[Bug 1080818] Re: Sanitize and decouple dependencies - cover all scenarios

2013-04-02 Thread Launchpad Bug Tracker
[Expired for upstart (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.] ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Expired -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/108081

[Bug 1080818] Re: Sanitize and decouple dependencies - cover all scenarios

2013-02-01 Thread Fjodor
xnox: I hope you will accept my apologies for the lateness of my reply, but I hope the following will answer your question: 1) It doesn't add value to my use case 2) It increases complexity 3) It seems to introduce a tight coupling to a non-related component (upstart) 4) Have you ever looked at th

[Bug 1080818] Re: Sanitize and decouple dependencies - cover all scenarios

2012-12-11 Thread Dmitrijs Ledkovs
Plymouth is well & deeply integrated into Ubuntu and disabling/uninstalling plymouth is hard. Currently I do not believe we support disabling plymouth. Can you please explain why you want to disable plymouth? ** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Changed in: upstart