** Changed in: libatasmart (Fedora)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: libatasmart (Fedora)
Importance: Unknown => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Title
I am seeing similar issues with my SSD, lots of errors, but system seems to
run fine.
On my previous drive however, it started to run slowly, due to recovering
errors, and finally reported an error, so something funny is going on.
Regards
Wilbur Harvey
[image: Inline image 1]
On Fri, Mar 2, 2012
Running dual-boot Windows 7 / Ubuntu 11.10 Oneiric on Dell M90. Windows
CHKDSK reports no problems with my hard drive. Ubuntu S.M.A.R.T. reports
a staggering 7 million+ bad sectors with green light status: "Disk has a
few bad sectors". My system runs just fine, which is why I'm adding my 2
cents.
** Tags added: oneiric precise
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Title:
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
** Changed in: libatasmart
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Title:
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
To manage notifications about t
#165
> Right, the updated package wasn't supposed to actually reinterpret the
raw values.
Is it supposed to reinterpret on fresh installations?
After fresh Oneiric and Precise installations during the year palimpsest still
counted up allocated sectors, since #172 increase to 53. Tresholds in UI d
** Changed in: libatasmart
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Title:
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
To manage notifications about t
** Changed in: libatasmart
Importance: Unknown => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Title:
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
** Changed in: libatasmart
Importance: Medium => Unknown
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Title:
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Did another scan with CD from vendor, it also shows SMART status ok.
Palimpsest says at the moment 25 reallocated sectors.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Title:
palimpsest bad
After successful scan with Hitachi DFT palimpsest now shows 15 moved
sectors instead of 1 before.
** Attachment added: "ATA-Hitachi-HDS5C1050CLA382–SMART.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+attachment/1778484/+files/ATA-Hitachi-HDS5C1050CLA382%E2%80%93SMART.png
--
You re
** Attachment added: "ATA-Hitachi-HDS5C1050CLA382– SMART.png"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+attachment/1777477/+files/ATA-Hitachi-HDS5C1050CLA382%E2%80%93%20SMART.png
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Affects new hardware and Maverick installation.
Thanks to comment #130 I did also advanced check with Hitachi DFT, result:
Operation completed successfully
Disposition Code: 0x00
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
** Attachment added: "drive-check"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/438136/+attachment/1777476/+files/drive-check
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Ti
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Fix Released => Incomplete
** Changed in: oem-priority
Assignee: (unassigned) => Robert (robertkanabis)
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Incomplete => Confirmed
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438
This bug was fixed in the package libatasmart - 0.16-1ubuntu0.1
---
libatasmart (0.16-1ubuntu0.1) karmic-proposed; urgency=low
* debian/rules: Enable simple-patchsys.
* Add 01_use_manufacturer_bad_blocks.patch: Drop our own "many bad sectors"
heuristic. This currently causes a
Graham Inggs [2010-06-11 9:11 -]:
> I no longer get the notifications, but the SMART data palimpsest still
> warns that I have "893 bad sectors", which is incorrect.
Right, the updated package wasn't supposed to actually reinterpret the
raw values. Thanks for testing!
** Tags added: verifica
> Do you still get those notifications with the current lucid or karmic-
proposed packages?
I no longer get the notifications, but the SMART data palimpsest still
warns that I have "893 bad sectors", which is incorrect.
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438
Graham Inggs [2010-06-09 8:50 -]:
> The problem is that 29000 is the RAW value of the re-allocated sector
> count, not the actual count of bad sectors.
Right. But the notification about "Your disk is about to die" now
checks the normalized value/threshold, which is under control by the
driver
> 29.000 bad blocks does sound like something you should start being
concerned about, though.
The problem is that 29000 is the RAW value of the re-allocated sector
count, not the actual count of bad sectors.
I have a failing Seagate drive that I have been monitoring for several
weeks and I have e
adMcb [2010-06-08 15:07 -]:
> Ok. We all know that the bug is affecting us, but what is the solution
> for this?
It got fixed in 10.04, and for 9.10 (karmic) the fix is in
karmic-proposed, waiting to be tested. Please see the updated
description for how to test it.
> I already repaired my dis
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/libatasmart
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
Ok. We all know that the bug is affecting us, but what is the solution
for this? I already repaired my disk with HDD Regenerator, and only 10
sectors showed me that same bad completely repaired, and Ubuntu 4.10
Netbook keeps telling me I have 29 000 for bad blocks and that the drive
failure is immi
** Branch linked: lp:debian/sid/libatasmart
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/karmic-proposed/libatasmart
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu
Accepted into karmic-proposed, the package will build now and be
available in a few hours. Please test and give feedback here. See
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to
enable and use -proposed. Thank you in advance!
** Tags added: verification-needed
--
palimps
confirm as fixed in Lucid =).
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: New => In Progress
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Uploaded to karmic-proposed queue (needs another SRU team member to
review now) and to my PPA at https://launchpad.net/~pitti/+archive/sru-
test (sudo add-apt-repository ppa:pitti/sru-test).
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
palimpsest bad
Ugh, the karmic code is quite a bit different, so I basically needed to
implement the same logic for a rather different code base. It's working
now, though (see attached debdiff). The SRU test case (see description)
is working now, and I also run the old and new version against all the
blob example
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility
palimpsest complains, that the disk has many bad sectors. palimpsest
thinks, that SMART value 5 "Reallocated Sector Count" fails (screenshot
attached). smartctl reports " 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 097
097 010
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility
palimpsest complains, that the disk has many bad sectors. palimpsest
thinks, that SMART value 5 "Reallocated Sector Count" fails (screenshot
attached). smartctl reports " 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 097
097 010
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic)
Assignee: Canonical Platform QA Team (canonical-platform-qa) => Martin
Pitt (pitti)
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
Yo
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic)
Milestone: None => karmic-updates
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
I encountered this problem under Karmic on my 6 month old Dell Mini-9
with a 4 GB SSD. I zeroed the SSD with the "dd" command and installed
Lucid Beta 2. Within 30 seconds of the post install restart I was
getting the same error message. I loaded and installed all available
patches with software up
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Karmic)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Canonical Platform QA Team
(canonical-platform-qa)
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Just adding that I am getting this as well on my asus 900ha
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ub
I unsubscribed ubuntu-sponsors, because there is no debdiff to sponsor.
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-b
@Martin Pitt
Can this fix to the heuristics be backported to 9.10 Karmic via
SRU?
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
I definitely have a false positive with my main drive (Hitachi), but
something else just occurred to me - when I tried install Karmic from
the live CD, it refused to recognize my Hitachi drive as a viable target
for installation. In the end, I was forced to upgrade from Intrepid to
Jaunty to Karmic
** Branch linked: lp:ubuntu/libatasmart
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lis
This bug was fixed in the package libatasmart - 0.17+git20100219-1git2
---
libatasmart (0.17+git20100219-1git2) lucid; urgency=low
Upload current Debian packaging git head.
* debian/local/apport-hook.py: Update for udisks.
* Add 0001-Speed-up-get_overall-and-get_bad.patch: Spee
I'm very happy for this decision.
Before to investigate through this problem, I've bought a new hdd for
security reason (backup all data), but for now, after 3 months, the
numbers of reallocated sectors is stable and haven't increased.
This patch could will save unneeded e-waste
--
palimpsest b
I sent a patch to the upstream freedesktop.org bug, and uploaded a new
libatasmart package to lucid. It's currently stuck in UNAPPROVED and
will land after the beta-1 release.
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
palimpsest bad sectors false po
** Changed in: libatasmart
Status: Unknown => Confirmed
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
** Also affects: libatasmart via
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25772
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: ubuntu-10.04-beta-1 => ubuntu-10.04-beta-2
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Martin Pitt (pitti)
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
I got a computer from a friend who said it was not working well.
As soon as I booted it with Live CD, I got the error of a disk failing.
I did a backup, but some of the files were unreadable, even though
S.M.A.R.T says the Read Error Rate is 0 (Raw 0x)
Reallocated sectors = 335 and Pe
** Also affects: libatasmart (Mandriva)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libatasmart (zUbuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you ar
@Oded Arbel : hmmm now that I am a little less irritable, I seem to
agree with your opinion. I have in fact been witnessing some cooling
problems lately, although I thought they were pertaining to the CPU
only, I didn't know or anticipate that they could be harming my hard
disk too, but now I guess
I also see the same behaviour on a dual-boot (ubuntu 9.10 and winXP) hp 8530w
laptop with a Hitachi drive. It suddenly appeared after defragging a shared
ntfs data partition. My reallocation sector count is 65538, and the rest seems
unremarkable to me (only reallocation event count is 1).
I atta
Dhruva: the problem you are reporting sounds like you do have a problem
with the drive and libatasmart is reporting the issue correctly - so
this is not the issue that is reported in this bug.
Regarding your actual problem, as you had escalating problems with an
old drive and now have an escalatin
I am also facing the issue. I had an old SATA hard disk and once I upgraded to
Karmic it started giving me hard disk failure errors. I tried to ignore them
for a while, but slowly things deteriorated and soon half of my hard disk was
rendered useless, even if I tried to format that partition Ubu
** Tags added: regression-potential
** Changed in: libatasmart (Ubuntu Lucid)
Milestone: None => ubuntu-10.04-beta-1
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
I confirm the same problem "palimpsest bad sectors false positive " on
Karmic and Lucid Alfa 3. Palimpsest ID errors number 5 and 197 reported
on my HD Samsung 1 Terabyte model HD103UJ. Meanwhile, no error is
reported on my second HD Hitachi 500 GB model HDT725050VLA360.
--
palimpsest bad sector
Bought a brand new WDC WD20EADS-00S2B0 2Tb and as soon as it was installed
palimpsest told me it had about 1200 bad blocks. Verifications made by other
means shos nothing.
Every time I boot a message pops up.
But you can tell the program to ignore it and not give advice.
So what is the use?
--
To get a definitive answer to whether the drive is actually remapping defects
due
to bad blocks you have to examine the "defect lists". It's easy to do on SCSI, I
expected libata to swizzle the cmd into ATA'ez but it apparently fails on my
dell.
sg_reassign --grow /dev/sda
I don't know how to d
** Also affects: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu
The problem with palimpsest isn't that there are warnings, or that there
aren't warnings (if we will make it less warning happy). I personally
would like to get a notification when my first reallocated sector
happens - and then I want to be able to ignore this until another
failure happens.
The pr
I would like to recieve warnings, when something wrong is going on with
my hdd, but it isn't good when we recieve errors, that other software
doesn't diagnose. Of course we could say that other software isn't as
cautious as palimpsest is.
On the other hand, if palimpsest shows an error, other soft
This is not a "minor thing", depending on harddrive and environment! If
you don't like warning messages turn disk notification off. This tiny
feature saved my data two times. Every time starting with a low
reallocated sector count. Two days later I had to remove the harddrives,
that were almost unu
I also have encountered the problem during copying file on my 500GB hdd that I
bought two weeks ago.
Many bad sectors, Reallocated Sector Count: normalized=99, worst=99,
threshold=36, value=72 sectors'
I think that users should be able to turn off this notification, until
the values significant
i forgot the basic info: ubuntu karmic 9.10 2.6.31-19-generic
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
Wow. After discovering this thread http://forum.ubuntuusers.de/topic
/festplatte-fehlerhafte-sektoren and finding this bug-report, i believe
i'm not the only one with a "failing" hdd.
However: 65537 sectors in my case: Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 100 100 005
Pre-fail Always - 65537
hdd: Hitachi
Today, same thing happened here on Ubuntu 9.10 with a ATA Hitachi
HTS54325L9A300 inside a HP 6730B laptop:
'Many bad sectors, Reallocated Sector Count: normalized=100, worst=100,
threshold=5, value=65537 sectors'
System ran fine for months - since Karmic came out.
Occured during a copy job (abou
Same problem here on my HP Elitebook 8530W. This with a Hitachi
HTS723225L9A360 built-in. The program states that there are 65543 bad
sectors. That's of course not true. I've tested it with the HP Disk
Check(in the Bios) and with the smartmontools.
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https:/
bad sectors attachment. after upgrade
** Attachment added: "screenshot_006.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38797199/screenshot_006.png
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
Karmic, 64bit.
Harddisk: ATA Hitachi HTS541616J9SA00
Another magic number for: Count of remapped sectors: 131089 (that is 2^17 + 2^4
+ 2^0)
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
In my case:
Palimpsest : Count of remapped sectors 655420
Count of pending sectors2
Smartctl: Reallocated_Sector_Ct 655420
Current_Pending_Sector2
With the tool of BIOS for check hard disk, show errors in the disk .
it seems that my hard disk if
Contrary to statement:
"The upstream fix is in karmic.
Changed in libatasmart (Ubuntu):
status: New → Fix Released "
In marked duplicate bug, this issue is still affecting Karmic as of today's
updates on a new install.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libatasmart/+bug/413673
--
Ubuntu 9.10 32bit
Hitachi Travelstar HTS541040G9AT00
5400 RPM
40 GB
ATA/IDE
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Duplicate bug reported and found this info - no resolution as of now,
although I am updating the Karmic Laptop before doing further debugging.
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/archive/index.php/t-220231.html
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You receive
2 different Fujitsu MHY2160BH drives affected here.
OK so who's going to elevate the priority on this one - over a hundred
affected users here... ;)
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
I have the same problem with my 400GB ST3400820AS on my desktop HP
Pavillion Slimline s3220n.
Linux henrique-pc 2.6.31-16-server #53-Ubuntu SMP Tue Dec 8 05:08:02 UTC
2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notif
I have this message for one of the two 160GB Hitachi drives on my HP
pavilion laptop. It may be relevant that this drive holds my Windows 7
partition and Ubuntu is stored on the other ('healthy') drive. Windows 7
chkdsk reports the drive is clean.
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://
Confirmed. I had this same problem on an IBM X41 Tablet. Please help
me figure out how to fix this. Has Palimpsest now prevented me from
accessing these sectors? Can I unmark these and undo this damage?
Computer all of a sudden seems to be slow. Other software shows no
SMART errors.
--
palim
Here's my report, for an old Fujitsu drive in an equally aged Dell
Inspiron 500m laptop.
Palimpset reports 65537 reallocated sectors, raw value is
0x01000100cf07.
Don't know how many reallocated sectors there really are, but I cannot
believe that the real value is coincidentally so close to 2^16.
confirm
http://img687.imageshack.us/img687/4755/83370567.png
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.u
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: gnome-disk-utility
palimpsest complains, that the disk has many bad sectors. palimpsest
thinks, that SMART value 5 "Reallocated Sector Count" fails (screenshot
attached). smartctl reports " 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct 0x0033 097
097 010
attached my report
** Attachment added: "Bad sectors.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37541821/Bad%20sectors.png
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
attached my report
** Attachment added: "Bad sectors.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37541820/Bad%20sectors.png
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Have the same problem on my HP 530.
Palimpset says I have got 720958 bad sectors! :o My hard disk is barely a year
old..
I guess there is nothing to do with the bug? It will still appear every time I
boot my computer?
Thanks laods!
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchp
Same problem here in a out of the box Dell Inspiron 1520.
/ and /home mounted separatedly.
** Attachment added: "Pantallazo-2.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37497657/Pantallazo-2.png
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug no
Same problem here in a out of the box Dell Inspiron 1545.
Fresh install on Karmic, / and home mounted separatedly.
I'm worried... ¿can my HD fail? thank's
** Attachment added: "Pantallazo.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37304292/Pantallazo.png
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
http
For all those with very large counts of bad sectors (i.e. >1000) take a look at
my comment here:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25772#c2
Basically it looks like the manufacturers are using the raw value in a
different way. i.e. the 48 bit value is likely split into 3 x 16bit
values t
My disk Just started giving a warning too ( Laptop HP dm3 AMD)
The magic number is "65543 bad sectors"
I was about to garbage the disk and thank you for the info here.
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you a
I'm also going to mark this as affecting myself, the log is included for
a:
SAMSUNG PZA064 SSD
** Attachment added: "SAMSUNG PZA064 SSD"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37258549/smartctl.txt
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug n
I have the same problem on Hp6130, Standard disk S9808210A. tk.
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
I'm getting a similar warning on my Dell Vostro 1310 with a Samsung
Drive.
Palimpsest reports something about drive failing and drive has many corrupt
sectors. What it doesn't like is the number of the current pending sector.
smartctl does not indicate any problem:
o...@hermes:~$ sudo smartctl -
I have the same problem on Dell mini 10 (SATA SAMSUNG HM160HI)
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
@Martin Pitt
I have filled 2 bug reports for that.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25772
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25773
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org Bugzilla #25772
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25772
** Bug watch added: freedesktop.org
Getting a similar problem myself on HP Compaq nc6120; ATA Fujitsu
MHT2080AH PL 80gb drive; reporting 65537 bad sectors; computer *seems*
to be working fine; screen attached.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of Palimpsest SMART error message."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37096057/Screenshot-SM
Getting a similar problem myself on HP Compaq nc6120; ATA Fujitsu
MHT2080AH PL 80gb drive; reporting 65537 bad sectors; computer *seems*
to be working fine; screen attached.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot of Palimpsest SMART error message."
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37096046/Screenshot-SM
Jean-Louis, thank you for working on this patch! Would you mind
reporting it upstream at
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=libatasmart so that
it can be intregrated upstream? It's pretty intrusive and also
potentially changes the behaviour of libatasmart clients (such as
devicekit-
+1 confirm issue: ATA SAMSUNG HM160HI in Dell Mini 10v Ubuntu 9.10 NBR
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
confirm issue: ATA SAMSUNG HM160HI
--
palimpsest bad sectors false positive
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/438136
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ub
New version of patch with correct patch tagging (I hope).
** Attachment removed: "libatasmart_0.17-1git1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36757930/libatasmart_0.17-1git1.debdiff
** Attachment added: "libatasmart_0.17-1git1.debdiff"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/36771955/libatasmart_0
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
