"Mac Ryan" wrote
A couple of months ago I took the time to read a few articles on python
web application frameworks and I got the impression that the two most
mature and active projects are Zope and Django.
They are both mature and widely used, but for quite different markets.
TurboGears is a
"Megan Land" wrote
I'm trying to call a function from a dictionary. I did some googling and
from what I can tell my code should work, but doesn't. Here's an
example:
def myFunc(self, inputList):
The fact you have a self in there suggests that this is a method
of some class? Is it? If not
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 3:30 PM, Megan Land wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to call a function from a dictionary. I did some googling and
> from what I can tell my code should work, but doesn't. Here's an example:
>
> def myFunc(self, inputList):
> dict={0: func0, 1: func1, 2:func2}
> for element in in
Hi,
I'm trying to call a function from a dictionary. I did some googling and
from what I can tell my code should work, but doesn't. Here's an example:
def myFunc(self, inputList):
dict={0: func0, 1: func1, 2:func2}
for element in inputList:
dict[element]()
When I go to run this
I've never used Zope so I can't speak to its strengths or weaknesses.
But I can say that Django is quite natural if you already know Python.
It certainly is modular, with a ton of apps that you can plug in to
gain added functionality. And there's also a project called Pinax that
provides layers of
On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Mac Ryan wrote:
> A couple of months ago I took the time to read a few articles on python
> web application frameworks and I got the impression that the two most
> mature and active projects are Zope and Django.
>
> Zope vs. Django hits 879.000 pages on google but
A couple of months ago I took the time to read a few articles on python
web application frameworks and I got the impression that the two most
mature and active projects are Zope and Django.
Zope vs. Django hits 879.000 pages on google but much of the debate - or
at least this is my impression - fa
Dave Angel wrote:
However, if someone had tried to do that in a single call to the
current function, their code would already be broken because the
dictionary doesn't preserve order, so the & substitution might not
happen first.
Wow, I never thought about the dictionary not being sorted me
Serdar Tumgoren wrote:
But most folks find multiple cursors easier to manage in the same way that
they find multiple variables easier than reusing a minimal number.
That makes sense. I think I'll try using a global import/connect, and
then create cursors inside each method.
Thanks to you
> But most folks find multiple cursors easier to manage in the same way that
> they find multiple variables easier than reusing a minimal number.
>
That makes sense. I think I'll try using a global import/connect, and
then create cursors inside each method.
Thanks to you both for the advice!
_
Nick Raptis wrote:
Dave
Angel wrote:
As I said, you'd probably get in trouble if any of the lines had '&'
or '<' characters in them. The following function from the standard
library can be used to escape the line directly, or of course you
could use the function Nick supplied.
xml.sax.saxut
"Serdar Tumgoren" wrote
Is there any reason why you can't reuse the same cursor object? I know
when you're writing to a database, you have to be sure to commit your
changes. But if I'm just issuing execute statements and then fetching
data, is it okay to reuse the same cursor?
No, there is no
12 matches
Mail list logo
