debdiff for noble
** Patch added: "lenovo_wwan_unlock_noble.debdiff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lenovo-wwan-unlock/+bug/2073558/+attachment/5798487/+files/lenovo_wwan_unlock_noble.debdiff
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is s
** Also affects: ubuntu-power-systems
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: ubuntu-power-systems
Assignee: (unassigned) => Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage
(ubuntu-power-triage)
** Changed in: grub2 (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Ubuntu on IBM Power Systems Bug Triage (u
Public bug reported:
[ Impact ]
* The package lenovo-wwan-unlock is required to land Noble and Jammy to
make preloaded WWAN modules functional on Lenovo machines.
[ Test Plan ]
* install lenovo-wwan-unlock package on supported machine and modem
combination in [Other Info] without SIM card
** Also affects: oem-priority
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072858
Title:
Fix L2CAP/LE/CPU/BI-02-C bluetooth certification failure
To ma
See also bug 2073252
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073553
Title:
Screen flickering if PSR2 selective fetch is enabled
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.lau
Public bug reported:
The issue is similar to lp:2046315
The issue is gone after I config i915.enable_psr2_sel_fetch=0 to kernel cmdline.
Here is the panel edid:
edid-decode (hex):
00 ff ff ff ff ff ff 00 06 af 9c 6d 00 00 00 00
00 1f 01 04 a5 1e 13 78 03 8e 95 a8 54 48 9e 25
0e 50 54 00 00 00 0
** No longer affects: Ubuntu Noble
** No longer affects: ubuntu
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Confirmed
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to
Looks like updating the firmware works for QCA6174 with hw3.0.
I have sent a PR to the linux-firmware-jammy for updating FW binary in
ath10k/QCA6174/hw3.0.
Link: https://kernel.ubuntu.com/gitea/kernel/linux-firmware/pulls/39
** Description changed:
+ BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/207
** Tags removed: needs-mre-backport
** Tags added: needs-sru-backport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2040467
Title:
MRE updates of openvpn for noble
To manage notifications about thi
*** Bug 1907248 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to the bug report.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/10883
Title:
Stuck in proportional font mode
To manage notifications about this
[Expired for cups (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60
days.]
** Changed in: cups (Ubuntu)
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066079
Tit
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* Add a service to make mbim-cli be able to send AT command to Compal
- WWAN module DW5826e
+ WWAN module DW5826e through mbimcli
[ Test Plan ]
* On the platform with Compal SDX12 WWAN module with ID:
usb:v413Cp8217
usb:v413Cp8218
I can't work out the process owning the reserved pages.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073214
Title:
hugepages causes permissions error [invalid, page pool too small]
To manage noti
** Description changed:
[ Impact ]
* Add a service to make mbim-cli be able to send AT command to Compal
- WWAN module for FCC unlock
+ WWAN module DW5826e
[ Test Plan ]
* On the platform with Compal SDX12 WWAN module with ID:
usb:v413Cp8217
usb:v413Cp8218
- * Install
** Information type changed from Public to Public Security
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2051574
Title:
gnome-shell-portal-helper crashed with SIGTRAP in
waitUntilSyncedOrDie() fro
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Status: New => In Progress
** Changed in: linux (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => En-Wei Wu (rickywu)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073538
** Changed in: xfsdump (Debian)
Status: Unknown => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073548
Title:
xfsdump does not respect build flags
To manage notifications about this bu
After looking at the ACPI dump, it seems like the GPE17 is generated by
the EC0 (embedded controller):
Scope (_SB.PCI0.SBRG)
{
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2073320 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073320
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2073320
Backport of postgresql for focal, jammy and noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
Based on Marco's comment above, I suspect we need to add an AppArmor
profile for gnome-shell-portal-helper.
Using the example in that blog post, this would be the simplest possible
policy:
abi ,
include
/usr/libexec/gnome-shell-portal-helper flags=(default_allow) {
userns,
** Changed in: liquidsoap
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054815
Title:
FTBFS: Unbound module Pcre
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
ht
Public bug reported:
xfsdump package does not respect build system passed compilation flags.
** Affects: xfsdump (Ubuntu)
Importance: Low
Assignee: Zixing Liu (liushuyu-011)
Status: New
** Affects: xfsdump (Debian)
Importance: Unknown
Status: Unknown
** Changed
** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro)
** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro)
** Changed in: haproxy (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Athos Ribeiro (athos-ribeiro)
** Ch
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lena Voytek (lvoytek)
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lena Voytek (lvoytek)
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Lena Voytek (lvoytek)
** Changed in: openvpn (Ubunt
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2073315 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073315
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 2073315
Backport of haproxy for focal, jammy and noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
To clarify on the statement from @georgiag above - "some applications
are still not going to work properly" means that some applications
*which currently do not work on Ubuntu 24.04 with the current version of
apparmor in the archive (4.0.1really4.0.0-beta3-0ubuntu0.1)* are still
not going to work
** Tags added: needs-sru-backport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068021
Title:
MRE updates of walinuxagent 2.11.1.4 into N/J/F
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://
** Tags added: needs-sru-backport
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2067480
Title:
MRE updates of dpdk 23.11.1(Noble)/22.11.5(Mantic)/21.11.7(Jammy)
To manage notifications about this b
@RogerRamjet> Do you have motherboard,CPU and OS information to share?
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 6:45 PM Roger Ramjet <2068...@bugs.launchpad.net>
wrote:
> Why does the updated kernel show installed but not active, I'm still
> having a problem?
>
>
>
> Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
>
> On T
This looks like a backport[1] so we might want to follow the same
process as in[2].
[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/UbuntuBackport
[2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/package-notes/+bug/2073502
** Also affects: xlnx-platformstats (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
However, I can share any log you need in this fresh install, if you
would like.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073499
Title:
The whole desktop lagged at rendering even though memory
Thanks for the reply, Daniel. After the clean install, I can no longer
reproduce any problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073499
Title:
The whole desktop lagged at rendering even
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2061827 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061827
Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make
Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a
duplicate of bug 2061827, so it is being marked as such. Please look
wsdd 2:0.8-2ubuntu1 seems to be failing discovery autopkgtest due to the
introduced restrictions.
The previous version passed the test.
Would it be possible to look into the issue[1]?
[1]
https://objectstorage.prodstack5.canonical.com/swift/v1/AUTH_0f9aae918d5b4744bf7b827671c86842/autopkgtest
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2061827 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2061827
** Package changed: ubuntu => gnome-shell-extension-tiling-assistant
(Ubuntu)
** Tags added: noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu
This log message may have been relevant:
Failed to use stored monitor configuration: Invalid mode 1024x768
(59.999) for monitor 'unknown unknown'
which is related to your old ~/.config/monitors.xml that mentions:
None-1
unknown
unknown
un
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~ravi-sharma/ubuntu/+source/lxpanel/+git/lxpanel/+merge/468841
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072323
Title:
Remove wireless-t
Will create a new SRU bug for noble and jammy
** No longer affects: lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu Jammy)
** No longer affects: lenovo-wwan-unlock (Ubuntu Noble)
** Changed in: oem-priority
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
** Changed in: lenovo-wwan-unlock
Status: New => Fix Release
This bug was fixed in the package dash - 0.5.12-9ubuntu1
---
dash (0.5.12-9ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2071627). Remaining changes:
- DEP17 /usr merge:
- debian/shells.d/dash: move files to /usr
- d/t/smoke: add /bin/dash link
This bug was fixed in the package dash - 0.5.12-9ubuntu1
---
dash (0.5.12-9ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2071627). Remaining changes:
- DEP17 /usr merge:
- debian/shells.d/dash: move files to /usr
- d/t/smoke: add /bin/dash link
This bug was fixed in the package dash - 0.5.12-9ubuntu1
---
dash (0.5.12-9ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2071627). Remaining changes:
- DEP17 /usr merge:
- debian/shells.d/dash: move files to /usr
- d/t/smoke: add /bin/dash link
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and i
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and i
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and i
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and i
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.2~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page listed below and i
Public bug reported:
I cannot upgrade from 22.04 to 24.04. The process either complains about
update-manager or the ubuntu-desktop with the deny list being the issue.
The package 'update-manager' is marked for removal but it's in the
removal deny list. I have tried to reinstall these, but have had
This bug was fixed in the package tlp - 1.6.1-2ubuntu1
---
tlp (1.6.1-2ubuntu1) oracular; urgency=medium
* Merge with Debian unstable (LP: #2073295). Remaining changes:
- debian/control, debian/patches/remove_gnome_conflict.patch:
CPU_ENERGY_PERF_POLICY_ON_BAT and CPU_ENER
Note: the upstream issue https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-8166162
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071358
Title:
Build-time test fails in some chroots
To manage notifications about
Why does the updated kernel show installed but not active, I'm still
having a problem?
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
On Thursday, July 18th, 2024 at 2:47 PM, Pete Orlando
<2068...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote:
> Ok Black screen now fixed after "update Manger" sent new update on
> 7/17/2024.
I have updated the description with the information of the SRU version
4.0.1really4.0.1-0ubuntu0.24.04.3
The Test Plan is updated with detailed instructions and I also added an
analysis of why the regression happened for the previous SRU. Note that since
we have removed the enablement by default
** Description changed:
[SRU Justification]
+
+ BugLink: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072592
[Impact]
Commit: "UBUNTU: [Packaging] introduce do_lib_rust and enable it only on
generic amd64" introduces the "do_lib_rust" variable in rules.d/ that
avoids generating the extra rust
** Changed in: livecd-rootfs (Ubuntu)
Status: Triaged => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069391
Title:
debsums reports file changed /usr/lib/systemd/system/cloud-
This also prevents the use of the falcosecurity modern_ebpf driver on
6.8.0-1007-raspi:
root@pi01:~# uname -a
Linux pi01 6.8.0-1007-raspi #7-Ubuntu SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Mon Jun 24 10:21:12
UTC 2024 aarch64 aarch64 aarch64 GNU/Linux
root@pi01:~# bpftool feature probe kernel | grep -q "program_type
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2072761 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072761
Thank you for your reply
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2073398
Title:
After changing or mo
I've tripped over this bug so many times and it's killing my SSD. I have
manual compaction turned on and I only compact when the saving is over
1G. And approximately 1 in 16 times the compaction becomes pathological;
it just keeps consuming disk until the disk is full, the highest I have
seen was a
(In reply to Matt from comment #59)
> I've tripped over this bug so many times and it's killing my SSD.
Please report your version when posting.
And if you are not on beta 127.0b5 or newer, or esr 128, it will helpful
if you can update and report results based on the newest version. The
"rewrite
1. Confirmed diff from packaged cloud-init.service and override
root@lcd-o:~# diff -urN /lib/systemd/system/cloud-init.service
/etc/systemd/system/cloud-init.service
--- /lib/systemd/system/cloud-init.service 2024-06-26 18:30:42.0
+
+++ /etc/systemd/system/cloud-init.service
marking magnum-ui (ubuntu)/devel as invalid since the fix is part of the
package shipped with Noble
** Changed in: magnum-ui (Ubuntu)
Status: Confirmed => Invalid
** Changed in: cloud-archive
Status: New => Invalid
** No longer affects: cloud-archive/caracal
--
You received this
marking magnum-ui as fix released, since the patch landed during the
Caracal devel cycle and it's part of magnum-ui-14.0.0 -
https://github.com/openstack/magnum-
ui/commit/6f6c3db282fe2f0e08ad69c557eb153858b0164a
** Changed in: magnum-ui
Status: In Progress => Fix Released
--
You received
Zed is EOL
** Changed in: cloud-archive/zed
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038663
Title:
no option to override the fixed_subnet when creating a new c
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into focal-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/24.2-0ubuntu1~20.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into jammy-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/24.2-0ubuntu1~22.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
Hello Chad, or anyone else affected,
Accepted cloud-init into noble-proposed. The package will build now and
be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cloud-
init/24.2-0ubuntu1~24.04.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed
repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. Se
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux-bluefield
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2071715
Title:
LAG with CT causes DPU
Thanks @alberto. I confirmed the following:
The question of whether apt upgrade would show us the Files changed prompt
which would break unattended upgrades. The answer is we don't have to worry
about it because apt upgrade only reacts to changes in files registered by the
deb package as conff
Marking Bobcat as won't fix since it's going EOL and this patch is not
needed when doing upgrades.
** Changed in: cloud-archive/bobcat
Status: New => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
This affects me too, just finished the upgrade to 24.04 manually (I'm on
Kubuntu), and on first reboot into new system, I saw my external SATA
pop up in Dolphin, but I got an error when I tried to mount it, the same
one which Chris received, as a warning in the top portion of Dolphin.
After follow
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.1~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page list
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.1~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page list
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.1~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page list
All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools (33.1~24.04) for
noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:
software-properties/unknown (amd64, arm64, armhf, i386, ppc64el, s390x)
Please visit the excuses page list
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux-bluefield
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072675
Title:
BF2: Add support for eM
** Tags removed: verification-needed-jammy-linux-bluefield
** Tags added: verification-done-jammy-linux-bluefield
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2072786
Title:
BF3: Add support for eM
TLDR version, yes it's fixed!
I guess there's only one way to find out!
I've been running kisak PPA so was on 24.1.x on there, but I'm ppa-purge'ing is
now to test. I no longer have that Sandy Bridge notebook, but have an Ivy
Bridge desktop (and I verified based on the plenty of debug info Wine
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by te
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by tes
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by te
Hello sistemas_grupo-cps, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by tes
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pa
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello L, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new pac
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Marco, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this ne
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Renan, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into xenial-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~16.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into bionic-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~18.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into jammy-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~22.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this n
Hello Jeffery, or anyone else affected,
Accepted ubuntu-advantage-tools into focal-proposed. The package will
build now and be available at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-advantage-tools/33.2~20.04
in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this n
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
An upload of gnome-shell to noble-proposed has been rejected from the
upload queue for the following reason: "GNOME MRE not valid for gnome-
shell as discussed in bug".
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
1 - 100 of 453 matches
Mail list logo
