[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103808] Re: desktop-raspi should be based on desktop-minimal, not desktop

2025-04-04 Thread Dave Jones
Moving this to the qq cycle ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-25.04 => later -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2103808 Title: des

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099944] Re: Depwait on libselinux 3.8

2025-03-07 Thread Dave Jones
Is refpolicy affected as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libselinux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099944 Title: Depwait on libselinux 3.8 Status in libselinux package in Ubuntu: Invali

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098838] Re: apparmor appears to deny wpasupplicant on plucky, breaking wifi

2025-02-28 Thread Dave Jones
Hi Georgia, thanks for the link -- I'll add some details there. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098838 Title: apparmor appears to deny wpasupplicant on pl

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098838] Re: apparmor appears to deny wpasupplicant on plucky, breaking wifi

2025-02-28 Thread Dave Jones
Sorry to be the bearer of bad news: unfortunately this still appears broken on certain platforms. Specifically, testing a fresh plucky image on the Raspberry Pi, the wifi interface was recognized but not configured: $ ip a 1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group default qlen 1000

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: [SRU] Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-02-07 Thread Dave Jones
* sudo reboot * systemctl status * Verify status is "running" and not "degraded" For Dave (not including full instructions for the sake of brevity, but if anyone else wants to try this I can provide instructions on request): * Build 24.04.2 image locally with proposed poc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: [SRU] Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-02-07 Thread Dave Jones
ger required * sudo reboot * systemctl status * Verify status is "running" and not "degraded" For Dave (not including full instructions for the sake of brevity, but if anyone else wants to try this I can provide instructions on request): * Build 24.04.2 image l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1841525] Re: apt-add-repository can take machine down

2025-02-07 Thread Dave Jones
Just going through some old bugs while investigating something else in add-apt-repository, and I noticed this bug references LP: #1311056 which I fixed some years ago (but after the last comment on this bug). I'm setting this to incomplete as I suspect the root cause of this is indeed LP: #1311056,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2095074] Re: [SRU] Upgrade to media driver version 24.3.4 in Noble

2025-02-07 Thread Dave Jones
Looking at this during my patch pilot shift. I'm probably not the best person to review this -- I suspect someone on the desktop team would be better, but from a quick look at the associated PPA, and the current status of the packages in question, would I be right in thinking this is basically bum

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: [SRU] Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-02-01 Thread Dave Jones
stall -t noble-proposed ubuntu-desktop-minimal + * sudo apt autoremove + * Check that protection-domain-mapper is removed as no longer required + * sudo reboot + * systemctl status + * Verify status is "running" and not "degraded" + + For Dave (not including full instructions for the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-02-01 Thread Dave Jones
Doh! Knew I'd forgotten something in the whirlwind of meetings today. Just a mo... ** Summary changed: - Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop + [SRU] Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-01-31 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.2 ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Jones (waveform) ** Changed in: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu Noble) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug not

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-01-31 Thread Dave Jones
Bah, keep forgetting I need to go update ubuntu-meta. Also qrtr and protection-domain-mapper aren't really the targets of these fixes; marking those invalid. ** Changed in: qrtr (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Invalid ** Changed in: protection-domain-mapper (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2025-01-28 Thread Dave Jones
These changes are now merged for both oracular and noble. I'll wait for a rebuild on the noble images tomorrow, re-check those, and then mark this fix released. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2025-01-16 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: mesa (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-24.04.2 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2082072 Title: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2089712] Re: pam-auth-update --remove doesn't work properly

2024-12-05 Thread Dave Jones
This does appear to be "working as designed" on jammy. Tested with the profiles in the original report and as noted in comment 2, whilst pam-auth-update --remove will transiently disable the profiles in the PAM configuration, any subsequent run of pam-auth-update will re- enable them because there

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-12-05 Thread Dave Jones
Verified jammy back-port with a manually rebuilt gnome content snap. On Pi 4, current and proposed variants worked. On Pi 5 C1 (earlier stepping), the same. On Pi 5 D0 stepping (2GB model only), current version fails (crashes the entire desktop in fact), and proposed version worked successfully. O

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2090972] Re: /boot intermittently fails to mount on boot

2024-12-04 Thread Dave Jones
** Tags added: rls-nn-incoming -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to util-linux in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2090972 Title: /boot intermittently fails to mount on boot Status in util-linux package i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-11-20 Thread Dave Jones
Thanks very much, Timo! Looks like ppc64el is having some issues in autopkgtest, but they all look like tmpfails so I've just submitted retries for all of those. The i386 regression looks more serious (there's an actual fail involving a missing header there). I'll try and have a look this evening.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-11-19 Thread Dave Jones
Ohhh -- I hadn't realized the jammy backport had already been uploaded! (the PPA linked earlier only had the noble build, hence my assumption) Unfortunately, this is going to start becoming rather urgent in the next couple of weeks as the D0 stepping starts appearing in the Pi 5 supply chain, and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-11-18 Thread Dave Jones
** Tags added: fr-9631 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2082072 Title: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping Status in mesa package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Statu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-11-15 Thread Dave Jones
As all the seeded snaps on recent releases are still Core 22 based, it appears the jammy fix is indeed now needed. I'll prepare a debdiff for sponsorship. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https:/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078759] Re: Ability to use comments in YAML generated by Netplan

2024-11-14 Thread Dave Jones
I'd concur with Lukas that netplan shouldn't be messing with stuff outside of /etc or /run as anything outside those can reasonably be assumed to be under the control of the package manager. Even if the comment is removed, will netplan leave a newline at the end of the file, or maybe not (enough t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039278] Re: Consistent naming of onboard NIC on all Pi on all Ubuntu

2024-10-29 Thread Dave Jones
Oh, I actually did this back in ... erm ... mantic maybe (the git blame isn't here because ubuntu-raspi-settings got split out as a separate source package in noble, but this change was definitely before then): https://git.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-raspi- settings/tree/10-raspi-eth0.link

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-10-04 Thread Dave Jones
Verification performed according to test plan on D0 and C1 stepping of Pi 5, and older 8GB model of Pi 4. Proposed version operated correctly on all boards. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-noble ** Tags added: verification-done-noble -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-10-02 Thread Dave Jones
@racb yes, that's correct -- I forgot to update the title! -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2082072 Title: No support for Pi 2712D0 stepping Status in mesa pac

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: [SRU] Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-10-02 Thread Dave Jones
@tjaalton -- I think I put this on MM already, but just adding a confirmation here that the staging build in your PPA does indeed fix the mesa issue on the D0. Is there any possibility this is going to make it into noble (and the mesa content snap) before oracular's release? The reason I ask is th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: [SRU] Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-09-26 Thread Dave Jones
** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + Pi 5 owners with the D0 stepping will find the noble (24.04) desktop + doesn't work at all, including login. While oracular desktop users have + a sufficiently up to date mesa, all snaps relying on noble's mesa + (firefox, thunderbird, and the snap-store -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: [SRU] Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-09-26 Thread Dave Jones
** Summary changed: - Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping + [SRU] Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-09-26 Thread Dave Jones
I'm informed the three commits that require backporting for D0 support are: b545e78f12b v3dv: support 2712D0 1fc846dce39 v3d: support 2712D0 7b807c3e

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-09-26 Thread Dave Jones
My uneducated guess is that this is the source of the incompatibility: /* 2712D0 (V3D 7.1.10) has included draw index and base vertex, * shuffling all the fields in the packet. Since the versioning * framework doesn't handle revision numbers, the XML has a * diff

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] Re: Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-09-26 Thread Dave Jones
Related mesa bug: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/29189 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2082072 Title: Mesa bump to 24.2 required for

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2082072] [NEW] Mesa bump to 24.2 required for Pi 2712D0 stepping

2024-09-26 Thread Dave Jones
Public bug reported: The Raspberry Pi 5 2GB model now uses the D0 stepping of the 2712 SoC. Unfortunately, this is only supported from Mesa 24.2.0 (see https://docs.mesa3d.org/relnotes/24.2.0.html -- search for 2712D0). The result is corrupted or blank output for the current Ubuntu 24.04.1 Pi desk

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081238] Re: colors inverted on qxl graphics on lubuntu installer only with qxl graphics on vm.

2024-09-25 Thread Dave Jones
Well, not exactly duplicate given that's targetting the snap-store- desktop package specifically, but the symptom sounds identical, and I wonder if it's the mesa package underlying both these things (given that snap-store-desktop is packaged as a snap and is thus using the snap version of mesa whic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081238] Re: colors inverted on qxl graphics on lubuntu installer only with qxl graphics on vm.

2024-09-25 Thread Dave Jones
Possible duplicate of LP: #2076919 ? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2081238 Title: colors inverted on qxl graphics on lubuntu installer only with qxl graphi

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060693] Re: No welcome/login sound on Ubuntu desktop

2024-09-20 Thread Dave Jones
** Description changed: Under the Ubuntu desktop for Raspberry Pi, for several recent releases, the startup sound from the Yaru sound theme has failed to play both at the initial setup (from oem-config, where it used to play just before language selection), and at the greeter. This wo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081052] [NEW] audio

2024-09-18 Thread Dave Andrew
-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.28.1-0ubuntu3.1 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/seq:dave 1388 F pipewire /dev/snd/controlC0: dave 1396 F wireplumber CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown CurrentDesktop: KDE Date: Wed Sep 18 11:23:05

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: [SRU] py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-09-02 Thread Dave Jones
@mfo re: comment 91 on nordugrid: I've re-uploaded with the (horrible :) spacing restored. The Breaks being against nordugrid-arc-arex and nothing else is indeed deliberate and correct. The bug only affects those binary packages which 1) contain python modules (which this package does) and 2) are a

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2003027] Re: fq_codel qdisc compiled but not enabled on 22.10

2024-08-30 Thread Dave Taht
be made the default via compiling it into the kernel as a > kernel default. > > Aggh! death to fifos! > > root@localhost:~# sysctl -a | grep qdisc > net.core.default_qdisc = pfifo_fast > > disc pfifo_fast 0: dev eth0 parent :1 bands 3 priomap 1 2 2 2 1 2 0

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: [SRU] py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-12 Thread Dave Jones
** Tags added: foundations-todo -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075337 Title: [SRU] py3clean fails when using alternate character set Status in cloud-in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: [SRU] py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-08 Thread Dave Jones
Marking dh_python as invalid; it was added originally on the theory that we may have needed to patch the prerm fallback but this has thankfully turned out to be unnecessary. ** Description changed: + [ Impact ] + + With the current version of python3-defaults in jammy and noble, + packages which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: [SRU] py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-08 Thread Dave Jones
** Summary changed: - py3clean fails when using alternate character set + [SRU] py3clean fails when using alternate character set -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2003027] Re: fq_codel qdisc compiled but not enabled on 22.10

2024-08-07 Thread Dave Taht
Thank yall for addressing this! On Wed, Aug 7, 2024, 12:50 PM Nick Rosbrook <2003...@bugs.launchpad.net> wrote: > ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu Oracular) >Status: In Progress => Fix Committed > > -- > You received this bug notification because you are subscribed to the bug > report. > htt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-07 Thread Dave Jones
** Patch added: "lp2075337-jammy.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2075337/+attachment/5803631/+files/lp2075337-jammy.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-07 Thread Dave Jones
** Patch added: "lp2075337-noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2075337/+attachment/5803632/+files/lp2075337-noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-07 Thread Dave Jones
Attaching debdiffs for sponsorship in noble and jammy. For the purposes of review, the jammy diff does include one additional change to avoid using shell=True on the invocation of dpkg -L. This can be excised if necessary, but I really didn't want to leave something that ultimately runs as root do

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Dave Jones
Attaching debdiff for proposed changes to python3-minimal in noble ** Patch added: "noble.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2075337/+attachment/5802639/+files/noble.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Dave Jones
Attaching debdiff for proposed changes to python3-minimal in oracular ** Patch added: "oracular.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3-defaults/+bug/2075337/+attachment/5802638/+files/oracular.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2075337] Re: py3clean fails when using alternate character set

2024-08-05 Thread Dave Jones
Having spent some time digging into this (at the request of the SRU team), I'll summarise my findings: Firstly, the analysis is correct: py3clean is ultimately the issue; packages that both use py3clean and have diversions are affected (diversions are the only circumstances that produce localised

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062667] Re: Fails on (and should be removed from) raspi desktop

2024-04-24 Thread Dave Jones
** Also affects: ubuntu-meta (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062667 Title: Fails on (and should be

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062414] Re: busybox 1.36.1 FTBFS with current kernel headers on noble

2024-04-23 Thread Dave Jones
** Bug watch added: Busybox Bugzilla #16042 https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=16042 ** Also affects: busybox via https://bugs.busybox.net/show_bug.cgi?id=16042 Importance: Unknown Status: Unknown -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062564] Re: [FFe] Seed pemmican

2024-04-19 Thread Dave Jones
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu-seeds/+git/ubuntu-seeds/+merge/463674 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062564 Ti

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062414] Re: busybox 1.36.1 FTBFS with current kernel headers on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
Build reference: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/1:1.36.1-6ubuntu2/+build/28036868 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to busybox in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2062414 Title: busybox 1.36.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062414] Re: busybox 1.36.1 FTBFS with current kernel headers on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
Revised patch with upstream bug links ** Patch added: "2-2062414.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/2062414/+attachment/5767659/+files/2-2062414.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subsc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062414] Re: busybox 1.36.1 FTBFS with current kernel headers on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
** Patch added: "1-2062414.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/busybox/+bug/2062414/+attachment/5767655/+files/1-2062414.debdiff ** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2062414] [NEW] busybox 1.36.1 FTBFS with current kernel headers on noble

2024-04-18 Thread Dave Jones
Public bug reported: The networking/tc.c unit in busybox relies upon the CBQ (class based queue) UAPI in the kernel. Unfortunately this was removed in [1]. At present, there is no upstream patch (or even bug report that I can find), and this close to the release patching the kernel to resolve thin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1097467] Re: bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly

2024-04-16 Thread Dave Jones
Attaching new debdiff based on the current noble version. ** Patch added: "1097467-3.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/1097467/+attachment/5766422/+files/1097467-3.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded package

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060730] Re: totem cannot install codecs via packagekit

2024-04-12 Thread Dave Jones
Sorry, I should give a bit more context on this issue to clarify things. The test for this issue comes from the ISO tests for the Ubuntu Desktop for Raspberry Pi images. The test intends to check whether a fresh install can play a video "out of the box". The video used in the test is https://archiv

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1097467] Re: bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly

2024-04-11 Thread Dave Jones
Bah, looks like this upload got accidentally dropped by the subsequent merge for noble. I'll rebase and re-proposed it when I've got some time... ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Confirmed ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dan Bungert (dbun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060693] Re: No welcome/login sound on Ubuntu desktop

2024-04-11 Thread Dave Jones
** Summary changed: - No login sound on Ubuntu desktop + No welcome/login sound on Ubuntu desktop -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libcanberra in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060693 Title: No wel

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942260] Re: compress firmware in /lib/firmware

2024-04-10 Thread Dave Jones
This was fixed with version 11 of linux-firmware-raspi in noble; I don't see a great deal of point in expending the effort to backport this to mantic, however, so I'll set that to invalid. ** Changed in: linux-firmware-raspi (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Fix Released ** Changed in: linux-f

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060730] Re: totem cannot install codecs via packagekit

2024-04-09 Thread Dave Jones
Adding affects packagekit as I've no idea if this is totem's fault or packagekit's. ** Also affects: packagekit (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to packagekit i

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037015] Re: Screen corruption of slides during install on Raspberry Pi 4

2024-04-09 Thread Dave Jones
There's an intriguingly different style of corruption in the noble images on the Pi 5. It's still just on the installer's slides, but it's more ... "chunky"? I'll attach a photo... ** Attachment added: "slide-corruption-2.jpg" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/2037015/+at

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2060693] [NEW] No login sound on Ubuntu desktop

2024-04-09 Thread Dave Jones
Public bug reported: Under the Ubuntu desktop for Raspberry Pi, for several recent releases, the startup sound from the Yaru sound theme has failed to play both at the initial setup (from oem-config, where it used to play just before language selection), and at the greeter. This worked in Jammy (

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2057927] Re: lxd vga console throws "Operation not permitted" error

2024-03-29 Thread Dave Jones
I see a basically identical message (and dmesg apparmor output) with "lxc profile edit default": unshare: write failed /proc/self/uid_map: Operation not permitted And the dmesg entry: [ 194.625507] audit: type=1400 audit(1711709095.424:293): apparmor="DENIED" operation="capable" class="cap"

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036358] Re: systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

2024-03-26 Thread Dave Jones
> If you have a bunch of unmanaged interfaces, then you should use a > drop-in configuration to pass the --any flag to > systemd-networkd-wait-online: > > cat > /etc/systemd/system/systemd-networkd-wait-online.service.d/any.conf << > EOF > [Service] > ExecStart= > ExecStart=/lib/systemd/systemd-n

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2055351] Re: [amdgpu] Firefox and Chromium browser windows are corrupt in Xorg

2024-03-06 Thread Dave Zielinski
This looks like it's the same issue as this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox/+bug/2004532 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2055351 Title: [amd

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054683] Re: Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian unstable.

2024-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
Created MP as suggested by Bryce on the last merge (LP: #2020464) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2054683 Title: Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian unstab

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054683] [NEW] Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian unstable.

2024-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
Public bug reported: Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian unstable. Updated changelog and diff against Debian unstable to be attached below. ** Affects: lvm2 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Tou

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054683] Re: Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian unstable.

2024-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
Test builds may be found in ppa:waveform/lvm2 (https://launchpad.net/~waveform/+archive/ubuntu/lvm2) ** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+git/lvm2/+merge/461016 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seede

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054683] Re: Please merge lvm2 2.03.16-3 from Debian unstable.

2024-02-22 Thread Dave Jones
Attaching patch against Debian unstable. For ease of review, relevant commits and tags have been pushed to the following repository: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu/+source/lvm2/+git/lvm2 Specifically: * logical/2.03.16-2ubuntu1 represents our split-out delta on top of old/debian (

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2054517] Re: webkit2gtk renders as corrupt in Raspberry Pi Xorg sessions

2024-02-21 Thread Dave Jones
This may be a duplicate of LP: #2037015 -- we saw this on mantic first, then noble, in the oem-config process (the first-time setup wizard). Previously it *didn't* affect jammy, but I'm currently running through the ISO tests for the jammy .4 release and it's cropped up there now as well. -- You

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2024-01-25 Thread Dave Jones
Tested on mantic install, and as Robie suggested, performed binary debdiff against old versions to ensure only change was the version number. Marking verification done. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-mantic ** Tags added: verification-done-mantic -- You received this bug notification becau

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: [SRU] liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-24 Thread Dave Jones
** Summary changed: - liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases + [SRU] liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-24 Thread Dave Jones
Noble's now in proposed and looks to have built successfully so I'll mark that Fix Committed. I'm just uploading the mantic and jammy SRUs (the jammy one took a little longer as the fix is slightly different there; appears the build system changed between jammy and mantic). ** Changed in: lxc (Ubu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-22 Thread Dave Jones
Okay, good enough for me -- I'll sponsor my aforementioned branch for noble and have a look at the mantic and jammy SRUs tomorrow, assuming everything builds happily in noble. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lx

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2024-01-22 Thread Dave Jones
I had a little time to look over this again in my patch-pilot shift. I agree it's almost certainly best to just get LXC_DEVEL set correctly quickly. Andreas' suggested branch is a good start, but I agree with the critique that the DEP-8 test should be checking the installed headers rather than the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039873] Re: liblxc-dev was built with LXC_DEVEL=1 in Ubuntu 22.04 and later releases

2023-12-11 Thread Dave Jones
Thanks very much for the updated debdiff. There's a lot of changes here to look at and unfortunately I've run out of time looking through it all during my patch-pilot shift, but here's what I've got so far: The major thing that I think needs correction is that this patch is built on top of ubuntu/

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951586] Re: Need option to specify wifi regulatory domain

2023-11-16 Thread Dave Jones
Setting network-manager back to confirmed as I think the case is made that this is an issue, despite upstream having reservations about whether network-manager is quite the right place for this particular setting. Also setting netplan.io in jammy to fix released as 0.105 was back-ported there quite

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1924251] Re: Embedded browser display corruption under Wayland on Pi desktop

2023-11-15 Thread Dave Jones
This has been fixed for a couple of releases now (since lunar I believe), and if I recall correctly the issue was indeed the wpe backend mentioned in comment 17. That would suggest this should be "invalid" for gtk and yelp, and "fix released" for webkit2gtk. -- You received this bug notification

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1877194] Re: switch-on-connect mistakes startup for USB hotplug, so seemingly ignores the old default device on reboot

2023-11-15 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: pulseaudio (Ubuntu) Assignee: Dave Jones (waveform) => (unassigned) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pulseaudio in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1877194 Title: switch-on-conn

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1097467] Re: bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly

2023-11-14 Thread Dave Jones
Doh, I always forget something... ** Patch added: "1097467-2.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnubash/+bug/1097467/+attachment/5719318/+files/1097467-2.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ub

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1097467] Re: bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly

2023-11-14 Thread Dave Jones
** Patch added: "1097467-1.debdiff" https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnubash/+bug/1097467/+attachment/5719274/+files/1097467-1.debdiff -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1097467] Re: bash does not fulfill --rcfile option properly

2023-11-14 Thread Dave Jones
It appears this has come up before, and was discussed upstream. [1] and [2] cover discussion of whether --rcfile should ignore the system-wide bashrc (SYS_BASHRC hereafter), with the conclusion from upstream that it should not. [3] is an attempt by someone to fix this upstream by modifying bash's b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-11-09 Thread Dave Jones
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+git/ubuntu-settings/+merge/455407 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-11-07 Thread Dave Jones
Thanks for the quick review! Could someone set up a "mantic" branch on the lp:~ubuntu-desktop/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings repository so I can propose a merge to fix mantic too? (basically the same commit with a lower version number) -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2039104] Re: ubuntu-settings must drop ubuntu-raspi-settings* from debian/control

2023-11-06 Thread Dave Jones
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+git/ubuntu-settings/+merge/455178 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1951586] Re: Need option to specify wifi regulatory domain

2023-10-31 Thread Dave Jones
Is this fixed in noble now? No. Is this due to be fixed; I've not heard anything, but happy to be corrected if this is on a roadmap somewhere? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-10-13 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: ubuntu-release-notes Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037642 Title: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support Sta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-11 Thread Dave Jones
Figured out a work-around: ensure the matching state of the rename rule matches the end-state of the rename rule so the networkd state machine stops flopping between the two rules. Linked the MP with the required change; will tag ubuntu-release to see if it's not too late for a re- spin. -- You r

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-11 Thread Dave Jones
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+git/ubuntu-settings/+merge/453340 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-11 Thread Dave Jones
There does seem to be something unusual going on with the lan78xx re- initializing (or restarting?) part way through the boot sequence, causing another round of renaming to kick off (and then everything fails). Bizarre. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-11 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu. https

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-10 Thread Dave Jones
** Attachment added: "kern.log from unaffected 2B (rev 1.2)" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2038964/+attachment/5708342/+files/unaffected.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] Re: raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-10 Thread Dave Jones
** Attachment added: "kern.log from affected 3B+" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+bug/2038964/+attachment/5708341/+files/affected.log -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settin

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038964] [NEW] raspi ethernet rename is racy

2023-10-10 Thread Dave Jones
Public bug reported: The renaming of the ethernet interface (controlled by 10-raspi-eth0.link in ubuntu-raspi-settings) turns out to be racy. Specifically, in the final mantic server images (but not the desktop images), under armhf or arm64, on the Raspberry Pi 3B+ (but not any other supported boa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-10-10 Thread Dave Jones
Added text to the release notes [1] detailing Pi 5 support, including the planned SRU of libcamera support. Can others double-check the raspberry pi sections look reasonable, and let me know if we want to mention anything else specific? I've also updated the "known issues" section, removing a coup

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2036358] Re: systemd wait-online now times out after jammy and lunar upgrade

2023-10-03 Thread Dave Jones
Seeing the same results as comment 27 with the Pi lunar (23.04) image. After installing -proposed and checking systemd-networkd-wait-online, with wlan0 undefined in the netplan configuration (but eth0 set as the default DHCP and optional), it still waits for the full 2 minutes, presumably because w

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923363] Re: Grant access to hardware (UARTs, I2C, etc.) via custom udev rules

2023-09-29 Thread Dave Jones
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+git/ubuntu-settings/+merge/452468 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-09-29 Thread Dave Jones
** Merge proposal linked: https://code.launchpad.net/~waveform/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-settings/+git/ubuntu-settings/+merge/452468 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-settings in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2037642] Re: [FFe] Raspberry Pi 5 support

2023-09-29 Thread Dave Jones
** Changed in: rpi-eeprom (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Jones (waveform) ** Changed in: ubuntu-settings (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Dave Jones (waveform) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, wh

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >