** Changed in: debian
Status: New => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
Uploaded to hardy.
** Changed in: mumble (Ubuntu)
Sourcepackagename: None => mumble
Assignee: (unassigned) => Thorvald Natvig (slicer)
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you
The documentation issue is fixed and will be included in the next upload.
Unbundling of speex will have to wait for speex 1.2~beta4 or 1.2 final
(whichever happens first) -- the changes mumble requires are now included in
speex svn and will be included in the next release.
Mumble is now included
ISSUE: The version of Speex libraries included with Ubuntu have
insufficient features to be used with Mumble. The newest version of
Speex 1.2~beta3 does have, for the most part, sufficient features. By
getting Speex 1.3~beta into the Debian Experimental repository, Mumble
can be packaged for Ubun
ISSUE: There is mention in the documentation of Mumble that there is
"Proprietary" code within Mumble. Through an IRC discussion, it was
determined by Thorvald that there, in fact, was not "Proprietary" code
within Mumble. Perhaps this was a misuse of the word. Regardless, it
was also determined
nohup.out is the output of "nohup". "man nohup" should show it's usage.
As an output file that's obviously been included by mistake, it is not
required.
The speex issue has been discussed in this very thread.
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bu
- Is debian/nohup.out required?
- Can we rip out 'speex' out of the tarball? Our archive-admins won't be happy
about an internal version of speex. Security fixes will always have to be
applied not only for the speex source package but for mumble too. This package
should be able to get built wi
This sort of became very, very quiet.
I updated my debian rules and put the package at
https://edge.launchpad.net/~slicer/+archive
Could someone take a peek at it?
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
You can check his last upload on:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?package=mumble
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Johan Euphrosine (proppy) => (unassigned)
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Thorvald Natvig, I'm leaving the job to [EMAIL PROTECTED], he needs mumble
packaged for amarok radio.
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
License holders has been discussed before in this very thread. The
speex/ directory is a snapshot of libspeex and libspeexdsp. It includes
the COPYING file from that directory. Stefan Gehn and Sebastian
Schlingmann have both submitted larger OSX-related patches to Mumble and
as such should probably
Here is the list in a more readable format, Thanks in advance:
Thorvald Natvig
Xiph.org Foundation
Jean-Marc Valin
Analog Devices Inc.
Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research
David Rowe
EpicGames
Jutta Degener
Carsten Bormann
Jean-Marc Valin
Mark Borgerding
Christopher Montgomery
Stefan G
To Thorvald Natvig:
Norsetto and I noticed that there are additional authors quoted in some souces,
are there missing name from the following list ?
./LICENSE:Copyright (C) 2005-2007, Thorvald Natvig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
./speex/COPYING:Copyright 2002-2007 Xiph.org Foundation
./speex/COPYING:Co
Following changes have been applied to the svn debian/ directory.
(See attached patch)
** Attachment added: "fix-general-and-changelog.patch"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10201034/fix-general-and-changelog.patch
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received
Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-
pkglist?action=details;package=mumble as well.
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Fixed General and changelog issue with:
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=456
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubun
Uploaded to http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-
pkglist?action=details;package=mumble as well
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=449
Fix debian-rules-ignores-make-clean-error
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=448
Fix .svn in source
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
Uploaded in current state on REVU
http://revu.tauware.de/details.py?upid=447
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bug
I'm assuming the above posts were a replay of some off-list email
conversation and that you aren't discussing with yourself ;)
murmur.sqlite definitely belongs in /var somewhere. It's a binary
database with no user-servicable parts inside it.
/var/lib/mumble/murmur.sqlite sounds perfect to me, as
After reporting a couple of minor bugs in the debian/rules script, I was
advised to post my findings here:
1: The murmur icon gets installed to /usr/share/pixmaps/mumble.png.1. This
causes some issues because gnome can't find the icon with the .1 appended.
Fix: Change line 99 (as of SVN) in debia
> First of all, I would like to see the package in revu:
That will be my next step on this subject.
> Concerning the daemon initialisation, you should refer to the debian policy:
>
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s-sysvinit
> http://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-op
> I don't think /var/lib is a good place for murmur.sqlite, shouldn't be
in /etc/ too?
As murmur.sqlite is often changed by the program itself and not by the user
My first thought was that it belong to /var/lib and not to /etc.
I get the following information from "Filesystem Hierarchy Standard"
> The items I thought about addressing first are (because they are easy
> and all about packaging):
> What do you (two) think ?
First of all, I would like to see the package in revu:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuDevelopment#NewPackages
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU
So that we can
Murmurd searches around a bit for a .ini file. If it can't find one, it
goes with it's builtin defaults. There's a sample one distributed in the
scripts/ directory.
If you put that file into /etc, you can set the logpath, database path,
pidpath etc from that file.
The current murmur.pl script nee
Hi,
I've build the package from svn trunk on:
http://mumble.aminche.com/
Just as you reported it, lintian outputed the following error/warning:
http://mumble.aminche.com/lintian.out
I've installed a murmurd server on:
mumble://mumble.aminche.com:64738/
murmul.pl cgi can be accessed from:
http:/
All right.
The current work in progress is the current Mumble SVN from sourceforge
(See http://mumble.sf.net for links). That contains the debian/
directory I used to build the binaries we have on sourceforge. At
Justin's request, the debian/ dir has been removed from the tarballs as
I understood
Thorvald,
I have assigned Johan to this.
Its his first complete package but I'm backing him up fully. Please coordinate
with him and I'm sure we will have a very good mumble package in hardy soon.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Assignee: Justin M. Wray (wray-justin) => Johan Euphrosine (proppy)
--
Thorvald Natvig, Justin M. Wray:
What is current state of debian/ubuntu packaging ?
Can you provide an url with the work in progress ?
I'm not that a packaging expert, but I can help you if there is specific
things that needs to be done.
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
I'd be more than happy if Justin does the official packaging, providing he
still has time?
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
It depends on how you want to proceed.
If you want to make the package yourself, then the best would be to upload your
package to REVU, and we will assist you there:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/MOTU/Packages/REVU
If you want to have leave your package to Justin, just coordinate with
him, for instanc
1.1.0 is out the door with our homebuilt .deb packages for gutsy.
There's a lot of new functionality in there, so there's likely a few
bugs as well. So a 1.1.1 and 1.1.2 is probably expected "sometime in the
not-too-distant future".
However, the binary protocol, build system and dependencies are s
Sorry for the delay in my response, extended holiday this past weekend.
>Justin, what are your plans on this? You wanted to do this, but I
haven't seen much interest from your side.
Cesare, I am absolutely interested in packaging the next released
version mumble for Hardy. Unfortunitally working
Its too late for gutsy anyhow, the NPF was on Agust the 30th. If the package
was to be ready before beta freeze we could have asked an exception but I doubt
this can be done.
In any case, what was the point of proposing 1.0 for gutsy if 1.0 will be
obsolete by the time gutsy is out? It would ha
Actually, the library is just used when building; it's embedded in the
binary as a static library and is not in any way exported to the rest of
userspace. It is completely internal to Mumble.
You're already bundling a snapshot; speex 1.1.12 is a development
snapshot, it is not a "stable release".
Of course you are free to have a /debian in your tree. As long as its excluded
once you make dist (or whatever you use to make your tarball) thats fine.
I'm personally not very happy to ship an extra copy of libspeex just for the
purpose of your package.
I discussed with some developers and they
1) Ubuntu is my main Linux distro at the moment, and our primary (and
only) disitribution for binary packages for Mumble, so yes, I'm familar
with Ubuntu :) I'd be interested in keeping the debian/ stuff (possibly
integrating whatever changes you make the "official" package) in the SVN
tree so we c
Thanks for the clarifications Thorvald:
1) Native Debian packages are packages which have been written
especially for Debian (or Ubuntu in our case), which is not the case for
Mumble. To give you an example, if you are familiar with Ubuntu, update-
manager is a native debian package.
2) Patch is
As I said in the sourceforge bug report, I was under the impression that
tarballs with a embedded "debian/" dir were considered "native"
packages? Or is that reserved for packages that exist only on debian and
nowhere else?
I can fix the desktop file. Alternately if you have a patch I can apply
th
Hi Torvald,
Thanks indeed for your interest. There is a number of points that I had
asked Justin to forward to you. Let me paste them here in case you
haven't got them (in no particular order):
1) The upstream tarball must not contain a debian directory, upstream
should exclude it in their dist t
Being the "upstream", is there anything I can do to help this along?
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.
Justin,
you should check this page to undestand what bug status is:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Bugs/Status
I'm changing back to In Progress.
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug noti
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: In Progress => Confirmed
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.
I also think it would be good to have this appear somewhat soon, can it
also be backported to feisty while at it?
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
** Changed in: Ubuntu
Assignee: (unassigned) => Justin M. Wray
Status: Confirmed => In Progress
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubun
** Summary changed:
- Mumble needs packaging
+ [needs-packaging] Mumble
--
[needs-packaging] Mumble
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/129081
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@li
47 matches
Mail list logo
