[Touch-packages] [Bug 2109413] Re: Plugin nvcodec is missing on plucky amd64

2025-04-26 Thread Simon Kirsten
I checked the build logs of past builds and it seems like the following was the last version where the amd64 build did not disable nvcodec: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gst-plugins- bad1.0/1.24.12-2ubuntu1/+build/30170792 Unfortunately this build output deb file is now incompatible with t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2109413] [NEW] Plugin nvcodec is missing on plucky amd64

2025-04-26 Thread Simon Kirsten
Public bug reported: I noticed that on plucky the nvcodec plugin (libgstnvcodec.so) is missing. https://packages.ubuntu.com/plucky/amd64/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad/filelist (missing) https://packages.ubuntu.com/jammy/amd64/gstreamer1.0-plugins-bad/filelist (there) Upon further inspection I could

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103945] Re: Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04

2025-04-11 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: qt6-base (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-25.04 => None ** Changed in: qt6-imageformats (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-25.04 => None ** Changed in: qt6-languageserver (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-25.04 => None ** Changed in: qt6-shadertools (Ubuntu) Milestone: ubuntu-25.04 =>

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2106311] Re: File picker does not work in browsers in Ubuntu 25.04 beta for SSSD users

2025-04-11 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: apparmor (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2106311 Title: File picker does not work in br

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097820] Re: Additional Drivers tab on software-properties-qt does not populate

2025-04-10 Thread Simon Quigley
Sometime within the next six hours or so. I have the problem identified, I just need to get the patch tested and working. Thanks for your patience. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097820] Re: Additional Drivers tab on software-properties-qt does not populate

2025-04-10 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: software-properties (Ubuntu Plucky) Assignee: Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) => Erich Eickmeyer (eeickmeyer) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to software-properties in Ubuntu. ht

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103888] Re: Please remove lomiri and qtmir from plucky-proposed

2025-04-05 Thread Simon Quigley
** Also affects: mir (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Medium -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, whic

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103945] Re: Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04

2025-04-05 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: Shipping a stable and reliable Qt 6 stack is critical for the success of Lubuntu, Kubuntu, and Ubuntu Studio. We would like to ship Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04, which will provide an extra level of polish for our users. Qt's release schedules surprisingly align with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103945] Re: Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04

2025-04-05 Thread Simon Quigley
nassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) ** Changed in: qt6-languageserver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: qt6-languageserver (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: qt6-languageserver (Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.04 ** Changed in: qt6-l

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104169] Re: Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta accidentally discarded, needs restoring before Plucky's release

2025-04-04 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: # Context Earlier this cycle, I synced lightdm, under the impression that the vast majority of the fixes were upstreamed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.32.0-6 This required a near-immediate followup upload: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2035337] Re: dh-python: Cannot exclude deliberately embedded .egg-info from the clean step

2025-04-02 Thread Simon Chopin
Well, yes, AFAICT the lack of escape hatch hasn't been addressed in dh- python. ** Changed in: dh-python (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dh-python in Ubuntu. https://b

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103945] Re: Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04

2025-04-01 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: calibre (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: copyq (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: digikam (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Changed in: dolphin (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Comm

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2105378] Re: Apport requests admin password multiple times

2025-03-31 Thread Simon Chopin
I count 3 requests on current plucky, two of them coming from the plymouth hook, one of them from the general ubuntu hook (which is also run for apport). We could reduce the immediate issue in plymouth by moving both of its requests into a single 'execute_multiple_root_commands', but you'd still h

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103945] Re: Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04

2025-03-27 Thread Simon Quigley
Ubuntu) Milestone: None => ubuntu-25.04 ** Changed in: qt6-quickeffectmaker (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gst-plugins-good1.0 in U

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103945] Re: Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04

2025-03-26 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: calibre (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: copyq (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: digikam (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: dolphin (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress ** Changed in: dt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098411] Re: All snaps are not visible to the end-user

2025-03-26 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098411 Title: All snaps are not visible to the

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104169] Re: Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta accidentally discarded, needs restoring before Plucky's release

2025-03-26 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lightdm in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2104169 Title: Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098411] Re: All snaps are not visible to the end-user

2025-03-25 Thread Simon Quigley
** Also affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: lightdm (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104169] Re: Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta accidentally discarded, needs restoring before Plucky's release

2025-03-25 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: # Context Earlier this cycle, I synced lightdm, under the impression that the vast majority of the fixes were upstreamed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.32.0-6 This required a near-immediate followup upload: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2078467] Re: [SRU] App armor crashes on aa-enforce due to "Profile not found"

2025-03-25 Thread Simon Quigley
This fix has now been uploaded to the queue, and awaits review from a member of the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates (SRU) Team. This could take somewhere around several days, depending on several factors. They will follow up with further instructions on how to verify this patch and get it fully deli

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104169] Re: Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta accidentally discarded, needs restoring before Plucky's release

2025-03-25 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: # Context Earlier this cycle, I synced lightdm, under the impression that the vast majority of the fixes were upstreamed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.32.0-6 This required a near-immediate followup upload: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104169] Re: Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta accidentally discarded, needs restoring before Plucky's release

2025-03-25 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: # Context Earlier this cycle, I synced lightdm, under the impression that the vast majority of the fixes were upstreamed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.32.0-6 This required a near-immediate followup upload: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104169] Re: Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta accidentally discarded, needs restoring before Plucky's release

2025-03-25 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: # Context Earlier this cycle, I synced lightdm, under the impression that the vast majority of the fixes were upstreamed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.32.0-6 This required a near-immediate followup upload: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104169] Re: Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta accidentally discarded, needs restoring before Plucky's release

2025-03-25 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: # Context Earlier this cycle, I synced lightdm, under the impression that the vast majority of the fixes were upstreamed: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lightdm/1.32.0-6 This required a near-immediate followup upload: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+so

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2104169] [NEW] Useful parts of the Ubuntu delta accidentally discarded, needs restoring before Plucky's release

2025-03-25 Thread Simon Quigley
cribed, and that no obvious regressions exist from smoke tests otherwise. ** Affects: lightdm (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical Assignee: Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) Status: In Progress ** Tags: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2103945] Re: Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04

2025-03-23 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: Shipping a stable and reliable Qt 6 stack is critical for the success of Lubuntu, Kubuntu, and Ubuntu Studio. We would like to ship Qt 6.8.3 in Ubuntu 25.04, which will provide an extra level of polish for our users. Qt's release schedules surprisingly align with

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099944] Re: Depwait on libselinux 3.8

2025-03-22 Thread Simon Quigley
** Also affects: refpolicy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: refpolicy (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: refpolicy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch s

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101101] Re: [p-m] FTBFS in the proposed pocket

2025-03-21 Thread Simon Quigley
Thank you. :) ** Changed in: bash (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102236] Re: plucky/s390x (with root disk on dm?) does not come up after kernel update + reboot

2025-03-17 Thread Simon Chopin
You might want to check /usr/lib/udev/ruled.d as well. Is it possible for you to boot the updated systems with the old kernel by any chance? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to lvm2 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchp

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] Re: Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-13 Thread Simon Chopin
Alright, I'm taking a rather blunt approach here, so I walked the dep graph until I got this: ./checkrdepends --no-ports -B 'http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu' -a amd64 -s plucky -p akonadi-calendar apitrace arc-gui-clients aseba fontmatrix goldendict kaddressbook kalarm kdesdk kdewebkit kf5-mess

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2102147] [NEW] apport-collect confuses source and binary packages

2025-03-12 Thread Simon Chopin
Public bug reported: The only way for apport-collect to work is if the source package has a binary of the same name. Otherwise, you get the following feedback: Package glibc not installed and no hook available, ignoring ** Affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: In P

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101101] Re: [p-m] FTBFS in the proposed pocket

2025-03-11 Thread Simon Chopin
I'll do a glibc upload next week that will take care of this. ** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Triaged -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bash in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101101] Re: [p-m] FTBFS in the proposed pocket

2025-03-09 Thread Simon Quigley
refore reassigning the bug to the glibc package, it will be fixed in the 2.41-4 upload. Simon, could you please consider a glibc upload? ** Also affects: glibc (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: glibc (Debian) via https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.c

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2101101] [NEW] [p-m] FTBFS in the proposed pocket

2025-03-07 Thread Simon Quigley
Public bug reported: When merging bash 5.2.37-1.1 from Debian, it FTBFS on all architectures. This is a known RC bug in Debian, as well, with the exact same error. We will need another Debian merge with the fix. Adding rls-pp-incoming in case someone on Foundations is intimately familiar with th

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] Re: Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-06 Thread Simon Quigley
> Some of this is cleaned up by an Archive Admin running process- removals. For instance goldendict. Even better! I'm glad there's a way to save work here :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtwebkit-opensource

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] Re: Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-06 Thread Simon Quigley
Should be all set for a re-review now. ** Changed in: supercollider (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: supercollider (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] Re: Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-06 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: kbibtex (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: kbibtex (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) ** Changed in: kdesignerplugin (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: kdesignerplugin (Ubuntu)

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] Re: Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-06 Thread Simon Quigley
ntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: quassel (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) -- You recei

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] Re: Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-06 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: mythtv (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Changed in: mythtv (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to qtwebkit-open

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099790] Re: [p-m] Mir FTBFS in plucky-proposed

2025-03-06 Thread Simon Quigley
The bug still stands for Mir, but it looks like QtMir gained support for dual Mir versions. This is great, thanks! ** Changed in: qtmir (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscri

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100598] Re: [FFe]: re-enable DFLTCC on s390x

2025-03-06 Thread Simon Quigley
As the sponsor of the temporary fix, thank you for following up and for filing this bug! +1 from me -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gzip in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100598 Title: [FFe]: re-en

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] Re: Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Quigley
** Description changed: - NOTE: this should be processed at the same time as bug 2100637, they are - fairly interdependent. + NOTE: this should be processed at the same time as bug 2100637 and bug + 2100646, they are fairly interdependent. QtWebKit5 is old, insecure, and has no replacement up

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099944] Re: Depwait on libselinux 3.8

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Quigley
Thank you for the removals so far! That being said, there are a few more. Hopefully I caught them all this time! ** Changed in: libsepol (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: libsepol (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: mcstrans (Ubuntu) Importance: Un

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] [NEW] Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Quigley
Public bug reported: NOTE: this should be processed at the same time as bug 2100637, they are fairly interdependent. QtWebKit5 is old, insecure, and has no replacement upstream for Qt 6. Developers are recommended to use the Chromium-based QtWebEngine 5 or 6 instead. Please remove QtWebKit5 and

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100639] Re: Please remove QtWebKit5 and all its reverse dependencies

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: arc-gui-clients (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: arc-gui-clients (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: aseba (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical ** Changed in: aseba (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: fontma

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100297] Re: dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on armhf with glibc 2.41

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Chopin
** Tags added: update-excuse -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to x264 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100297 Title: dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on armhf with glibc 2.41 Status in glibc package in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100297] Re: dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on armhf with glibc 2.41

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Chopin
** Changed in: postgresql-pllua (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to x264 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100297 Title: dlopen(libx264/libde265) fa

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100297] Re: dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on armhf with glibc 2.41

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Chopin
** Also affects: postgresql-pllua (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: postgresql-pllua (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to x264 in Ubuntu.

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100297] Re: dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on armhf with glibc 2.41

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Chopin
** Also affects: openblas (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to x264 in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2100297 Title: dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2100297] Re: dlopen(libx264/libde265) fails on armhf with glibc 2.41

2025-03-04 Thread Simon Chopin
Simple NCRs for the libraries will fix it since binutils now defaults to non-executable stacks in the absence of the GNU_STACK field, see https://tracker.debian.org/news/1618944/accepted-binutils-244-2-source- into-unstable/ ** Also affects: x264 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: Ne

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081629] Re: bluetooth mouse no longer works after suspend/resume

2025-03-02 Thread Simon Dalley
Problem no longer occurs for me with recent and current updates of Ubuntu 24.04. ** Changed in: bluez (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1892014] Re: 18.04.14.7 regression: no alt_shift_toggle in XKBOPTIONS

2025-03-01 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to console-setup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1892014 Title: 18.04.14.7 regression: no alt_sh

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1297234] Re: Live session set wrong keyboard layout and time zone

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to console-setup in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1297234 Title: Live session set wrong keyboard

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099944] [NEW] Depwait on libselinux 3.8

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
Public bug reported: Several packages in plucky-proposed are currently dependency wait on the following: libselinux1-dev (>= 3.8), libsemanage-dev (>= 3.8) Security Team, could you please clarify your plans re: the libselinux version intended for Plucky? If you plan to ship 3.8, could you please

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099864] Re: [p-m] depwait on riscv64 due to missing linux-bpf-dev in Ubuntu

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
awesome :) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2099864 Title: [p-m] depwait on riscv64 due to missing linux-bpf-dev in Ubuntu Status in linux package in Ubuntu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099864] Re: [p-m] depwait on riscv64 due to missing linux-bpf-dev in Ubuntu

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
--- stderr --- Ubuntu clang version 20.1.0 (+rc2-1~exp2ubuntu0.4) Target: bpf Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/lib/llvm-20/bin Available CPUs for this target: generic probe v1 v2 v3 v4 Use -mcpu or -mtune to specify the target's processor. For

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099864] [NEW] [p-m] depwait on riscv64 due to missing linux-bpf-dev in Ubuntu

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
Public bug reported: It seems as if Ubuntu doesn't build this package on riscv64: https://packages.ubuntu.com/plucky/linux-bpf-dev This discrepancy is causing systemd to FTBFS due to depwait in plucky- proposed, blocking migration. ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Critical

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1923052] Re: screen reader does not read ubiquity window after it is launched in "Try Ubuntu" session

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to at-spi2-core in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1923052 Title: screen reader does not read ubiqu

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1184006] Re: wrong conffile prompt for /etc/default/rcS when UTC=no

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to sysvinit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1184006 Title: wrong conffile prompt for /etc/defaul

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1592691] Re: Mir source in xenial (0.21.0) fails to build

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => Fix Committed ** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** Changed in: mir (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Triaged => Fix Released ** Tags removed: ftbfs -- You received this bug notification because you are a

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099821] [NEW] [p-m] Stuck in proposed due to component mismatch

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
Public bug reported: Migration status for ubuntu-meta (1.547 to 1.548): BLOCKED: Rejected/violates migration policy/introduces a regression Issues preventing migration: ubuntu-desktop/amd64 in main cannot depend on xdg-terminal-exec in universe ubuntu-desktop-minimal/amd64 in main cannot depend o

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099790] Re: [p-m] Mir FTBFS in plucky-proposed

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
> Please note that FTBFSes on arm* have been resolved in mir 2.14.1-8 (Debian unstable). Maybe sync that version first? Unfortunately, that's the exact version having the issue: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mir/2.14.1-8 > This might be a problem for Lubuntu, though. With my Release Manag

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099791] [NEW] [p-m] FTBFS on arm64

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
Public bug reported: 1.8.1-0.1 FTBFS on arm64 in plucky-proposed due to a linking error: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunwind/1.8.1-0.1/+build/30119512 The exact cause is unclear on an initial glance. ** Affects: libunwind (Ubuntu) Importance: High Status: Triaged ** Ta

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2099790] [NEW] [p-m] Mir FTBFS in plucky-proposed

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
om the Mir Team, or Mike Gabriel, and please either remove the upload from proposed to clear the report or fix the arm64 failure in 2.14.1. ** Affects: mir (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist Assignee: Simon Quigley (tsimonq2) Status: Triaged ** Affects: qtmir (Ubuntu) Importance

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081629] Re: bluetooth mouse no longer works after suspend/resume

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Dalley
The bluetooth mouse is now working properly again after suspend/resume. Presumably came out in the wash after a system update. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to bluez in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/20

[Touch-packages] [Bug 997737] Re: Detroit is not in Canada, 12.04

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Confirmed => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/997737 Title: Detroit is not in Canada, 12.04 Status

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1187981] Re: symbol conflicts in libtimezonemap1

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libtimezonemap in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1187981 Title: symbol conflicts in libtimezon

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1576024] Re: Wifi "device not ready" after booting into OS for the 1st time

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: ubiquity (Ubuntu) Status: Incomplete => Won't Fix -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1576024 Title: Wifi "device not ready" after

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098962] Re: Merge 33+20240816-2 from Debian sid

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Chopin
** Changed in: kmod (Ubuntu) Status: New => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098962 Title: Merge 33+20240816-2 from Debian sid Status in

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098962] [NEW] Merge 33+20240816-2 from Debian sid

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Chopin
Public bug reported: New upstream version ** Affects: kmod (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to kmod in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098962 Tit

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098794] Re: Please merge 0.8-16 into plucky

2025-02-28 Thread Simon Quigley
** Changed in: avahi (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to avahi in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098794 Title: Please merge 0.8-16 into plucky Stat

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098654] Dependencies.txt

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Chopin
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098654/+attachment/5858183/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gcr in Ubuntu. https://bugs.la

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2098119] Re: dnsmasq opens DHCP server ports on all interfaces instead of just on the interface(s) defined in interface= setting

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Kelley
On 17/02/2025 13:47, jean-christophe manciot wrote: >> In order to allow multiple dnsmasq instances (for instance in the >> libvirt case) dnsmasq sets REUSEPORT on DHCP sockets, and, if exactly >> one interface is specified in the configuration, it sets SO_BINDTODEVICE. > No, it does not work: if d

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098654] Re: /usr/libexec/gcr-prompter:11:gtk_im_multicontext_set_slave:im_module_setting_changed:g_closure_invoke:signal_emit_unlocked_R:signal_emit_valist_unlocked

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Chopin
The crash turns out to be due to a combination of several things: * the authd patches were disabled in latest src:gnome-shell, including the definition of the missing key (presumably to make migration easier) * the binary gnome-shell package could not upgrade through simple `apt upgrade` due to

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098654] Re: /usr/libexec/gcr-prompter:11:gtk_im_multicontext_set_slave:im_module_setting_changed:g_closure_invoke:signal_emit_unlocked_R:signal_emit_valist_unlocked

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Chopin
My gut feeling is that the following is the cause: févr. 17 11:09:07 dresden gnome-shell[4485]: Failed to interact with fprintd service: Error: GSettings key enable-authd-authentication not found in schema com.ubuntu.login-screen Stack trace: _checkKey@resource:///org/gnome/gjs/modules/cor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098654] Re: /usr/libexec/gcr-prompter:11:gtk_im_multicontext_set_slave:im_module_setting_changed:g_closure_invoke:signal_emit_unlocked_R:signal_emit_valist_unlocked

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Chopin
Attached the logs between the start of GDM and The first whoopsie entry. ** Attachment added: "logs.gz" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcr/+bug/2098654/+attachment/5858186/+files/logs.gz -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098654] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Chopin
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2098654/+attachment/5858184/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gcr in Ubuntu. htt

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098654] Re: /usr/libexec/gcr-prompter:11:gtk_im_multicontext_set_slave:im_module_setting_changed:g_closure_invoke:signal_emit_unlocked_R:signal_emit_valist_unlocked

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Chopin
Just in case, I added the apport info for this crash. I'm raising this to Critical because it completely breaks the ability to log into my graphical session, especially since it combined with a kernel bug preventing me from getting to a console. ** Changed in: gcr (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098654] Re: /usr/libexec/gcr-prompter:11:gtk_im_multicontext_set_slave:im_module_setting_changed:g_closure_invoke:signal_emit_unlocked_R:signal_emit_valist_unlocked

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Chopin
ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.31.0-0ubuntu5 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: GNOME DistroRelease: Ubuntu 25.04 InstallationDate: Installed on 2024-11-13 (96 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 24.04.1 LTS "Noble Numbat" - Release amd64 (20240827.1) NonfreeKernelMo

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098588] Re: After recent libc update my login screen goes "something bad happened" screen is shown

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Chopin
** Changed in: glibc (Ubuntu) Status: New => Incomplete ** Also affects: xorg (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2098119] Re: dnsmasq opens DHCP server ports on all interfaces instead of just on the interface(s) defined in interface= setting

2025-02-21 Thread Simon Kelley
onfiguration, it sets SO_BINDTODEVICE. Neither of these things is visible in netstat. TLDR; 1) The behaviour you are asking for doesn't work. 2) This is not a regression: it has always been done this way. Simon. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2081061] Re: Port from GTK 3 to GTK 4

2025-02-17 Thread Simon Chopin
** Changed in: apport Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: apport Importance: Wishlist => Low ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Wishlist => Low -- You received this bug notification because you ar

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2088054] Re: apport can't report bugs in snapd and redirects to dead end

2025-02-17 Thread Simon Chopin
You want `snap info snapd`, which indeed redirects to GH even though it's not possible to file bugs there. Reassigning this to them. ** Also affects: snapd Importance: Undecided Status: New ** No longer affects: apport (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a m

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2098059] Re: when report apport or ubuntu-bug, its still open in terminal, I waiting when it will close and let write next command

2025-02-17 Thread Simon Chopin
To be clear, you'd like for `ubuntu-bug` to return as soon as the GUI shows up? That change of behavior would break consistency with the UX when there is no GUI, and would also break any script out there that invokes ubuntu-bug and expect it not to return immediately. ** Changed in: apport (Ubun

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097736] Re: A broken service in the repository 24.04(gvm)

2025-02-17 Thread Simon Chopin
** Package changed: apport (Ubuntu) => gvm (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097736 Title: A broken service in the repository 24.04(gvm) Status in g

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2098119] [NEW] dnsmasq does not open DHCP server ports

2025-02-16 Thread Simon Kelley
It's not clear from this if there's at least one dhcp-range in /etc/dnsmasq.conf, but from the posted logs, it looks like there isn't. If so that's the problem. No dhcp-range -> no DHCP server -> no port 67 socket. Simon. On 12/02/2025 16:57, jean-christophe m

Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 2098119] Re: dnsmasq does not open DHCP server ports

2025-02-16 Thread Simon Kelley
HCP on the loopback interface, and certainly not with that dhcp-range. The only time when a DHCP server can do something sensible with packets arriving on lo is when there's a DHCP relay in use on the same machine, and that's pretty esoteric. Simon. -- You received this bug notif

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097820] Re: Additional Drivers tab on software-properties-qt does not populate

2025-02-16 Thread Simon Quigley
Please provide much more information from ubuntu-drivers proving that it can provide a list of drivers to install that software-properties can't. If this is still a bug in software-properties, please assign it to me and ping me. If not, please appropriately re-assign the bug. Thanks! ** Changed

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097168] Re: Launchpad can't process crash reports

2025-02-10 Thread Simon Chopin
** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097168 Title: Launchpad can't process crash repor

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097168] Re: Launchpad can't process crash reports

2025-02-10 Thread Simon Chopin
Also affects: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New => Triaged ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => Simon Chopin (schopin) ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided => Critical

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096327] Re: apport cannot upload blobs to launchpad - X-Launchpad-Blob-Token missing from http response -> "assert ticket"

2025-02-10 Thread Simon Chopin
After spending a while with ilkermeroc to try and verify the bug, we actually discovered that the subsequent parsing done by Launchpad of the apport payload is *expecting* LF endings, and thus breaks down if using CRLF. So, to summarize: apport in -updates fails against qastaging when trying to PU

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2065088] Re: AppArmor profiles allowing userns not immediately active in 24.04 live image

2025-02-09 Thread Simon McVittie
** Also affects: flatpak (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: evolution (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: steam (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- You received this bug notification because you are a membe

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096327] Re: apport cannot upload blobs to launchpad - X-Launchpad-Blob-Token missing from http response -> "assert ticket"

2025-02-09 Thread Simon Chopin
That sounds good to me, but it'd need to be available relatively quickly, we'd like to be able to get the package in the candidate images (first build on Monday). Would that be possible? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subsc

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096327] Re: apport cannot upload blobs to launchpad - X-Launchpad-Blob-Token missing from http response -> "assert ticket"

2025-02-09 Thread Simon Chopin
All reported autopkgtest regressions are tmpfail or network failure, it seems the infra is hiccuping a bit. ** Description changed: [ Impact ] The apport code, through the use of Python's `email` package, isn't HTTP 1.1 compliant when crafting the payload to the LP +storeblob endpoint,

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096327] Re: apport cannot upload blobs to launchpad - X-Launchpad-Blob-Token missing from http response -> "assert ticket"

2025-02-09 Thread Simon Chopin
Verification will need to be done in sync with the LP team as we need to make sure that we actually have a strict parser available somewhere (qastaging has also reverted multipart at the moment). -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2096327] Re: apport cannot upload blobs to launchpad - X-Launchpad-Blob-Token missing from http response -> "assert ticket"

2025-02-09 Thread Simon Chopin
It works because the Launchpad team temporarily reverted the changes that exposed the bug in apport. The oracular upload is in Unapproved, I'm working on Jammy and Focal uploads. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed t

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097429] [NEW] apport FTBFS with sbuild unshare backend

2025-02-09 Thread Simon Chopin
Public bug reported: Seen on (at least) the versions in Noble, Oracular and Plucky. === FAILURES === ___ TestApportCheckreports.test_has_no_system_report ___ self = def test_has_no_system_report(self) -

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097404] Re: Segmentation faults occur in bin/Runner.Listener and GCC during DKMS build on kernel 6.8.0-1020-azure, possibly due to GCC version mismatch and OpenSSL compatibility

2025-02-09 Thread Simon Chopin
These are very unlikely to be the same issue, please file a separate bug against openssl for that specific crash, let's keep this one for the GCC segfault. ** Also affects: gcc-12 (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: apport (Ubuntu) Status: New => Invalid --

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097404] Re: Segmentation faults occur in bin/Runner.Listener and GCC during DKMS build on kernel 6.8.0-1020-azure, possibly due to GCC version mismatch and OpenSSL compatibility

2025-02-09 Thread Simon Chopin
(marking apport as Invalid, it's clearly not a bug in the bug reporting application) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2097404 Title: Segmentation faults occur

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2097264] Re: FTBFS on LP buildd infrastructure

2025-02-07 Thread Simon Chopin
Jammy isn't affected either. ** Description changed: - This might be only in PPAs and/or a recent change in our build - environment, but when trying to rebuild the package for an upcoming SRU - I got a nice FTBFS. + [ Impact ] + + The package FTBFS on the LP builders due to the cloud build name

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >