-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/10/2015 01:02 PM, Seth wrote:
>
> The firearms rights lobby is one of the few success stories of
> the past 30 years in rolling back the power of the leviathan state.
>
*** Hmmm, not really. It illustrates how well the military-industrial
com
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 02/05/2015 12:15 AM, Max Bond wrote:
> What are you proposing we do?
>
*** You can help push the P2PNames Internet Draft through IETF to ensure
that there's at least a standard technical support for
censorship-resistant alternatives to global nam
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/02/2015 08:26 PM, liza...@riseup.net wrote:
> ok
>
*** It's interesting to see how much you care about your own, and how
much you care about responding to conversation. You seem to show the
same care, or lack thereof about choosing your target
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/27/2014 02:30 PM, benjamin barber wrote:
> 'blackmailing' and 'terrorists' is exactly the hyperbolic and vague
> language like 'harassment'. When you staff your project with unethical
> assholes, don't be surprised when alot of people act like
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/27/2014 03:06 AM, benjamin barber wrote:
> I don't represent the lizards, but when legitimate concerns are hand-waved
> away, perhaps it should be shown the the emperor has no clothes.
>
*** I don't represent the Tor project, and I agree that l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/27/2014 02:17 AM, benjamin barber wrote:
> The things that the some Tor members have done in the past, in regards to
> some less then becoming behavior in public, is pretty indicative of the
> reason why they're getting "harassed".
>
*** So now
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/27/2014 12:24 AM, benjamin barber wrote:
> Yes, if not for the fact that Tor have been *COMPLETELY* receptive to
> criticisms about how they run things.
>
> Its not as if some members of Tor are bigoted and walk around with a chip
> on their sh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/26/2014 11:30 PM, liza...@riseup.net wrote:
> If you're going to be guessing you should probably point that out instead
> of presenting your guesses as facts. We are not trying to flood the dir
> with offline relays.
>
> The fact that you've b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/24/2014 10:47 PM, I wrote:
> http://slur.io/
>
> Something to mull
>
*** I traced the slur.io to https://github.com/genjix/pp
According to Genjix, who is not affiliated with slur.io, the service is
based on Paypub. You can read more about
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/25/2014 01:50 PM, Libertas wrote:
>
> child exploitation
>
*** WTF? Yeah, let's not start a political debate, you're arguments are
way off the mark. Apples and syringes.
==
hk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/25/2014 12:48 PM, Libertas wrote:
> On 12/24/2014 09:58 PM, hellekin wrote:
>> But yeah, why not? Turning anything into a market seems to be the way
>> to go--not. So, libertarians, prove me wrong.
>
> Please don&#x
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/25/2014 10:08 AM, Tommy Collison wrote:
> Part Wikileaks, part TMZ, Slur.io positions whistleblowing outside of
> the public interest. A marketplace where the highest bidder takes all
> creates an explicit profit motive.
>
> I really hope it's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/24/2014 10:47 PM, I wrote:
> http://slur.io/
>
> Something to mull
>
*** That is wikileaks for psychopaths, as presented:
"Its estimated that 5% of the general population are psychopaths.
Introducing financial incentive in an anonymous fram
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/20/2014 06:58 PM, Mirimir wrote:
> If the attack happens, is it likely that Tor folk will know who did it?
>
> If Tor folk know who did it, or if they at least identify likely
> suspects, will they share the information publicly?
>
*** Am I t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/17/2014 04:46 PM, Jacob Appelbaum wrote:
>>>
>>> Let the community speak about Tor and tell their stories about usage.
>>
>> I really like this idea.
>
> We now have a talk slot at 31c3. We should plan this talk well in
> advance of the Congre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I use "onionspace" regularly, and find "onion service" and "onion site"
equally attractive. Just wanted to remind you that not all onion
services are websites.
Indeed onion* has another couple of advantages hidden services: 1) it
doesn't sound so i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/13/2014 10:45 AM, Derric Atzrott wrote:
>
>> If my bank, for example, sees
>> Tor IPs, it might freeze my account. And that's a _good_ thing.
>
> I disagree. I'd rather have more people using Tor even for things
> where identity is an essenti
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/11/2014 10:47 AM, Andreas Krey wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 10:39:06 +0000, hellekin wrote:
> ...
>> But now I think it would be better to explain why it's not necessary,
>
> You need it if you want to guard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/11/2014 06:09 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
> On Monday 10 November 2014 13:02:14 hellekin wrote:
>> advantages: it's free hardware, free software friendly, energy
>> efficient, more powerful than Pi and such, and mad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/10/2014 07:41 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
>
> That's actually quite a good idea and in reality it could probably be based
> on
> exactly the same OpenWrt source. OpenWrt compiles just fine for ARM
processors
> as well as MIPS based Rout
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/07/2014 01:29 PM, Aymeric Vitte wrote:
>
> - force ssl through Tor, non ssl outside
>
*** Is that what you meant? Can you explain why?
==
hk
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJUXP76XxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/05/2014 04:20 PM, lee colleton wrote:
>
> Have other Twitter & Tor users seen this same account lock-out?
>
*** Yes, and a lot. Things got way better for me after complaining
systematically and leaving a note in my profile for a couple of mon
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/03/2014 04:06 PM, l.m wrote:
>
> So I can laugh at you when your buyers realize how
> stupid they were for not reading the Tor manual.
>
> [snip]
>
> Who the hell
> wants anonymity and actually trusts their networking equipment?
>
*** Every
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 11/01/2014 06:52 AM, Lars Boegild Thomsen wrote:
>
> the key here being "selectively". Using Facebook is a choice - users of
> Facebook chose
> to accept the terms.
>
*** Theoretically yes, but in reality there are many reasons why
Facebook m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/16/2014 06:03 PM, Thomas White wrote:
> Note: I have excluded sectoor.de from this message
>
*** You could probably have kept them Cced, as your arguments are
cooling down the initial flame and shed light over potential solutions
and consequenc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 09/04/2014 09:10 PM, Virgil Griffith wrote:
> carlo, if you want a place to implement these ideas, look at automating
> traffic peering agreements. It's not very sexy, but it would be an
> immediate, marketable improvement over the existing syste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 05/19/2014 06:24 AM, Anders Andersson wrote:
> On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 7:06 AM, grarpamp wrote:
>
>> Users leaking dns / failing to redirect dns into tor is not a tor problem.
>>
>
*** That is a common technologist / U.S. liberal / libertarian i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
(resent to the list after subscription. Originally Cced to Lunar and
draft-grothoff-iesg-special-use-p2p-na...@tools.ietf.org)
On 05/18/2014 04:17 PM, Lunar wrote:
> Anders Andersson:
>> A few years ago, ICANN started to accept suggestions for new t
28 matches
Mail list logo
