@Patrick, would you mind attaching /var/log/syslog , and possible
urfkill crash files in /var/crash ? Also, could you please describe what
were you doing when this happened?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
Just got this on rtm16 and Alfonso's workaround worked for me. Not sure
if this is a regression.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofon
This bug was fixed in the package urfkill -
0.6.0~20141007.235123.f908aff.1-0ubuntu1
---
urfkill (0.6.0~20141007.235123.f908aff.1-0ubuntu1) utopic; urgency=medium
* New release snapshot:
- Asynchronous support for rfkill operations. (LP: #1321627, #1339794)
- Improvements to
This bug was fixed in the package urfkill -
0.6.0~20141007.235123.f908aff.1-0ubuntu1
---
urfkill (0.6.0~20141007.235123.f908aff.1-0ubuntu1) utopic; urgency=medium
* New release snapshot:
- Asynchronous support for rfkill operations. (LP: #1321627, #1339794)
- Improvements to
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu RTM)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Tony Espy (awe)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' tog
** Also affects: urfkill (Ubuntu RTM)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu RTM)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu RTM)
Importance: Undecided => Cr
Updated milestone as landing the required fix requires additional fixes
to indicator-network.
There also have been some krillin-specific timeout issues that have
taken longer to debug than expected.
** Tags removed: touch-2014-09-18
** Tags added: touch-2014-09-25
--
You received this bug notif
** Branch linked: lp:~mathieu-tl/+junk/urfkill-debian
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' toggle fails
To manage notifica
** Tags added: touch-2014-09-18
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' toggle fails
To manage notifications about this bug g
** Tags added: rtm14
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' toggle fails
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' toggle fails
To manag
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (mathieu-tl) => Tony Espy (awe)
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
I can reproduce it on Nexus 5 every day even on a clean install..
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' toggle fails
To man
I have experienced the same issue on krillin when toggled the flight
mode couple of times.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Onl
Moving to high as one piece already landed and it's way harder to
reproduce the issue with latest image.
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu)
Importance: Critical => High
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
** Tags added: lt-category-visible lt-prio-low
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' toggle fails
To manage notifications a
** Description changed:
Sometimes the WWAN value in /var/lib/urfkill/saved-states is incoherent
with the flight mode status. Note that in this case we have dual SIM (I
have not tried yet with just one modem, could happen too).
Start with flight mode=0. soft=false in all sections in save
For reference, the silo mentioned in comment #21 landed on 20140711.
The first image this package was seeded in was #u127:
http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/landing-team/127.commitlog
Also, as I'm still able to re-create the bug ( see comment #23 ),
changed Status back to Triaged.
** Changed
So it looks like it's still possible to hit this bug even with the
updated urfkill from silo-0014 ( mentioned in comment #21 ).
Martti reported bug #1339794 while testing the pending Flight Mode UI
which seems to cause the modem to stop responding to Online/Offline
requests if FM is toggled too q
Thanks for getting me here Tony. It looks like I'm getting this too.
Yes it has always worked until this weekend possibly when I flashed #113
with 'ubuntu-device-flash --channel=ubuntu-touch/utopic'
$ adb shell cat /var/lib/urfkill/saved-states -> Everything is is false
except WWAN
$ adb shell
A silo has been created today for urfkill. This includes fixes for this
bug, and some additional changes needed by the pending Flight-Mode
system settings UI.
Here's the silo link, please feel free to download this version of
urkfill and report back your results:
https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-
Changed Status to FixCommitted via the following two pull requests:
https://github.com/cyphermox/urfkill/pull/4
https://github.com/cyphermox/urfkill/pull/5
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
@taiebot65
I think the crucial evidence for this bug is the saved_states file per
the description.
We should be landing a new version of urfkill this week with fixes for
this bug and a separate issue with DBus signals that affected the Touch
Flight Mode UI ( which hopefully will land at the same
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' toggle fails
** Summary changed:
- Wrong WWAN value in saved-states
+ Wrong WWAN value in saved-states if ofono 'Online' toggle fails
** Description changed:
Sometimes the WWAN value in /var/lib/urfkill/saved-states is incoherent
with the flight mode status. Note that in this case we have dual SIM (I
h
I think i am hitting this bug everyday while i am at work. Because only
a hard reboot gives me back my gsm after leaving work.
Anyway to cut it short i have poor to really bad GSM reception at work.
Almost two to three times a day i completely lose ability to call or
send text and only a hard rebo
I had to carry out the following manually to get the GSM signals to work
/usr/share/urfkill/scripts/flight-mode 1
# restart to write values in saved-state
restart urfkill
/usr/share/urfkill/scripts/flight-mode 0
# restart to write values in saved-state
restart urfkill
--
You received this bug no
For me on #87, by default the GSM signals are turned off. I am using the
Android/Ubuntu dual boot app provided by Canonical
Also, following
root@ubuntu-phablet:~# cat /var/lib/urfkill/saved-states
[ALL]
soft=false
[BLUETOOTH]
soft=false
[WLAN]
soft=false
[UWB]
soft=false
[WIMAX]
soft=false
[
Without logs, I can't know what happened. Tony, do you still have the
logs for that testing run?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states
To man
I was able to reproduce a similar problem on mako following Alfonso's
instructions. I ended up with the following states:
root@ubuntu-phablet:~# cat /var/lib/urfkill/saved-states
[ALL]
soft=false
[WLAN]
soft=true
[BLUETOOTH]
soft=true
[UWB]
soft=false
[WIMAX]
soft=false
[WWAN]
soft=false
[
maybe interesting or maybe red herring:
14:25 < asac> cyphermox: grepping through urfkill its odd that there are places
where there is WLAN, but not WWAN in the switch/case codes
14:26 < asac> cyphermox: i guess thats (one of) the reason for the weird WWAN
state bugs
14:26 < asac> cyphermox: se
I filed bug #1329734 as requested
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WWAN value in saved-states
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.
Please disregard the timeout part here, as that does not affect nexus 4
(I will open a different bug for that). This bug is for the wrong value
for WWAN in saved states.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.laun
@Mathieu: Not sure what those two bugs are. Should I file a new one with
'ubuntu-bug urfkill' for the part that requires me to run
/usr/share/ofono/scripts/online-modem after every reboot ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Timeout indeed could be increased, but it's currently supposed to be set
at 25 seconds (the default for g_dbus_proxy's).
As for saving the states, I'll think about it a bit, try to figure out
why it was set the way it was so far.
Ideally however, there should be two bugs if there are two separate
Argh, updated to #77 and didn't realize I need to use the script again
:-/ Looks like that will be case for every reboot right ?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1321627
Title:
Wrong WW
I ran into this issue during the week end and indeed completely lost
carrier selection.
abeato pointed me to /usr/share/ofono/scripts/online-modem that restored
the correct carrier.
Thanks for that but this needs a better fix than requiring the user to
run a script ;)
--
You received this bug
Bumped this to critical as it can result in someone not having use of
their phone for emergency calls.
** Changed in: urfkill (Ubuntu)
Importance: High => Critical
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
My mako was in this state, the save-states file had WWAN soft=true and
this value was never changed despite bringing the modem up, turning off
flight mode, etc. This happened since the orginal landing of the flight
mode capability, I never ran any commands, it was just defaulted to
having the mode
In fact I did not restart immediately urfkill, I waited for around a
minute and did some checks between each command in the bug description.
The problem is not that the file is written just on shutdown, although I
would argue that it makes sense to write it each time the user modifies
a setting, t
Not necessarily.
The saved-states file is only necessary for persistence across reboots.
That it's not always 100% up to date is irrelevant, because you'll also
should have UI available to toggle this. Writing on shutdown is
sufficient for this purpose. I'm not against writing more often, but it
j
An interesting line in syslog is:
URfkill[3014]: Could not set Online property in oFono: Timeout
was reached
In the case of MTK modem, onlining the modem after powering it on takes
~8 seconds, so probable the timeout has to be increased (maybe to ~20
seconds to be on the safe side).
However, ev
42 matches
Mail list logo
