This bug has been reported on the Ubuntu ISO testing tracker.
A list of all reports related to this bug can be found here:
http://iso.qa.ubuntu.com/qatracker/reports/bugs/32561
** Tags added: iso-testing
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is sub
ffox 2 won't see any non-critical fixes anymore.
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Changed in: firefox (Baltix)
Status: New => Invalid
--
Pango-enabled firefox is much slower
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32561
You received this bug notification b
On Sun, Jan 13, 2008 at 11:21:24PM -, Alexey Spiridonov wrote:
> I looked at firefox-3.0 also. The results are not bad, but not perfect
> either:
>
> 1) The original e-mail renders quickly and correctly, regardless of
> MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO (it's unclear if the switch has any effect at all now)
I looked at firefox-3.0 also. The results are not bad, but not perfect
either:
1) The original e-mail renders quickly and correctly, regardless of
MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO (it's unclear if the switch has any effect at all now)
2) The sanitized e-mail that I attached "renders" fast. However, it produces
On Fri, Jan 11, 2008 at 03:06:31PM -, jojo4u wrote:
> 3.0~alpha8+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 is not affected. Both settings of
> MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO bottom out at 2.6 seconds with quite a bit variation
> upwards.
> Firefox 2.0.0.11 is 3.7/1.8 seconds and Swiftfox is 1.4 seconds at the moment.
>
OK, th
3.0~alpha8+nobinonly-0ubuntu1 is not affected. Both settings of
MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO bottom out at 2.6 seconds with quite a bit variation upwards.
Firefox 2.0.0.11 is 3.7/1.8 seconds and Swiftfox is 1.4 seconds at the moment.
--
Pango-enabled firefox is much slower
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3
On Sat, Dec 29, 2007 at 01:04:15PM -, Vytas wrote:
> FWIW, the extreme slowness with multiple tabs seems to be gone with
> MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 too
>
ok
affects ubuntu/firefox
status confirmed
can you please test if firefox-3.0 works better
affects ubuntu/firefox-3.0
status incomplete
FWIW, the extreme slowness with multiple tabs seems to be gone with
MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 too
--
Pango-enabled firefox is much slower
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
I second that.
I did the same test like jojo4u, I get 9.9 sec with Pango and 5.3 sec
without.
Also, Firefox is very slow when multiple tabs with flash are open (might
be different bug, might be related).
Gutsy, FF 2.0.0.11
** Changed in: firefox (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => New
--
I am seeing this on 7.10 Gutsy Gibbon, Firefox 2.0.0.11, and it showed
up in a very nasty way. I have an e-mail (see attachment) with lots and
lots of text (data files). Opening this e-mail in its original context
-- Yahoo mail with its CSS and JS and tables -- caused the browser to
effectively han
I'am affected on Xubuntu 7.10 (upgraded from 7.04). Firefox version is
2.0.0.6+2nobinonly-0ubuntu1.
Disabling pango by MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=1 doubles speed on a local copy of
http://scragz.com/tech/mozilla/test-rendering-time. That means from 6.8 s to
3.2 s. My /etc/environment says: LANG="en_US.UT
** Also affects: firefox (Baltix)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Pango-enabled firefox is much slower
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/32561
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
A late Hello... just curious.. has anyone addressed or investigated
David Finch's issue of the Mozilla build being significantly faster even
with Pango disabled? Or should this be a seperate bug?
I reran my benchmark on this system to test pang
(alternately, form teams and conduct an undercover mission to determine
what Pango is up to and why it's so slow...)
--
Pango-enabled firefox is much slower
https://launchpad.net/bugs/32561
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu
On Tue, Sep 12, 2006 at 06:07:23PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote:
> Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Bug 32561] Re: Pango-enabled firefox is much
> slower"):
> > I'll check to see if the latest betas have the patch discussed there
> > included; I'm not sure, because
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Bug 32561] Re: Pango-enabled firefox is much slower"):
> I'll check to see if the latest betas have the patch discussed there
> included; I'm not sure, because it's listed as `Trunk'. If so then we
> could turn off our hack (
** Changed in: firefox (upstream)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Pango-enabled firefox is much slower
https://launchpad.net/bugs/32561
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
On Dom, 2006-08-20 at 20:54 +, Noumaan Yaqoob wrote:
> We already have a bug report filed #54091. But the solution to our
> problem lies right here. How Ubuntu decides to deal with this bug
> directly affects the Urdu Font rendering and Firefox performance issues
> for us.
>
I think an importa
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 08:54:50PM -, Noumaan Yaqoob wrote:
> We already have a bug report filed #54091. But the solution to our
> problem lies right here. How Ubuntu decides to deal with this bug
> directly affects the Urdu Font rendering and Firefox performance issues
> for us.
Thank you; pl
Matt actually our problem is directly related to the patch applied here.
If we enable Pango by adding:
MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=0
We would be able to render Urdu Pages but our Firefox would be a lot
more slower and consuming 100% cpu resources at times. I have noticed
that with Pango enabled firefox cra
On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 01:27:35AM -, Noumaan Yaqoob wrote:
> Actually what firefox does is that it displays the page with out Pango
> most urdu pages remain readable but firefox uses someother font like
> Tahoma (if installed) and it even renders Tahoma badly for urdu.
>
> I don't quite under
Actually what firefox does is that it displays the page with out Pango
most urdu pages remain readable but firefox uses someother font like
Tahoma (if installed) and it even renders Tahoma badly for urdu.
I don't quite understand how this patch works. I assume that by
Installing Urdu language pack
BBCUrdu seems to be rendering without any obvious (eg, boxes) problems
for me with Pango disabled (though I know nothing about the language),
but we probably should err on the side of safety here. Ian, could you
consider adding Urdu to the list of locales requiring Pango?
--
Pango-enabled firefo
It seems that the fix released is actually stopping web pages in Urdu
Fonts to display correctly in Firefox, Epiphany, Mozilla Thunderbird.
However it does not effects Galeon.
When I tried Firefox after adding:
MOZ_DISABLE_PANGO=0 in /etc/environment
It started rendering Urdu web pages perfectly
24 matches
Mail list logo
