*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2071729 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071729
Happy to do that reupload fwiw, but I want to give Zixing a chance too
:)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpa
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2071729 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071729
Moving everything to the main bug for cleanliness.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093190
Tit
** Also affects: geeqie (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: geeqie (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2071729 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071729
The SRU should be reuploaded mentioning only the other bug
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2093
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ Crash when doing the (pretty standard for usage) action of hiding the
+ file list.
+
+ The upload fixes the crash by a cherry-picl from upstream, which is already
+ applied in later versions of geeqie, later versions of Ubuntu, and in Debian.
+
+ [ Test
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2071729 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071729
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2071729
geeqie crashes when switching to "float file list" mode (after dist-upgrade
to noble)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
The error messages are generated by apt; and the apt includes the
process holding the lock if available since 1.9.2.
** Package changed: dpkg (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a mem
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
** Changed in: germinate (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
ht
This is targeted for plucky + 1 as it's quite a bit late now.
There are no users of apt-xapian-index left other than the Kylin
software center.
apt-xapian-index provides a horrible user experience as it tries to
build its index.
This is not up to the level of quality we should have in 26.04.
**
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/470
** Description changed:
APT in plucky uses a pager, so far we pass LESS=FRX, but this is not
very intuitive, so I'd like to pass SMK as well:
* S disables the bell
* M changes the prompt from ":" to "lines 1-2"
* K makes the
Public bug reported:
APT in plucky uses a pager, so far we pass LESS=FRX, but this is not
very intuitive, so I'd like to pass SMK as well:
* S disables the bell
* M changes the prompt from ":" to "lines 1-2"
* K makes the pager exit on ctrl+c which makes it more discoverable how to exit
These fl
https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/468
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103921
Title:
APT doesn't
/x8BvcpBiCJ6GQgTLuiI+J0ncMKfC1S7doeAVUh939WobcDgkUls/jK0TKa134rCyGjpNOYsC
GSBgIilX7aq01KDBBt4oi0w/kOeAdjvtU00ZcYgeC9YnotIGdPFvjaQgavB2Wua6CVRn3tvF4chh
4AEIgvUOTAY=
** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: High
Assignee: Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
Status: In Progress
** Changed in
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2103556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103556
Oh shoot Andreas, I am strangely enough unable to reproduce this. If you
still experience it (you were running a dist-upgrade when it triggered
that solver regression report), can you run dist-upgrade with -
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2103556 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103556
Oh nevermind, I was testing the wrong version of apt. This is fixed in
2.9.34, it is a duplicate of bug 2103556
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2103556
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a w
Put the security levels (noble release vs unapproved vs oracular) into a
table in
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1rIREl1ebAoJXyqjig5MlV1-Jae9EREcApuVMlKT1whQ/edit?tab=t.0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bug
Xavier please file a separate bug, this one is solved. There can be
loads of different underlying conditions that can cause the evaluation
to fail with a worse result. Thank you!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103556
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: dhcpcd-base drop
This bug is a bit unclear to me:
> there is no difference other than the debootstrap version
> As this involves two different germinate versions, 2.44 (noble) versus
2.46 (plucky), I'm adding that too, though I doubt that is the issue.
An easy way to rule this out is to install 2.46 in noble or
The former syntax isn't really valid and should probably cause an error,
we should figure out how though.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103747
Title:
Regression: germinate failing t
This bug was for testing the crash report writer.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098752
Title:
Testing the bug reporter for
This was just testing uploading with zstd-compressed, base64-encoded
solver dumps (which are needed to fit into errors.ubuntu.com database)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Testing
ProblemType: AptSolver
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 25.04
Package: apt 2.9.33+0~202503141434~ubuntu25.04.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.14.0-11.11-generic 6.14.0-rc7
Uname: Linux 6.14.0-11-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.32.0-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResu
Actually tagging the coreutils one as triaged as it should refer you to
logind or support reading from there
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1080330
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1080330
** Also affects: coreutils (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugr
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101101
Title:
[p-m] FTBFS in the proposed pocket
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad
Fix in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/466
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102720
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
To manage notification
Thanks, this is very useful. Now that you likely did upgrade dhcpcd-base
you should not get further reports of this, but this is very useful for
me to figure that out.
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Triaged
** Summary changed:
- Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse r
I strongly believe all our package management tools should use apt's
download support to avoid these issues; there's a lot of other stuff in
proxy management that they don't replicate, not to mention certificate
setup.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs,
You say the release testing passed and link
https://github.com/canonical/snapd/actions/runs/13771811525/job/38543122363;
but that shows the spread tests for ubuntu-jammy and ubuntu-daily (and
some other distros) failed. Please explain why that should be considered
a pass.
--
You received this bug
We had a couple accidents in Debian retitling the bug in the right
format, and I forgot to link it, but both are resolved now. Should have
just filed a fresh bug with reportbug because it's too magical.
Now after we did that I added the bug here and there noticed the two
remnants.
(Likewise, libe
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #1100760
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100760
** Also affects: apt-xapian-index (Debian) via
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1100760
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
--
You received this bug notifica
I have subscribed the techboard and reset the bug status for the
ubuntustudio-meta task to New.
Synaptic used the index via libept which has been unmaintained for ages,
and which we finally managed to remove earlier this cycle from both
Debian and Ubuntu.
I do not believe there is a strong techni
** Changed in: ubuntustudio-meta (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Incomplete
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103528
Title:
Remove apt-xapian-index
To manage notifications about t
Public bug reported:
apt-xapian-index is obsolete and unmaintained and not really necessary.
** Affects: apt-xapian-index (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Affects: ubuntu-kylin-software-center (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Triaged
** Affects: ub
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2102720
Title:
Failure:
Maybe I should print some message in apt when I generate a report for
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/evaluating-the-new-apt-solver-
in-25-04/55618
But in released versions apport doesn't prompt for bug reports but you get the
whoopsie error reports, so not sure.
--
You received this bug notif
Ah I think you have a hold (or pin) on brz; and the new solver now
considers "brz" as obsolete because the candidate version is not
installable anymore, and then tries to prefer to satisfiy
libdpkg-perl Suggests bzr
by installing bzr (it does not want to end up with Suggests getting
broken by upg
Alright I made a silly mistake when I patched the "don't detect manually
installed package as obsolete"; the calls were interleaved. So we see
the "libdpkg-perl Suggests bzr" *before* we see "brz" as installed and
set the flag in the solver state. Turns out I gotta loop twice; who
knew?
** Changed
I'd appreciate someone doing an end-to-end test of the package in
https://code.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-core-dev/+git/boot-managed-by-
snapd/+merge/482761
that is, build it and install it in a hybrid FDE system, then upgrade
wireless-regdb. Ta!
--
You received this bug notification because you are
This was fixed in apparmor; so not fixing it in os-prober
** Changed in: os-prober (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Changed in: flash-kernel (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Jones (waveform)
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100618
Title:
dracut instal
This is already tracked as part of our regular proposed-migration where
we import proposed-migration items into the Canonical JIRA (FR-10292)
** Changed in: build-essential (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Matthias Klose (doko)
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug no
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: In Progress => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101800
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: emacs is install
Public bug reported:
debtags is not maintained and has no rdeps, we should remove it:
$ reverse-depends src:debtags
$ reverse-depends src:debtags -b
No reverse dependencies found
I also filed removal request in Debian now that packagesearch has been
updated there finally.
** Affects: debtags (U
Fix still in progress, turns out the fix I had queued actually breaks
something else (autoremove in 3.1 solver level), but perhaps 3.1
autoremove is actually broken anyway since nothing tests it :D
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
/Recommends confusion
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided => High
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
Fix in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-team/apt/-/merge_requests/459
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2101800
Title:
Fail
APT 2.9.32 released with the fix. Frankly I think that's the only
difference vs 2.9.31ubuntu3, and turned out trivial.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100247
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 s
FInal piece in https://salsa.debian.org/apt-
team/apt/-/merge_requests/458/
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => In Progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100247
Tit
** Changed in: systemd (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2088268
Title:
systemd /tmp cleaning removes files that it shouldn't
To manage noti
Seems I missed tagging this todo
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096979
Title:
wireless-regdb update problem at Ubuntu 24.04.1 TPM-backed Full Disk
Should we ship the apparmor profiles in os-prober or do you want to
stash them into the big apparmor profiles package?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099811
Title:
Os-prober segmenta
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100485
Title:
Valgrind: FATAL: Private file creation failed.
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bu
Removing the incoming tag as this is archive admin work
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099944
Title:
Depwait on libselinux 3.8
To manage notificati
First of all, this bug is about btrfs partitions not using a subvolume
for /, which is not supportable, because the snapshot would end up being
a subvolume of the volume being snapshotted, i.e. you'd clutter /.
As for the other requests for different / subvolume names I commented on
that in the me
I think you can pass -o Debug::RunScripts=1
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100714
Title:
apt cannot update from security repo
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://b
It *sounds* like your dbus is timing out, and you have packagekit
installed and it fails in
Running external script: '/usr/bin/test -e /usr/share/dbus-1/system-
services/org.freedesktop.PackageKit.service && /usr/bin/test -S
/var/run/dbus/system_bus_socket && /usr/bin/gdbus call --system --dest
or
** Changed in: boot-managed-by-snapd (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: boot-managed-by-snapd (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
** Changed in: boot-managed-by-snapd (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided => Critical
--
You received this bug
Frankly it seems ubuntu-desktop-minimal has no key packages registered,
and u-r-u just then picks it because "all of none" are installed :D
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100880
Title:
2025-03-04 21:03:04,613 DEBUG need_server_mode(): run in 'desktop' mode,
(because of key deps for 'ubuntu-desktop-minimal')
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Nick Rosbrook (
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => linux (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100893
Title:
kernel regression where suspending worked in kernel 6.8.0-52-gener
It's not possible for os-prober to reliably unmount it's filesystem
mounts sadly, so hence the mount namespaces are necessary. Mounting file
systems in the global mount namespace can easily make random things try
to read them.
But also os-prober should probably use more namespaces. The grub file
s
Please be careful changing bug states, the plucky one was released.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096979
Title:
wireless-regdb update problem at Ubuntu 24.04.1 TPM-backed Full Disk
Resetting the verification tag.
Marat, it seems you have managed to remove the boot-managed-by-snapd
package, leaving you with an unsupported system configuration. This is
quite a hard thing to achieve, since the package is protected from being
removed, i.e. you need to run apt remove --allow-remo
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100247
Title:
Failure:
** Summary changed:
- Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
+ Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result: obsolete
postgresql-client-16 replaced by postgresql-client
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
http
I have forwarded this as a question with the IS team who operate the
servers. I'm closing the bug in apt, as server bugs are not bugs in apt.
I assume this has been resolved shortly after you reported it, as I did
not see it.
The redirect in curl seems correct, you requested /ubuntu and were
redir
Sorry, reading a third time, the `apt update` also succeeds entirely and
does not report any connection issue. All sources are reported as up-to-
date and correct.
The timeout message is not from APT but some post-update hook.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
** Tags added: regression-updates
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096979
Title:
wireless-regdb update problem at Ubuntu 24.04.1 TPM-backed Full Disk
Encryption setup
To manage noti
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2096979 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096979
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2096979
wireless-regdb update problem at Ubuntu 24.04.1 TPM-backed Full Disk
Encryption setup
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
I'm going to have a lot of fun abusing the package manager here. The
obvious first step is preventing wireless-regdb updates which is
comparatively easy.
The 2nd step is ensuring that we can actually remove the wireless-regdb
package such that you don't get held back packages. So we need to
convin
Diverting directories does not work of course, but we can divert the
files...
root@p:~# apt install wireless-regdb
So simply speaking
dpkg-divert --package boot-managed-by-snapd --divert
/lib/firmware.unused --no-rename /lib/firmware
would make dpkg unpack all files below /lib/firmware to
/lib/firmware.unused instead; allowing wireless-regdb to be upgraded
(and other firmware packages to be installed but be n
** Changed in: boot-managed-by-snapd (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank)
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2096979
Ti
** Tags removed: rls-nn-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100266
Title:
Versioned cargo wrapper script points to default cargo
To manage notifi
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099827
Title:
[p-m] s390x build FTBFS due to tests
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchp
Missing merge of gcc-defaults-ports
** Package changed: build-essential (Ubuntu) => gcc-defaults-ports
(Ubuntu)
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: foundations-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://
Mate has cherry-picked the fix into the branch for the pending security
update.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098641
Title:
FAT filesystem probing fails if a file's timestamp exceed
This is fine in gnome-terminal (ulimit -n is 1024) but broken in ptyxis
(ulimit -n is 1073741804)
** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => ptyxis (Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2
This is not a regression in valgrind; as the old valgrind works fine.
Adding a kernel task.
A smaller reproducer is `valgrind true`
** Also affects: linux (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is
dpkg also has some color these days I believe, though not to the extent
asked here.
I have some plans - or rather prepared merges - for further APT UX
improvements that I still need to finish.
** Changed in: dpkg (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification
Public bug reported:
In plucky:
$ valgrind apt list
--4154283:0:libcfile Valgrind: FATAL: Private file creation failed.
The current file descriptor limit is 1073741804.
If you are running in Docker please consider
lowering this limit with the shell built-in limit command.
--4154283:0:lib
Action items:
(1) Fix the EDSP protocol handler to not consider a non-downloadable
version as downloadable. Funny trickery.
(2) I see postgresql-client-16 is manually installed.
The answer here seems to be that when we go look at dependencies to
process:
postgresql-client as postgresql-clien
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100247
Title:
Failure: The 3.0 solver produced a worse result
To manage notifications about
Suffice it to say, what happens on the real system is that it sees that
you have
postgresql-client-16
installed.
As that package is no longer available in the repository, it demotes it
in priority and when it sees a dependency on postgresql-client, installs
the metapackage. In this case, it seem
Do I understand this correctly? You were running a bare `apt dist-
upgrade`. It produced the result:
Upgrading google-chrome-stable:amd64 133.0.6943.126-1 133.0.6943.141-1
Upgrading gir1.2-gstreamer-1.0:amd64 1.25.50-1 1.25.90-1
Upgrading gstreamer1.0-tools:amd64 1.25.50-1 1.25.90-1
Upgrading libg
Public bug reported:
These are signed with Debian CA key and should not be in the archive. We
have no intention of signing systemd-boot ourselves. Please remove it
and add it to the sync blocklist.
tsimonq2 reuploaded them with faked Built-Using values.
** Affects: systemd-boot-efi-amd64-signed
** Description changed:
[Impact]
People upgrading from noble are stuck on the no-longer-available
libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 (which has been changed back to libcanberra-gtk3-0 in
oracular).
This is in turn causes them to have an unsupported package installed,
and the new apt solver is prod
** Description changed:
[Impact]
People upgrading from noble are stuck on the no-longer-available
libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 (which has been changed back to libcanberra-gtk3-0 in
oracular).
This is in turn causes them to have an unsupported package installed,
and the new apt solver is prod
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: libcanberra (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: apt (Ubuntu Plucky)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Invalid
** Also affects: libcanberra (Ubuntu
** Package changed: ubuntu-release-upgrader (Ubuntu) => libcanberra
(Ubuntu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099829
Title:
libcanberra-gtk3-0t64 still around in oracular/plucky
To ma
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2099829 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099829
This does not reproduce for some reason (did you pass arguments to dist-
upgrade? My solver dump is a bit broken and dumps the solver changes
together with manually specified ones); but suffice it to say, yo
Alright I have a bug in the solver dumper, these actions were scheduled
by it.
Please run `apt install libcanberra-gtk3-0:amd64`, it seems the
replaced `libcanberra-gtk3-0t64` has inadvertently not been replaced
during a release upgrade to oracular (24.10)
** Also affects: ubuntu-release-upgrad
Yes and in English you'd also have a space after the :, but they are
grouped together in the output for some reason, presumably to better
separate it from the url which comes next, or because of laziness, who
knows what people were thinking 30 years ago when they wrote it :D
--
You received this
Ubuntu translations are not being used by APT at all; so I'm going to
close it
** Changed in: ubuntu-translations
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099699
T
Both of them technically are wrong, there should be no spaces at all
really; for some reasons we don't have spaces around ":" in these lines,
I don't know why, but the question is which to stick with, compatibility
with output expectation (which albeit also needs similar length of words
like Get or
Thank you for your bug report. This is the first report from the new
solver evaluation feature
https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/evaluating-the-new-apt-solver-
in-25-04/55618
The logs indicate it did not fail during supertuxkart but while running
a dist-upgrade, and that it (you?) were trying to
Re
We should wait until the OpenSSL variant has HTTP/3 support; GnuTLS is
not reliable enough for the main curl binary (you don't want to know how
many issues I've seen with GnuTLS so far, server certificate chains
treated as incorrect, country "firewalls" blocking GnuTLS traffic,
random server incomp
curl does not depend on nghttp3, so this is not needed.
** Tags removed: rls-pp-incoming
** Tags added: rls-pp-wontfix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098797
Title:
[MIR] nghttp3
To
A revert of that dependency is in progress
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098769
Title:
[MIR] nghttp3
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu
1 - 100 of 3936 matches
Mail list logo
