fribidi 0.19.2-1 is on Debian now, please sync
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 11:07:33PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> 1) That Debian/Ubuntu do as Fedora, and patch the few apps (probably
> only bidiv & centerim will need patching) that use obsolete fribidi
> symbols. Note that centerim will also need a small patch very similar to
> the one used fo
Thanks Ahmed. My comments below:
On 01/11/2010 11:22 AM, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:18:56AM -, Daniel Holbach wrote:
>> Check the list of rdepends, get the source and grep -r for the function
>> names that were removed between versions.
> ---end quoted text---
>
> For
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 09:32:57PM +0200, أحمد المحمودي wrote:
> 1) bidiv: the source package in Fedora was patched to be able to compile
> with fribidi 0.19.1
>
> 2) centerim: fribidi was not enabled in Fedora source package. Hence no
> problem appeared.
>
> 3) mailutils: this package does not
It might be worth talking to Behdad about it again and present the
evidence that you collected. Maybe there can be a brown-paper bag
release?
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
I have a correction and additional info regarding the matter:
The correction, regarding what I mentioned earlier:
> * quesoglc uses: nFriBidiMirroredChars, fribidi_prop_to_type
> [...]
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi.c:pp->pos, pp->len,
> fribidi_type_name (pp->type), pp->level);
>
** Tags removed: needs-packaging
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mai
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 04:40:02PM -, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> I'm sure that Behdad would be interested in that list. A soname change
> would make the switch to the new version of fribidi a lot easier and
> less messy.
---end quoted text---
The fribidi mailing list was CC'ed in the last email.
I'm sure that Behdad would be interested in that list. A soname change
would make the switch to the new version of fribidi a lot easier and
less messy.
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 11:18:56AM -, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Check the list of rdepends, get the source and grep -r for the function
> names that were removed between versions.
---end quoted text---
For all packages in Debian unstable (sid) that depend on libfribidi0, I
grep'ed for the symbo
Check the list of rdepends, get the source and grep -r for the function
names that were removed between versions.
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 08:31:04AM -, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Are the missing symbols anything that's used in the distro? Is it
> functions that were supposed to be exposed at all?
---end quoted text---
Many were symbols that weren't supposed to be exposed in the first place
indeed. How can I
Are the missing symbols anything that's used in the distro? Is it
functions that were supposed to be exposed at all?
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
So, it seems like Ahmed is only a packager and may not be able to decide
on this matter. Still, I think it is better to include a package that
works (and is recommended by the authors) than ship something that
doesn't work at all.
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191
By decision I meant if a soname bump should be introduced or not and
that'd be Behdad's call as maintaining a soname bump over upstream is a
big delta to carry.
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
by upstream maintainer , you mean Debian or Behdad ?
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://
That's very hard for me to say... it should be an upstream maintainer
decision and we should make sure that no package needs those symbols any
more.
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, wh
On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 10:19:14AM -, Daniel Holbach wrote:
> Salam Ahmed... do you think it wuold make sense to get this into Ubuntu
> first as the mentoring request in Debian seems to be getting quite old?
---end quoted text---
There is only one issue which is removed symbols discussed on bo
Salam Ahmed... do you think it wuold make sense to get this into Ubuntu
first as the mentoring request in Debian seems to be getting quite old?
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
** Summary changed:
- New upstream version 0.19.1
+ New upstream version 0.19.2
** Description changed:
- Please update to the latest upstream version, FriBidi 0.19.1, which adds
+ Please update to the latest upstream version, FriBidi 0.19.2, which adds
much-needed support for Arabic letter jo
20 matches
Mail list logo
