go to
>>You probably want to install "samba" instead. The samba4 package in precise is
>>a pre-release and experimental.
The main reason I was interested in samba4 is because it has the active
directory which is required by the OpenChange
I see a number of how-to's on the web. I guess I will remove e
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 05:53:06AM -, castirondude wrote:
> I'm confused. I chmod +x the setoption.pl and ran "bzr branch
> lp:~jelmer/ubuntu/precise/samba4/fix-provisioning"
> Output:
> ""
> You have not informed bzr of your Launchpad ID, and you must do this to
> write to Launchpad or access
I'm confused. I chmod +x the setoption.pl and ran "bzr branch
lp:~jelmer/ubuntu/precise/samba4/fix-provisioning"
Output:
""
You have not informed bzr of your Launchpad ID, and you must do this to
write to Launchpad or access private data. See "bzr help launchpad-login".
Most recent Ubuntu Raring
Am 23.12.2012 10:42, schrieb aspon:
> Por favor cancele esse Bug 988509, ja reinstalei e não apareceu mais.
Please find the "This bug affects me" on the relevant website (URL
below) and click it, then select "No, this bug does not affect me".
--
You received this bug notification because you are
Por favor cancele esse Bug 988509, ja reinstalei e não apareceu mais.
Alexandre
2012/12/23 Mario Grignetti
> Thank you. Simple enough
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 22, 2012, at 12:43 AM, Joshua Selser
> wrote:
>
> > ONE scrolls to the bottom and clicks on the area that says "To manage
> > n
Thank you. Simple enough
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 22, 2012, at 12:43 AM, Joshua Selser
wrote:
> ONE scrolls to the bottom and clicks on the area that says "To manage
> notifications about this bug go to ".
>
> Summary: ONE reads. Good luck!
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Mario Grign
ONE scrolls to the bottom and clicks on the area that says "To manage
notifications about this bug go to ".
Summary: ONE reads. Good luck!
On Fri, Dec 21, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Mario Grignetti wrote:
> How does ONE remove ONESELF?
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On Dec 20, 2012, at 12:49 PM, brightjoker
How does ONE remove ONESELF?
Sent from my iPad
On Dec 20, 2012, at 12:49 PM, brightjoker <988...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> People asking to be removed, YOU have to remove YOURSELF. Please stop
> sending vulgar emails as it is immature and some of us read these in a
> business atmosphere.
>
@brightjoker89: the bug has been fixed in Ubuntu 12.10 with an updated
version of samba4, so it is marked as Fix Released. However, that fix is
too risky for a stable release (see comment #40), which is why there is
still a task for Ubuntu 12.04/LTS.
--
You received this bug notification because
Didn't I tell you that would work? :-) great!
On 21 Dec 2012 01:05, "brightjoker" <988...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> So the following worked for me: (Ubuntu 12.04)
>
> Purge Samba install:
>
> sudo apt-get remove --purge samba
>
> (If Samba 4 is installed, make sure to sudo apt-get remove --pur
To all who don't want to be notified about this bug any more, at the
bottom of each and every mail it tells you how to get yourself off of the
notifications. Please don't yell at us; we didn't put you on the list, and
we can't take you off.
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012 18:45:08 +0100, Rick Collins
So the following worked for me: (Ubuntu 12.04)
Purge Samba install:
sudo apt-get remove --purge samba
(If Samba 4 is installed, make sure to sudo apt-get remove --purge
samba4 also.)
Apt Clean:
sudo apt-get autoremove
sudo apt-get autoclean
Update Repos:
sudo apt-get update
Reinstall Samba:
Wow someone has a pathetic life...grow up. And if you are older than 11,
I'm sorry that no one loves you, go make friends.
Could a mod or someone please remove this guy?
On Dec 20, 2012 1:45 PM, "Ted N" wrote:
> No, I gave up on Ubuntu long ago as a failed project for simple-minded
> fucks like
No, I gave up on Ubuntu long ago as a failed project for simple-minded
fucks like you. Go sniff your sister's panties now.
On 12/20/2012 11:57 AM, cj fotheringham wrote:
> Thanks ass-hat, guess you can't figure this one out yourself? Moron
>
> On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 17:35 +, Ted N wrote:
>>
SO TO GET BACK ON TRACK
I just ran the following command after purging my samba install (apt-get remove
--purge samba) and reinstalling (apt-get install samba):
testparm /etc/samba/smb.conf
This has fixed samba for me! Shared folders working correctly again.
--
You received this bug notificat
Thanks ass-hat, guess you can't figure this one out yourself? Moron
On Thu, 2012-12-20 at 17:35 +, Ted N wrote:
> TAKE ME OFF THIS FUCKING MAILING LIST
>
>
> On 12/20/2012 11:23 AM, brightjoker wrote:
> > Already purged my samba install. My main question is why this is
> > labeled as "fixed
Remove yourself
- Original Message -
From: Ted N
To: zew...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 10:35 AM
Subject: Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
TAKE ME OFF THIS FUCKING MAILING LIST
On 12/20/2012 11:23 AM, brightjoker wrote:
> Already purged
People asking to be removed, YOU have to remove YOURSELF. Please stop
sending vulgar emails as it is immature and some of us read these in a
business atmosphere.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Purge my name from this crap!
On Dec 20, 2012 11:31 AM, "brightjoker" <988...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Already purged my samba install. My main question is why this is
> labeled as "fixed" with no real fix available?
>
> --
> You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to a
For Ted N.
Everytime you reply to this list you send it to everyone. I personally
don't want your foul language on my e-mail. Just shows you're dumber
than a moss covered rock so knock it off. Go back to windows.
On 12/20/2012 10:35 AM, Ted N wrote:
> TAKE ME OFF THIS FUCKING MAILING LIST
>
@Ted N You have to remove yourself...but thanks for spamming the rest of
us.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
setoption.pl is not executable
To manage notifications about
TAKE ME OFF THIS FUCKING MAILING LIST
On 12/20/2012 11:23 AM, brightjoker wrote:
> Already purged my samba install. My main question is why this is
> labeled as "fixed" with no real fix available?
>
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscri
TAKE ME OFF THIS FUCKING MAILING LIST
On 12/20/2012 10:56 AM, Kaustubh Ghanekar wrote:
> You can try running
> apt-get purge samba*
> apt-get autoremove
> apt-get update
> apt-get install samba
> On 20 Dec 2012 22:21, "brightjoker" <988...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
>
>> First, I am running Ubunt
TAKE ME OFF THIS FUCKING MAILING LIST
On 12/20/2012 10:45 AM, brightjoker wrote:
> First, I am running Ubuntu Server, so no GUI.
>
> I updated to new kernel.
>
> Samba4 was installed.
>
> Received the "setoption.pl is not executable" error.
>
> Removed samba4.
>
> Installed samba (apt-get install
u already
> have it installed all you should need to do is share... hope this helps
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: brightjoker <988...@bugs.launchpad.net>
> To: zew...@yahoo.com
> Cc:
> Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 9:02 AM
> Subject: [B
Already purged my samba install. My main question is why this is
labeled as "fixed" with no real fix available?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
setoption.pl is not execu
You can try running
apt-get purge samba*
apt-get autoremove
apt-get update
apt-get install samba
On 20 Dec 2012 22:21, "brightjoker" <988...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> First, I am running Ubuntu Server, so no GUI.
>
> I updated to new kernel.
>
> Samba4 was installed.
>
> Received the "setoption
First, I am running Ubuntu Server, so no GUI.
I updated to new kernel.
Samba4 was installed.
Received the "setoption.pl is not executable" error.
Removed samba4.
Installed samba (apt-get install samba)
When I issue "samba" in terminal, it returns: Samba is not installed,
run "apt-get install
- Original Message -
From: brightjoker <988...@bugs.launchpad.net>
To: zew...@yahoo.com
Cc:
Sent: Thursday, December 20, 2012 9:02 AM
Subject: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
Hello, I would like to know why this is marked as having a "Fix Release"
when I encountere
Hello, I would like to know why this is marked as having a "Fix Release"
when I encountered the exact same error today.
I am running Ubuntu Server 12.04
I can do "apt-get install samba", however whenever I enter "samba" or
"samba -v" into terminal, it says I need to install "samba4". When I
inst
Hi Jelmer,
The SRU upload for this has a couple of issues, unfortunately:
- The .changes file was generated on Debian, not on Ubuntu, so the LP bug
references are missing. We need this to be generated on Ubuntu for the SRU
tracking process to work. I would reupload to fix this myself, except
Hello,
I have no idea, I stopped to use samba 4.
Kind regards, Loes
2012/11/28 Dave Walker
> @jelmer: Hey, do you happen to know what happened to this SRU? It seems
> it might have been rejected... but i don't see any documentation to
> suggest this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> You received this bug
Hi Daviey,
It was waiting for approval to land in -proposed for a couple of weeks,
and after that it was rejected (by one of the archive admins, according
to the Launchpad email I received). The e-mail didn't have any
information as to why they rejected it and I didn't hear from any of the
admins.
Sorry, no clue.
Steve
Sent from my Google Nexus 7 tablet.
On Nov 28, 2012 6:16 AM, "Dave Walker" wrote:
> @jelmer: Hey, do you happen to know what happened to this SRU? It seems
> it might have been rejected... but i don't see any documentation to
> suggest this.
>
> Thanks.
>
> --
> You rece
@jelmer: Hey, do you happen to know what happened to this SRU? It seems
it might have been rejected... but i don't see any documentation to
suggest this.
Thanks.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: Fix Committed => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
setoption.pl is not executable
To manage notifications abo
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer) => (unassigned)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
setoption.pl is not executable
To manage n
Hopefully armhf will have a new binary compiled for it too now:
"/tmp/samba4.config.108313: 1: /tmp/samba4.config.108313: samba-tool:
not found"
in
precise/universe samba4 armhf 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I don't know why it isn't available as .deb file in
http://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/pending-sru.html
I was unable to installed from -proposed, however I've downloaded the
patched version and rebuild it in a pbuilder environment, and then test
it in Ubuntu 12.04 and it works
$ cat /etc
Il 28/10/2012 01:59, Jelmer Vernooij ha scritto:
>> Question:
>> 1.) How can I upgrade to the samba4 4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-7 fix that was
>> released?
> By upgrading to Ubuntu quantal (12.10).
>
> ** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu Precise)
> Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
>
no
the system
I uploaded a fix for this issue to the precise-proposed queue on 17
October, where it is currently waiting for approval.
(see https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/precise/+queue?queue_state=1)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
> Question:
> 1.) How can I upgrade to the samba4 4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-7 fix that was
> released?
By upgrading to Ubuntu quantal (12.10).
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
** Branch linked: lp:~jelmer/ubuntu/precise/samba4/fix-provisioning
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
setoption.pl is not executable
To manage notifications about this bug
This is not fixed in upstream.
When doing an upgrade through synaptic, I get the followiing errors every time:
First Screens Error Message:
E: samba4: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit
status 1
Next screens error message:
ProvisioningError: guess_names: 'realm ='
El 13/07/12 11:17, lptr escribió:
> how about moving over to samba 4 beta?
>
Hi!
By hardware change I had to reinstall the entire operating system and
not use the moment samba 4 beta.
It re-install the first week of August and comment.
Thanks.
--
Enrique Carlos Ferrándiz Esteve
ecferrandiz.ferr
Quantal will have beta 2. Older releases are generally not update Cor newer
upstream versions.
--
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
lptr wrote:
how about moving over to samba 4 beta?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a bug assignee.
https
how about moving over to samba 4 beta?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
setoption.pl is not executable
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpa
If SRUed to Precise, please also add a dependency on perl-modules as
this package isn't necessarily installed on Ubuntu.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
setoption.pl is n
Dear Jelmer,
the problem is, that not the stable vesrsion, but samba4 is coming, when
you want to use, or install from software center, for example:
root@lleho-MSI-NOTEBOOK-VR630:/home/lleho# samba restart
The program 'samba' is currently not installed. You can install it by
typing:
apt-get inst
no - it's the server not the workstation that's the issue. Make sure you
assign it to the right domain.
Â
Bruce Collins
From: Nathaile Latil
To: bruce_coll...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 23, 2012 8:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption
to be honest I worked it out through a lot of testing and samba4 is
prototype be careful.
Â
Bruce Collins
From: Brian Murray
To: bruce_coll...@yahoo.com
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 6:20 PM
Subject: Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
On
> Brian Murray wrote:
> The tool that suggests packages to install is called command-not-found.
> How did you end up getting this suggestion? I tried smbd on a precise
> system without samba was installed and just samba was suggested.
As for me, I simply upgraded from Oneiric. I believe the upgra
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 05:37:23PM -, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Am 22/05/12 15:04, schrieb Vasil Krstevski:
> > Hi!
> >
> > I uninstalled samba4, but Ubuntu 12.04 automatically suggest:
> >
> > The program 'samba' is currently not installed. You can install it by
> > typing:
> > sudo apt-get in
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 01:04:04PM -, Vasil Krstevski wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I uninstalled samba4, but Ubuntu 12.04 automatically suggest:
>
> The program 'samba' is currently not installed. You can install it by
> typing:
> sudo apt-get install samba4
The tool that suggests packages to install i
oste.net
> > Copie à :
> > Objet : Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
> >
> > In my case, the error took place after a system update, not because I
> tried
> > to install Samba 4 by itself
> >
> > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Je
Me too
> Message du 22/05/12 15:41
> De : "jahmusic" <988...@bugs.launchpad.net>
> A : frederic.leo...@laposte.net
> Copie à :
> Objet : Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
>
> In my case, the error took place after a system update, not be
Subject: Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
Since I uninstalled samba4 and ran an update, my problems seem to have
gone away.
Thanks to all for their efforts in getting this resolved!
On 05/22/2012 08:40 AM, Gary Krolak wrote:
> Thanks for your efforts. Mine also happened a
Am 22/05/12 15:04, schrieb Vasil Krstevski:
> Hi!
>
> I uninstalled samba4, but Ubuntu 12.04 automatically suggest:
>
> The program 'samba' is currently not installed. You can install it by
> typing:
> sudo apt-get install samba4
>
>
> Shouldn't this be fixed in the repositories?
No, that is cor
t
> Subject: Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
>
> system running fine now. Thanks
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:30 AM, jahmusic<988...@bugs.launchpad.net>
> wrote:
>
>> In my case, the error took place after a system update, not because I
>> tried to
Thank you all. For me, it happened as a result of upgrading to 12.04. I
uninstalled Samba4 and I'm running Samba with no problems.
Even though not every time I can access Windows based computers. Thanks again.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2012 7:02 AM
To: gkro...@verizon.net
Subject: Re: [Bug 988509] Re: setoption.pl is not executable
system running fine now. Thanks
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:30 AM, jahmusic <988...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> In my case, the error took place after a system update,
Hi Jelmer,
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Unfortunately it looks like Samba4 is accidentally being installed by
> some people who are looking for the stable version of Samba (Samba 4 is
> still experimental, see the package description). I wonder if this is
> the case, and if so, h
system running fine now. Thanks
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 9:30 AM, jahmusic <988...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> In my case, the error took place after a system update, not because I tried
> to install Samba 4 by itself
>
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jelmer Vernooij
> <988...@bugs.launchpad.n
In my case, the error took place after a system update, not because I tried
to install Samba 4 by itself
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Jelmer Vernooij
<988...@bugs.launchpad.net>wrote:
> Unfortunately it looks like Samba4 is accidentally being installed by
> some people who are looking for the
It had to have been an update. I had the 11.10 disc in my hand ready to
roll back had it kept misbehaving.
Thanks again!
On May 22, 2012 7:00 AM, "Rick" wrote:
> Thanks for the info. If this is the case, it's because Samba4 is either
> in the distro of 12.04, or was part of an update download.
Hi!
I uninstalled samba4, but Ubuntu 12.04 automatically suggest:
The program 'samba' is currently not installed. You can install it by
typing:
sudo apt-get install samba4
Shouldn't this be fixed in the repositories?
Thanks,
V.
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Rick wrote:
> Thanks for the
Thanks for the info. If this is the case, it's because Samba4 is either
in the distro of 12.04, or was part of an update download. I know for
sure, that I did not specifically download and install Samba4.
On 5/22/2012 8:28 AM, Jelmer Vernooij wrote:
> Unfortunately it looks like Samba4 is acc
I have 12.04 lts installed and since the last batch of updates it's been
running stable with no system errors. Yay! :)
So, I believe this case can be closed out. Thanks for the assistance.
On May 22, 2012 6:35 AM, "Jelmer Vernooij" <988...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Unfortunately it looks like
Unfortunately it looks like Samba4 is accidentally being installed by
some people who are looking for the stable version of Samba (Samba 4 is
still experimental, see the package description). I wonder if this is
the case, and if so, how this is happening?
I'm working on backporting this fix to pre
** Also affects: samba4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu Precise)
Assignee: (unassigned) =>
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Jelmer Vernooij (jelmer)
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
This bug was fixed in the package samba4 - 4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-7
---
samba4 (4.0.0~alpha19+dfsg1-7) unstable; urgency=low
* Only update smb.conf if it exists. Closes: #670560
* Automatically add shares required for active directory controllers if they
don't exist. Closes: #670
** Summary changed:
- package samba4 4.0.0~alpha18.dfsg1-4ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade:
Unterprozess installiertes post-installation-Skript gab den Fehlerwert 126
zurück
+ setoption.pl is not executable
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: samba4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/988509
Title:
seto
84 matches
Mail list logo
