[Bug 942043] Re: Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6

2012-02-29 Thread Metabaronen
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 858122 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 The bug report #858122 doesn't deal with the fact that scripts are linked as Start rather then Stop. I think that #858122 should deal with the problem but until then it should not be a duplicate. I've placed a

[Bug 942043] Re: Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6

2012-02-29 Thread Metabaronen
** Description changed: Description: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release: 10.04 initscripts: 2.87dsf-4ubuntu17.5 I expect my system to kill all processes, umount all volumes gracefully or forcefully. By default the symlinks for umountfs, umountroot, sendsigs, reboot and umountn

[Bug 942043] [NEW] Ubuntu does not shutdown properly due to wrong symlinks in runlevel 0 and 6

2012-02-27 Thread Metabaronen
Public bug reported: Description:Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release:10.04 initscripts: 2.87dsf-4ubuntu17.5 I expect my system to kill all processes, umount all volumes gracefully or forcefully. By default the symlinks for umountfs, umountroot, sendsigs, reboot and umountnfs.sh are created a

[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)

2012-02-27 Thread Metabaronen
Sorry! I managed to click on a link that changed the status with no questions asked (just wanted to get an explanation of the status). Can someone undo the Status change? I can't undo it myself :-/ -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)

2012-02-27 Thread Metabaronen
** Changed in: insserv (Ubuntu Oneiric) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/858122 Title: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order h

[Bug 858122] Re: incomplete migration to /run (shutdown script order has been demolished)

2012-02-27 Thread Metabaronen
Just a note... I can't get why the sendsig (for example) does have a S-link. The script does only handle stop (start is a no-op). Same goes for umountfs etc. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Bug 842746] [NEW] libreadline5-dev should provide libreadline-dev

2011-09-06 Thread Metabaronen
Public bug reported: Description: Ubuntu 10.04.3 LTS Release: 10.04 Package: libreadline5-dev 5.2-7build1 libreadline6-dev provides libreadline-dev but libreadline5-dev does not. But lib32readline5-dev does provide lib32readline-dev. It's a problem with swi-prolog since it requires libreadline-d

[Bug 601114] Re: /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh references $USER

2011-01-03 Thread Metabaronen
There are other problems with the profile shell fragment: - it assumes that the id never will be higher than the max port - it guesses that the generated port number is free - getent gets confused by numeric usernames Also reported in Bug #696758. -- You received this bug notification because y

[Bug 696758] [NEW] /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh fails on high UID

2011-01-03 Thread Metabaronen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: speech-dispatcher There are problems with /etc/profile.d/speechd-user-port.sh: - it assumes that the id never will be higher than the max port - it guesses that the generated port number is free - getent gets confused by numeric usernames ** Affects: sp

[Bug 694953] [NEW] missing i386 libraries on amd64

2010-12-28 Thread Metabaronen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: winbind It is common to use 32 bit proprietary applications like flashplayer, citrix and acrobat on a amd64 system. The NSS libraries are a vital part of the system as it enables programs to lookup user and group information. To solve this problem today

[Bug 605299] Re: missing i386 libraries on amd64

2010-12-12 Thread Metabaronen
I don't deploy this package no more so we are not affected anymore. But I feel the need to say that if a PAM module provider have a serious approach they must take the problem to run i386 programs on an amd64 system seriously. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu

[Bug 605299] Re: missing i386 libraries on amd64

2010-07-16 Thread Metabaronen
Yes, we need to have a 32bit pam_lwidentity.so and dependencies. -- missing i386 libraries on amd64 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/605299 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubu

[Bug 605299] [NEW] missing i386 libraries on amd64

2010-07-14 Thread Metabaronen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: likewise-open Description:Ubuntu 10.04 LTS Release:10.04 likewise-open: Installed: 5.4.0.42111-2ubuntu1 We currently got tools written in java that must run in a i386 java version. There are no i386 libraries provided by likewise-open so u

[Bug 117991] Re: lack of http-proxy support

2010-07-12 Thread Metabaronen
+1 -- lack of http-proxy support https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117991 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs

[Bug 548893] Re: 1.7.2p1ubuntu3 (lucid) :Gid Duplicate verification problem with likewise

2010-07-02 Thread Metabaronen
I encountered this problem with the ppa package of likewise-open https://launchpad.net/~likewise-open/+archive/likewise-open-ppa?field.series_filter=lucid After installing the old it started to work again. -- 1.7.2p1ubuntu3 (lucid) :Gid Duplicate verification problem with likewise https://bugs.la

[Bug 574354] [NEW] update-gconf-defaults permissions on create

2010-05-03 Thread Metabaronen
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: gconf2 Ubuntu 9.10 gconf2 2.28.0-0ubuntu2 update-gconf-defaults relies on users umask when creating new files. I think that the tool should know that the files must be readable by all users to set their policy. I encountered this problem using cfengine

[Bug 475679] Re: Mapping a Windows DFS share doesn't properly show me the filesystem.

2010-01-11 Thread Metabaronen
This is a problem at our site. We need to use a workaround where we use smbclient -k '\\dfs\path\' -c 'list' to get the real path to the server. Windows administrators feels the need to move things around so we can't publish the real path instead. I would like to have importance elevated to at lea

[Bug 458785] Re: can not unlock gnome-screensaver when password is near to expire

2009-11-25 Thread Metabaronen
I think that this bug should have importance set to medium. It is a problem in a big organization to handle all the support calls and comments about this :-P -- can not unlock gnome-screensaver when password is near to expire https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/458785 You received this bug notificati