** Changed in: ros-catkin-lint (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892529
Title:
`catkin` doesn't recognize `lint` verb
To manage notifications abo
I appreciate the thoughtful explanation, and I wasn't aware of the
Debian policy that strongly discourages shipping programs as libraries.
Working around that policy, it looks like the problem still could be
addressed by breaking out separate library and runtime packages.
However, I've moved on a
Upstream author/Debian maintainer here.
I'm sorry that I had to break your workflow. The thing is, catkin_lint
is actually a stand-alone tool with its own CLI binary, appropriately
named catkin_lint. In the past, catkin_lint shipped for both Python 2
and Python 3, mostly to support non-standard RO
The attachment "0001-Reorganize-packages-to-install-Python-under-usr-
lib-.patch" seems to be a patch. If it isn't, please remove the "patch"
flag from the attachment, remove the "patch" tag, and if you are a
member of the ~ubuntu-reviewers, unsubscribe the team.
[This is an automated message per
This patch reverses the dependencies, so `catkin-lint` pulls in `python3
-catkin-lint`. The Python libs are in the `python3-catkin-lint` package
now.
This fixes the problem for me, but I'm just a dabbler in Debian
packaging, so I don't know the greater ramifications of esp. the
dependency reversa
