I have a correction and additional info regarding the matter:
The correction, regarding what I mentioned earlier:
> * quesoglc uses: nFriBidiMirroredChars, fribidi_prop_to_type
> [...]
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi.c: pp->pos, pp->len,
> fribidi_type_name (pp->type), pp->level);
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_mirroring.c: if (pos >
> nFriBidiMirroredChars - 1)
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_mirroring.c: pos =
> nFriBidiMirroredChars - 1;
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_mirroring.c: pos = step =
> (nFriBidiMirroredChars / 2) + 1;
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_tab_char_type_9.i: return
> fribidi_prop_to_type[(unsigned char)FRIBIDI_GET_TYPE (uch)];
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_tab_mirroring.i:const int
> nFriBidiMirroredChars = 332;
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_types.c:const FriBidiCharType
> fribidi_prop_to_type[] = {
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_types.c:fribidi_type_name (FriBidiCharType
> c)
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_types.h: char *fribidi_type_name
> (FriBidiCharType c);
> quesoglc-0.7.2/src/fribidi/fribidi_types.h: extern const FriBidiCharType
> fribidi_prop_to_type[];
quesoglc actually defines those symbols in some .h & .i files, so it
does not use fribidi removed symbols.
What I want to add is regarding those:
> * bidiv & centerim use: fribidi_iso8859_8_to_unicode_c,
> fribidi_unicode_to_iso8859_8
> * mailutils uses fribidi_wcwidth provided that HAVE_FRIBIDI_WCWIDTH is
> defined, I grep'ed for HAVE_FRIBIDI_WCWIDTH in both 0.19.2 & 0.10.9
> and I didn't find that
> * text-bidi, which is a perl interface for libfribidi, uses many of
> those obsolete symbols of fribidi, yet declares them to be "private".
Behdad previously said that fribidi 0.19.x is currently in Fedora
(without any SO bump) and there are no problems there.[1]
I had a look at Fedora source packages, and I found the following:
1) bidiv: the source package in Fedora was patched to be able to compile
with fribidi 0.19.1
2) centerim: fribidi was not enabled in Fedora source package. Hence no
problem appeared.
3) mailutils: this package does not seem to exist in Fedora. Yet I'm not
sure if this package will have a problem in Debian/Ubuntu (please read
the previous email, quoted above)
4) text-bidi: this package does not seem to exist in Fedora, also I am
not really sure if this one is a problem. Since it is a sort of Perl
bindings for fribidi.
[1]
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/debian-hebrew-package/2009-March/002330.html
--
أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy)
Digital design engineer
GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 (@ subkeys.pgp.net)
GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
--
New upstream version 0.19.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/191241
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
