Dear ubuntu-release team,
this is a FeatureFreeze Exceptions request for the tomahawk-player
package.
Many of the music streaming plugins of tomahawk 0.7 do not work any
longer. Tomahawk 0.7.x is deprecated and there are no updates any
longer. And so it would be nice if you would accept my reques
** Attachment added: "pbuilder-dist build log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomahawk/+bug/1487729/+attachment/4576018/+files/tomahawk-player_0.8.4+dfsg1-0ubuntu1~xenial1_amd64.build
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
> Should data/js/cryptojs/ be replaced with libjs-cryptojs?
Now, there exists a patch to use the external libjs-cryptojs package.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomaha
> lintian complains about a number of things in debian/copyright.
Is fixed.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notificat
> Ok, so you're now changing the Ubuntu-only tomahawk package to
distinguish itself from the tomahawk package (different upstream) in
Debian, OK.
Exactly!
> Should data/js/cryptojs/ be replaced with libjs-cryptojs?
This would be better, but I do not know how to patch the cmake files to
use the e
It'd also be good to explain why you needed to repack the tarball and in
which way.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage no
Should data/js/cryptojs/ be replaced with libjs-cryptojs?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notifications about this bug
Why are the debian/repack bits dropped in the new upload?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notifications about this bug
lintian complains about a number of things in debian/copyright.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notifications about th
A few unrelated changes: http://paste.ubuntu.com/15105969/ (readd
changelog entry, update timestamp, run update-maintainer, run wrap-and-
sort).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
T
Ok, so you're now changing the Ubuntu-only tomahawk package to
distinguish itself from the tomahawk package (different upstream) in
Debian, OK.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Ti
** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #649287
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=649287
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [need
The debian tomahawk package (https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/tomahawk) is
activly maintained by Kouhei Maeda and based on this source code:
https://github.com/oinume/tomahawk. It is "a simple ssh wrapper to
execute commands into many hosts".
This program is not related to the ubuntu tomahawk packa
Why would it be necessary to have two source packages? Why would we not
just update the current one to 0.8.4? Will the old tomahawk including
the python packages still be maintained somewhere?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
Ah ok, this source package (tomahawk-player) is a replacement for the
old tomahawk source package. And so it will be possible to sync the
tomahawk package from the debian source, which is not the same.
The debian source package contains the binary packages python-tomahawk
and python3-tomahawk. The
But having two separate source packages will mean that
- two sets of packages have to be maintained
- code in the archive is being duplicated
- users will be confused
- bugs will end up in two different places
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, whi
Tomahawk 0.8.4 is the latest version of the tomahawk player. There are
huge changes between 0.7.x and 0.8.x. I've attached the upstream
changelog.
** Attachment added: "upstream-changelog.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tomahawk/+bug/1487729/+attachment/4568433/+files/upstream-
Can you maybe explain why a new source package is required?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notifications about this b
** Changed in: tomahawk (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Medium
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notifications about thi
** Bug watch removed: Debian Bug tracker #770906
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=770906
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [need
** Changed in: tomahawk (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notifications
** Branch linked: lp:~justin-time/ubuntu/xenial/tomahawk/bug-1487729
** Changed in: tomahawk (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Stefan Ahlers (justin-time)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.ne
I'm one of the maintainers of the official tomahawk PPA.
I have created a PPA with a tomahawk-player build for xenial [1], which uses
the package name "tomahawk-player" instead of
"tomahawk" to allow sync the "tomahawk" package of the debian sources.
I also started to bring the "tomahawk-player"
** Changed in: tomahawk (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notifications about
** Tags added: xenial
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
Tomahawk 0.8.4 or newer [needs upgrade]
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/u
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
** Changed in: tomahawk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1487729
Title:
T
Thanks for taking your time to report this issue and help making Ubuntu
better.
Since this concerns an upgrade request, I've added the
'upgrade-software-version' tag.
Note that the tomahawk package in Debian has the same name, but is actually
something completely different. It is mentioned in th
27 matches
Mail list logo
