I'm not sure why you come to that conclusion, but I always authorize the
accounts whenever requested (the top right menu button turns red). In
fact, I repeatedly authorized and unauthorized the gtalk account when
debugging the problem, trying to make Empathy show the contacts.
In any case the prob
This only seems to happen if I launch Empathy from the Unity Launcher.
It works correctly when I set my status to Online through the Unity
Panel and then launch Empathy from there as well.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu
Public bug reported:
This problem happens in two computers, whether I use auto-login or not, with
Ubuntu 12.10.
I configured two accounts on the Online Accounts window: Facebook and Google.
My Facebook contacts always appear on Empathy, but gTalk contacts almost
never appear, with the error mess
I would like to "reopen" this bug because it does seem that it is not a
question of UMS support for dri on r200 or r300.
I'm on PP beta 2 on i386, I've compiled and installed mesa 7.11 and
7.10 and the problem remains. Didn t notice before as I didn t need to
disable modesetting. I'm investigatin
same here with r300
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/946677
Title:
UMS dri support missing for r200
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so
Still present in 12.04 beta 2
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/537703
Title:
Compiz intercepts alert sound from gnome-terminal
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
Nevermind, will try my luck elsewhere, i'll surely find somewhere where
"my" login-corruption bug is described and still open.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/931967
Title:
Corrupted
Sure I have old hardware, but I have to recompile the entire kernel with
module enabled for speedstep-centrino instead of just compiling the
module in a few seconds, as I have to patch the driver for accepting the
cpufreq tables for my Sonoma (stepping C0) 2.0 GHz Pentium-M which is
not standard bu
I'm glad that many others had their issue solved, maybe I have a
different bug: I've never had this problem of reading from previous
sessions, but the screen is corrupted from after login until the
background is drawn (so actually before unity launcher).
Can anyone tell if this is another bug ?
And here the problem is NOT gone with the last update.
I'm on Beta 1 and compiled/installed 0.2.5ubuntu2. Did I miss some Beta
2 extra update ?
Card is ATI X700.
Screen still showing either "displaced" full login screen or multiple
black login-like tiles on top.
Also now logging out from sessio
Just to add some feedback, despite the crash notification the session is not
impaired and compiz continues working, I guess it is relaunched.
I wonder also if this is not related to the shortly garbled screen between the
greeter login and the desktop bacgkround appearance. I doubt I'm alone at
** Visibility changed to: Public
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/945514
Title:
compiz crashed with SIGSEGV in get_radeon_bo()
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bug
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 366967 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366967
Nevermind, the quickfix from GdP seems to have worked as is.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/4480
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 366967 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/366967
I'm reluctant to apply the PPA because I fear that if it breaks I will
not be able to recover. Could someone summarize/update the cli steps as
done by SvG in the past for 11.10 ? I've tried these manual steps
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/869980
Title:
language support should install aspell dictionaries automatically
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Public bug reported:
Oneiric daily build from 6 Oct 2011
When I added Portuguese as a language using the language support application,
no spell check dictionaries were installed.
Gedit in particular wouldn't offer to spell check portuguese and I had to
manually install the package aspell-pt in
My display hangs whenever I run compiz too.
Same graphics card, Natty Beta. I think I already have driver version 270.30,
from the repos.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/728745
Title:
Will reopen to highlight the issue as the bug has not been really solved
( i mean the issue of breaking the upgrade from karmic/jaunty...)
--
flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/554883
You received this bug notification because you are
Well, just in case this could help, i would rember this was a 32 bit system
(have read about similar issues with nspluginwrapper but on 64 bit systems).
There wasn't a symlink in firefox/add-ons/plugins to nspluginwrapper on my
system which was being upgraded since Gutsy.
Now why FF was going
Well, could solve the issue linking npwrapper.flashplugin.so. Not sure
thgis was the original issue as I ve done quite a few reinstalls but it
stills seems it could be a bug for people upgrading. I hope that LL
final release will not break as for me on beta1. But then so much for
the support on th
Well Jaunty is quite over and better to close this
** Changed in: xinit (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
Jaunty won't source .xsession
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Failed to load module "module-x11-xsmp
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/300275
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bu
✠pactl list | grep module-x11-xsmp
Name: module-x11-xsmp
Driver: module-x11-xsmp.c
Syslog file:
Apr 5 14:22:23 localhost pulseaudio[16031]: module-x11-xsmp.c: Failed to open
connection to session manager: Could not open network socket
Apr 5 14:22:23 localhost pulseaudio[16031
Is it an upstream bug on flash plugin ?
I've found the same description here on a mozilla forum:
http://support.mozilla.com/tiki-view_forum_thread.php?locale=en-
US&comments_parentId=638378&forumId=1
--
flash plugin broken on firefox 3.6.2 after update on lucid beta 1
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: flashplugin-nonfree
I've made an update today on Lucid beta 1 and the flash plugin for
mozilla stopped working.
Browsing other similar errors, I could resume functionality for Chrome
and Opera by installing nspluginwrapper and editing npviewer as per th
With latest Lucid beta 1, message appears.
Apparently, module is loaded despite warning on failure to "open
connection to session manager", as I receive a message that it cannot be
loaded twice after pactl load-module.
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Fai
** Changed in: plymouth (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Fix Released
--
Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, plymouth launch broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
Thanks.
Could I also ask if it is normal that when I first booted with the new
Plymouth version the splash screen appeared for a relatively good time (
i could see the dots move) but when I rebooted many times since it
only appears very late just before gdm login screen ? I ve read a few
pos
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 530779 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/530779
I'm not sure this is relevant to your opinion that this is a duplicate of bug
#530779, but I was able to boot without problems until some updates ago (2 days
- plymouth stopped showing), and now I'm getting
As i had noticed I didn't have a tty0 in event.d (as i have been
upgrading since 6.04), tried to install Plymouth back.
In the process version 0.8.1-3 was available to upgrade. I did it and
now it works. Tx. Will close the bug if Reuben confirms also.
BTW, should I left created a tty0 anyway ? I
I dont know if this helps but the output to the screen is not totally
frozen as i can see usb messages by plugging/unplugging usb devices.
Actually I can always see an error message from a previous usb keyboard
initialization which was timed out, so it appears 11 s later. after the
init-bottom don
Well Steve, first thanks for the attention. You all seem to confirm we
were right to maintain as a bug since this is not happening to a
majority of users and could remain unnoticed.
Sorry if we lack more info but we were already quite lucky to "bypass"
the issue and be able to pinpoint on plymout
Will leave bug open as the one marked as duplicated rightly consider
this still open (i guess as beta this plymouth issue will be solved, but
it is anyway a bug as apparently many systems are not featuring it) and
since this bug being the "primary" one, it could hide the issue to
maintainers.
** C
Ok, removing plymouth with apt-get purge (not by disabling splash
script) solved the issue and allowed me to boot.
** Changed in: upstart (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046
You received thi
** Package changed: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu) => upstart (Ubuntu)
** Summary changed:
- Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom
+ Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken
--
Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, upstart scripts broken
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046
You received thi
A couple of people confirming this issue on
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?p=9053029&posted=1#post9053029.
** Changed in: initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046
You received thi
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 552046 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 552046
Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom
--
Lucid beta 1 - will not boot
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552088
You received this bug notific
** Package changed: ubuntu => initramfs-tools (Ubuntu)
--
Lucid beta 1 won' t boot, stuck after init bottom
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/552046
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@l
Public bug reported:
LL beta1 just downloaded won' t boot whatever the kernel and recovery
mode, and will stop after init bottom scripts.
Some users pointed the same bug in the development forum in just the
last few hours so may be really a new issue.
No particular detail to releve but that it
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41871498/Dependencies.txt
--
Grub doesn't display distro's versions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/546343
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub2
I don't know if this is by design, but my opinion is it shouldn't be.
Grub2 (both 30_os-prober and 10_linux) saves menu entries for linux distros
using only the name and kernel version.
So instead of displaying:
Ubuntu 10.04 (or Ubuntu Lucid Lynx
I don't think os_prober is supposed to detect the current running OS, isn't
that 10_linux's job?
If I understood correctly, you want only one kernel to boot your karmic from,
right? Why not delete the older linux-images?
--
os-prober does not detect karmic, but only lucid ?
https://bugs.launchp
It can be hard to see if your image viewer / browser has a light
background, but here is a screenshot.
** Attachment added: "Screenshot.png"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41326990/Screenshot.png
--
nautilus draws white bars on desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207
You received this b
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41323563/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "usr_lib_nautilus.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41323564/usr_lib_nautilus.txt
--
nautilus draws white bars on desktop
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/542207
You receiv
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: nautilus
I'm running Lucid Beta 1.
Nautilus version: 1:2.29.92.1-0ubuntu1
Whenever I change my theme in System > Preferences > Appearance,
nautilus draws two white bars in the desktop, as if the wallpaper didn't
fill the whole screen. They are located in
I agree with Adam Williamson and I think a lot of the heat this is
generating comes from the fact that we don't know what is the "Cool New
Stuff" that is being envisioned for the now free space.
I think most people can't really see improvements with this change and
maybe it would open our minds a
This always happened, as far as I can remember.
Got suddenly reminded of it by fellow Ubuntu forums user.
He posted a video of the problem here: http://www.vimeo.com/10127262
--
small gap between menu bar and main window.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/459896
You received this bug notification
I confirm this bug on my Timeline 4810t, hosts 0 and 5 don't keep the
settings while the others do.
--
unable to modify scsi host link_power_management_policy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/427925
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
I had the same problem too, when installing kubuntu-desktop on top of Ubuntu.
It seems to be fixed by running:
sudo update-alternatives --config x-cursor-theme
and selecting "/usr/share/icons/DMZ-White/cursor.theme" (it was 7 in my
machine)
--
Stuck with KDE Cursor after installing ubuntu-deskt
I would like to know meanwhile the recommended practice ? Delete
xsession-errors every week ? I'm getting 30MB+ .xession-errors files per
session, will this keep increasing ?
--
(firefox:24993): Gdk-WARNING **: XID collision, trouble ahead - overeager XID
caching
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
Nice guess :)
Removing my empathy accounts fixed it.
Is this the normal behavior?
--
Pidgin account disabled on status change (MSN)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449007
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs m
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33460970/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "XsessionErrors.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/33460971/XsessionErrors.txt
--
Pidgin account disabled on status change (MSN)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/449007
You
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: indicator-applet
(I'm using fully updated 64bit Karmic)
Whenever I change my pidgin status (available, away, etc) using
indicator-applet-session, pidgin says my MSN account has been disabled
because I logged in from another place!
This does not happen w
I wondevrif this is not the oldest medium-importance acknowledged bug
not to be fixed in the last 4 years in the Ubuntu distro
--
splash screen does not free virtual console #8
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25547
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
I would propose to close this bug as no one really cares and most probably will
never get assigned and eventually fixed.
It seems like xsessionrc is the one config file to use, i guess if one wants
xsession too it has only to change that in
/etc/X11/Xsession.d/40x11-common_xsessionrc
--
Jaunty
This confirms my fears that my bug #429616 wouldn't be fixed quickly as
this is trailing for 4 years. At least here it was ranked medium while
mine was ranked low.
I've investigated a bit and it seems that the culprit is in usplash.c,
where the vt is opened, activated on vt8 by ioctl VT_ACTIVATE,
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 25547 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/25547
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 25547
splash screen does not free virtual console #8
--
usplash won't deallocate vt even if console is redirected
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616
You re
** Summary changed:
- x display manager won't open session on next free vt
+ usplash won't deallocate vt even if console is redirected
** Description changed:
- Binary package hint: xdm
+ Binary package hint: usplash
- Since Ibex, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even if vt8
- ha
seems like the main culprit is really usplash it tinkers with ttys in
initramfs scripts.
** Package changed: gdm (Ubuntu) => usplash (Ubuntu)
--
x display manager won't open session on next free vt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616
You received this bug notification because you are a member
fair enough, at least for the 4th line (the other 3 i could try to
challenge).
would you anyway be able to hint which file i could look into, haven t
find anything in /etc/init.d (only some references to fgconsole check in
usplash) ?
--
x display manager won't open session on next free vt
https:
Just a comment, the startx "discovery" meant that vt8 was not actually
locked by usplash as I had thought since Gutsy,
--
x display manager won't open session on next free vt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Sebastien
I beg to differ. Though sure this is not a critical bug, it certainly is
one since it's well documented that new vts should be created
sequentially, vt7, vt8, etc...
Also before I came to the startx "discovery" I've found quite a few
complaints, some very old dating from hardy or 2005 (
seems like gdm is rather managing this
** Package changed: xdm (Ubuntu) => gdm (Ubuntu)
--
x display manager won't open session on next free vt
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/429616
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
u
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xdm
Since Ibex, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even if vt8
has been released from usplash activities at kernel boot by
console=ttyX, unless vt8 is specifically forced (through startx)
So somehow the dm seems just to assum
** Description changed:
Binary package hint: xdm
Since Ibex, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even if vt8
has been released from usplash activities at kernel boot by
console=ttyX, unless vt8 is specifically forced (through startx)
So somehow the dm seems just to assum
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xdm
Since Ibex, opening a new session will create it on vt9, even if vt8
has been released from usplash activities at kernel boot by
console=ttyX, unless vt8 is specifically forced (through startx)
So somehow the dm seems just to assume that vt8 is per
Well, the message is still appearing over the weekend in a very random
way.
Since it came out of the blue and I had some mysterious ipv6-related
dns-resolution lag issues lately, maybe it is not related to the package
itself.
Will turn back to fixed if no news.
--
spurious 'WARNING: cannot con
Started yesterday completely out of the blue (no upgrade, no reboot, no
nothing) around 17:44 GMT May 22 according to daemon log.
ddclient is (or was) working fine, actually effectuated an ip update
just last sunday smoothly.
Obs: message is "bad hostname checkip.dyndns.org" i/o "no route to
hos
I could notice that the bug disappeared when I disable the Fast User
switch and that consequently I had all my logout menu entries restored.
I guess this is somehow linked at the way the menu probes for checking
if the FUS is set to appear.
Since then my remote logins on NX have been working fine
Well, actually linking .xsessionrc to .xinitrc breaks my system ... No
login (some xrdb error message).
But manifestly in this case it was sourced. So is having my login
broken the correct behaviour ? Will search about this xrdb error.
I' m an average user step-upgrading since 6.04 if 'm not wro
** Changed in: kexec-tools (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => Confirmed
--
reboot in jaunty doesn't restart from bios
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364889
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
Well, I think it´s a bug also.
I´m pretty much sure i didn´t choose to have kexec-tools installed
(don´t remember about any chrashdump choice either), except that for the
first time I tried the beta/rc jaunty release and maybe it was installed
by default or almost (i mean, suggested in the upgrade
I disagree. Can´t see since when .xsessionrc is the default sourced
file, this would be against a lot of legacy.
Yes it was so if the scripts look the same the issue is elsewhere,
that´s exactly the point. Maybe a permission issue. And in the scripts
if you read all of them you will find that usex
** Package changed: xinit (Ubuntu) => xorg (Ubuntu)
--
Jaunty won't source .xsession
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:/
Hi anyone
Seriously, am I really the only to have this or having noticed it ?
Would believe that such an issue would cause greater feedback, seems
pretty serious if true.
--
Jaunty won't source .xsession
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721
You received this bug notification because you are a
** Summary changed:
- Jaunty won't source xinitrc
+ Jaunty won't source .xsession
--
Jaunty won't source .xsession
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/355721
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubunt
Actually created .xsession and linked to .xinitrc to no avail.
Am I really the only one experiencing this ? Please let me know if it is
a non-issue.
Attached my xsession-errors
** Attachment added: ".xsession-errors"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24911220/.xsession-errors
--
Jaunty won't s
Ok, so GDM is not meant to source .xinitrc.
Notwithstanding this, it worked in Ibex. Was there a link from .xsession
to .xinitrc ?
I have a few xsession errors (like xmodmap), could this cause somme breakage in
the sourcing or simply some rule is being enforced that .xinitrc is no more
sourced
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xinit
Apparently .xinitrc is not sourced at session startup. Could notice that
as a gamma correction by monicarc was not called and the screen is
extremely bluish.
In fact, ownership of .xinitrc after install was root:root. Even after
changing to user:us
So Sebastien,
We have all understood this is a well known bug and in fact I've landed
here because i wanted to upgrade form 8.10 and read about. The problem
is that despite this there seems to be no 100% workaround or patch.
Does this daily iso fix mean that any delta upgrade from 8.10 will also
a
Fixed as of today's updates (March 23)
** Changed in: gedit-plugins (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
gedit-plugins doesn't install
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346976
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gedit-plugins
Standard Ubuntu Jaunty daily build, fully updated, with minimal
configuration.
When trying to install the package gedit-plugins, apt always fails with
the following output:
Selecting previously deselected package gedit-plugins.
(Reading da
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: music-applet
I can't add the applet on Ubuntu Jaunty up-to-date (development version).
It crashes with the normal panel notification, no more information is visible.
Is there any way I can gather more information (debug info)?
** Affects: music-applet (
Just another hint that just happened: I've tried to unmount the sftp
folder and the desktop was frozen (only, other app widows would work
normally) then all icons simply disappeared. Killing the sftp process
made reappear the desktop icons.
So maybe it a problem rather linked to the display of th
I think that this is not right way to handle a bug that has been
reported since three years and through even more distros releases.
I've just landed here for the first time since I'm using nautilus for
sftp and was worried by this strange cpu activity even - and especially
- after the download wou
** Changed in: usplash (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/308211
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@list
Sorry for additional comment:
Bug is also not related to "new session".
Simply put, startx -- :1 vt8 opens normally on vt8 but startx -- :1
opens on vt9.
So it seems the system believes vt8 is not available. Hal issue ?
--
usplash fails to unlock x on vt8 (ibex)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bug
Update: I'll eventually invalidate this bug or change its scope
because:
It happens I could open an xserver on vt8 (was using only startx -- :1
instead of startx -- :1 vt8) so vt8 is definitely not locked as it would
happen with default console=tty8 (and of course there is no ghost
xserver).
So
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: usplash
Description: on boot, everything runs fine but when a new session ornew gdm
login screen is created, it jumps to vt9. Expected it to be created in vt8.
Release: Upgraded Ibex 8.10 with last updates, fglrx driver 8.543 from
synaptics.
Some resig
Seems like a I have the same issue. Had had in the past some rare
lockups but since Hardy 2.6.24 (and I guess since update to .1 - or -19
- even more) I've had more frequent lock-ups. Hard drive led starts
blinking fast as for a low-level routine and nothing happens, complete
freeze, only sys-alt-b
Just to comment that I semm to understand now that it was more
coincidence than legacy intent as the mounted folder appears
automatically on the desktop. Seems like the best way would be to
disable display of these "lesser" mounted volumes
--
"Connect to server" sftp mount does not save folder l
I´ve now seen now that bug #198857 is indeed a duplicate technically
speaking, but from my average-joe perspective I was far away from
guessing the issues behind of what seems now majorly a basic UI bug
rather than an architecture issue. Simply stated, I just wanted like a
granma to connect to a s
Same problem here, first connection is right. Wonder why is listed
invalid. Pretty much annoying, despite being ranked low priority.
Couldn't find where it has been report before except here, as it seems
slightly different from other natilus root redirection issues.
--
"Connect to server" sftp mo
Added another bug report for the above mentioned random factor in:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/alsa-driver/+bug/208006
--
Only PCM volume control takes effect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149622
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Public bug reported:
Using Ubuntu Gutsy Gibbon and Ubuntu Hardy Heron BETA on a HP Pavilion
dv5000 series laptop.
I found this bug because of this one (until I had that problem I didn't notice
it because I didn't need to control PCM volume!):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/alsa-driver/+bug/149622
Same here, and PCM volume change doesn't work properly, i.e. when I hold
VolumeUp it increments the volume a random number of bars and then
starts from the beginning (mute).
--
Only PCM volume control takes effect
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/149622
You received this bug notification because y
96 matches
Mail list logo
