[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2011-01-10 Thread Jeremy Foshee
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 Title: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver -- ub

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2010-06-18 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Andy Whitcroft (apw) => (unassigned) -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubunt

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-09-02 Thread StefanHuszics
This bug seems to be a bit confusing likely because people are reporting status/issues of (at least) 2 completely different USB-modems. 0af0:6971 Option (aka GlobalTrotter Icon 255 Model: GI0255) Works out of the box with Jaunty. 0af0:6911 Option (aka GlobalTrotter Icon 7.2 Model: GI0201 with up

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-27 Thread Laurent GUERBY
jaunty beta does not fix the issue. When the key is plugged in it is recognized as usb-storage. I installed rezero from http://ppa.launchpad.net/martijn/ppa/ubuntu/pool/main/r/rezero/rezero_0.1-3_i386.deb And after that install the key is recognized as modem and I get to setup the connection in

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-25 Thread Timo Aaltonen
sorry, mine didn't load option, it just defaulted to mass-storage -mode, and I'm trying to come up with a patch to fix it. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs,

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-25 Thread Timo Aaltonen
I've installed jaunty on a machine that comes with a Option 0af0:7011 device. It uses option by default, but forcing hso doesn't seem to work. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-21 Thread Damian Melniczuk
Hi. I have unknown modem from polish GSM operator "Era BlueConnect" identified by lsusb as " 0af0:6971 Option". I use program HSOconnect v. 1.1.82 2008-05-23. I can start using modem, but some time after initialization and using it, it completely hang system. I'm using Ubuntu 8.10 with "2.6.27-1

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-13 Thread Alexander Sack
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:21:28AM -, Alexander Sack wrote: > > please try to patch the kernel with the patches from below thread (3 > patches) and maybe add your device to the unusual devices (as the 3/3 > patch does) > > > https://lists.one-eyed-alien.net/pipermail/usb-storage/2009-Januar

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-11 Thread Martijn van de Streek
Alexander, could you provide a pre-built kernel with those patches? -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-03-02 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 11:18:20AM -, Ban wrote: > Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has > > "Modem" in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In > > jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. > > > > i don't agree. it's true th

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-02-19 Thread Ban
Well, the modem is not detected. its just that the scsi device has > "Modem" in its name. Have you tried to use hso vs. option driver? In > jaunty hso driver supposely will prevent the usb storage mount. > i don't agree. it's true that the scsi driver gets loaded, and that the usbstorage device na

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-02-09 Thread Alexander Sack
On Thu, Jan 22, 2009 at 09:40:17PM -, Ban wrote: > i had a try with the latest Jaunty alpha livecd with what seems like > interesting results: > it seems like the device gets recognised as usb storage first, > only the usb storage scan takes a while and meanwhile the modem gets detected, > the

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-22 Thread Ban
i had a try with the latest Jaunty alpha livecd with what seems like interesting results: it seems like the device gets recognised as usb storage first, only the usb storage scan takes a while and meanwhile the modem gets detected, then the storage gets mounted and the modem seems not usable, or a

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-21 Thread Martijn van de Streek
Jaunty doesn't seem to have option_ms.[ch]yet: http://kernel.ubuntu.com/git?p=ubuntu/ubuntu- jaunty.git;a=tree;f=drivers/usb/storage;h=eb55e5f0a0a86d3b67610b6da7ee02c48626aa7a;hb=7c88cff7e3a5e14d83287e3111a8131358b0091d Also, the one in kernel HEAD (http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torva

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-21 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 01:12:57PM -, Ban wrote: > I tried with both 2.6.27-9 and 2.6.27-7 (the only ones my updated 8.10 > has) > > these came with zerocd udev rule (i'm guessing from a package ?) > > do you want me to try the one from -proposed or the jaunty one (or is that > the same one

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-21 Thread Ban
I tried with both 2.6.27-9 and 2.6.27-7 (the only ones my updated 8.10 has) these came with zerocd udev rule (i'm guessing from a package ?) do you want me to try the one from -proposed or the jaunty one (or is that the same one ?) i can re-try tonight but i'm on umts right now. -- USB id 0af0

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-21 Thread Martijn van de Streek
Hm, but that might be an old kernel. Will retry later. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-21 Thread Martijn van de Streek
Without rezero, I get the ZeroCD CD drive, which doesn't switch into modem mode. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-21 Thread Alexander Sack
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:49:20PM -, Ban wrote: > i'm still having the 'hanging' problem on an updated 8.10 with a Option > Icon 225 (GIO225) > > I used the udev rule in combination with rezero to load the hso driver for > this device, that works great. > i can use the connection in networkm

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-20 Thread Ban
update: if i manually stop the 3g connection, but the kernel module is still loaded, the hang does not occur. i hope it's ok to log this here, please let me know if i need to open another bug report. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2009-01-20 Thread Ban
i'm still having the 'hanging' problem on an updated 8.10 with a Option Icon 225 (GIO225) I used the udev rule in combination with rezero to load the hso driver for this device, that works great. i can use the connection in networkmanager, but as soon as the connection stops (for example because

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-24 Thread Andy Whitcroft
This looks to have been resolved during the stable updates. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Fix Committed -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ub

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-23 Thread Martijn van de Streek
Works for me in -11. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://list

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-23 Thread Andy Whitcroft
@Martijn van de Streek, thoughtbox -- the current intrepid kernels have both the option and hso drivers, looking at the PCI ids you are reporting here they appear to only be supported by the hso driver. I would therefore expect only that driver to be loaded when they are detected. So could you co

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-23 Thread Andy Whitcroft
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: Pete Graner (pgraner) => Andy Whitcroft (apw) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-23 Thread thoughtbox
Could you make sure this also is the case for the 6711 device id? The "option" driver does not work with this device; only the "hso" driver (albeit with its watchdog timeouts and crashes, by the looks of things -- see my bug report elsewhere). Bus 005 Device 002: ID 0af0:6711 Option AKA Option Gl

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-22 Thread Leann Ogasawara
Hi Alexander, I'll make sure we track this and try to get this resolved for Jaunty's release. Thanks. -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

Re: [Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-18 Thread Alexander Sack
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 01:46:58AM -, Leann Ogasawara wrote: > ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) >Importance: Undecided => Medium > Leann, this sounds like rather a simple fix. Can you ensure that this gets done during this cycle so users with that hardware dont get a wrong driver? - Alexan

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-16 Thread Leann Ogasawara
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing li

[Bug 256296] Re: USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver

2008-12-04 Thread Alexander Sack
Pete, assigning to you to get kernel team attention. Dispatch to someone appropriate please. ** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Pete Graner (pgraner) -- USB id 0af0:6911 should use hso and not 'option' driver https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/256296 You received this bug