Packaging looks ok; copyright doesn't cover some files in tools, but
this is minor (one author not listed and the glibc files don't seem to
be used during our build).

Some unchecked fread/fwrite warnings when building celtdec/celtenc could
probably be fixed.

You say "maintenance in Debian appears to be dead", and you don't answer
to "Who is responsible for monitoring the quality of this package and
fixing its bugs ? Are they Ubuntu or Debian developers ?".  So perhaps
people committed to opal's maintenance can commit to the maintenance of
celt?  Could you get an ack on this?

Would be nice to enable the testsuite.

There's a new upstream version available too.

** Changed in: celt (Ubuntu)
       Status: New => Incomplete

** Changed in: celt (Ubuntu)
     Assignee: (unassigned) => Loïc Minier (lool)

-- 
MIR for celt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/388285
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

-- 
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

Reply via email to