[Bug 394766] Re: 300 processes

2010-02-06 Thread gsteckel
If there are any examples of "only let one copy of this program run" in the distribution, it would be nice to know where they are to clone one. There's no point in reinventing heptagonal wheels. If I knew what to clone, I could write a utility/script thing which could be used by many people. Linux

[Bug 394766] Re: 300 processes

2009-07-02 Thread Pasi Lallinaho
I understand your frustration. I've already talked with the Xfce developers about this and they have no intent in changing this. As I proposed you can always remove the shortcut to the screenshooter and add a different one. With some scripting experience, you will also be able to write a script th

Re: [Bug 394766] Re: 300 processes

2009-07-02 Thread qe2eqe
Invalid? I disagree. Misplaced, perhaps, but if a cat can walk across a keyboard and nuke a session... thanks enough for the help, though. On 7/2/09, Pasi Lallinaho wrote: > You can "fix the bug" by disabling the shortcut key. Set a *key > combination* for xfce4-screenshooter if you still want t

[Bug 394766] Re: 300 processes

2009-07-02 Thread Pasi Lallinaho
You can "fix the bug" by disabling the shortcut key. Set a *key combination* for xfce4-screenshooter if you still want to use it via your keyboard. ** Changed in: xfce4-screenshooter (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- 300 processes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394766 You received this

[Bug 394766] Re: 300 processes

2009-07-02 Thread qe2eqe
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28630731/Dependencies.txt -- 300 processes https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/394766 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun