Personally, I have given up on that and moved to using sdkman
(https://sdkman.io) for handling Java variants, this so far seems the
best / most reliable way to get different Java versions (including 8.x
series) to work on recent Linux distributions. Java packaging in Debian-
based distributions alw
> Although that works, its quite an hack. Can't we have something like
> openjdk-8-jfx,
> openjdk-8-jfx-source, openjdk-11-jfx, ...
It should possibly "just" be consistent. JavaFX *always* depends upon a
particular JDK. Either make different versions of openjfx available for
different openjdks (
Hmmm, ok, I am unsure how Oracle and OpenJDK/JFX relate to each other,
and whether the Open* variants will continue to see any community
updates. The whole post-Java8-world still is a difficult thing to
handle.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Yes, but the suggested approach ("Would it be possible to supply an
openjfx-8 package, similar to the openjdk-{8,11}-{jdk,jre}?") would both
fix this problem and make versioning of the openjdk- and openjfx-
packages (which, despite being separate packages, are pretty closely
tied to each other) imm
Stumbled into this problem here as well both with a couple of internal
Java applications and some FLOSS apps such as mediathekview
(https://mediathekview.de/) in Germany.
Currently, Java 11 -> Java 8 downgrade or even installing both in
parallel on any Ubuntu/Debian system works well, however for
Added myself to the list. Same issue here, fresh install of 18.10 with
vanilla-gnome-default-settings and arc theme.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813465
Title:
Shadow Issues on som
Works for me (de_DE) with the packages in -proposed. Thanks. :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1572661
Title:
Ubuntu Gnome Bug -evolution translation
To manage notifications about th
Apport did report this bug for me. It occurs repeatedly, my system seems
up-to-date. What other information do you need to track this down?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1538402
Title:
Not so far. :( So far I just left the server running at its current
version and am scheduling a full re-install / move to new hardware with
copying post boxes on an IMAP level.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bu
+1 for sec=lanman, thanks for the workaround. Server in our case is smbd
off Debian Unstable using guest-only access.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1113395
Title:
mount.cifs on 13.04
I am unsure what to do with this one. Haven't tested and can't reproduce
this as we don't run this device anymore. Right now, using a "plain"
NetApp FAS-2020, OnTap 7.4 and a 3.8.0 kernel off Ubuntu 13.04, this is
no longer a problem. As far as I am concerned, this one could be closed.
--
You rec
Added myself to the list as I ended up with similar things. None of the
workarounds worked, nevertheless. My system, however, is a bit older,
already used to go through a migration step-wise from 6.06 across some
intermediates to 10.04 (there's an enormously large mail spool on that
drive so so far
Public bug reported:
Starting someday around mid March 2013, GTK+ 3.0 based applications
started looking ugly on Xubuntu 13.04 applications with "stock" Xubuntu
themes. Attached a sample for that (gthumb). Reproducibly happens on two
different machines (laptop, netbook, both running Xubuntu 13.04
Seeing something akin to this on a Toshiba Tecra M11, installed 11.10
yesterday. Kernel seems to be up to date:
Linux node428 3.0.0-14-generic-pae #23-Ubuntu SMP Mon Nov 21 22:07:10
UTC 2011 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
Device seems a bit different though:
01:00.0 SD Host controller: Ricoh Co Ltd MM
@Michael Vogt: Thanks, the chown - solution does indeed fix things.
--
software-center crashed with IOError in _open()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/652151
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ub
Looking at things, problem still persists, both using virtualbox-ose and
the virtualbox.org builds in latest Lucid kernel. Anything to be done
about that?
--
starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487
You received this bug notification because
Confirmed this issue on several different machines (including
net-/notebooks with intel onboard gfx, two radeon machines - one with
stock xorg ATI driver, one with the proprietary ones, and one with an
older GeForce and nvidia binary drivers).
--
old_style landscapes not rendered correctly
https:
Resolved this the same way Philip Muškovac suggested.
--
package tex-common 2.06 failed to install/upgrade: exit status 1 - Kein Paket
gefunden, das auf texlive-base passt.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/536714
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
Well, at the very least I fail to reproduce this connecting to a CIFS
share provided by a Windows 2003 Server machine, but I'm not using CIFS
that much asides connecting to the N3300. Looking at my experiments I
did yesterday, this at the very least seems to be the same in 9.04 and
9.10.
--
trans
** Attachment added: "CifsVersion.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43414482/CifsVersion.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43414483/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "SambaInstalledVersions.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43414484/SambaIns
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: samba
Mounting a CIFS share off an IBM N3300 filer (== NetApp FAS 2020), I
experienced some file managers, applications, ... to more or less
regularly lock up / don't do anything while trying to browse folders.
Looking more into this, it seems the problem
Hi there;
debian#570122 indeed seems to be the cause here too, with the exception
that in the first thunar window opened, only the top-level (window)
menus are German. As far as the context menus are concerned, locales are
ignored in the first window instance as well. And, the "first instance"
of
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/43343890/Dependencies.txt
--
lucid: localization (de_DE) missing?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/557255
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: thunar
Running an up-to-date lucid installation, I experience thunar displaying
English menu and dialog texts despite having my locale / language
environment explicitely set to de...@utf8 (German chosen during gdm
login). Installed all language-pack-*-de
This problem still exists in lucid-prereleases with the virtualbox on my
Tecra A8 (most up-to-date BIOS).
--
starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscr
Are there any workarounds known for that so far?
--
Eclipse crashes on content assist
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/531719
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https:
Adding myself, same here (vanilla Eclipse, JDK 1.6.0_18).
--
eclipse crashed with signal 5 in _XError()
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/528324
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists
Adding to that, however, it _seems_ to be a GNOME related problem. Using
XFCE/Xubuntu desktop (also GTK+-based) on my platform doesn't expose
this issue, no matter whether or not GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS=1 is set. Can
anyone confirm this, or is this just my system?
--
Eclipse GTK is not working correct
Same problem here, using stock packages off eclipse.org. Having plugins
installable via Eclipse Update Center rather than apt package management
seems the most common use case related to using Eclipse, so I see the
GDK_NATIVE_WINDOWS solution to deal with this. :(
--
Eclipse GTK is not working co
I am not sure whether this really is related to virtualbox or might be a
kernel issue: In my environment, I managed to boot up any VM reliably
after, in the VM configuration, disabling "VT-x/AMD-V" support (which is
not really what one wants on a Core2 Duo that actually supports VT).
However:
- Sw
Public bug reported:
Installed a jaunty testbed system on my machine (Tecra A8 notebook,
Core2 Duo CPU, 2GB RAM). Tried both Sun VirtualBox and virtualbox-ose
off the package repository, with the same result: Starting virtualbox
works well, vbox* modules also seem loaded. However as soon as I try
** Attachment added: "lspci.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24285058/lspci.log
--
starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/24285103/dmesg.log
--
starting virtual machine in virtualbox-ose freezes system
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/347487
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
Uninstalling linux-backports-modules did eliminate all the iwl3945
related messages, no matter whether or not booting with pci=nomsi. Good.
:)
Thanks and best regards,
Kristian
--
iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602
You received this bug notification becau
Adding the "pci=nomsi" did provide quite some improvement so far:
Machine seems more performant even after being up all day, and the log
entries periodically dumped to dmesg have reduced to the following
lines:
[...]
[21834.120984] PM: Writing back config space on device :02:00.0 at offset 1
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16768656/dmesg.log
--
iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/16768625/lspci-vvnn.log
--
iwl3945 driver: unexpected IRQ trap?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/257602
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
Sorry, should have been more verbose initially. To provide the
information required:
- Architecture:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 8:00:56] ~> uname -a
Linux n428 2.6.24-20-generic #1 SMP Mon Jul 28 13:49:52 UTC 2008 i686 GNU/Linux
- Backport modules: Yes, they are installed, according
ii linux-backports-m
Public bug reported:
System: Hardy 8.04.1, Toshiba Tecra A8 Notebook, intel 3945 WLAN
disabled per hardware switch.
Trying to figure out why, lately, Hardy grows slow and hardly responsive
after a day of working, I found my dmesg output filling up with messages
like this:
[...]
[30471.141177] P
Also stumbled across this, two different machines upgraded to hardy just
recently. Downgrading qt4 so far, seems likely to remove quite a bunch
of other packages currently in use. Any chance of a better solution to
that, here, before hardy+1?
--
Stellarium, white screen with last libqt4
https://b
Haven't seen this happening with recent beta installers anymore.
Considering it done - thanks guys!
--
hardy alpha6 installer: "cleaning" /usr/local mount?!
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/200582
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
workaround does its job, thanks for having a look at this. Overally this
makes dealing with FF 3.x a lot more painless. ;)
--
firefox 2 extensions installed in profile break after starting ffox 3 (by
accident)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/209888
You received this bug notification because you
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: firefox-3.0
- upgraded to current hardy build
- launched firefox 3.0 for the first time
- gone through the "checking for plugin updates" section
- found that some plugins I don't yet want to go with do not so far offer any
ff 3.x compliant versions
- ins
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
First installment of hardy-6 actually makes me use my backup for the
first time in ages: Trying to have my old "/usr/local" partition already
configured to be mounted while in the installer, installation seemed to
"hang" a few moments showing a m
fix confirmed for recent feisty kernels > 2.6.20-10 on my machine. good
work everyone! :)
--
CPU soft lockup during boot if ipw3945 kill switch is on
https://launchpad.net/bugs/63418
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
removing myself from the list. For the Tecra A8, a new BIOS (3.30) has
been released in early 2007 which seems to have fixed the problem.
Thanks anyhow. :)
--
APIC error on CPU0: 40(40)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66900
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubun
@Duncan: Are you sure? By this morning when I tried to install
2.6.20-10-generic, I had to see that linux-modules-restricted for right
this kernel wasn't yet available, and both the ipw3945 will not work
without it and (as far as I remember my machine) the error doesn't show
up without having linux
Broken on any post-dapper version; neither edgy nor current feisty are
capable of running any version of MaxDB (the "official" MySQL.com builds
also fail, but the bug report - http://bugs.mysql.com/bug.php?id=25087 -
has not at all been dealt with so far).
--
[UNMETDEPS] maxdb-7.5.00 has unmet de
Adding myself to the list as I see the same problem on a Toshiba Tecra
A8:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~> cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 15
model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 CPU T7200 @ 2.00GHz
stepping: 6
cpu
Not sure whether this is still of relevance; I've noticed the "soft
lockup detected" message on my Toshiba Tecra A8 a couple of times this
morning, leaving the machine unable to boot at all. It's a completely
new install, first time Linux installation on that very machine, so I
can't say whether or
For what I have found out so far, MaxDB 7.5.00.* (same as 7.6.00.*) do
per default rely upon LD_ASSUME_KERNEL in order to avoid some threading
related issues (feel free to use the MaxDB mailing list archive or read
here - http://www.mysqltalk.org/sap-db-not-working-on-redhat-phoebe-the-
solution-vt
My unlabeled Atmel based card
eth1: Atmel at76c50x. Version 0.98. MAC ...
doesn't work out of the box running Dapper and 2.6.15-26-k7. Same thing
using the dapper firmware and a custom build of Edgy 2.6.17 kernel so
maybe it's a firmware rather than a kernel issue?
--
[atmel] breezy->dapper wi
52 matches
Mail list logo
