** No longer affects: null
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
Title:
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.la
Is this set up on purpose to make GNU-Linux in general, and Gnome in
particular, sociologically dysfunctional as to make Windows look better
by comparison? And, yes, I _DO_ believe that this belongs in a technical
discussion in a bug-tracking system.
--
You received this bug notification because
Reverting apparently mistaken affects: change. If you really mean to
assign this to Baltix, please explain why.
** Package changed: baltix => gnome-screensaver
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.laun
** Project changed: gnome-screensaver => baltix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
Title:
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
To manage notifications about this bug g
@xfx:
This seems to work partially for me on:
$ uname -srvmo
Linux 2.6.35-30-generic #59-Ubuntu SMP Tue Aug 30 19:00:03 UTC 2011 x86_64
GNU/Linux
(Maverick Meerkat)
I have gnome-screensaver installed, and I also had to install gnome-
desktop-sharp2 after seeing an error referencing "gnomedeskto
Is there any experienced packager that could take a look at the new
x86/x64 DEB packages I created for version 0.3.4 and let me know if they
need some modifications/additions in order to be considered for addition
into the Debian repository?
The latest version of the .deb packages can be downloade
Perhaps there should be a "talk" section associated with each bug in
launchpad, which could hold the meta-conversation?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
Title:
no 'Settings' button
@Brian & @James: Please download the binary and see if this one corrects
the problem under x64: http://software.xfx.net/ftp/screensaver-settings-
bin.tar.gz
Please, remember not to post bugs/comments regarding screensaver-
settings here. I don't the admins/mods would like that.
--
You received t
@Brian & @James: Ok. I will download Ubuntu 64bit now and run some tests but,
please, let's try to keep any bug reports relating to screensaver-settings out
of this forum.
You can continue post your bug reports, comments and suggestions on my personal
blog: http://whenimbored.xfx.net/2011/05/i-w
@xfx: I just tried to run the 32-bit screensaver-settings.exe on 64-bit
Ubuntu 10.10, and it failed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
Title:
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensav
Reading the wikipedia article about the unity desktop makes me wonder if
I should be looking for a new distro to run. Sounds like more choices
are being taken away.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
https://bugs.launchpad
@James: I don't see why the 32bit version shouldn't work under 64bit Ubuntu. I
guess I will have to download it and test it...
But, before I do, could you please download the binary package
(http://whenimbored.xfx.net/wp-content/plugins/download-monitor/download.php?id=8)
and see if it works?
To
@xfx: the last time I had looked at screensaver-settings, it wasn't
working for the current release of Ubuntu--I'm glad it seems to be in
development. This should get into the repository; is there any way to
get this into the Canonical repository?
--
You received this bug notification because you
Oh yeah, thanks for making to effort to do something instead of just
complaining like the rest of us! :) I downloaded the deb, but I'm using
64-bit... I guess I should download the tarball and compile, etc?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a
@James: I understand your frustration -- that's why I'm still maintaining the
screen-saver settings application:
http://whenimbored.xfx.net/2011/05/i-want-my-screensaver-settings/
Although not a solution, it is at least a workaround...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
Five years... Thank you, Gnome, for protecting us from the terrifying
complexity of having options, and the potential difficulty of attempting
to use software that has actual functionality. Where would we be without
you to protect us from our own foolishness?
This whole situation is preposterous.
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver
Importance: Unknown => Low
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lis
I've filed a new bug 634108
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/634108) suggesting that gnome-
screensaver be deprecated and replaced with xscreensaver.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
I agree, the bug is to have that screensaver manager and not a better
one
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
Maybe the Ubuntu bug is that Ubuntu ships Gnome-screensaver at all.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
I think it needs a little more publicity. Perhaps on
http://blogs.msdn.com/ or New York Times technology pages (they've not
published much on GNU/Linux since 2009).
"You're too smart for Linux if you can configure a screen-saver" is a
suitable headline.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensav
Back when I first started running Ubuntu the screensavers _WERE_
configurable.
So was the login window.
I could choose what application ran when I inserted a DVD, eg have it
run dvd:rip rather than the small number of programs that Ubuntu has
deemed an acceptable 'player' for DVDs.
I could confi
With the bug listed as "Won't Fix" this bug report does not show up in
the list of open bugs under gnome-screensaver any more. You have to
click "Advanced search" and choose to display "Won't Fix" bugs to see
it.
Only 10 bugs that haven't had a fix released have more users affected
(including "inv
Seroiusly, Gnome is suffering of some sort of anorexia.
The project wanted to remove and declutter itself.
And that's ok.
But then, when it is ok, it started to cut more and more of itself. We say, hey
Gnome, you are cute that way! but Gnome keeps telling, i'm still fat...
We need options. Simple
On 31/08/10 15:32, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
> I see two photo screensavers. The first one is called F-Spot photos and
> uses the "Favorites" tag in F-Spot. The second one is called "Pictures
> folder" and simply displays the pictures it finds in your ~/Pictures
> directory. Seriously, what's to c
https://help.launchpad.net/Bugs/Statuses
Won't Fix: this is acknowledged as a genuine bug but the project has no plans
to fix it.
It is unclear whether this means "we don't have time for this" or if it
means "don't even bother submitting a fix, you'll just be wasting your
time."
I think I will
Won't fix?
Why... hey, that's just to bring back the old button that launched the
settings config of each screensaver...
No matter what a few people believe, some screensavers have settings to
configure, some people love screensavers, i do!
But we want to keep freedom to choose how our screensav
** Changed in: null
Importance: Unknown => Undecided
** Changed in: null
Status: Unknown => New
** Changed in: null
Remote watch: GNOME Bug Tracker #316654 => None
** Changed in: null
Status: New => Invalid
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.n
Screensavers are mainly a passive activity, yes. I happen to be in love
with the Eletric Sheep screensaver, if only because I find it
hypnotising.
Schools and other educational institutions around me are still using the
old CRT monitors. As such, I would argue agaisn't the removal of
screensavers
"I don't have any plans to support this. My view is that any screensaver theme
that requires configuration is inherently broken."
As said by the original gnome-screensaver maintainer... In 2006. IMHO
this person has some serious control issues.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https
"Modern monitors don't suffer burn, and nearly all computer monitors are
"green" and set to automatically power down anyway, so perhaps the
screen saver should be removed completely (other than the stub that
shuts off power)
In these times, screen savers are no more than a passive game, they
serve
** Changed in: null
Status: Invalid => Opinion
** Changed in: null
Status: Opinion => Confirmed
** Changed in: null
Importance: Undecided => Unknown
** Changed in: null
Status: Confirmed => Unknown
** Changed in: null
Remote watch: None => GNOME Bug Tracker #316654
--
There are many, many screensavers in the Ubuntu repo, and many more on
various websites. An example of an RSS Screensaver is FontGlide,
Noseguy, Phospherseriously, there are loads.
So what if I don't want to have my pictures folder as a basis for the
screensaver? What if I would like to only s
This bug was marked WONTFIX by the maintainer. I suggest alternatives be
found, since the original maintainer no longer cares about gnome-
screensaver and has an absolutist philosophy about screensaver
preferences.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
I think the inability to set the preferences in a screensaver is
shortsighted at best. Efforts should be made to discard the "won't fix"
upstream and, perhaps, develop an in-house tweak to add the missing
functionality. I won't comment on the Gnome team's reasons for crippling
the functionality bec
I see two photo screensavers. The first one is called F-Spot photos and
uses the "Favorites" tag in F-Spot. The second one is called "Pictures
folder" and simply displays the pictures it finds in your ~/Pictures
directory. Seriously, what's to configure? If you want a different
picture directory, j
Listen, I'm really, REALLY sorry if the GNOME 'Vision' conflicts with
reality. But this is reality, and the vision must fit into it; we have
many screensavers that REQUIRE configuration; like the dozens of picture
screensavers.. How about RSS screensavers? Sure, equip them with a
certain feed, but
Marc, are you saying now that Ubuntu won't fix this either? I know the Gnome
people/person has his head up his @$$ on this, but now Canonical has joined him
up there? I understand this is not high priority (though it should be if Ubuntu
ever wants to compete with Windows/MacOS), but it is defini
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
Relax. They (upstream) have a fix - of course!
This bug has been marked as a secret show-case bug for some MS fan-boi
(or Ballmer on his swan song) to pull out as evidence as to how kack
"linux" (Gnome) is because you can't even configure your screen-saver.
As soon as that happens, the patch will
This is moronic. Screensavers are supposed to be configurable. Period.
Fix the damn screensaver applet.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
Please, someone either fix this of fix that:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/indicator-session/+bug/528094
This is a significant user interface bug in my opinion, and the
alternative (xscreensaver) suffers from a bug as well. I'd personally
prefer to have xscreensaver called properly from the session m
The reason why they didn't make this for so long time is either they
don't want us to use Ubuntu (shame) or they don't know how to do this
(which seems to be simple), or they have no time (5 years [first post
2005] may be not enough for them :D ). Or they just simply pis.. at us
(shame again).
--
Modern monitors don't suffer burn, and nearly all computer monitors are
"green" and set to automatically power down anyway, so perhaps the
screen saver should be removed completely (other than the stub that
shuts off power)
In these times, screen savers are no more than a passive game, they
serve
I agree that this is an overly aged and annoying bug, but the rhetoric
isn't really necessary.
As far as using xscreensaver - sure, it works. But it's nasty looking
(gtk 1.x?) and not very well integrated with Gnome. The lock screen
reminds me of the '90s!
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screen
sudo aptitude purge gnome-screensaver && sudo aptitude install
xscreensaver
Look, choice!
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs
This kind of bugs are the sensible proof of why Linux is not yet a
replacement for Windows or OSX.
Can't Ubuntu fork it?
The reasons we need such settings button:
1. "I'll gift you a book, but you are not allowed to read it"
Ubuntu came with CUSTOMIZABLE screensavers but with no way to access ho
This is _still_ a problem, going on half a decade.
PLEASE, Ubuntu FORK THIS! The GNOME dev has his head up his own @$$ and
will never make this work correctly. How it's possible for GNOME to
think this is the correct way for the screensaver app to work is beyond
me, but that's what they think. I r
** Project changed: hundredpapercuts => null
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
http
It's like Apple's refusal to do cut-n-paste on the iPhone.
It will happen in the end but someone may have to get promoted - or
leave - before it happens.
Sam
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a m
There's no excuse for this to still be an issue only due to the stubborn and
ignorant Gnome devs.
This very pigheadedness if the reason I switched to KDE, I won't be even
considering Gnome again until this silliness is over.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
Good grief, I've just noticed that people are still complaining about
this bug! Clearly, they're not going to fix it, as they've decided that
that's the way it should be. Move on, folks, I ditched most of the UI
aspects of Gnome ages ago, they became increasingly dumbed-down and
unusable for me. Cl
** Description changed:
There is no settings button in gnome-screensaver, thus I am unable to
change the settings for any screensaver.
+
+ Note: this bug is marked, upstream, as "won't fix." Here is the given
+ explanation why:
+ http://live.gnome.org/GnomeScreensaver/FrequentlyAskedQuestion
i want to point out that this bug not only causes inconveniences because
some screensavers do not perform as good as they could, but some
screensavers are outright broken.
the screensaver to show pictures from the user directory must be
configured before it can work for non-english installs becaus
** Changed in: gnome-screensaver (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Oliver Grawert (ogra) => (unassigned)
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-b
This is not exactly true, i saw the tunnel screensaver there, and i know
that screensaver has settings!
also system installs the other screensavers, popsquares for example, but we
can't use it cause its initial is lowercase and the interface don't load
them
i think it is not logic to install some
@cablop:
The reason this is not solved is not because this is not critical. This is kept
this way because the philosophy of this package requires not to have settings
button.
This is a basic set of basic screensavers that must have no settings.
This has to be as simple as possible. If you want a
Sincerely i think this is one of the worst things open source can do, to
not to solve something cause it is not critical... so how can we
demonstrate this operative system could be a replacement to some other
privative operative systems if we are forcing the user to lose his
freedom and stuck with
But *WHY* do we have to run around in rings to do something that should be
simple, just not to miff inoperative upstream maintenance. Let's DIVERGE if
we want something good, while upstrem pushes something bad.
Really, the screensaver is not important. Fine, then, let's fix it too,
because this Ub
Chad Bernier wrote:
> I liked the app solution. I checked it out when I was using Ubuntu. I don't
> have a linux right now, and I am not sure which I will pick when I put it on
> again. I don't think this is an issue though. There are more important
> things to work on. Screen savers haven't been
I liked the app solution. I checked it out when I was using Ubuntu. I don't
have a linux right now, and I am not sure which I will pick when I put it on
again. I don't think this is an issue though. There are more important
things to work on. Screen savers haven't been necessary for years, and the
Why is it that we *have* to be stuck with the suckiest screensaver selector
of any platform? We've got some of the coolest screensavers, but some are
really very bad; however, there's no way to make a selection, and all users
are stuck with choosing just one, or letting any one pop up at random. Al
Most screen savers have options to make them more appealing, better
functioning, or even to get them to function at all (like picture
slideshows on non-English systems). It's incomprehensible that we
cannot access these options from the Screensaver applet with a little
"Settings" button like KDE a
I don't think this screensaver-settings app is the right approach unless
we want to diverge from upstream GNOME forever. Therefore this bug is
not trivially fixable, so it does not qualify as a paper cut.
** Changed in: hundredpapercuts
Status: New => Invalid
--
no 'Settings' button in gn
** Also affects: hundredpapercuts
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
i can confirm that this is still not solved properly and many
screensavers are still completely broken with non-english installs,
while others work but are quite useless without customized settings.
i'd like to see this solved and -- i'd appreciate a better summary of
the discussion in the origina
** Tags added: regression-release
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.u
james_pic: thank you for the information -- I didn't know that.
I will check your changes and, as time permits it, I will re-release
screensaver-settings with your changes.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification becau
I would just like to say that I'd really like this package to be in
some kind of a repository. I find things in the "local or obsolete"
section annoying.
On 6/11/08, James_pic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> xFX: I thought you might like to know that the current version of gnome-
> screensaver can a
xFX: I thought you might like to know that the current version of gnome-
screensaver can accept themes from
~/.local/share/applications/screensavers, as well as
/usr/share/applications/screensavers. I've attached a hacked version of
screensaver-settings, which modifies themes in this folder rather
Kalmar: which screensaver are you trying to configure?
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt
I forgot to mention that bugs/problems with screensaver-setting should
be reported here: https://bugs.launchpad.net/screensaver-settings
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
I can't find any option to use screen grabs instead of pictures (even in
sss0.3)... Is it somehow possible?
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
Thank you for the suggestion cablop.
It was my mistake and I was able to receive Sam's donation. Thank you
VERY much Sam!!!
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a di
Try Moneybookers instead of Paypal... Maybe that can help
** Attachment added: "unnamed"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12993637/unnamed
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bug
Thank you very much!
Hopefully someone can package it into Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "unnamed"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12950811/unnamed
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
Hello all,
Well, today I had some time to spare to I decided to do some work with
the screensaver-settings program.
So, I just wanted to let everyone know that I have just released version 0.3
This released incorporates many (not all) of the UI suggestions made by Matthew
(https://launchpad.net/
I tried o paypal that author to show thanks, but he didn't collect the
payment and it as returned.
I've got 25 dollars waiting if he gpl's what's he's already released.
Sam
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification beca
Further to the above, I'd not read far enough down the above discussion
to see the work of "xfx"- which appears to have it covered. Hopefully
this will be GPL licensed and rolled into Ubuntu in place of gnome-
screensaver.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu
This has been outstanding since 2005, it's clearly not going to be fixed
by the gnome-screensaver maintainter(s), which either means no-one cares
enough to submit patches or the patches are consistently rejected.
If the former, I'm guessing it's 'cos everyone's going back to
xscreensaver, which i
I understand the thoughts of the author, but the ones who don't care so much
about philosophy can do the following.
For the slideshow screensaver, there's a little workaround: put symbolic links
in your default picture directory.
Also, you can modify the .desktop files in order to pass parameters
* Vadim Peretokin wrote, On 05/03/08 04:39:
> I did get in touch with the author, and he said that he'll release the next
> version under a license, probably LGPL. That would be okay, yeah?
>
Maybe the author will also release this version under LGPL?
I've seen lots of people never get round to
LGPL is very nice, yes :)
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.co
I did get in touch with the author, and he said that he'll release the next
version under a license, probably LGPL. That would be okay, yeah?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 5:40 PM, Conrad Knauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Copyright is with the original author. You can't just take someone
> else's wor
Copyright is with the original author. You can't just take someone
else's work, plaster a license on it and call it yours and expect the
law (or anyone really!) to recognize it :) Proving copyright is simple
enough; just show when/where the original was published and by whom.
See http://en.wikip
question. what is there to stop someone else from taking someone's
unlicensed work, adding their own license to it, and calling it theirs? how
do you prove copyright in cases like this?
On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Conrad Knauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding to what Reinhard Tartler sai
Adding to what Reinhard Tartler said, it is my understanding that
copyright remains with the author unless they specifically renounce it
(e.g. 'I release this work into the public domain'). What you quoted is
basically that the author has given you permission to distribute a
64-bit version of the
Oh. Well, I thought it was open-source since there's no visible license,
hence, it's in the public domain - and that means freely distributable.
Here's what the xfx said to me a while ago:
"That's great!
If you have the means, please, feel free to redistribute your 64bit binary
version of the p
Vadim Peretokin: it is not enough for source code to be available; to be
"open" it needs to be licensed under an open source license (that is, it
allows redistribution and modification), otherwise its just 'freeware'.
The DEB file lacks a proper copyright file for the status of the code it
contains
It is open-source already. Sources are avialable on his website:
http://xfx.net/utilities/sss/
On Sun, Mar 2, 2008 at 11:11 PM, cablop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the code was open source already, it isn't?
>
> I didn't mirrored it cause I was too busy and have little problems, but
>
I thought the code was open source already, it isn't?
I didn't mirrored it cause I was too busy and have little problems, but i'm
still interested in doing that
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a
xfx, can you please think more about making your code open source?
It might be a bit much to ask all this from you when all it came from was a
stubborn gnome developer, but you could help the Ubuntu community out if you
did this.
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchp
Two things:
1.- I can mirror this file if you give me a deb file :D
2.- You can use moneybrookers instead of paypal, it's easier and cheaper
Awe, sorry, i see there's already a deb for this issue... hehe, then
i'll post it on my web page, don't worry :D
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensa
xfx, I tried to paypal you but the paypent was returned.
Sam
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
Thank you so much xfx for finally fixing this silliness! Perhaps you
can submit this to the gnome-screensaver developer and see if it can be
merged into gnome in some way? He said the problem was that no one would
write the code so this should show him.
And one more suggestion people would wan
I just wanted to thank everybody for your donations... I truly
appreciate them!
I've had a pretty rough week; a high voltage surge damaged most of my
equipment (two gorgeous ViewSonic 21" monitors, two power supplies, one
video card and several other minor stuff) and I'm still in the process
of r
Oliver has asked me to comment on the UI for the new screensaver
settings. I have several suggestions, but I do not think any of them
should block this code being introduced to Ubuntu, because it implements
such an important missing feature without critical problems. (I
understand that other things
A little question... does this tool works in other linux distros???
--
no 'Settings' button in gnome-screensaver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/22007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
Oh... I forgot to mention that version 0.2.2 no longer requires to be run using
gksudo!
Whenever required, the program will request elevated privileges and you will
have to provide you admin/root password to allow it to save the changes you
make to your screensavers.
Enjoy!
--
no 'Settings' b
Phew! After reading half the internet I was finally able to create a
.deb package for the program.
You can download the package from:
http://software.xfx.net/ftp/screensaver-settings_0.2.2-1_i386.deb
Also, you should be able to build it on your own by downloading the tarball
(http://software.xfx
1 - 100 of 129 matches
Mail list logo
