On Wed, 29 Jun 2005, Peter Szinek wrote:
> Hello Denise,
>
> How about this:
>
> myjar = cookielib.CookieJar()
> for cookie in myjar:
> print cookie.value
>
> In this case the above code should print a single 'B'.
Yes, whenever the documentation talks about something being "iterable",
the
Hello Denise,
How about this:
myjar = cookielib.CookieJar()
for cookie in myjar:
print cookie.value
In this case the above code should print a single 'B'.
HTH,
Peter
Liam Clarke wrote:
> Hi Denise,
>
> Have you tried 'print myjar.value'?
>
> Regards,
>
> Liam Clarke
> On 6/29/05, *D. H
Hi Denise,
Have you tried 'print myjar.value'?
Regards,
Liam ClarkeOn 6/29/05, D. Hartley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone! Just a quick question about cookie jars:when I create a myjar = cookielib.CookieJar(), and go to a website toget the particular cookie, I get something like this in
Hi everyone! Just a quick question about cookie jars:
when I create a myjar = cookielib.CookieJar(), and go to a website to
get the particular cookie, I get something like this in return:
or, if I do print myjar, this: ]> .
Now, if I wanted to pull out just the value from the cookie (i.e., "B
I may be missing something, but isn't this what __dict__ does? Just
return self.__dict__. This is an old message, so this may have mentioned
already. Sorry if that's the case. I'm a little behind.
Kent Johnson wrote:
>Smith, Jeff wrote:
>
>
>>Here would be the usage:
>>
>>myinst = MyClass()
>
Reed L. O'Brien wrote:
>Luis N wrote:
>
>
>
>>Hi,
>>
>>
>>
>l
>
>
>>[{'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'},
>>{'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}]
>>
>>
>>This is how I imagine it:
>>
>>for i in l:
>>for j in l
Luis N wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >>> l
> [{'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'},
> {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}]
>
>
> This is how I imagine it:
>
> for i in l:
> for j in l[i]:
> for k in l[i][j]:
> print k.get('first')
Hey tutors
Just want to inform that I'm Out Of Town(OOT) and I haven't had the chance
to a PC until this very moment.
Sorry I didn't reply to your help, I have just read them and I think I get
the idea
Thanks to all who helped me and I'll be home next Tuesday (a week from now)
and I'll give y
Luis N said unto the world upon 28/06/2005 15:25:
> Hi,
>
>
l
>
> [{'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last':
> 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}]
>
>
> This is how I imagine it:
>
> for i in l:
> for j in l[i]:
> for k in l[i][j]:
>
Hi,
>>> l
[{'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'},
{'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}, {'last': 'Bar', 'first': 'Foo'}]
This is how I imagine it:
for i in l:
for j in l[i]:
for k in l[i][j]:
print k.get('first')
print k.get('last')
Is
Hi,
Ive been looking for way to scrape the data from a html table, but dont know even where to start, or how to do..
an example can be found here of the table (
http://www.dragon256.plus.com/timer.html ) - i'd like to extract all
the data except for the delete column and then just print each row.
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 05:50:54 -0400
Kent Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Don Parris wrote:
> > Just getting back to this - Mondays are always hectic. This recipe is
> > the one I saw and like. It looks cool! In my brief efforts tinkering
> > with it, I am not really getting very far. I sav
On Tue, 28 Jun 2005 07:31:43 -0400, Chinook wrote
(in article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>):
> [[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
>the 'To' and 'Newsgroups' headers for details. ]]
>
Sorry for the duplication. I'm trying Hogwasher on OS X and it seems I
better look around some more.
Clarifications:
1) Truth test simplified after a %) by Peter Otten - thanks. In reality the
"testit" methods will all be quite different as you might imagine (as will
the "doit" methods).
2) A final subclass will always return True, so there will always be a valid
result.
[[ This message was both posted and mailed: see
the 'To' and 'Newsgroups' headers for details. ]]
Clarifications:
1) Truth test simplified after a %) by Peter Otten - thanks. In reality the
"testit" methods will all be quite different as you might imagine (as will
the "doit" methods).
2) A
Don Parris wrote:
> Just getting back to this - Mondays are always hectic. This recipe is the
> one I saw and like. It looks cool! In my brief efforts tinkering with it,
> I am not really getting very far. I saved the recipe, and import it into
> the file containing all my database functions.
Quoting Alan G <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I don't know the direct answer but the more common way
> of doing that in Python is not to use super() but just
> call the inherited constructor directly:
>
> Parent.__init__(self,'I am a child')
>
>
> SO if you just want to fix the itch use that, if you
|class Parent(object):
| def __init__(self, name="I am a parent"):
| self.name = name
|
|class Child(Parent):
| def __init__(self, number):
| super(Parent, self).__init__("I am a child")
| self.number = number
|
|# I would like it to produce the following:
|>> c = Child(23)
|>> c
18 matches
Mail list logo
