[Bug 1913062] Re: netplan apply backtrace

2021-03-17 Thread Bill Nickless
@slyon looks like you released https://github.com/canonical/netplan/releases/tag/0.102 with the fix two days ago; how long does it usually take to filter upstream releases out to focal-updates and groovy-updates? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 1914945] [NEW] iftop ignores passively sniffed IPv6 traffic

2021-02-07 Thread Bill Nickless
Public bug reported: IPv4 traffic is displayed but IPv6 is not, when running iftop against a passive promiscuous network interface. ** Affects: iftop (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Patch added: "0001-Support-passively-sniffing-IPv6.patch" https://bugs.launchpad.n

[Bug 697803] Re: xfsdumpBULKSTAT failed on 2.6.32-27-server

2011-05-06 Thread Bill Nickless
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 692848 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 Good news -- per bug #692848, it's fixed in -31. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/697803 Title:

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-03-21 Thread Bill Nickless
I've verified that the proposed "Linux nitwo-ubuntu 2.6.32-31-generic #60-Ubuntu SMP Thu Mar 17 22:15:39 UTC 2011 x86_64 GNU/Linux" fixes the problem. I also confirmed that the warnings noted in #30 appear to be harmless; I see them too but the resulting dump includes the files and the restored fi

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-03-02 Thread Bill Nickless
Regression problem is still present in Lucid 2.6.32-29: d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:~$ gunzip < ~/Desktop/100mb.xfs.gz > /tmp/100mb.xfs d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:~$ sudo mkdir -p /mnt/100mb d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:~$ sudo mount -o loop /tmp/100mb.xfs /mnt/100mb d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:~$ sudo xfsdump /mnt/100mb -f /dev

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-02-22 Thread Bill Nickless
I found that gzip'ing the image makes it small enough to attach to this bug. So to replicate the problem under -28, download the attached file and do the following: d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:/tmp$ gunzip < ~/Desktop/100mb.xfs.gz > /tmp/100mb.xfs d3m406@nitwo-ubuntu:/tmp$ sudo mkdir -p /mnt/100mb d3m40

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-02-22 Thread Bill Nickless
I have a 100mb xfs filesystem that causes xfsdump to fail every time. I created it by copying /usr/include to a newly created xfs filesystem within a file in /tmp/, deleting a few files, and then restoring them from /usr/include again. Should I attach it to this bug, or would you like me to put i

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-02-22 Thread Bill Nickless
For what it's worth, I use xfs for the root and /home filesystem on my Dell M6500. /home is also encrypted with ECRYPTFS. Since -26, xfsdump always fails immediately on both filesystems. I've been rebooting back to -26 to perform my weekly backups to offline media. -- You received this bug not

[Bug 697803] Re: xfsdumpBULKSTAT failed on 2.6.32-27-server

2011-01-26 Thread Bill Nickless
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 692848 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/692848 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 692848 Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22 * You can subscribe to bug 692848 by following this link: https://bugs.l

[Bug 692848] Re: Regression between 2.6.32-27 and 2.6.32-26 xfsdump SGI_FS_BULKSTAT errno = 22

2011-01-26 Thread Bill Nickless
Problem still exists under 2.6.32-28 on x86_64: + sudo xfsdump -p 10 -L NITWO Ubuntu Home Filesystem -M Written 2011-01-26 -f /media/tvms/Backups/nitwo-ubuntu/home/2011-01-26.xfsdump /home xfsdump: using file dump (drive_simple) strategy xfsdump: version 3.0.4 (dump format 3.0) - Running single-

[Bug 586553] [NEW] casper misinterprets ipv6.disable=1 on kernel command line

2010-05-27 Thread Bill Nickless
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: casper In Lucid (casper 1.236), the script /usr/share/initramfs- tools/scripts/casper has a function parse_cmdline. It iterates over the words in /proc/cmdline looking for boot options. Inside that loop is a case statement. Starting in line 43 we see:

RE: [Bug 411635] Re: Flash player plugin in Firefox is not working

2009-08-12 Thread Robert Nickless
I did seems to have cured the problem. Thank you, Robert Nickless. > Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:04:04 + > From: gnomefr...@gmail.com > To: rnickl...@hotmail.com > Subject: [Bug 411635] Re: Flash player plugin in Firefox is not working > > Please trya new profile also p

[Bug 411635] Re: Flash player plugin in Firefox is not working

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Nickless
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30126628/Dependencies.txt ** Attachment added: "ExtensionSummary.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30126629/ExtensionSummary.txt ** Attachment added: "profiles.ini.txt" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30126630/profiles

[Bug 411635] [NEW] Flash player plugin in Firefox is not working

2009-08-10 Thread Robert Nickless
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: firefox-3.0 The Flash player has stopped working with Firefox 3.0. Websites state that flash needs updating but when try I am told that a later version is already installed. I have tried uninstalling Flash and reinstalling. I have tried uninstalling and

[Bug 25931] Re: Failed to initalize HAL.

2007-11-01 Thread nickless
Ok, I also got booting on Gutsy with CONCURRENCY=shell to work using just sudo mv /etc/rc2.d/S12hal /etc/rc2.d/S13hal (Kloudy actually had a typo there moving "S12hal" to "13hal", which of course wouldn't work) But shell didn't really speed up my boot. I still boot up in 25s, which isn't too bad

[Bug 25931] Re: Failed to initalize HAL.

2007-10-29 Thread nickless
Kloudy try using CONCURRENCY=shell and report if the HAL-Problem reoccurs. I would be interested in the outcome :) -- Failed to initalize HAL. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25931 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is a direct subscriber. -- ubunt

[Bug 146812] Re: Gusty Beta: error on startup. "Internal Error" "failed to initialize HAL!"

2007-10-24 Thread nickless
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 25931 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25931 Same here. Changed to shell for faster booting, too fast as it seems. Well I hope this can be fixed soon, so that I can use this little tweak. -- Gusty Beta: error on startup. "Internal Error" "failed to initi

[Bug 151544] Re: [Gutsy] GNOME takes too much time to load during system boot

2007-10-24 Thread nickless
I have the same problem on Dell Inspiron 9400 with an Nvidia 7900GS using Gutsy with Compiz Fusion. It takes unusual long to load the desktop after the first login when fresh booted. Disabling startup programs doesn't help, also turning on the Compiz Fusion starting splash-screen to see when Co