[Bug 525741] Re: [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0

2010-02-23 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
This bug was fixed in the package vm-builder - 0.12.0-0ubuntu1 --- vm-builder (0.12.0-0ubuntu1) lucid; urgency=low * New upstream release. (FFe: LP: #525741) - All patches incorporated upstream. -- Soren HansenMon, 22 Feb 2010 13:56:18 +0100 ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubun

[Bug 525741] Re: [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0

2010-02-22 Thread Steve Langasek
FFe granted, please upload ASAP. ** Changed in: vm-builder (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525741 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

[Bug 525741] Re: [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0

2010-02-22 Thread Soren Hansen
The delta between the 0.11 and 0.12 branches is vast, and bugfixes from 0.12 are going to be a hassle to backport to 0.11. The upstream focus of development is 0.12, and certainly lucid+1 will have 0.12 (or later), so 0.11 will, unless someone dedicates ressources to maintaining it, be abandoned.

[Bug 525741] Re: [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0

2010-02-22 Thread Steve Langasek
Just to clarify, what will make maintenance in Lucid more difficult if we stick with vmbuilder 0.11.3? -- [FFe] VMBuilder 0.12.0 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/525741 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs maili