After discussions with the Debian maintainer of celt, and it being
pointed out that upstream have yet to finalize the library itself or the
bitstream used, I have uploaded a new version of opal that doesn't use
celt.
** Changed in: celt (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Invalid
--
MIR for ce
The README claims the bitstream isn't final yet; I'm not sure it's a
good idea to include this codec in opal if it has the potential to be
used in ekiga: users from karmic's ekiga calling users of karmic+1's
ekiga wont be able to detect that even if they support the same codec,
it's not the same bi
Packaging looks ok; copyright doesn't cover some files in tools, but
this is minor (one author not listed and the glibc files don't seem to
be used during our build).
Some unchecked fread/fwrite warnings when building celtdec/celtenc could
probably be fixed.
You say "maintenance in Debian appears
