--- Comment From jre...@de.ibm.com 2025-04-10 11:54 EDT---
IBM has announced the IBM z17. Please backport GNU Binutils mainline commit
981fe5fd80fa ("s390: Add support for z17 as CPU name"), which adds the real CPU
name "z17" as alternative for "arch15".
--
You received this bug notific
Uh, good catch Nick (with that it looks like it's since oracular ?!)
And yes, the names may indeed look a bit cryptic,
since these are for s390x specific (so called CCW) devices (here in this case
disk devices, but there are more types; cio-ignore is to mask out a range of
CCW devices).
One diff
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2025-03-19 02:03 EDT---
Thank you enr0n for providing the info and the release notes. per above
comments I am closing this bug.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From kowshik.j...@in.ibm.com 2025-03-18 10:16 EDT---
Thanks for the response enr0n.
I would like to know from which version of ubuntu that the support for
building systemd with utmp is stopped?
Is this info available in any of the release notes? If yes, could you
please point
Public bug reported:
== Comment: #0 - Kowshik Jois B S - 2025-03-17
09:06:44 ==
---Problem Description---
"who" command is not listing the users.
---Steps to Reproduce---
1. Install Ubuntu25.04 on a PowerVM LPAR
2. Execute "who" command
---uname output---
Linux ubhost2504 6.14.0-10-generic #
--- Comment From jre...@de.ibm.com 2025-03-07 06:56 EDT---
Successfully verified the DEB package. All GAS tests pass, including the new
arch15 test. The relevant GAS s390 source code matches the one on the binutils
2.44 release branch (containing all requested commits).
--
You received
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2410
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-211710 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100598
Title:
dfltcc.c FTBFS on s39
There is no bug reference or logs, I'm trying to find out what happened.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083700
Title:
rsyslog FTBFS due to gzip different beh
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 2083131 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083131
--- Comment From jre...@de.ibm.com 2024-12-09 04:18 EDT---
I have successfully verified that printf of floats now works fine on s390x with
the fixed bash package from oracular-proposed:
Verificatio
--- Comment From eduard.ste...@ibm.com 2024-11-29 03:32 EDT---
Hi,
so i have a patch for gzip that will fix the problem. Unfortunately my
Copyright Assignment is still processed by the FSF. Until then i cannot
send patches in. Ilja and I will figure out a way to make the patch
available.
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-11-08 08:22 EDT---
I don't think it's supposed to be stable. Different zlib versions or
implementations (zlib-ng, for example) will produce different encodings, even
without the accelerator and even for the same compression level. I'm not an
apport d
--- Comment From eduard.ste...@ibm.com 2024-11-08 06:10 EDT---
indeed the problem is that the ibm unzip function dfltcc_inflate and gzip own
function gzip_inflate differ in behavior.
gzip_inflate will flush its output buffers in many more cases, where
dfltcc_inflate is much stricter about
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-30 09:57 EDT---
Eddy asked me to have a look at it while he is on vacation.
The root cause seems to be that DFLTCC-enabled gunzip behaves
differently on truncated archives:
# ls -l rstb_567931_cea0d3b3uMHc.out.log.gz
-rw-r--r--. 1 root root 5090 Oc
--- Comment From jre...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-28 05:37 EDT---
This is a duplicate of Launchpad Bug #2083131 ("Bash's builtin command "printf"
has a grave functionality bug - fails to print the format like "%.2f .1""):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/bash/+bug/2083131
The major diff
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-210346 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2083700
Title:
rsyslog FTBFS (s390x
--- Comment From ar...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-15 13:48 EDT---
Since the underlying issue is probably due to a design flaw that needs to be
fixed in common code, I opened an upstream Bug for this:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32278
** Bug watch added: Sourceware.org Bugzilla
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-07 10:58 EDT---
I've extracted the compression logic into a stand-alone script, and it doesn't
fail:
#!/usr/bin/env python3
import gzip
import struct
import zlib
value = b"ABABABABABABABABABAB\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00\x00Z"
compressed =
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-10-07 10:23 EDT---
export DFLTCC=0 makes the problem go away, so it must be zlib. I will
investigate.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bug
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-210029 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076269
Title:
invalid base64 enco
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2024-09-05 04:23 EDT---
The problem seems fixed meanwhile for Oracular (24.10) see here
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/s390-tools
Are you thinking of backports for the LTS releases 22.04 and 20.04 ?
--
You received this bug notification becaus
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-19 11:34 EDT---
Thanks everyone for your work!
With the fix being verified and released, we can close this bug.
==> Changing status to "CLOSED"
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2410
--
You received
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2024-08-15 16:17 EDT---
What is the status of this bug? Looking at:
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1695289642
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1398091323
It looks like a couple of commits were
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-15 09:00 EDT---
I don't think the other patch is necessary. Stefan backported only
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e903ada5e8881acec734eb3f89c3644bbd8da7e9
to gcc-14.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-15 04:26 EDT---
Stefan has committed the patches:
master:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e8a7142a697c5d2673adea33ba23af82a89c9559
gcc-14:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=e903ada5e8881acec734eb3f89c3644bbd8da7e9
--
You
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-09 05:47 EDT---
Thanks Stefan, for your GCC patch posted at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-August/659923.html
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-08-07 12:48 EDT---
Thanks Ilya for your quick analysis, finding out that this is a compiler issue.
Stefan will send a patch to the GCC mailing list.
We will post a link here once it's available.
--
You received this bug notification because you
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-208475 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075567
Title:
zlib fails to build o
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-208023 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gdb in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2075204
Title:
gdb on s390x chokes on
Now? CPUs are faster; if you disable irqtune, you can observe in
/proc/interrupts that various device interrupts are still sent to CPUs
other than CPU0, they just don't go ping-ponging around between all of
them like they do with irqtune. A big difference compared to the early
days, for example f
--- Comment From peter.oberparlei...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-31 04:28 EDT---
(In reply to comment #22)
> Then `/sbin/chzdev --is-author-of-udev-rule "$rules"` should produce the
> correct exit code. The tool that generates the udev rules should be queried
> (is that chzdev or something else?) or
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-25 07:28 EDT---
Thanks everyone for your work.
With the fix being released to -updates, I will close this bug as soon as the
status in Launchpad changes to "fix released"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 05:09 EDT---
# apt-cache policy libssl3 openssl
libssl3:
Installed: 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13
Candidate: 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13
Version table:
*** 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13 400
400 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports jammy-proposed/main s390x Packages
100 /var/l
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 03:53 EDT---
After upgrading to Ubuntu 22.04.3 the solution is working and the problem is
not visible anymore.
Explicit update of the fix is not valid on the older version (22.04.1).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From grgo.mari...@ibm.com 2024-01-23 03:44 EDT---
The problem is still visible after installing the -proposed package:
root:~# dpkg -l | grep openssl
ii openssl 3.0.2-0ubuntu1.13
s390xSecure Sockets Layer toolkit - c
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-19 05:42 EDT---
@xnox, @Boris,
are there any updates on this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974056
Ti
--- Comment From cborn...@de.ibm.com 2024-01-15 06:46 EDT---
Just a statement from s390x/IBM Z. For our platform irqbalance makes no sense
as our interrupt handling works differently. So we do not need it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch see
--- Comment From holger.deng...@ibm.com 2024-01-11 13:09 EDT---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Holger: I can't pretend speaking for the SRU team, but I'd be willing to bet
> that having "the fix is trivial" as a test plan would result in the SRU
> being trivially rejected :-).
@schopin: The AP
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-204586 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin2404
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1833322
Title:
Consider re
--- Comment From holger.deng...@ibm.com 2023-12-11 02:24 EDT---
Even if the problem can be reproduced easier on 32-bit architectures, the
architecture doesn't matter at all. If you do a syscall in userspace programs,
you have to check the returned value for errors. Period.
In my opinion,
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-204450 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to pam in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2045250
Title:
pam_lastlog doesn't
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2310
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037569
Title:
udev issues with mantic beta
--- Comment From peter.oberparlei...@de.ibm.com 2023-11-22 09:17 EDT---
(In reply to comment #19)
> This was implemented around 2020, mainly to catch any ccw config changes in
> a user friendly way:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892367
> https://i527439087.restricted.launchpadlibrarian
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2023-11-20 03:40 EDT---
Harsh, This issue/bug is reported on Ubuntu 22.04 Distro and hence we cannot
track behavior reported in other Distro like fedora though internally
Development can check those behaviour.
I will ask Jamie if he can pass the machi
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2023-10-17 10:45 EDT---
Fix has been released to Focal, Jammy and Kinetic. With 22.10 being out of
service, we can close the bug.
==> Changing the status to: "CLOSED"
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch se
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-203787 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2037569
Title:
udev issues with m
--- Comment From christian.r...@de.ibm.com 2023-09-14 03:15 EDT---
First, reproduced the behaviour of the problem as described and encountered the
segmentation fault situation as described.
Wrote out the coredump with coredumpctl dump and saw from the call stack the
reported problem was r
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2023-08-28 04:22 EDT---
Thanks @Canonical for catching this.
Thank you Stefan for your fix & successful verification.
The updated package has been included in Mantic, therefore we can close
this bug.
==> Changing the status to: "CLOSED"
--
You rece
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2310
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gmp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029438
Title:
gmp z13 config fails with illega
--- Comment From s...@de.ibm.com 2023-07-21 05:29 EDT---
I've installed libgmp-dev, libgmp10 from matic in version
2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1ubuntu2 and GMPbench shows the expected increase due to the
z13 optimizations.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added:
"debdiff_gmp_mantic_from_6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1ubuntu1_to__6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1ubuntu2.diff"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1926752/+attachment/5685690/+files/debdiff_gmp_mantic_from_6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1ubuntu1_to__6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1ubuntu2.diff
--
You received t
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2023-07-05 12:00 EDT---
Is this a new testcase, or did it work before?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974056
Ti
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2023-07-04 07:59 EDT---
Is this issue reproducable on your side?
Or can we close this?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to iptables in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/
--- Comment From wint...@de.ibm.com 2023-06-26 03:07 EDT---
I was not able to reproduce this.
Runs fine on my machine (see below).
Any ideas how to continue?
root@m8360007:~/# cat /etc/os-release
PRETTY_NAME="Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS"
NAME="Ubuntu"
VERSION_ID="22.04"
VERSION="22.04.2 LTS (Jammy
--- Comment From sthou...@in.ibm.com 2023-06-06 01:35 EDT---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Backtraces are on the upstream bug, eg:
>
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1401824195
> https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/25091#issuecomment-1402425787
>
> It would
--- Comment From pp...@de.ibm.com 2023-05-11 10:35 EDT---
Is there any update on this? I have a request to update Ubuntu 20.04 to 22.04
but currently it is not possible.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to
--- Comment From cha...@us.ibm.com 2023-02-14 17:28 EDT---
Howdy. Adding developers from KVM on Power and Toolchain to our bug but it
would be good to understand exactly what IBM needs to look at. For example, you
mention a backtrace you see but I don't see that in the bug. Any details yo
** Tags added: architecture-ppc64le bugnameltc-201628 severity-medium
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1992178
Title:
autopkgtest: up
--- Comment From christian.r...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-28 12:42 EDT---
Thanks for having a look Frank and Steve.
I am all right with closing.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.
--- Comment From christian.r...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-24 12:16 EDT---
Hello Frank,
thanks for getting back to me on this. I did freshly install jammy jellyfish on
a z/VM guest system.
I had updated the package definitions before I tried to install the
systemd-coredump package (and attached
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-11-22 04:52 EDT---
As a comprehensive test plan I would suggest the following:
* Run zlib-ng testsuite against Ubuntu zlib. This is possible since
https://github.com/zlib-ng/zlib-
ng/commit/e63f36b1cf615a81e2cfa2d97fc54a5f493c9c19, the testsuite is
qui
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-10-10 19:01 EDT---
Thanks! With
https://ppa.launchpadcontent.net/fheimes/lp1990379+lp1982583/ubuntu
kinetic/main s390x zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-4.1ubuntu2
the following command:
python3 -c 'import zlib; zlib.crc32(b"X"*50)'
begins to work
--- Comment From manjunath.ma...@ibm.com 2022-09-29 10:33 EDT---
The issue was reproduced on Ubuntu 22.04
---uname output---
Linux 5.15.0-48-generic #54-Ubuntu SMP Fri Aug 26 13:27:34 UTC 2022 ppc64le
ppc64le ppc64le GNU/Linux
?Steps to recreate ---
install the following packages
dpkg -i
--- Comment on attachment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-27 20:08 EDT---
Here is the patch for kinetic. It's just an one liner.
** Attachment added: "kinetic patch"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379/+attachment/5619612/+files/410-lp1990379.patch
--
You received this bug notific
--- Comment From ra...@ca.ibm.com 2022-09-23 13:07 EDT---
Hi, I am Eclipse OpenJ9 developer. This issue was exposed by Java Certification
Kit running on RHEL 9 on z15+ and impacts all JDK versions (8,11,17, etc.)
using system default settings. The JCK failure impacts our ability to certi
However, a chance would be to piggy-back a fix like this with a more
severe zlib update that might come up in future.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1990379
Tit
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-22 08:10 EDT---
zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.4 passes all of my tests.
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-22 08:18 EDT---
@Ilya: thanks a lot for your instant verification on focal!
With that, I am updating the tags / key
** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-focal
** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
T
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-focal
** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-focal
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
T
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2204
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1974115
Title:
[UBUNTU 22.04] BINUTILS: Ad
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-13 10:40 EDT---
I've installed binutils 2.38-4ubuntu2 on jammy. With that the -march=z16 option
is accepted by 'as'. So looks good to me.
No idea about the regressions mentioned above. I don't see how an IBM
zSystems only patch can affec
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-05 11:31 EDT---
zlib1g-dev s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 and zlib1g s390x
1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 pass all of my tests.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib i
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-09-01 04:48 EDT---
@Canonical: Hi Brian,
the test / verification on our side will be delayed as our SME is out on
vacation.
We should have an answer by the end of next week.
Thanks
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member
(While looking into libbio-samtools-perl and other related packages, I
found that there is yet another htslib bundled in tabix - which is not
great. But this at at least already the needed patch.)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, whic
--- Comment From cdead...@us.ibm.com 2022-07-23 09:55 EDT---
Re-open to move to diff. component.
#=#=# 2015-04-23 10:27:57 (CDT) #=#=#
New Fix_Potential = [GSI_HDW]
#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#=#
Any updates on this issue? Thanks!
Some "sync" issue between CQ and bugzilla.
Please
** Tags added: architecture-s39064 bugnameltc-199129 severity-high
targetmilestone-inin---
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1982583
Title:
zlib CRC32 optimizati
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-21 05:51 EDT---
Comment on attachment 153124
zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8 (jammy)
this is obsolete - has been replaced by newer version
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-21 05:52 EDT---
Comment o
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "zlib debdiffs for jammy and kinetic (latest)"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5604516/+files/debdiffs_J_K.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscr
Since the zlib package progressed meanwhile due to a security update, I
created new debdiffs for jammy and kinetic - see debdiffs_J_K.tar.gz.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchp
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added: "reverse dependencies, gathered on focal.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5604505/+files/reverse_dependencies%2C_gathered_on_focal.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
Due to the fact that now in total 3 packages are involved and two libraries
(zlib and htslib, well and the libraries included in bedtools), this will cause
a bigger transition (especially for htslib in focal, and zlib itself on all
affected Ubuntu releases).
(The transition(s) need to be planned
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin2110
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin20045
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427
Title:
zlib: compressBound() returns
An updated test package was created for kinetic and build with the help of this
PPA:
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1959469
for the major architectures.
This incl. building and executing the testsuite too, which results in all tests
passed:
...
All 112 test
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2022-07-07 07:55 EDT---
(In reply to comment #13)
> We just realized that we had DFLTCC support in 20.04, so we need to put this
> fix there as well.
So this still gets fixed in Focal (20.04).
--
You received this bug notification because you are a
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-15 14:00 EDT---
I don't really remember, so I retested.
20.04: 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 fixes the problem (I had to install the .deb file
manually with dpkg).
22.04: 1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu9.1 fixes the problem.
--
You received this bug notification be
--- Comment (attachment only) From pp...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-03 08:34
EDT---
** Attachment added: "sources.list file"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1977493/+attachment/5594615/+files/sources.list
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded
--- Comment From pp...@de.ibm.com 2022-06-03 08:33 EDT---
I have already run the command do-release-upgrade. At the end of the upgrade I
could see "upgrade completed" but there were errors. Than I rebooted the system.
I attach the sources.list file an the output of the commands.
root@tux
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-25 04:39 EDT---
Description by Canonical (LP#1974056):
command17 FAIL stderr: W: [FAILED] ././testcases/nft-only/0009-needless-
bitwise_0: expected 0 but got 1
this can be reproduced with:
pull-lp-source iptables
cd iptables-1.8.7/
chmod +x
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-18 23:07 EDT---
Fix released, hence closing the bug.
Status: -> CLOSED
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-18 23:17 EDT---
fix verified and released, hence closing the bug.
Staus: => CLOSED.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to binutils in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launch
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-16 06:17 EDT---
With the new combination, bedtools testsuite is green and zlib passes all of my
tests too. So it looks good, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribe
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-10 07:14 EDT---
Hi, thanks for looking into this. I'll wait until
https://launchpad.net/~fheimes/+archive/ubuntu/lp1961427 finishes the build and
try it.
In the meantime I've asked the bedtools upstream to cherry-pick the
htslib commit: https://gi
Well, that bundled htslib seems to make the situation a bit messy,
So my guess is that this should be fixed in bedtools upstream first...
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.n
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-06 06:22 EDT---
Here are the originally reported failures:
> But I found in "bedtools":
> bedtools: bgzf.c:351: bgzf_hopen: Assertion
> `compressBound(BGZF_BLOCK_SIZE) < BGZF_MAX_BLOCK_SIZE' failed. test-
> intersect.sh: line 201: 1981 Aborted
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-04 08:51 EDT---
Good that this was pinged - it seems that we hit a deadlock here :-)
I was waiting on Ubuntu to bump the HTSlib version (or cherry-pick
https://github.com/samtools/htslib/pull/1258), where the incompatibility
issue is resolved. The o
--- Comment From mario.h...@de.ibm.com 2022-05-04 05:20 EDT---
It seems there is no progress with this issue for a while. What is next? Is the
reason for the incompatibility found meanwhile?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, w
--- Comment From andreas.kreb...@de.ibm.com 2022-04-07 02:38 EDT---
After the announcement support for the official machine name z16 has been added
to binutils. Please consider picking up the following patch from 2.37 branch:
commit e24d2a2d11008aa363366c1087219f3e3405782a (origin/binutil
--- Comment From i...@de.ibm.com 2022-03-15 18:41 EDT---
zlib1g s390x 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu1.3 passes all of my tests on focal, thanks!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to zlib in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launc
Default Comment by Bridge
** Attachment added:
"debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1961427/+attachment/5569373/+files/debdiff_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu7_to_zlib_1.2.11.dfsg-2ubuntu8_impish.diff
--
You received this bug notification
--- Comment From boris.m...@de.ibm.com 2021-12-01 10:03 EDT---
The bug was fixed in Focal, Impish and Hirsute. Thanks for everybody
contributing to fix and verify.
IBM Bugzilla status change: -> CLOSED
** Tags removed: targetmilestone-inin---
** Tags added: targetmilestone-inin2004
--
Y
1 - 100 of 952 matches
Mail list logo
