[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-16 Thread Mark Robinson
Sorry for the late reply - I was on holiday last week. The only remaining was that the updates were appearing twice - under the normal updates section and under the greyed out Pro updates section. We have discussed this internally and have decided that it's not really an issue. So, we're happy wi

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-03 Thread Mark Robinson
Sorry, I did mean "to be updated". To clarify what I meant by the duplicate update issue, I have attached another screenshot. The python3-pip package is showing in the "Other updates" section and also in the (disabled) Ubuntu Pro security updates section. It's the same versions in both sections

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-02 Thread Mark Robinson
I've now installed 4:20.69 Unfortunately, it's showing duplicate entries for updated packages that are in upstream ESM and also in our staged repos. The highlighted package in the screenshot is also one of the "Python package installer" updates in the "Other updates" section. I think that's going

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-02 Thread Mark Robinson
I don;t think we've pinned it - it's just not seeing the +esm3 package: # apt policy python2.7-minimal python2.7-minimal: Installed: 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm2 Candidate: 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm2 Version table: *** 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm2 500 500 http://landscape.nowhere.com/repository/standa

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-02 Thread Mark Robinson
Morning Nathan, apt wasn't offering the python2-minimal patch: # apt list --upgradable Listing... Done google-chrome-stable/stable 129.0.6668.89-1 amd64 [upgradable from: 128.0.6613.113-1] krb5-locales/devclient-focal-staging-updates,devclient-focal-staging-updates 1.17-6ubuntu4.7 all [upgradab

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-01 Thread Mark Robinson
I think I know why the Python2.7 packages are showing like that. In the current cut of our ESM Landscape staged repos, we have Python 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm2, but version 2.7.18-1~20.04.4+esm3 is available directly from upstream ESM, even though ESM isn't enabled in UA pro. That's the same behaviou

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-01 Thread Mark Robinson
** Attachment added: "Standard package" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+attachment/5823738/+files/update-manager%201%3A20.04.10.21.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://b

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-01 Thread Mark Robinson
** Attachment added: "update-manager 4:20.66.png" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/update-manager/+bug/2083081/+attachment/5823739/+files/update-manager%204%3A20.66.png -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-01 Thread Mark Robinson
Nathen, I've tested your patch on my laptop (used for the original report above) and there's definitely an improvement, however the prompt to enable still shows. See attached screenshots of standard vs your version -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, wh

[Bug 2083081] Re: Locally Mirrored ESM repositories are not properly being picked up by software updater.

2024-10-01 Thread Mark Robinson
# ua security-status --format=json | jq . { "_schema_version": "0.1", "livepatch": { "fixed_cves": [] }, "packages": [ { "download_size": 1274208, "origin": "esm.ubuntu.com", "package": "python2.7-minimal", "service_name": "esm-apps", "status": "pending

[Bug 874635] Re: Guest session throws an apparmor denial

2012-03-02 Thread Mark Robinson
I suggest that this be pushed out to the non-proposed repository. This is the kind of bug that pushes users back to the mainstream in droves. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/874635 Titl

[Bug 387161] Re: JMicron drive 152d:{2329, 2338, 2339} cause USB resets on ATA smart probing

2011-02-04 Thread Mark Robinson
I just ran into this situation too: Feb 5 02:48:28 terrorbite kernel: [ 1478.220053] usb 2-1: new full speed USB device using ohci_hcd and address 32 Feb 5 02:48:28 terrorbite kernel: [ 1478.400385] usb 2-1: device descriptor read/64, error -62 Feb 5 02:48:29 terrorbite kernel: [ 1478.690035]

[Bug 625111] Re: lpstat default destination of two minds

2010-08-27 Thread Mark Robinson
$ cat ~/.cups/lpoptions Default hplj5l _kde-filters=true $ The others are lost. A number of points come to mind: - lpr (the failure of which brought me to this point) and lpstat should moan if the lpoptions files reference non-existent printers. - they should fail in a manner which tends to wo

[Bug 625111] Re: lpstat default destination of two minds

2010-08-26 Thread Mark Robinson
Before filing this bug I had already removed /etc/cups/lpoptions and ~/.lpoptions Removing ~/.cups/lpoptions has restored the desired operation. See: http://www.cups.org/str.php?L3503 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=481481 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=565569 I still co

[Bug 625111] [NEW] lpstat default destination of two minds

2010-08-26 Thread Mark Robinson
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: cups $ lpstat -d no system default destination $ lpstat -s system default destination: HP_LaserJet_5L device for HP_LaserJet_5L: parallel:/dev/lp0 $ cups version 1.4.3-1ubuntu1.2 ** Affects: cups (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Bug 430220] Re: [karmic] Upstart fixups

2010-02-11 Thread Mark Robinson
Wups, that should be #463471 -- [karmic] Upstart fixups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430220 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/lis

[Bug 430220] Re: [karmic] Upstart fixups

2010-02-11 Thread Mark Robinson
I found that the reason that my system was being taken down was a crude reload script in /usr/local/sbin which I had written before the introduction of upstart. Perhaps reload should be called using the explicit path ie. /usr/sbin/reload. Similarly, the explicit path for cron has been removed cau

[Bug 435893] Re: logrotate breaks rsyslog w/ attempted reload

2010-02-07 Thread Mark Robinson
Ignore me. The problem was a version of reload in /usr/local/sbin which I wrote before the introduction of upstart. -- logrotate breaks rsyslog w/ attempted reload https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435893 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscrib

[Bug 435893] Re: logrotate breaks rsyslog w/ attempted reload

2010-02-07 Thread Mark Robinson
For me this is a critical bug as it takes my machine down every day. Some time after booting my machine every morning it is consumed by a recursive explosion of reload and rsysklogd tasks. The attached file shows the first 300 tasks as reported by 'ps auxf'. I snaffled this as soon as possible bu

[Bug 430220] Re: [karmic] Upstart fixups

2010-01-10 Thread Mark Robinson
This system is suffering random take downs most days by a gales of 'reload' and 'rsyslog' tasks which multiply until swap space is exhausted. After that I dunno what happens. -- [karmic] Upstart fixups https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/430220 You received this bug notification because you are a mem

[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run

2008-08-17 Thread Mark Robinson
Achim: try mem=190M, I know that that much memory was demonstrating the problem for me and also that it boots up into gnome, albiet slowly. I tried to load the packages from -proposed when they were announced but it didn't want to work. As far as I could tell it was because they were not in the ar

[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run

2008-07-23 Thread Mark Robinson
** Changed in: gksu (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => In Progress -- gksu dies on first run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.c

[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run

2008-07-17 Thread Mark Robinson
Adding Michael's PPA to my sources.list, then updating and upgrading with aptitude appears to have sorted this out on this machine. The following packages have been kept back: synaptic [0.61ubuntu9 -> 0.62.1ubuntu1~ppa2] The following packages will be upgraded: f-spot [0.4.3.1-0ubuntu1 -> 0.4

[Bug 160413] Re: Wake on LAN (WOL) not working with r8169 driver on Gutsy

2008-07-13 Thread Mark Robinson
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux- networking-3/realtek-813981688169-on-2.6.21.3-or-newer-593495/ speaks of a setting in Windows XP which prevents same from leaving the NIC in a state from which the linux drivers cannot recover. That all said I am suspicious of network-manager given t

[Bug 184017] Re: [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server

2008-07-10 Thread Mark Robinson
** Tags added: patch -- [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184017 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.

[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run

2008-07-01 Thread Mark Robinson
The machines I've seen this on are also RAM starved. -- gksu dies on first run https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/55172 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.

[Bug 55172] Re: gksu dies on first run

2008-07-01 Thread Mark Robinson
> Could you please try the package of libgksu2-0 in hardy-proposed ? It hopefully fixes the problem. Can you give a link to the .deb ? I'd rather not add hardy-proposed to sources.list, but I'm happy to install the single package. Less variables that way. This is a pretty nasty bug, it prevents

[Bug 234290] Re: After Locking Firewall Firestarter freezes and cannot be unlocked

2008-06-27 Thread Mark Robinson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 184017 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/184017 ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 184017 [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server -- After Locking Firewall Firestarter freezes and cannot be unlocked h

[Bug 184017] Re: [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server

2008-06-20 Thread Mark Robinson
This wee patch makes firestarter work again. Someone clueful needs to look this over. ** Attachment added: "firestarter-wont-unlock.diff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/15484920/firestarter-wont-unlock.diff -- [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server http

[Bug 241520] [NEW] [Hardy] Typo: Suggests svn-buildpacakge

2008-06-19 Thread Mark Robinson
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: devscripts Suggested packages: cvs-buildpackage devscripts-el gnuplot mutt svn-buildpacakge This begs the question: should suggested package names be sanity checked? devscripts: Installed: 2.10.26ubuntu3~hardy1 ** Affects: devscripts (Ubuntu)

[Bug 184017] Re: [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server

2008-06-19 Thread Mark Robinson
Adding rules to the locked firewall to log packets showed these connection attempts on attempting to unlock: Jun 19 15:29:42 kotuku kernel: [546262.683765] IN= OUT=lo SRC=127.0.0.1 DST=127.0.0.1 LEN=44 TOS=0x00 PREC=0x00 TTL=64 ID=37291 DF PROTO=TCP SPT=58463 DPT=16001 WINDOW=32792 RES=0x00

[Bug 184017] Re: [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabilises the entire X-Server

2008-05-30 Thread Mark Robinson
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #479224 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479224 ** Also affects: debian via http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=479224 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- [Hardy]locking the firewall using Firestarter destabil

[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade

2008-03-07 Thread Mark Robinson
I think I can make sense of and confirm this report. Using "Update Manager" in the GUI or "do-release-upgrade" from the command line fails after displaying a list of software no longer supported by Canonical. In the GUI clicking on the "Close" button aborts the upgrade and restores the system to

[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail

2008-03-07 Thread Mark Robinson
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailin

[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail

2008-03-06 Thread Mark Robinson
I'm sorry but I can't test this fix. I have no idea where that machine came from or went to. -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.

[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade

2008-02-28 Thread Mark Robinson
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/main_pre_req.log Feisty -> Gutsy failure" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12283050/main_pre_req.log -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whi

[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade

2008-02-28 Thread Mark Robinson
** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/main.log Feisty -> Gutsy failure" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/12283046/main.log -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed

[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade

2008-02-28 Thread Mark Robinson
# ls -l /var/log/dist-upgrade/ total 104 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2583 2008-02-21 22:16 apt-autoinst-fixup.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 82989 2008-02-22 17:42 apt.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 8005 2008-02-22 17:42 main.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1375 2008-02-22 17:39 main_pre_req.log -rw-r--r-- 1 root

[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade

2008-02-28 Thread Mark Robinson
Further information: Dapper was installed on this machine and manually dist-upgraded to Edgy without major drama. The dist-upgrade to Feisty was done using update-manager and again went smoothly. ** Attachment added: "/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt.log Feisty -> Gutsy failure" http://launchpadlib

[Bug 154078] Re: Error during version upgrade

2008-02-27 Thread Mark Robinson
** Changed in: update-manager-core (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- Error during version upgrade https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/154078 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu

[Bug 59557] Re: horizontal off by one error

2007-08-14 Thread Mark Robinson
Fair call. Sorry about the lack of feedback. I was unable to secure the hardware to test the solution. -- horizontal off by one error https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/59557 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu. -- ubunt

[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail

2007-04-07 Thread Mark Robinson
** Attachment added: "/proc/acpi/dsdt" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7216513/20070408148-dsdt -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug contact

[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail

2007-04-07 Thread Mark Robinson
** Attachment added: "dmidecode" http://librarian.launchpad.net/7216510/200704081447-dmidecode.txt -- Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/64308 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug con

[Bug 64308] Re: Samsung X60 T2300: ACPI video module causes ACPI to fail

2007-04-07 Thread Mark Robinson
I'm seeing this on an Acer Extensa 2303LC. /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.20-12-generic installed by a very recent Feisty install snapshot works fine but the first upgraded kernel /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.20-14-generic exhibits the * Loading ACPI modules... hang described by others except that black

[Bug 103973] Re: audacity not installable in Feisty

2007-04-07 Thread Mark Robinson
Sorry about that - something seems to be playing the fool with my repository indices. If I find out what I'll advise further. -- audacity not installable in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103973 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is the bug

[Bug 103973] audacity not installable in Feisty

2007-04-06 Thread Mark Robinson
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: audacity This on a spanking new feisty install: depends on libjack*? and a three other virtual packages. ** Affects: audacity (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Unconfirmed -- audacity not installable in Feisty https://bugs.launchpad.

[Bug 12937] Re: Can't deliver mail through mixed IPv4/IPv6 smarthost

2006-12-06 Thread Mark Robinson
I've encountered this failure in a different context. This machine uses a PCMCIA ethernet card for connectivity. Postfix is configured as a satellite system. After several weeks running during which time I reconfigured eth0 to use a static ip address rather than dhcp, resolvconf presented me with

[Bug 38977] Re: When installing SWAT no connection to localhost:901 possible

2006-11-10 Thread Mark Robinson
When addressing this bug it may be worth considering adding a "Recommends: inetutils-inetd|xinetd" (can't trust that syntax) to samba too as it puts the following line into /etc/inetd.conf when no inetd is installed: ## netbios-ssn stream tcp nowait root /usr/sbin/tcpd /usr/sbin/smbd Pleas

[Bug 50642] Re: swat and xinetd

2006-11-10 Thread Mark Robinson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 38977 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 38977 When installing SWAT no connection to localhost:901 possible -- swat and xinetd https://launchpad.net/bugs/50642 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.co

[Bug 67495] Re: swat needs xinetd

2006-11-10 Thread Mark Robinson
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 38977 *** ** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 38977 When installing SWAT no connection to localhost:901 possible -- swat needs xinetd https://launchpad.net/bugs/67495 -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https://lists.ubuntu.

[Bug 59557] horizontal off by one error

2006-09-08 Thread Mark Robinson
Public bug reported: Running aviplayer under dapper on a toshiba satellite 2550cdt (~200MHz ~200MB 800x600) gives an apparent off by one error which manifests as a vertical line of not quite randomly changing coloured pixels down the right hand margin. This happens whether the window is maximised